Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 5:07-cv RS Document 1 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-679 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs,

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:13-cv J Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 11 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Case 0:18-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2018 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv LDG-RJJ Document 1 Filed 11/06/2009 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION. Case No.: Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv DPW Document 1 Filed 10/30/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No.

Case 2:14-cv GHK-MAN Document 1 Filed 10/15/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 1:16-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:18-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case: 3:12-cv WHR Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/01/12 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

PlainSite. Legal Document. North Carolina Middle District Court Case No. 1:13-cv THE NORTH FACE APPAREL CORP. et al v. DAHAN et al.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.

Case 2:13-cv KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Transcription:

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

1. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to U.S.C. 1 because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims herein occurred in this District, and because the Defendants are found and conduct business within this District.. Intra-district venue is proper in the Western Division because, on information and belief, the Defendants are found and conduct business within the County of Los Angeles. PARTIES. Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION ( HAMC ) is now, and at all relevant times was, a non-profit mutual benefit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of the trademarks described herein, which it administers on behalf of, and for the benefit of, the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club.. Defendant ALEXANDER MCQUEEN TRADING LIMITED ( MCQUEEN ) is, on information and belief, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom. Defendant MCQUEEN is a luxury fashion house, designing, manufacturing, distributing and selling products through its own stores, other retailers and online. Defendant MCQUEEN is found and conducts business within this District through its subsidiary enterprises as Alexander McQueen Boutique, located at Melrose Ave., Los Angeles, CA 00. Defendant MCQUEEN and its subsidiary enterprises also conduct business within this District and throughout the United States via the Internet website <alexandermcqueen.com>.. Defendant SAKS INCORPORATED ( SAKS ) is, on information and belief, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York. Defendant SAKS is the operator of high-end department stores, and is found and conducts business within this District through its subsidiary enterprises as Saks Fifth Avenue, 00 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, CA 0. Defendant SAKS and its subsidiary enterprises also conduct business within this District and throughout the United States via the Internet website <saksfifthavenue.com>. AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1. Defendant ZAPPOS RETAIL, INC. ( ZAPPOS ) is, on information and belief, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada. Defendant ZAPPOS conducts business within this District and throughout the United States via the Internet website <zappos.com>. PLAINTIFF S MARKS. At least as early as, Plaintiff HAMC and its predecessor in interest, an unincorporated association known as the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, have continuously employed the word mark HELLS ANGELS and design mark depicting a skull with wings (the HAMC Death Head ) as collective membership marks, trademarks and service marks used in connection with the promotion, advertising, conduct and expansion of a motorcycle club, including indicia of membership; on authorized products such as jewelry and apparel; and in connection with authorized services such as promotional and entertainment services.. From more than half a century of continuous and conspicuous usage, both the HELLS ANGELS word mark and the HAMC Death Head design mark (the HAMC Marks ) are famous. The HAMC Marks are widely known and recognized by the public as indicating the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club. Plaintiff HAMC and its predecessors in interest have exercised legitimate control over the membership, trade and service uses of the HAMC Marks by the duly authorized affiliates and licensees, and have been diligent and successful in abating the use of the HAMC Marks by unauthorized third parties.. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of the following United States trademark registrations for the HAMC Marks, further described in Exhibit A: a. Reg. Nos. 1,,, 1,01,00, and,,1 for HELLS ANGELS and HAMC Death Head as collective membership marks; b. Reg. Nos. 1,,, 1,,1,,,, and,, for HELLS ANGELS word mark as trademark and service mark; c. Reg. Nos.,,,,,0, and,, for HAMC Death Head AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1 design as trademark and service mark.. Plaintiff s registrations for the HAMC Marks have become incontestible under U.S.C.. These registrations are, therefore, conclusive evidence of Plaintiff s exclusive right to use the HAMC Marks. 1. From decades of notoriety, the HAMC Marks have acquired very widespread public recognition, consequently they evoke strong and immediate reactions whenever used. The impact of these marks is virtually incomparable, and as a result they have great commercial value. Defendants seek to exploit that value for their own gain. DEFENDANTS INFRINGING PRODUCTS. Plaintiff HAMC is informed and believes that Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, have in the past and continue to manufacture, source, market and/or sell jewelry, apparel and accessories that infringe and dilute the HAMC Marks (hereinafter the infringing products ).. In particular, Plaintiff HAMC is informed and believes that Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, manufactures, sources, markets and/or sells jewelry designs that are confusingly similar to the HAMC Death Head mark. These infringing jewelry designs include, without limitation, the examples illustrated in Exhibit B, which are referred to therein as the Hells Four-Finger Ring design.. In particular, Plaintiff HAMC is informed and believes that Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, manufactures, sources, markets and/or sells infringing handbags that employ the same design as the Hells Four- Finger Ring and also confusingly similar to the HAMC Death Head mark. These infringing handbags include, without limitation, the examples illustrated in Exhibit C, which are referred to therein as the Hells Knuckle Duster design.. In particular, Plaintiff HAMC is informed and believes that Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, manufactures, sources, markets AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1 and/or sells apparel and accessories named with the HELLS ANGELS word mark. These infringing items include, without limitation, the examples illustrated in Exhibit D, the Hells Angels Jacquard Box Dress and Hells Angels Pashmina.. Plaintiff HAMC is informed and believes that Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, have produced, manufactured, designed, marketed, offered for sale and sold substantial quantities of products infringing the HAMC Marks, and have obtained and continue to obtain substantial profits from such sales.. The actions of Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, have caused and will cause Plaintiff HAMC irreparable harm for which money damages and other remedies are inadequate. Unless Defendants, and each of them, are restrained by this Court, they will continue and/or expand the illegal activities alleged in this Complaint and otherwise continue to cause great and irreparable damage and injury to Plaintiff. Accordingly, in addition to other relief sought, Plaintiff HAMC is entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and all persons acting in concert with them. FIRST CLAIM Federal Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act U.S.C. -). Plaintiff HAMC realleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through of this Complaint.. Without consent of Plaintiff HAMC, Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, have used, in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution or advertising of the infringing products, designs that infringe upon the HAMC Marks.. These acts of infringement have been committed with the intent to cause confusion, mistake or deception, and are in violation of U.S.C... As a direct and proximate result of the infringing activities of Defendants AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1 MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, Plaintiff HAMC has suffered substantial damage.. Defendants' infringement of the HAMC Marks as alleged herein is an exceptional case and was intentional, entitling Plaintiff HAMC to treble the actual damages and to an award of attorneys' fees under U.S.C. (a) and (b). SECOND CLAIM Federal Unfair Competition (Lanham Act (a) U.S.C. (a)). Plaintiff HAMC realleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through of this Complaint.. Defendants' conduct constitutes the use of words, symbols or devices tending falsely to describe the infringing products, within the meaning of U.S.C. (a)(1). Defendants' conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception by or in the public as to the affiliation, connection, association, origin, sponsorship or approval of the infringing products to the detriment of Plaintiff HAMC and in violation of U.S.C. (a)(1).. As a direct and proximate result of the infringing activities of Defendants MCQUEEN, SAKS and ZAPPOS, and each of them, Plaintiff HAMC has suffered substantial damage. THIRD CLAIM Federal Dilution of Famous Mark (Federal Trademark Dilution Act of ) (Lanham Act (c) U.S.C. (c)). Plaintiff HAMC realleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through of this Complaint.. The HAMC Marks are distinctive and famous within the meaning of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of, U.S.C. (c), as amended.. Defendants' activities have diluted or are likely to dilute the distinctive quality of the HAMC Marks in violation of U.S.C. (c), as amended. 0. Plaintiff HAMC is entitled to injunctive relief pursuant to U.S.C. AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1 (c). 1. Because Defendants willfully intended to trade on Plaintiff HAMC's reputation or to cause dilution of the HAMC Marks, Plaintiff HAMC is entitled to damages, extraordinary damages, fees and costs pursuant to U.S.C. (c)(). PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff HAMC prays that this Court grant it the following relief: a.) Adjudge that the HAMC Marks have been infringed by Defendants in violation of the rights of Plaintiff HAMC under U.S.C. ; b.) Adjudge that Defendants have competed unfairly with Plaintiff HAMC in violation of its rights under U.S.C. (a); c.) Adjudge that Defendants' activities are likely to, or have, diluted the famous HAMC Marks in violation of the rights of Plaintiff HAMC under U.S.C. (c); d.) Adjudge that Defendants, their subsidiaries, parent and affiliated companies, successors, assigns, agents, and employees, and all others acting for, with, by, through or in concert with Defendants, shall be enjoined and restrained at first during the pendency of this action and thereafter permanently from using the HELLS ANGELS word mark, the HAMC Death Head design mark, and any other mark, word, name or symbol that is likely to cause confusion with, or cause dilution of, the HAMC Marks; e.) Adjudge that Defendants be required immediately to recall and sequester their inventories of the infringing products, and to supply an accounting of such inventories to Plaintiff HAMC's counsel; f.) Adjudge that Defendants be required to deliver their entire inventories of the infringing products to a mutually selected third party for supervised destruction; g.) Adjudge that Defendants, within thirty (0) days after service of the judgment demanded herein, be required to file with this Court and serve upon counsel AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

1 for Plaintiff HAMC a written report under oath setting forth in detail the manner in which they have complied with the judgment; h.) Adjudge that Plaintiff HAMC recover from Defendants its damages in an amount to be proven at trial; i.) Adjudge that Defendants be required to account for any profits that are attributable to its illegal acts, and that Plaintiff HAMC be awarded three times Defendants' profits under U.S.C., plus prejudgment interest; j.) Order an accounting of and impose a constructive trust on all of Defendants' funds and assets that arise out of Defendants' infringing activities; k.) Adjudge that Defendants be required to pay exemplary damages for fraud, malice and gross negligence, whether grounded on proof of actual damages or on proof of unjust enrichment; l.) Adjudge that Plaintiff HAMC be awarded the costs of this action, together with reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements; and m.) Adjudge that all such other and further relief be awarded to Plaintiff HAMC as the Court deems just and equitable. Dated: October, FRITZ CLAPP Attorney at Law P.O. Box Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: --1 Email: <mail@fritzclapp.com> Attorney for Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION AND TRADEMARK DILUTION (INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT) Page

HELLS ANGELS HAMC MARKS Mark Goods/Services [Int. Class] Reg. No. Membership in an association of motorcyclists [0] 1,, T-shirts; entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting concerts for the benefit of others [0, 01] 1,, Posters, calendars and adhesive labels [0] 1,,1 Belt buckles, embroidered and cloth patches [0],, Jewelry, jewelry pins, clocks and watches, earrings, key rings made of precious metal, badges made of precious metal, and chains made of precious metal [0]; Books, booklets and newspapers concerning motorcycle clubs; posters, calendars and adhesive labels [0]; Shirts, t- shirts, pullovers, jackets, sweaters, sweat pants, trousers,,, vests, caps with visors, headwear and footwear [0]; Belt buckles, ornamental novelty badges, ornamental cloth patches and embroidered patches for clothing [0]; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting concerts, parties, rallies and special events [01] Membership in a motorcycle club [0],,1 Embroidered patches for clothing; ornamental cloth,, patches; belt buckles [0] Clocks; pins and rings [0],,0 Jewelry, jewelry pins, clocks and watches, earrings, key rings made of precious metal, badges made of precious metal, and chains made of precious metal [0]; Books, booklets and newspapers concerning motorcycle clubs; posters, calendars and adhesive labels [0]; Shirts, t- shirts, pullovers, jackets, sweaters, sweat pants, trousers, vests, caps with visors, headwear and footwear [0]; Belt buckles, ornamental novelty badges, ornamental cloth patches and embroidered patches for clothing [0]; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting concerts, parties, rallies and special events [01],, Membership in a motorcycle club [0] 1,01,00 EXHIBIT A