Bahujan Ideology: Bahujan Samaj Party. Dr. Prakash R. Pawar Dept of Political Science, Shivaji University, kolhapur.

Similar documents
Chapter 6 Political Parties

The turbulent rise of regional parties: A many-sided threat for Congress

University of Pune. F. Y. B. A. Political Science

Navjyot / Vol. II / Issue IV ISSN

India's Silent Revolution

Uttar Pradesh Assembly Election 2017 Dates announced by Election Commission: Get schedule. of Polling and Results of UP State elections 2017

The Union of Right to Equality & Reservations in India

SHORT ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS [3 MARKS]

Chapter- 5 Political Parties. Prepared by - Sudiksha Pabbi

CONCLUSION. Uttar Pradesh has always occupied an important position among

Uttar Pradesh Sweep Boosts BJP and Modi. Ronojoy Sen 1

Case studies of female political leaders in India

Farewell to Maratha Politics?

Who Put the BJP in Power?

Syllabus SemV. Political Process in Maharashtra SEM VI. Caste and Politics 05/08/2013. Regionalism Sub-regionalism

The caste based mosaic of Indian politics

Political Thinking in India. Course Institution Year Class/ Grade SSC board Maharashtra

BJP Landslide Victory in 2014 General Election: A Political Geographer Perspective

Caste and Electoral Politics.

BJP s Demographic Dividend in the 2014 General Elections: An Empirical Analysis ±

CAS Occasional Paper Series: No.4. Coalitions in Maharashtra Political fragmentation or Social Reconfiguration?

COUNTRY FOCUS: INDIA. Modi s initiatives

Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for Uttar Pradesh BJP maintains big lead over opponents. Survey-based vote estimate (%)

DEVELOPMENT OF STATE POLITICS IN INDIA

How did the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) come to power

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. called the Scheduled Castes, is the constitutionally recognized.

ISA S Insights No. 64 Date: 13 May 2009

CHAPTER III IDEOLOGY AND THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE BAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY

LOKNITI-CSDS-TIRANGA TV-THE HINDU-DAINIK BHASKAR PRE POLL SURVEY 2019

Shri Yashwantrao Chavan Gold Medal of University of Pune for securing highest marks in M. A. Politics May 1992.

ISAS Insights No. 71 Date: 29 May 2009

A Step toward Social Transformation and Economic Emenciaption of Dalit in India

Online appendix for Chapter 4 of Why Regional Parties

Political Parties in India

Teaching Plan. Academic Year

The Battle for Bihar. Ronojoy Sen 1

Curriculum Viate. 1. Name Vaishali Prakash Pawar. 2. Date & Place Of Birth September 18,1977.

South Asia. India signals more justice for women

Trans. Inst. Indian Geographers. Fig.2 : Consistency in the seats won by the BJP: (See page 66 for text)

Narender Kumar Professor Centre for Political Studies School of Social Sciences AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

Time of Vote Choice in India

TOPIC: FORESTS, SOCIETY AND COLONIALISM

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN IN INDIA: A CASE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Downloaded from

The Indian Voter in 2014

Democracy in India: A Citizens' Perspective APPENDICES. Lokniti : Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS)

In re: Violation of model code of conduct by Shri Salman Khurshid, Union Minister for Law and Justice and Minorities Affairs.

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN STATE ASSEMBLIES

Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics

PARTY WISE SEATS WON AND VOTES POLLED (%),LOK SABHA 2009

Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy

NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1996 PRE-POLL SURVEY INTERVIEW SCHEDULE

Access from the University of Nottingham repository: Pub.

Karnataka Assembly Elections 2018: A Close Contest on the Cards

Xournals. Indian Electoral System & EVM. Udit Singh 1. Abstract: Authors:

International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research

INDIAN SCHOOL MUSCAT SENIOR SECTION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCE CLASS: IX: DEMOCRATIC POLITICS CHAPTER: 4- ELECTORAL POLITICS WORKSHEET - 11

Preamble of the Indian Constitution

Vol. XLIV, No. 3, May/June 2004

NEW PRESIDENT OF THE BJP: PM Vajpayee has his way.

Karnataka Assembly Elections 2018: An Unlikely Alliance forms the Government

Indian Express, Delhi Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Page 1 Width: cms, Height: cms, a3r, Ref:

A Study: Importance of Manifestoes

ASSIGNMENT SOLUTIONS GUIDE ( ) B.P.S.E.-212

THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2010

Women in National Parliaments: An Overview

Can Elected Minority Representatives Affect Health Worker Visits? Evidence from India. Elizabeth Kaletski University of Connecticut

Director, Center for Women s Studies, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. Maharashtra, INDIA

Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for West Bengal TMC widens the lead over Left Front. Survey-based vote estimate (%)

I: INTRODUCTION. Table-2: Election Results Party Seats Contested Seats won Votes Share (percent) India National Congress

International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research ISSN (Online):

Test 15 History Questions: Insights Test Series

MADHYA PRADESH POST POLL SURVEY 2013 QUESTIONNAIRE

Does Political Reservation for Minorities Affect Child Labor? Evidence from India. Elizabeth Kaletski University of Connecticut

Leadership in Context Impact of Leadership in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections

Transformation From Single Party To Region Based Multi-Party System: A Study In Electoral Geography

Politics in India. Social Structure of India. Faculty of world studies - University of Tehran. Subject: M.A Student in : Indian studies

A tale of three cities

Inequality in Housing and Basic Amenities in India

Why political parties should be declared as public authorities?

Narrative I Attitudes towards Community and Perceived Sense of Fraternity

THE INDIAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL, KUWAIT

First the most crucial development of this period was the defeat

Political, Economic, and Security Situation in India

Issues of Under-Representation: Mapping Women in Indian Politics

BAL BHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL PITAMPURA,DELHI Class-IX ( ) TERM II (NOTES) UNIT TEST II ELECTORAL POLITICS

Assembly Poll Result Boosts Congress and Stings BJP Ronojoy Sen

Political Mobilization on Caste and Development in Bihar: Some Observations

ISSUES OF UNDER-REPRESENTATION: MAPPING WOMEN IN INDIAN POLITICS

Elections to Lok Sabha

SUPPORT MATERIAL CLASS VIII- HISTORY

ELECTORAL POLITICS OF BAHUJAN ALLIES IN ANDHRA PRADESH

Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for Bihar BJP+ maintains very comfortable lead over opponents

Chapter - II Methodology and Review of Literature

0447 INDIA STUDIES. 0447/01 Paper 1 (Core Themes), maximum raw mark 75

The Chamcha Age by Saheb Kanshi Ram

Women Empowerment in Panchayati Raj Institutions

How Unequal Access to Public Goods Reinforces Horizontal Inequality in India ASLI DEMIRGUC-KUNT LEORA KLAPPER NEERAJ PRASAD

The Road Ahead for Aam Aadmi Party. Ronojoy Sen 1

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Born: Place of Birth: Parents: Spouse: Education: Associations: Political Ideology: Religious Beliefs: Publications: Passed Away:

Transcription:

Bahujan Ideology: Bahujan Samaj Party Dr. Prakash R. Pawar Dept of Political Science, Shivaji University, kolhapur. Introduction:The nature of Ambedkarite Dalit Movement was changed in 1980s. It was mainly political. The political power is the core of Ambedkarite Dalit Movement. Power is related to Indian parliamentary politics. The changing nature of this movement was anti caste and anti-hindu religion. It criticizes on caste and religion. So this movement was known as Socio-political movement. There was less criticism on caste and religion after 1990s. This movement was exited from the leadership of kanshiram. Mayawati becomes the leader of this movement. This movement become only political under the leadership of mayawati. Social Movement was mobilized within the Framework of Class & caste In Maharashtra, Bahujan samaj party mobilized Bahujans. Kashiram established Backward & minority community employees federation in 1978. In the beginning this organization Concentrated an employs mobilization. After that they Started the mobilization of North Indians, Muslims & Seclude caste. There is much more influenced on new Buddhist community of this organization. In beginning twenty three new Buddhist, one graywal & one Ramdasi becames the member of this organization. Then Kashiram wants to Mobilize non-buddhist caste. He planned to mobilize non- Buddhist Caste for his Political Movement. In 1982-83 on the basis of actively Participated in Politics, Organization was Split into two groups. Kashiram wanted to Participated in Politics so he established Dalit Soshit Sangharsh Samiti on 6 th Dec. 1982. And then established Bahujan Samaj Party on 14 th April 1984. Kashiram wanted to Mobilized Bahujan so he expanded the organizational structure of BSP. Fifteen Percent higher caste Opposite Eighty fine percent bahujans this conflict issue was raised by BSP. According to BSP Bahujan means Maratha, OBC, SC, & Muslim in Maharashtra. But new Buddhist was influenced more than OBCs. In BSP working committee there were sixteen New Buddhist, Members out of twenty five. OBCs doesn t got any location or role in BSP. OBC leader Mahadev Jankar Criticized BSP on this issue. After 2000 BSP changed its policies. BSP tries to involved OBC, Muslim in organization. The coalition of new Buddhist and OBC caste policy was adopted by BSP in 2003. This policy influenced RPI and Bahujan Mahasangh. The bahujan vote of RPI and Bahujan Mahasangh shifted to BSP. Because of this Policy BSP Emerged as a party in Maharashtra. Votes of BSP was increased & the vote of Bahujan Mahasangh was decreased due to their Policies. In 1995 Maharashtra Vidhan Sabha election BSP had given 145 candidates. 119 New Buddhist and Charmkar candidates out of 145. Only 26 candidates were not belonged to Dalit castes. This clearly indicates BSP s main aim to mobilize the new Buddhist in Maharashtra. On 47

the basis of caste BSP doesn t enter in the politics of Maharashtra. But Dalit votes of Congress and bahujan Mahasangh Shifted to BSP. This action affected on Congress and Bahujan Mahasangh. In 2004 Maharashtra Vidhan Saba election BSP has mobilized New Buddhist and OBCs. 272 candidates was given by the Party. In election complain Mayawati give assures of Independent Vidarbha state and the separate new Vidarbha state named as Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar. In this election BSP has given 177 candidates of OBC out of 272 candidates (65.07%) 93 from SC candidates (34.01%). Dhanagar, mali, kosti farmer OBC got candidatre form BSP in vidarbha. Because Of this BSPs votes increased in vidarha. BSP got 9.3% vote in vidarbha. In those constituency BSP gives OBC candidates got more votes. New Buddhist, Matag and valmiki these Dalit castes also got candidature in election. In ten constituencies these Dalit candidates got more than five percent votes.bsp wants to interfere in Maharashtra politics from 1978 (bamsafe) but not successed. BSP s power politics was successful only for few seats. But today BSP failed to influence on Maharashtra politics.in 2009 Lok Sabha and Maharashtra Vidhan Sabha election BSP can t influence Voters. BSPs slogan was This is not elephant, this is Ganesh in this election. This slogan was used by BSP to mobilized upper and middle castes in Maharashtra. Because of this policy BSP s previous role of anti Brahmins had been changed. Anti- Brahmins issue was taken a soft nature. In local politics of Maharashtra BSP can t influenced the Voters. Bahujanvadi politics was emerged to Opposition domains of caste but it has own limitations. BSP s Performance in Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha Table 1 BSP s Performance in Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha Election year Contested won % of Vote % of Votes in seats contested 1989 372 13 9.41 10.72 1991 386 12 9.44 10.26 1993 164 67 11.12 28.52 1996 296 67 19.64 27.73 2002 401 98 23.06 23.19 2007 403 206 30.43 30.43 48

In 1989 Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha election BSP Contested 372 & won only 13. They got 10.72 Percent Votes. BSP s Performance was not good in 1991Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha election. They Contested 386 & won only 12 & got 10.26 Percent Votes. It Means BSP s Position in Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha remain still. In 1993 onwards BSP s role & Position had been totally changed in Uttar Pradesh. In 1993 Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha election BSP Contested only 164 & won 67. This is the highest of BSP as Compare to 1989 & 1991 UP Vidan Sabha election. They got 28.52 Percent Votes. & Votes of BSP increased in 1993 election. It means BSP s Social Support increased in Uttar Pradesh. In 1996 Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha election BSP Contested only 296 & won 67. They got 27.73 Percent Votes. It means BSP s Performances as Compare to 1993 was not good. Their Still remain but their votes less. In 2002 Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha election BSP Contested only 401 & won 98. They got 23.19 Percent Votes. First time BSP Contested highest seats in Uttar Pradesh. Their seats increased but their votes are less. In 2007 Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha election BSP Contested only 403 & won 206. They got 30.43 Percent Votes. BSP got highest seats in Uttar Pradesh Vidan Sabha election. 49

BSP s National level Performance Table : 2 : BSP s Performance in Lok Sabha General Election Contested won % of Vote % of Votes in seats contested 1989 245 03 2.07 4.53 1991 231 02 1.61 3.64 1996 210 11 4.02 11.21 1998 251 05 4.67 9.84 State Punjab (01) Uttar Pradesh (02 Madhya Pradesh (01) Uttar Pradesh (01) Madhya Pradesh (02) Punjab (03) Uttar Pradesh (06) Haryana (01) Uttar Pradesh (04) 1999 225 14 4.16 9.97 Uttar Pradesh (14 ) 2004 435 19 5.33 6.66 Uttar Pradesh (19) 2009 500 21 6.17... Madhya Pradesh (01) Uttar Pradesh (20) From 1989 BSP Contest Lok Sabha election. All over India they Contested Lok Sabha elections but only in four States they became Successful. Panjab, Utter Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh & Haryana these are the four States, Where BSP Performances is good. Utter Pradesh is the Hartland for BSP. In other State of India they have not Successed. In 1989 Lok Sabha election BSP Contested 245 all over India & won only 03. One from Panjab & Other two from Uttar Pradesh. They got 4.53 Percent Votes. In 1991 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 231 & won only 02 & got 3.64 Percent Votes. One from Utter Pradesh & another one from c BSP Opened their account in Madhya Pradesh. In Panjab BSP doesn t get any seats. They lost their previous two seats. As Compare to 1989 Lok Sabha election their & votes became less. In 1996 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 210 & won 11 & got 11.21 Percent Votes. This was the highest Performances of BSP in Lok Sabha election. They contested few seats as compare to 1989 & 1991 Lok Sabha election but won highest seat in this election. In Utter Pradesh they got six seats. This is the highest seats in 50

Utter Pradesh. In Madhya Pradesh they got two seats & Panjab they got three seats. In 1998 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 251 & won 05 & got 9.84 Percent Votes. BSP opened their account in Haryana. They got One seat in Haryana. They lost their previous two seats in Utter Pradesh. In 1999 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 225 & won 14 & got 9.97 Percent Votes. They got Fourteen seats in Utter Pradesh. This is the highest Performances of BSP in Utter Pradesh. No other State BSP Won the. In 2004 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 435 & won 19 & got 6.66 Percent Votes. They got Nineteen seats in Utter Pradesh. This is also highest Performances of BSP in Utter Pradesh. But Main fact is that their Votes became less. In 2009 Lok Sabha election BSP s Contested 500 & won 21. They got Twenty seats in Utter Pradesh & One in They got Nineteen seats in Utter Pradesh. Conclusion: In 1989 to 1991 Domians of Maratha opposed by Bahujanvadi politics but bahujan politics not get powerful party nature. The main success of bahujan politics was well selteled political parties gives importance to bahujan leaders. Bahujanvadi politics is not succed to got place. They can t succeed to spate kunbai from Maratha or separated poor Maratha from rich Maratha. But they were successful to got share in political power. In 1998-99 the importance of caste organization increased political interfears of kunbi, mali, and Dangar cast organization increased. The aim of Bahujanvadi politics is to change the exiting party politics but they were not Successful in this task. This is the main limitation of Bahujanvadi politics of BSP. REFERENCES 1) Ambedkar Prakash, 1996, Politics of OBC S, Aurangabad, Prabuda Bharat Publication. 2) Ambedkar Prakash, 1998, Navya Prayayacha Shodat, Aurangabad, Prabuda Bharat Publication. 3) Ambedkar Prakash, 2003, Bahujan Movement : Ideology & Party Organization, Aurangabad, Koshalya Publication. 4) Ambedkar Prakash, 2004, Contemporary Politics & Bahujan Movement, Aurangabad, Koshalya Publication. 5) Gavaskar Mahesh, 1994, Bahujan as vanguards : BSP & BMS in Maharashtra, Economic & Political Weekly, 26 April. 6) Palshikar Suhas, 1994, Politics in Maharashtra : Arrival of the Bahujan Idiom, The Indian Journal of Political Science, July-Sept. 7) Palshikar Suhas, Raeshwari Deshpande & Nitin Birmal, 2009, Maharashtra Polls : Continuity amidst Social Volatility, Economic & Political Weekly,VLXLIV No. 48. 8) Pawar Prakash, 2004, Caste Organization & Politics of Maharashtra, Samaj Prabodan Patrika, Oct-Nov-Dec. 9) Pawar Prakash, 2010, Bahujan Party, in Palshikar Suhas & Kulkarni Suhas (ed.), Power Conflict, Samakalin Publication, Pune. 10) Pawar Prakash, 2011, Samakalin Rajakiya Chalwali : Navahindutva va Jatsanghatna, Diamond Publication, Pune. 51