Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Similar documents
Case 3:15-cv WHO Document 42 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

- 1 - Questions? Call:

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:14-cv GLR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 88 APPENDIX I

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Transcription:

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 David Borgen (SBN 099354) dborgen@gbdhlegal.com James Kan (SBN 240749) jkan@gbdhlegal.com GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 763-9800 Fax: (510) 835-1417 Gregg I. Shavitz gshavitz@shavitzlaw.com SHAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A. 1515 South Federal Highway Suite 404 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tel: (800) 616-4000 Fax: (561) 447-8831 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVE RULLI, JOSE BUENROSTRO, EDWIN BUMP, and ENRIQUE CRUZ on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, NIELSEN COMPANY (U.S.) LLC, Defendant. Case No.: 3:14-CV-01835 VC [REVISED] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 556089 8 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page2 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, filed by Plaintiffs Steve Rulli, Jose Buenrostro, Edwin Bump, and Enrique Cruz ( Plaintiffs ), came on for hearing regularly in Courtroom 6 of the above captioned court, the Honorable Vincent Chhabria presiding. Defendant Nielsen Company (US), LLC ( Nielsen or Defendant ) does not oppose the motion. On April 22, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Nielsen on behalf of themselves and other employees. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that employees are owed compensation for hours worked (including regular wages, minimum wages and overtime wages), meal periods, rest breaks, untimely final pay and inaccurate itemized wage statements, and related penalties. The lawsuit seeks damages for lost wages, interest, penalties, injunctive relief, and attorneys fees and expenses. Defendant denies all of Plaintiffs claims. After initial exchanges of information, the Parties entered into private mediation before respected neutral mediator Mark Rudy, Esq. to try and resolve the claims. As a result of that mediation on September 16, 2014, and under the auspices of Mr. Rudy, the Parties reached a settlement. The Parties then entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and Release on or around November 6, 2014. A preliminary hearing was held before this Court on December 18, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., for the purpose of determining, among other things, whether the proposed Stipulation of Settlement was within the range of possible approval and whether notice to the Class of its terms and conditions, and the scheduling of a formal fairness hearing, also known as a final approval hearing, will be appropriate. Appearing at the hearing was counsel for Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on behalf of Defendant; and counsel for Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho on behalf of Plaintiffs and the Class. At the hearing, the Court made several suggestions for revising the proposed class action settlement agreement and for revising the proposed class notice. The Court denied the motion for preliminary approval but without prejudice to its renewal by means of an administrative motion without a further hearing (Dkt. No. 42). The Court requested that counsel resubmit these documents once revised pursuant to the Court s suggestions. The parties have agreed to the revisions (attached) and to the filing of the suggested administrative motion, filed on December 24, 2014. 27 28 556089 8 1 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page3 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed the papers and documents presented, having heard the statements of counsel, having considered the matter, including the renewed motion submitted pursuant to L.R. 7-11, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1. The Court hereby GRANTS Preliminary Approval of the terms and conditions contained in the Stipulation of Settlement (as modified by the Amendment to Stipulation of Settlement and Release dated December 23, 2014), attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The Court preliminarily finds that the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement (as amended) appear to be within the range of possible approval, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Fair Labor Standards Act and applicable law. 2. The Court finds on a preliminary basis that: (1) the settlement amount is fair and reasonable to the Class Members when balanced against the probable outcome of further litigation relating to class certification, liability and damages issues, and potential appeals; (2) significant informal discovery, investigation, research, and litigation have been conducted such that counsel for the Parties at this time are able to reasonably evaluate their respective positions; (3) settlement at this time will avoid substantial costs, delay, and risks that would be presented by the further prosecution of the litigation; and (4) the proposed Settlement has been reached as the result of intensive, serious, and non-collusive negotiations between the Parties. Accordingly, the Court preliminarily finds that the Stipulation of Settlement (as amended) was entered into in good faith. 3. The Court hereby GRANTS conditional certification of the provisional California Class and California FLSA Class, in accordance with the Stipulation of Settlement (as amended), for the purposes of this Settlement only. The California Class is defined as all current and former employees employed in field representative, field quality specialist and/or market quality specialist positions or senior variations of those titles by Defendant in California between April 22, 2010 and the date of Preliminary Approval of the Settlement or December 31, 2014, whichever is earlier, and who did not previously execute general releases and the California FLSA Class is defined as all current and former employees employed in field representative, field quality specialist and/or market quality specialist positions or senior variations of those titles by Defendant in California between January 9, 2011 and the date of Preliminary Approval of the Settlement, whichever is earlier. 556089 8 2 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page4 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The Court hereby authorizes the retention of Rust Consulting as Settlement Administrator for the purpose of the Settlement with reasonable administration costs estimated not to exceed $10,000.00. 5. The Court hereby conditionally appoints Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho and Shavitz Law Group, P.A. as counsel for the Class, and Plaintiffs as class representatives for the Class. 6. The Court hereby APPROVES the (Revised) Notice attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Court finds that the (Revised) Notice, along with the related notification procedure contemplated by the Stipulation of Settlement (as amended), constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances and are in full compliance with the applicable laws and the requirements of due process. The Court further finds that the (Revised) Notice appears to fully and accurately inform the Class Members of all material elements of the proposed Stipulation of Settlement, of the California Class Members right to be excluded from the Settlement, and of each California Class Member s right and opportunity to object to the Settlement. Subject to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, the (Revised) Notice shall be mailed via first-class mail to the most recent known address of each Class Member within the timeframe specified in the Stipulation of Settlement (as amended). The parties are authorized to make non-substantive changes to the proposed Class Notice that are consistent with the terms of the Settlement and this Order. 7. The Court hereby APPROVES the proposed procedure for California Class Member exclusion from the Settlement, which is to submit a written statement requesting exclusion to the Settlement Administrator no later than sixty (60) days following the date on which the Settlement Administrator first mails the Notice Packet to California Class Members. Any California Class Member who submits an Exclusion Letter shall not be a Member of the California Class, shall be barred from participating in the California Class Settlement and shall receive no benefit from the California Class Settlement. 8. The Court hereby APPROVES the proposed California Class Form and California FLSA Opt In Form for use in administering the Settlement, attached hereto as Exhibit B and C. The applicable documents must be mailed to Class Members along with the Notice. Subject to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, California FLSA Class Members must sign, date and return completed 556089 8 3 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page5 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 California FLSA Opt In Forms to the Settlement Administrator postmarked no later than sixty (60) days following the date on which the Settlement Administrator first mails the Notice Packets to Class Members in order to receive a monetary payment. The parties are authorized to make non-substantive changes to the proposed California Class Form and California FLSA Opt In Form that are consistent with the terms of the Settlement and this Order. 9. The Court further ORDERS that Class Counsel shall file a motion for approval of the Fee and Expense Award and the Service Payment, with the appropriate declarations and supporting evidence, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the close of the Class Notice period to be heard at the same time as the motion for Final Approval of the Settlement. 10. The Court further ORDERS that Class Counsel shall file a motion for Final Approval of the Settlement, with the appropriate declarations and supporting evidence, including a declaration setting forth the identity of any California Class Members who request exclusion from the Settlement, by April 16, 2015. 11. The Court further ORDERS that each California Class Member shall be given a full opportunity to object to the proposed Settlement and request for attorneys fees, and to participate at a Final Approval Hearing, which the Court sets to commence on May 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Any California Class Member seeking to object to the proposed Settlement may file such objection in writing with the Court and shall serve such objection on Class Counsel and Defendant s Counsel or may appear at the Final Approval Hearing to make the objection. 12. Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby APPROVES the Revised proposed Class Notice and adopts the following dates and deadlines: 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deadline Within fourteen (14) calendar days after entry of the order granting Preliminary Approval Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the Class Member list Action Defendant shall provide to the Settlement Administrator a list of all Class Members, including their name, social security number, last known address, telephone number, and Individual Work Weeks. The Settlement Administrator will send the Notice Packet via first class mail to all Class Members. 556089 8 4 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page6 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Deadline At least 14 days prior to the close of the Opt In Deadline and Exclusion Deadline Sixty (60) days following the date on which the Settlement Administrator first mails the Notice Packet to Class Members Within fifteen (15) calendar days after the Settlement Administrator notifies the Parties of the number of Exclusion Letters received April 16, 2015 May 21, 2015 Action Class Counsel will file a motion seeking approval of their Fee and Expense Award and the proposed Service Payments to the Plaintiffs. Exclusion Deadline: deadline for California Class Members to request exclusion from the Settlement. Opt In Deadline: deadline for California FLSA Class members to opt into the Settlement. If five or more of the California Class Members submit an exclusion letter, Nielsen will have the option of canceling the Settlement. Plaintiffs will move the Court for entry of Order of Final Approval and Judgment. Final Approval Hearing. 13. The Court further ORDERS that, pending further order of this Court, all proceedings in this Lawsuit, except those contemplated herein and in the Stipulation of Settlement, are stayed. 14. The Court further ORDERS that to facilitate administration of this Settlement, all California Class Members are hereby enjoined from filing or prosecuting any claims, cases, suits or administrative proceedings (including filing or pursuing claims with the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) regarding claims released by the Settlement unless and until such California Class Members have submitted Exclusion Letters with the Settlement Administrator. 15. If for any reason the Court does not execute and file a Final Approval Order and Judgment, the proposed Settlement subject to this Order and all evidence and proceedings had in connection with the Settlement shall be null and void. 16. The Court may, for good cause, extend any of the deadlines set forth in this Order or adjourn or continue the final approval hearing without further notice to the Class. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: January 12, 2015 HON. VINCENT CHHABRIA 28 556089 8 5 [REV.] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01835 VC

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page7 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page8 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page9 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page10 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page11 of 43 REVISED PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE [CLEAN VERSION]

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page12 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page13 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page14 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page15 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page16 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page17 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page18 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page19 of 43 REVISED PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE [REDLINE VERSION]

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page20 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page21 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page22 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page23 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page24 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page25 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page26 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page27 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page28 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page29 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page30 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page31 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page32 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page33 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page34 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page35 of 43 REVISED FLSA OPT-IN FORM [REDLINE VERSION]

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page36 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page37 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page38 of 43 REVISED FLSA OPT-IN FORM [CLEAN VERSION]

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page39 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page40 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page41 of 43 FLSA OPT-IN FORM SUBMITTED 11-06-2014

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page42 of 43

Case3:14-cv-01835-VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page43 of 43