UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Similar documents
Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

Case 1:05-cr PAS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 8 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

IN THE DISTMCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES For the Western District of New York

Case 6:08-cr CJS Document 76 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

Alien Smuggling: Recent Legislative Developments

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

Alien Smuggling: Recent Legislative Developments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

Case 1:13-cr RP-RAW Document 2 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF row A

Case 1:15-cr WJM Document 18 Filed 05/19/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

4:18-cr JMG-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

-v.- : SEALED INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Harboring: Overview of the Law

Case 1:16-cr RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2016 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COVERSHEET

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

Case 1:09-cr LEK Document 121 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 902 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 3:17-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF falifornia

2:18-cr DCN Date Filed 11/14/18 Entry Number 3 Page 1 of 7

Case 5:12-cv KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

) ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1349

Case 2:12-cr CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

RACKETEERING CHARGES

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 S 1 SENATE BILL 604. Short Title: NC Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act. (Public) April 19, 2011

State and Local Enforcement of Federal Immigration Law. The Arizona Experiment

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAMION ST. PATRICK BASTON, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Follow this and additional works at:

Trafficking People and Involuntary Servitude

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Forfeiture INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

Case 3:13-cv B Document 1 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

SANCTUARY CONGREGATIONS AND HARBORING FAQ THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY.

I l'_ r: MKM::MKP/TH F. #2017R01840

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:05-cr MGC Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Case 2:14-cr BP Document 14 Filed 11/05/14 Page 1 of 15

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT COUNT I

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR. EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER (Executive Order of Removal)

Case 1:12-cr JCC Document 11 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. Crim. No. I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIKiINIA. Alexandria Division SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. General Allegations

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:

22 Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury and continuing up. 23 to and including October 15, 2014, within the Southern District of

1. At all times relevant to this' Second Superseding Indictment, defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

Impact of Arizona v. United States and Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Governor of Georgia on Georgia s Immigration Law 1

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, (A)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:13-cr Document #: 24 Filed: 04/14/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:108

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: CF (B) 02

CHARGE TO GRAND JURY TREASON. [4 Blatchf. 518; 1 23 Law Rep. 597.] Circuit Court, S. D. New York. Jan. 14, 1861.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Diego, California. United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI DALLAS DIVISION 5 CR NO. 3:02-CR-052-R INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

SUBSTANTIVE JURY INSTRUCTIONS United States v. W. Carl Reichel No. 15-cr DPW. This case started with this document, the Indictment.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

2017 CO 98. No. 13SC128 Fuentes-Espinoza v. People Alien Smuggling Field Preemption Conflict Preemption.

(a) All motions shall be accompanied by a memorandum in support of the relief sought in the motion. The memorandum shall

Case 1:09-cr GBL Document 27 Filed 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ) ) ) INDICTMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Case 1:15-cr JCC Document 1 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007

Case 1:07-cr LEK Document 242 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 33

Case 3:17-cr JO Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:06-cr DTKH Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:18-cr DLF Document 7 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JUAN GARCIA 1. PROSTITUTION/PROCURE OR SOLICIT ANOTHER TO COMMIT (2)(F) MISD.

(Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization) 1. On or about and between May 15, 2014 and January 12, 2015, both dates

Transcription:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. GEOFFREY RODRIGUES, ROBERTO YOSVANY HERNANDEZ, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, RAMON BATISTA and GUILLERMO VALDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-10009-CR-MOORE(s) 18 U.S.C. 371 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) Defendants. / The Grand Jury charges that: SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT COUNT 1 From in or about July 2004, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, and continuing through on or about November 19, 2004, in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, GEOFFREY RODRIGUES, ROBERTO YOSVANY HERNANDEZ, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, RAMON BATISTA and GUILLERMO VALDEZ, did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit offenses against the United States, that is:

(A) to bring aliens to the United States, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such aliens had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, and reside in the United States, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such aliens for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii); (B) knowingly and in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, to transport, or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(2)(A)(B)(ii) and to, (C) knowingly and in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(I). PURPOSE AND OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY It was the purpose and object of the conspiracy for the defendants to unlawfully enrich themselves by smuggling Cuban major league baseball prospects as well as other Cuban nationals. MANNER AND MEANS USED TO ACCOMPLISH THE CONSPIRACY 2

The manner and means by which the defendants sought to accomplish the purpose and object of the conspiracy included, but were not limited to, the following: 1. Co-conspirators solicited potential major league prospects in Cuba with the intent to bring them into the United States. 2. Co-conspirators attempted to smuggle and smuggled the recruited baseball players as well as other Cuban aliens into the United States via go-fast vessels. 3. Upon arrival into the United States, co-conspirators separated the baseball players from the other Cuban nationals and transported them to California by motor vehicle. 4. Once in California, co-conspirators arranged and paid for the housing, transportation, and subsistence for five baseball players. 5. Co-conspirators failed to disclose the whereabouts and identity of the illegal aliens to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement. OVERT ACTS In furtherance of the conspiracy and to achieve the purpose thereof, at least one of the conspirators committed or caused to be committed, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, at least one of the following overt acts, among others: 1. On or about July 13, 2004, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ caused a wire transfer to be drawn on the account of a person known to the Grand Jury as (H.B.) at Commercial Capital Bank, Account No. 141-051-094 made payable to a person known to the Grand Jury as 3

(Y.M.S.) in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). 2. On or about July 20, 2004, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, caused a wire transfer to be drawn on the account of a person known to the Grand Jury as (H.B.) at Commercial Capital Bank, Account No.141-051-094 made payable to a person known to the Grand Jury as (Y.M.S..) in the amount of fifty thousand dollars($50,000). 3. On or about July 21, 2004, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, caused a wire transfer to be drawn on the account of a person known to the Grand Jury as (H.B.) at Commercial Capital Bank, Account No.141-051-094 made payable to RAMON BATISTA, in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars($1,500). 4. On or about July 28, 2004, GEOFFREY RODRIGUES, took approximately twentytwo (22) Cuban nationals onboard a 28' vessel. 5. On about July 28, 2004, GEOFFREY RODRIGUES traveled on the high seas aboard a 28' vessel bearing Florida Registration Number FL5005MK, and containing approximately twentytwo (22) Cuban nationals. 6. On or about July 28, 2004, GEOFFREY RODRIGUES repeatedly attempted to evade a Customs and Border Protection vessel while at sea aboard the 28' vessel. 7. On or about August 22, 2004, ROBERTO YOSVANY HERNANDEZ took approxi mately ninetee n (19) Cuban 4

nationa ls onboar d a vessel of unkno wn size. 8. On about August 22, 2004, ROBERTO YOSVANY HERNANDEZ traveled on the high seas aboard a vessel of unknown size containing approximately nineteen (19) Cuban nationals. 9. On or about August 22, 2004, RAMON BATISTA rented two (2) vans from AVIS at 2230 N.W. 27 th Avenue, Miami, Florida. 10. On or about August 23, 2004, RAMON BATISTA and GUILLERMO VALDEZ began traveling from Miami, Florida to Los Angeles, California. 11. On or about September 3, 2004, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, caused a wire transfer to be drawn on the account of a person known to the Grand Jury as (H.B.) at Commercial Capital Bank, Account No.141-051-094 made payable to a person known to the Grand Jury as (L.M.) in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000). All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. 5

COUNTS 2-23 On or about July 28, 2004, upon the high seas and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or district, with Monroe County, in the Southern District of Florida, being the first district where the offenders were brought, the defendants, GEOFFREY RODRIGUES and GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, did knowingly attempt to bring aliens, named below, to the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, as set forth below in Counts 2 through 23, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such aliens had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter and reside in the United States, regardless of any official action which might later be taken with respect to such aliens: COUNT ALIEN 2. Roberto Abreu-Alvarez 3. Maria-Amalia Alvarez-Oliva 4. Boris Rolo Barrachina 5. Francisely Bueno-Trueba 6. Osbew Castillo-Perez 7. Domirys Contreras-Ferreira 8. Ignacio Figueredo-Gomez 9. Yamaris Gill-Quesada 10. Allen Guevara-Perez 11. Edelberto Hernandez-Orijuela 12. Manuel Marquez-Vasquez 6

13. Osmany Masso-Arredondo 14. Ivet Nurquez-Alvarez 15. Jose Nurquez-Alvarez 16. Jorge Luis Perez 17. Zulgidy RODRIGUES-Miranda 18. Daysi Trueba-Brown 19. Yoankis Turino-Montalno 20. M.R.N. (minor) 21. Y.H.B. (minor) 22. A.M.A. (minor) 23. R.P.A. (minor). All in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. COUNTS 23-42 On or about August 22, 2004, in Monroe County, in the Southern District of Florida, the defendants, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ and ROBERTO YOSVANY HERNANDEZ, did knowingly bring aliens, named below, to the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, as set forth below in Counts 23 through 42, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such aliens had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter and reside in the United States, regardless of any official action which might later be taken with respect to such aliens: 7

COUNT ALIEN 24 Roberto Abreu-Alvarez 25. Edelberto Hernandez-Orihuela 26. Boris Rolo Barrachina 27. Francisely Bueno-Trueba 28 Osbek Castillo-Perez 29. Domirys Contreras-Ferreira 30. Ignacio Figueredo-Gomez 31. Yamaris Gil-Quesada 32. Allen Guevara-Perez 33. Manuel Marquez-Vasquez 34. Osmany Masso-Arredondo 35. Ivet Nurquez-Alvarez 36. Jose Nurquez-Alvarez 37. Jorge Luis Perez 38. Daysi Trueba-Bueno 39. Yoankis Turino-Montalno 40. Y.H.B. (minor) 41. A.M.A. (minor) 42. M.R.N.. (minor). All in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. 8

COUNT 43-47 From in or about August 22, 2006 and continuing through on or about November 19, 2006, in Miami-Dade County in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ, RAMON BATISTA and GUILLERMO VALDEZ, did knowingly and in reckless disregard of the fact that aliens, named below, had come to and entered and remained in the United States in violation of law, transported and moved such aliens within the United States; in violation of Title 8, United States by means of transportation and otherwise in furtherance of such violation of law; COUNT ALIEN 43. Osmany Masso-Arredondo 44. Allen Guevara-Perez 45. Francisely Bueno-Trueba 46. Osbek Castillo-Perez 47. Yoankis Turino-Montalno All in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Sections 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(ii). COUNT 48-52 From in or about August 22, 2006 and continuing through on or about November 19, 2006, in Miami-Dade County in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, GUSTAVO GUS DOMINGUEZ and 9

RAMON BATISTA, did knowingly and in reckless disregard of the fact that aliens had remained in the United States, in violation of law, conceal, harbor, and shield from detection such aliens in any place, including any building and any means of transportation for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain; COUNT ALIEN 48. Osmany Masso-Arredondo 49. Allen Guevara-Perez 50. Francisely Bueno-Trueba 51. Osbek Castillo-Perez 52. Yoankis Turino-Montalno All in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Sections 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(ii). A TRUE BILL FOREPERSON R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 10

BENJAMIN DANIEL ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 11