Electronic Access? State. Court Rules on Public Access? Materials/Info on the web?

Similar documents
State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

State Complaint Information

Committee Consideration of Bills

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

Security Breach Notification Chart

Subcommittee on Design Operating Guidelines

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Security Breach Notification Chart

Judicial Ethics Advisory Committees by State Links at

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Destruction of Paper Files. Date: September 12, [Destruction of Paper Files] [September 12, 2013]

Do you consider FEIN's to be public or private information? Do you consider phone numbers to be private information?

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Judicial Selection in the States

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

8. Public Information

Page 1 of 5. Appendix A.

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Floor Amendment Procedures

The Electoral College And

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

Call for Expedited Processing Procedures. Date: August 1, [Call for Expedited Processing Procedures] [August 1, 2013]

Fiscal Year (September 30, 2018) Requests by Intake and Case Status Intake 1 Case Review 6 Period

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY THURGOOD MARSHALL SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY LOCATION GUIDE July 2018

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Background Information on Redistricting

American Government. Workbook

DATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Results and Criteria of BGA/NFOIC survey

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS POLICY. Table of Contents Page

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

ARTICLE I ESTABLISHMENT NAME

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Components of Population Change by State

Election Notice. Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots. October 20, Ballot Due Date: November 20, Executive Summary.

Texas and New Jersey are Best States for American E-Government

Records Retention. Date: June 13, [Records Retention] [ ]

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 7, Executive Summary. Suggested Routing

Appendix Y: States with Rules Identical to FRCP Draft. By: Tarja Cajudo and Leslye E. Orloff. February 8, 2018

America s Deficient Bridges: A State-by-State Comparison

VOLUME 36 ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2018

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

DEFINED TIMEFRAMES FOR RATE CASES (i.e., suspension period)

Department of Justice

Nominating Committee Policy

Date: October 14, 2014

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 2, Nomination Deadline: October 2, 2015.

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Security Breach Notification Chart

BYLAWS. Mission Providing visionary leadership in nursing education to improve the health and wellbeing of our communities.

If you have questions, please or call

Security Breach Notification Chart

Alabama 2.5 months 2.5 months N/R N/R 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months No No

Transcription:

ALABAMA State employs dial-up access program similar to Maryland. Public access terminals are available in every county. Remote access sites are available for a monthly fee. New rule charges a fee for requests that require a special computer program to locate information, which discourages people from requesting wholesale information. ALASKA Nothing documented on electronic access. ARIZONA State employs dial-up access program similar to Maryland. Recent report from Ad Hoc Committee recommended the opening of court records electronically, with the general exception of personal information, such as social security and credit card numbers, and cases related to domestic relations, juvenile, mental health, and probate. For the most part, criminal information should be accessible. ARKANSAS Electronic access is provided for a small fee. The AOC is working towards employing an electronic case management system for many of the trial courts that will be made available to the public. No electronic access policies yet. Access guidelines are covered by law rather than by court rules. Aside from juvenile and adoption records, most records are open. CALIFORNIA Proposed rule changes include a general right of electronic access to trial court records, and preclude remote electronic access to filings in family law, juvenile, mental health, guardianship, and criminal proceedings. Also, the court may limit access to any court record based on overriding public or private interests.

CONNECTICUT The Judicial Branch offers to members of the press, bar and public, dial-in access to its civil/family system for a fee. This access allows users of the system to inquire directly into the civil and family case records contained in the Superior Court's database and to review the status of computerized court records. Available information includes: whether an appearance has been filed on behalf of a party and by whom; whether a motion has been filed or acted upon; whether the case is pending or disposed, and calendar information for the short calendar, family magistrate, civil assignment list, family assignment list and dormancy short calendar. The Electronic Bulletin Board System allows the electronic transfer of information from the Judicial Branch to a subscriber's personal computer. In addition to viewing the information, subscribers are able to download text onto their personal computers.

COLORADO CoCourts.com is the first online, real-time court records site in the United States. It was created as an initiative of the Colorado Judicial Branch and developed, under contract, by a private company, e-infodata.com of Boulder. Users can search both open and closed cases. Sealed cases are t available on the site. Also t included are these case types probate, mental health and juvenile. Additionally, certain information within each case is n-public. Social security numbers are omitted, as are street addresses. All parties to a case except the plaintiff and defendant (and in domestic relations cases, the petitioner and the respondent) are considered n-public. This includes judges, victims, police officers and jurors. Attorney names, however, are public. Long narratives are excluded from the database, as are suppressed, sealed, or confidential filings. Financial information such as fines are summarized. Delaware Few court record data is on the Internet. Court rules are linked to judiciary s main site. Court access policy varies depending on jurisdiction and type of court. Courts for the most part set their own policies regarding access. District of Columbia FEDERAL Could t locate access to court records on the web sites. Federal Judiciary has several electronic access services to obtain federal court information, including records. FLORIDA Electronic access authorized by statute, but t uniform statewide. A few jurisdictions provide web access to civil and/or criminal case information.

HAWAII State Program titled Ho ohiki is the state s online public records access system. Court pleadings and home addresses are t available online. Ho ohiki has an interesting disclaimer which must be read before proceeding to the program. Georgia No perceived electronic access to court records. Idaho No perceived electronic access to court records. ILLINOIS Special Supreme Court Committee on Electronic Transmission of Data studies and will make recommendations to the Supreme Court on permitting the service of tice and other papers and the filing of documents by facsimile transmission to the clerk's offices and on allowing the electronic receipt of dissemination of information regarding cases and other court business. INDIANA Judges Technical Committee is looking into electronic records-keeping access. Will likely institute a limited access policy. 1998 Task Force recommended broader implementation of electronic access to public records. IOWA Electronic Iowa Court Information System (ICIS) is available at courthouses. KANSAS Some general docket/case information is available online.

KENTUCKY The State will soon implement a new policy that will provide more electronic access to court information. Currently, each county collects informaiton that feeds into a mainframe. State is looking into providing access to that information via the Internet. Contact Ed Crocket at 502/573-2350 ext. 2029 for specifics on the policy and electronic access to court records. LOUISIANA varies No electronic access. Maine Newly created web page to include all administrative orders. Information will soon be available via public access terminals, but is already implemented in some jurisdictions. Criminal data information pretty much open and computerized. However, civil information more restricted. MASSACHUSETTS A web advisory committee is seeking comments on a draft report regarding the dissemination of court records on the Internet. Draft report includes specific recommendations on what should and should t be made available on the Internet. MICHIGAN No statewide electronic access policy as of yet, and real firm plans for one in the future. However, a few trial courts are offering electronic access to court records. Dan Voss 517/373-2106 Minnesota No perceived electronic access to court records.

MISSISSIPPI State supreme court is moving toward electronic access to its docket, and soon will have links to the actual motions and petitions before the court. Citizen electronic access to the trial courts far down the road. MISSOURI Case.net provides access to the Missouri State Courts Automated Case Management System. From here you are able to inquire on case records including docket entries, parties, judgments, and charges in public court. Only courts that have implemented the case management software as part of the Missouri Court Automation Project and only cases that have been deemed public under the Missouri Revised Statues can be accessed through Case.net. MONTANA Supreme Court is far behind in terms of electronic access to court records. NEBRASKA No electronic access. Nevada Rules t yet available on the Internet. Courts seeking funds to establish web site for rules and other pertinent court information. NEW HAMPSHIRE No perceived electronic access to court records. New Jersey Almost all court records on paper are available electronically. Nominal fee is charged for electronic services, but special program requests are t accepted.

NEW MEXICO Electronic access provided without fee. Addresses and phone numbers t provided on the Internet. Internet contains case management information for all cases in the state, as well as statutes and rules. NEW YORK Electronic access to court records is provided. Fees are charged based on costs and revenue. State was in litigation over denying access to entire database for resale. NORTH CAROLINA State has an electronic criminal calender, which can be searched by county, court type, or last name of the defendant. North Dakota Online Dakota Information Network provides general judicial information, but access to court records. OHIO Currently electronic access to court records. Supreme Court website provides party names, filing dates, entries, attorney names, and summaries. Oklahoma Electronic access is provided at charge. No difference between electronic and paper in terms of public information access. Oregon State maintains 18 regional databases kwn as Oregon Judicial Information Network. Dial-up access is permitted for all n-confidential (defined by statute) court cases. Pennsylvania State provides electronic access for a fee. Court system is moving towards better unification.

Rhode Island Electronic access is limited. State was involved in access lawsuit with local paper. Paper requested detailed statewide traffic court information, but was refused because state sells that information to private insurance companies. State argued that if information was given to the paper, they would have to also provide it to private insurance companies free of charge. By law, state can either refuse or charge for information t rmally collected. SOUTH CAROLINA Techlogy plan is looking at making all records electronic, first for internal use and then for the public. A few counties provide electronic access of some court information for free. SOUTH DAKOTA Electronic access to court records t provided. TENNESSEE No apparent electronic access to court records. TEXAS No apparent electronic access to court records. Utah Utah Court Information Xchange database charges monthly fee, service charge; and usage fee; contract. Vermont Electronic access to court records is limited for the time being. Recent committee, comprised of citizens, judicial officers, administrative personnel, and media, will offer suggestions regarding public access to court documents. Recommendations will address what should and should t be public accessible, what information should be provided on the Internet, and how to handle juvenile records.

VIRGINIA State Electronic access is available for many Circuit Court records in a pilot format. Committee is looking into the issues surrounding electronic access vs. paper access. WASHINGTON Under statute, electronic access is available for a fee. New legislation has been drawn up to limit Internet access to private information and some records. State has encountered cases of identity theft. West Virginia varies No specific provisions covering electronic case records. Majestries use the same electronic case system, but only accessible on a case-by-case basis. Limited information available via dial-up for a fee. Currently looking at web application that will make limited, basic case information available on main site. Wisconsin All unrestricted cases excluding juvenile, mental, paternity, and adoption cases are available on the Internet. However, text field may be missing, which may cause confusion. For example, a case may te that a motion was passed, but it may t explain what type of motion was passed. Internet service free and often includes phone numbers, addresses, date of birth, etc. Site gets between 200,000 and 250,000 hits per day, receives positive press, and has saved Clerks of the Court substantial time previously spent collecting court records requests. However, privacy advocates have complained about easy access to information deemed sensitive. Legislatures have contacted the Admin. office complaining, but thing has advanced further...yet.

Wyoming At this point, electronic access to court records, but moving in that direction. Note: All available court rules and state judicial sites can be accessed via www.courts.net. States in SMALL CAPS have recent changes. Access chart prepared by Todd Silver, Maryland Judiciary Court Information Office.