Should Capital Punishment Be Considered Humane or Cruel and Unusual? Capital Punishment

Similar documents
Chapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

A Guide to the Bill of Rights

Capital Punishment. The use of the death penalty to punish wrongdoers for certain crimes. Micki ONeal 12/5/2011

Capital Punishment: Political and Moral Issue. execution occurring in Because America was still a main part of Great Britain many of its

ACS NATIONAL CONVENTION STUDENT PANEL ON THE DEATH PENALTY THURSDAY, JULY 26 TH, 2007

The Evolution of Cruel and Unusual Punishment. As times change and societies adjust to those changes in their maturation process, the application

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

Rights of the Accused

Applications for Post Conviction Testing

Postconviction DNA Testing: Recommendations to the Judiciary from the National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence

Death Penalty. in the USA III

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

8th and 9th Amendments. Joseph Bu, Jalynne Li, Courtney Musmann, Perah Ralin, Celia Zeiger Period 1

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Objectives : Objectives (cont d): Sources of US Law. The Nature of the Law

Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS

CRAFTING THE CASE AGAINST THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

Newspaper Death Penalty

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

(4) When the victim is under the age of twelve years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

OCTOBER TERM 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASE NO.

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

Florida s Criminal Justice System

Sentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260)

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. It is better to allow 10 guilty men to go free than to punish a single innocent man.

A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

The Electoral College And

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

NC Death Penalty: History & Overview

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Death Penalty. Terry Lenamon on the. Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)

Suppose you disagreed with a new law.

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

The effect of the method of execution on sentencing determinations in capital cases

Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

Criminal Law. The Basics

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Should Capital Punishment Receive A Death Sentence? Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and polarizing topics that

The Bill of Rights: A Charter of Liberties Although the terms are used interchangeably, a useful distinction can be made between

THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2001: YEAR END REPORT

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

American Government. Workbook

How Administrative Law Halted the Death Penalty in Maryland

California holds a special distinction in regards to the practice of capital punishment.

The Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States

The Bill of Rights CHAPTER 6. Table of Contents. ESSENTIAL QUESTION: How do societies balance individual and community rights?

No IN THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

2010 State Animal Protection Laws Rankings

STAT E ST AND A RDS F OR AP P OINTM ENT OF COU NS EL I N DE ATH P EN ALTY CAS ES

ALLOCATIONS OF PEREMPTORIES (ASSYMETRICAL ARRANGEMENTS IN PURPLE)

Amendment Review 1-27

National Latino Peace Officers Association

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH QUALIFIED JURIES. Charles Chastain (University of Arkansas, Little Rock) Introduction

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Table 4.15 THE SECRETARIES OF STATE, 2005

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION

PRE TEST. 1. The purpose of the Bill of Rights is to? A. limit the rights of individuals. B. specify the powers of citizens

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

A Skyrocketing Prison Population

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Unit 3 Section 1 Articles and Early Government.notebook. January 18, Vocabulary. Westward Ho! Need for State and National Government

8. Public Information

Supreme Court of Florida

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

YOU PAY FOR YOUR WRONG AND NO ONE ELSE S: THE ABOLITION OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Department of Justice

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Criminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

EXECUTIONS DECLINE NEARLY 10%; DEATH SENTENCES REMAIN CLOSE TO HISTORIC LOW

HAWAII: A law passed this year allows voters to share a digital image of one's own marked ballot.

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material

S17A1758. VEAL v. THE STATE. Veal v. State, 298 Ga. 691 (784 SE2d 403) (2016) ( Veal I ). After a jury

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

No DR SCT EN BANC ORDER. This matter comes before the En Banc Court on Richard Gerald Jordan's Successive

Criminal Law - Death Penalty: Jury Discretion Bridled

Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

REVIEW FOR CHAPTERS 15, 16, AND 17 TEST

Results and Criteria of BGA/NFOIC survey

amnesty international

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire,

Introduction. of capital punishment. The knowledge helped me understand many views that the ordinary

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

Transcription:

Should Capital Punishment Be Considered Humane or Cruel and Unusual? University of Phoenix HIS 301 - U.S. Constitution May 19, 2007 Capital Punishment Intro/ N History & principles of the Constitution/ M Arguments pros/ L Arguments cons/ P Action plan/ Nl Conclusion/ P 1

History of Capital Punishment and Constitutional Interpretation Overview Throughout the years, the United States Constitution has been debated in the warranted use of capital punishment Idealisms of the death penalty has evolved over generations Amendments to the Constitution have been made in order to justify its use; however there are still concerns as to the further clarification of its proper implementation 2

Capital Punishment Throughout the Years Invention of the degrees of murder In 1793, Pennsylvania became the first state to distinguish between first and second degree murders, thus justifying that different kinds of murders were not necessarily deserving of a death sentence (Close,1999). Sentencing by Trial Jury In the early 1800 s, states began to authorize trial juries to make recommendations in capital cases (Close,1999). Capital Punishment Throughout the Years (cont.) Reducing the number of capital crimes Also in the 1800 s, states could execute for a number of crimes. Over the years states have reduced these. Since 1977, the only crime for which prisoners have been executed have been for criminal homicide (Close,1999). Eliminating public executions and the search of more efficient methods of execution Starting with New York in 1835, public executions are presently banned in the United States to prevent graphic material and to avoid chaotic crows. New York was also the first state to implement the electric chair. Methods of execution have evolved over the years to include the use of lethal gas and currently the use of execution by lethal injection (Close, 1999). 3

Death Penalty vs. U.S. Constitution -Bill of Rights, 1791- In the Bill of Rights, Amendment V- Protected James Madison wrote the right of due process amendments to the U.S. of law in federal courts Constitution that could Amendment VI protect prisoners on Provided the right to a death row from certain fair and speedy trial execution (Close, 1999). Amendment VIII Prohibited cruel and unusual punishment Landmark Cases that have had an Impact on Constitutional Interpretation Furman v. Georgia (1972) The supreme court ruled that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. They also stated that the juries were not given proper guidance in determining just sentencing (Close, 1999). 4

Landmark Cases that have had an Impact on Constitutional Interpretation (cont.) Gregg v. Georgia (1976) The supreme court ruled that the death penalty did not violate the Eighth Amendment s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment provided that juries are given guided discretion during trial (Close, 1999). For Death Penalty By 5

For Death Penalty About this section: This section deals with the execution of criminals found guilty of having committed serious crimes. This used to be a universal practice. Most democracies in the world have abandoned the death penalty. The U.S. and Japan and South Korea are the only exceptions. You may be infuriated by what you read in this section. Like other topics elsewhere in this, we try to explain objectively all viewpoints. Thus, no matter what your beliefs are, you will certainly see material with which you strongly disagree. Who speaks for the victims of those we execute? All over the country, news stories bemoan and hype the countdown to execution number 1,000. But where are the stories regarding the ripple effects of the heinous crimes that these murderers were executed for committing? Who is counting the victims? A conservative estimate puts the number of victims of these 1,000 murderers at 1,895. Why do we hear so much about the killers and so little about the victims and their loved ones who are left behind to pick up the pieces? A small sampling of case histories will leave readers shaken. 6

Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be imposed nor be required, nor excessive imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishments inflicted. Methods of Execution Electric Chair Gas Chamber Lethal Injection Hanging (Federal only) Firing Squad (Federal only) 7

Botched Executions Alabama. John Evans. E Mississippi. Jimmy Lee Gray. GC Georgia. Alpha Otis Stephens. E Texas. Stephen Peter Morin. LI Indiana. William E. Vandiver.. E Texas. Randy Woolls.. LI Texas. Elliott Johnson. LI Texas. Raymond Landry. LI Texas. Stephen McCoy. LI Alabama. Horace F. Dunkins.. E Florida. Jesse Joseph Tafero.. E Virginia. Wilbert Lee Evens. E Virginia. Derick Lynn Peterson. E Arkansas. Rickey Ray Rector. LI Oklahoma. Robyn Lee Parks. LI Texas. Billy Wayne White. LI Texas. Justin Lee May. LI Illinois. John Wayne Gacy.. LI Missouri. Emmitt Foster. LI Indiana. Tommie Smith. LI Florida. Pedro Medina. E Oklahoma. Scott Carpenter. LI South Carolina. Michael Elkins. LI Texas. Joseph Cannon. LI Action Plan Legislation- Assembly to create public awareness Demonstration Initiative- Petition for Referendum Minority Influence When all else fails write your Congressman 8

Conclusion Final Statements and questions 9