Philadelphia was not a major destination for immigrants, but at the end of the twentieth century the

Similar documents
the Philadelphia region became more diverse and cosmopolitan as it was energized by immigrants

How Immigrant Businesses Can Bring New Vitality to Downtown Retail #SOSroundtable #GlobalPhilly15

Boston s Emerging Ethnic Quilt: A Geographic Perspective. James P. Allen and Eugene Turner. California State University, Northridge.

The Foreign-Born Population of Southeastern Pennsylvania. By Randy Capps

PRESENT TRENDS IN POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

Illinois: State-by-State Immigration Trends Introduction Foreign-Born Population Educational Attainment

The Latino Population of the New York Metropolitan Area,

REPORT. PR1: Refugee Resettlement Trends in the US. The University of Vermont. Pablo Bose & Lucas Grigri. Photo Credit: L. Grigri

Strategies to Attract and Retain Immigrants in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Dr. Marie Price George Washington University

Analysis of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of African Immigrants in USA

Racial integration between black and white people is at highest level for a century, new U.S. census reveals

Unit II Migration. Unit II Population and Migration 21

A PROFILE OF THE FOREIGN-BORN IN THE PORTLAND, OREGON TRI- COUNTY AREA. Katherine Lotspeich Michael Fix Dan Perez-Lopez Jason Ost.

EQUAL ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE FOR ALL MISSOURIANS

Population Vitality Overview

The New Metropolitan Geography of U.S. Immigration

The Impact of Ebbing Immigration in Los Angeles: New Insights from an Established Gateway

A Portrait of Philadelphia Migration Who is coming to the city and who is leaving

The New Geography of Immigration and Local Policy Responses

THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF GENTRIFICATION ON COMMUNITIES IN CHICAGO

Statement of. Dr. Audrey Singer Immigration Fellow The Brookings Institution. Before the

The Brookings Institution

OUR REGION. Our People

Extended Abstract. The Demographic Components of Growth and Diversity in New Hispanic Destinations

Refugee Resettlement in Small Cities Reports

3/21/ Global Migration Patterns. 3.1 Global Migration Patterns. Distance of Migration. 3.1 Global Migration Patterns

The Impact of Immi ation

The Cost of Segregation

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

Immigrant Communities of Philadelphia: Spatial Patterns and Revitalization

Migration Patterns in New Gateways of Texas The Innerburbs

destination Philadelphia Tracking the City's Migration Trends executive summary

The problem of growing inequality in Canadian. Divisions and Disparities: Socio-Spatial Income Polarization in Greater Vancouver,

Migration Information Source - Chinese Immigrants in the United States

8AMBER WAVES VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3

how neighbourhoods are changing A Neighbourhood Change Typology for Eight Canadian Metropolitan Areas,

The State of Metropolitan America: Suburbs and the 2010 Census Alan Berube, Senior Fellow Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program July 14, 2011

Chapter 8 Ontario: Multiculturalism at Work

Ohio s Immigrants. Toledo and Dayton December 10-11, George Gund Foundation Migration Policy Institute

Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America

Ethnic Diversity, Mixing and Segregation in England and Wales,

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

African Immigrants in Metropolitan Washington A Demographic Overview

The New Geography of Immigration and Local Policy Responses

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

By 1970 immigrants from the Americas, Africa, and Asia far outnumbered those from Europe. CANADIAN UNITED STATES CUBAN MEXICAN

Unit 7. Social Transformations in the United States ( )

REGENERATION AND INEQUALITY IN AMERICA S LEGACY CITIES

URBAN CONCENTRATION: PROSPECTS AND IMPLICATIONS

In abusiness Review article nine years ago, we. Has Suburbanization Diminished the Importance of Access to Center City?

Population Outlook for the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Region

Pittsburgh s Gateway Communities

REPORT. PR2: Refugee Resettlement Trends in the Northeast. The University of Vermont. Pablo Bose & Lucas Grigri

Issue Brief: Immigration and Socioeconomic Status

The Statue of Liberty has long been a symbol of the American ideals that welcome immigrants to

Managing Migration and Integration: Europe and the US March 9, 2012

Relationships between the Growth of Ethnic Groups and Socioeconomic Conditions in US Metropolitan Areas

16% Share of population that is foreign born, 100 largest metro areas, 2008

Immigration, Community and Ethnic Diversity

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

The Potomac Conference

For each of the 50 states, we ask a

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Immigrants, Education and U.S. Economic Competitiveness

3Demographic Drivers. The State of the Nation s Housing 2007

LATINOS IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, NEW YORK, FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY

Migration. What is Migration? Movement. Chapter 3. Key Question: Cyclic Movement movement away from home for a short period.

From Africa to Philadelphia

The Borough of Newham, in East London

Urban Vitality, Diversity, and Culture: Population Growth and Ethnic Change in Philadelphia:

Migration and Settlement (MIG)

Principles of Cultural Geography

Levels and trends in international migration

FUTURES NETWORK WEST MIDLANDS WORKING PAPER 1. Demographic Issues facing the West Midlands

2.1 SOCIETAL ISSUES & IMMIGRATION UNIT 2 PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION. 1890s 1920s

FROM ELLIS ISLAND TO THE QUEEN CITY: IMMIGRATION GEOGRAPHY AND CHARLOTTE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY

CHAPTER 6: WHERE AND WHY PEOPLE MOVE

RISING GLOBAL MIGRANT POPULATION

MIGRATION TRENDS IN SOUTH AMERICA

Working Overtime: Long Commutes and Rent-burden in the Washington Metropolitan Region

Economic Segregation in the Housing Market: Examining the Effects of the Mount Laurel Decision in New Jersey

Immigration and Domestic Migration in US Metro Areas: 2000 and 1990 Census Findings by Education and Race

This Could Be the Start of Something Big: Looking for the New America

Snapshots of the past

African immigrants in the Washington region: a demographic overview

Canadian Orientation Abroad (COA) for Canada-Bound Refugees and Migrants

AMERICA S GLOBAL IMAGE REMAINS MORE POSITIVE THAN CHINA S BUT MANY SEE CHINA BECOMING WORLD S LEADING POWER

The Cultural Landscape Eleventh Edition

Chester County Immigration & Naturalization Maps

What's Driving the Decline in U.S. Population Growth?

Astrid S. Rodríguez Fellow, Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies. Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies

CREATING THE U.S. RACIAL ORDER DYNAMIC 3: IMMIGRATION

Setting the Context on South Asian Americans: Demographics, Civic Engagement, Race Relations. Alton Wang & Karthick Ramakrishnan AAPI Data

Chapter 3 Lecture. Chapter 3 Migration. Tim Scharks Green River College Pearson Education, Inc.

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

OLDER INDUSTRIAL CITIES

Understanding Residential Patterns in Multiethnic Cities and Suburbs in U.S. and Canada*

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Characteristics of the Ethnographic Sample of First- and Second-Generation Latin American Immigrants in the New York to Philadelphia Urban Corridor

Transcription:

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 1 Immigration, 1930-Present (Extract) By Daniel Amsterdam and Domenic Vitiello Source: The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia http://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/archive/immigration-1930-present/ For most of the decades since the United States immigration restriction acts of the 1920s, Philadelphia was not a major destination for immigrants, but at the end of the twentieth century the region re-emerged as a significant gateway. Beginning with changes in U.S. law in 1965 and accelerating by the 1990s, immigration added large, diverse groups of newcomers to the city and suburbs. Immigrants and refugees dramatically altered the region s economic, social, and political life and its geography of race and ethnicity. While the city and region remained more black and white than the global cities of New York, Los Angeles, or Miami, newcomers from Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Eastern Europe significantly diversified the population of Greater Philadelphia. During and after World War II, with limited foreign migration, internal migrations transformed the city and region. From the 1940s through the 80s, two major demographic trends the Second Great Migration of African Americans and mass suburbanization of the region s white population were joined by a third smaller, but significant development, the Great Migration of Puerto Ricans. Between 1940 and 1980, the nine-county region s black population grew from 330,000 to more than one million. The Puerto Rican population expanded from 3,000 in 1950 to almost 55,000 in 1980, and by 2010 to more than 120,000, the second-largest Puerto Rican population in the country, behind only New York. As U.S. citizens, Puerto Ricans are not an immigrant group, but as migrants to the mainland they became the largest group of newcomers to Philadelphia since the 1920s whose first language was not English. Puerto Ricans and African Americans settled mainly in the old rowhouse neighborhoods in Philadelphia and working class suburbs like Norristown, places earlier immigrants and their children left in the post-world War II era. Unlike earlier generations, however, the new migrants

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 2 entered a region whose manufacturing economy crashed in the 1950s through the 80s, as the jobs that had sustained these communities disappeared. Socially, economically, and spatially, in this period the region became a different destination for new immigrants. Although the federal government re-opened the borders with new immigration regulations in 1965, immigrant settlement in Philadelphia intensified and diversified only after 1980 and to a greater extent after 1990. New immigrants came from a much wider range of countries outside of Europe, with large numbers of Indians, Mexicans, Southeast Asians, Africans, Chinese, and Koreans in the city and suburbs. They entered a new regional economy, with the bulk of jobs dispersed in the suburbs, including high-paid posts in service and scientific sectors like health care, higher education, finance, computers, and pharmaceuticals. These jobs have attracted well-educated immigrants, while working class immigrants have found work in food and domestic service and other low-wage jobs. These trends marked significant changes in immigration to the region and nation, as today s newcomers are far more diverse socially and economically than the working class immigrants from Europe a century ago. In national context, late twentieth-century Philadelphia illustrated distinct patterns and challenges of newcomer settlement in a low-immigration region that remained largely white and black and continued to struggle with the legacy of deindustrialization, patterns shared with other Rustbelt regions and re-emerging gateways like Baltimore and Milwaukee. When new immigrants began to arrive in sizeable numbers in the early 1980s, they did not immediately follow local jobs to the suburbs. Instead, most initially settled in the old, economically debilitated urban core, where they found a city divided sharply between black and white with a small but growing Latino population, primarily Puerto Rican, and an old Chinatown struggling to survive urban renewal. Almost exclusively white suburbs encircled the city. Yet many of the less upwardly mobile descendants of old immigrants remained in the city, vying, sometimes violently, with blacks for power, turf, and the political upper hand. For new immigrants, the precipitous fall in the city s

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 3 population that coincided with deindustrialization meant readily available housing, but often amid racial and economic tension. [ ] By 1990 Koreans also made up a sizeable proportion of Asian immigrants in Philadelphia, illustrating different conditions of migration but also some similarities in settlement experiences. Middle-class Koreans, frustrated with opportunities in their own country, took advantage of the 1965 immigration law s skills-based employment preference system. Others obtained professional training in the United States and remained in the area. Once settled, Korean immigrants sponsored their relatives visa petitions, a broad pattern shared with other immigrants. Many Koreans with high levels of education struggled to transfer their credentials or to overcome an initial language barrier, and hence gravitated toward small business ownership rather than professional jobs, often experiencing considerable downward mobility for a time. [ ] Also fueling the growth, diversification, and suburbanization of the immigrant population in Philadelphia, a diverse mix of immigrants and refugees arrived from Africa, hailing from over thirty countries with Liberia and Nigeria the largest groups in the region. Highly educated Africans began arriving soon after the 1965 immigration law was passed, and many went on to sponsor the migration of family members. Beginning in the 1980s and continuing in the new millennium, first Ethiopian and Eritrean refugees, and then people displaced by wars in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, and Sudan, settled in the metropolitan area. Most came from large African cities and settled in West and Southwest Philadelphia, Delaware and Newcastle Counties, and Trenton, while some Sudanese moved to Northeast Philadelphia. Black immigrants and refugees further illustrated the complexity of newcomers diversity of experiences. Although African immigrants to the United States had the highest educational attainment of any other immigrant group, they struggled on the whole to transfer their skills to the

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 4 U.S. Africans in Philadelphia established employment niches in nursing homes, home health-care for the elderly, parking lots, and taxi service. Liberians, Sierra Leoneans, and later Haitians were granted Temporary Protected Status, meaning the U.S. government expects them to ultimately return to their countries, adding to an already diverse range of legal statuses. African and Caribbean immigrants and refugees largely settled in black neighborhoods, suffering most of the same ill effects of segregation and discrimination as their African American neighbors. Pan-African organizing and civil society, however, succeeded in forging a politics of shared prosperity by the early twenty-first century, partly in response to violence between young native and immigrant blacks. Joining black immigrants in reinforcing black-white segregation were Eastern Europeans who settled in the 1980s and 90s especially in the predominantly Jewish sections of Northeast Philadelphia and surrounding suburbs. Many were refugees and their families, from the USSR, Russia, and Ukraine. Poles settled in the old Polish enclave of Port Richmond. Albanian Muslims were resettled in Fishtown and South Kensington, overlapping a small Palestinian enclave that had formed after the Yom Kippur War in 1973. In the 1990s, Indian and Mexican immigrants finally supplanted Italians and Germans as the largest foreign-born groups in the region, as Greater Philadelphia experienced more substantial and diverse immigration continuing into the early twenty-first century. Mexican settlement in South Philadelphia and Norristown signaled the health of the downtown and suburban service economies, including the Center City restaurant scene and regional construction boom. The region s South Asian population, predominantly Indian, mostly came for middle class jobs and higher education, settling in Northeast Philadelphia, King of Prussia and other suburbs. Some working class Indians and Bangladeshis also settled in West Philadelphia and Millbourne, a tiny borough in Delaware County and the first majority-indian municipality in the U.S. Chinese immigration in this era also included both professional and working classes, who lived in the historic downtown Chinatown and

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 5 satellite Chinatowns in Cherry Hill and South and Northeast Philadelphia. Like Africans, these groups illustrated the bifurcation of immigrants economic and residential experiences in the late twentieth century. In 2008 the city of Philadelphia gained population for the first time since the 1950s, propelled mainly by immigration, which also helped reverse population loss in Norristown and other older suburbs and towns. According to a Brookings Institution report that year, among similar metropolitan areas Philadelphia had the largest and fastest growing immigrant population. Immigrants made up roughly nine percent of the region s population, still lower than the national average though the area was an increasingly important destination. Many of its foreign-born moved to the area after originally having settled elsewhere in the U.S., especially the New York region, often choosing Greater Philadelphia because of its lower costs of property and starting businesses compared to other major urban centers.

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 6 By 2000, the map of foreign-born population in the region illustrated major centers and corridors of settlement. Higher-income immigrants clustered along the route 202 corridor with its concentration of jobs in pharmaceuticals and other technology sectors, running from the suburbs of Trenton in the northeast corner of the region to the west-southwest through Bucks, Montgomery, and Chester counties and turning south to the suburbs of Wilmington in Newcastle County. Superdiverse, global neighborhoods had emerged in South and Upper North Philadelphia and in Upper Darby just west of the city. As the map shows, since the 1980s a Mexican community helped sustain Kennett Square in southern Chester County as the world capital of mushroom production, as well as agriculture in Bridgeton, Vineland, and other parts of South Jersey. In the early twenty-first century, Greater Philadelphia also became a national center of immigration debates and movements. Beginning in the 1990s the city had a sanctuary policy of protecting unauthorized immigrants by forbidding local police from asking for immigration papers. In 2003, Norristown passed a law recognizing the Mexican consular identification card for access to municipal services and banks. On February 14, 2006, Independence Mall was the site of the first Day Without an Immigrant rally of mainly Mexican restaurant workers. By that spring, headlines juxtaposed large immigrant rights marches against disputes over an English-Only sign in the storefront window of the city s famous Geno s Steaks. That summer and fall, first the town of Hazleton in the Poconos, then Riverside, New Jersey, and then Bridgeport, Pennsylvania, passed illegal immigration relief acts to punish landlords and employers of unauthorized immigrants. Riverside repealed its act when it saw people leave, local businesses suffer, and out of embarrassment from negative national press. In some ways the recent dynamics of newcomer settlement and debates over immigration recall the era of mass European immigration a century earlier, though much about the new immigration is indeed new. For example, the experiences of recent Mexican immigrants resemble those of earlier generations of Italians, from their roles as cheap labor in booming food and

The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia 7 construction industries to the fear they have encountered among receiving communities about housing overcrowding and integration. Yet the legal status of many new working class immigrants was quite different, partly since immigration restrictions barely existed for Europeans a century ago. Receiving communities politics of immigration remained fragmented and polarized, yet their responses took new forms. Moreover, newcomers of the early twenty-first century settled in a region with new geographies and structures of opportunity. Finally, the newest immigration was more diverse than older eras of immigration, in every way. It began to push Philadelphia and many of its suburbs beyond the black-white binary of their twentieth century population and neighborhood identities. This chart shows the changing ethnic makeup of the Philadelphia region from 1970 to 2006.