Professor Dr. Thomas König: Selected Topics in International Politics: International Institutions: Understanding European Decision Making (IP)

Similar documents
Overview and Objectives

Comparing European Democracies Draft Syllabus

European Community Studies Association Newsletter (Spring 1999) INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSES OF EUROPEAN UNION GEORGE TSEBELIS

POLI 242 Fall 2015 The European Union and Global Governance 12-2:50pm

Why do member states waste their time? Legislative oversight in the EU decision making process. Thomas König

Do Nationality and Partisanship link Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament in the Legislative Process?

Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Inputs, Processes and Outputs in Legislative Decision-Making before and after Enlargement

Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision making

Political Institutions and Policy-Making in the European Union. Fall 2007 Political Science 603

Comparing European Democracies

Designing Democratic Institutions: Legitimacy and the Reform of the Council of the European Union in the Lisbon Treaty 1

SUB Hamburg A/ THE EUROPEAN UNION. Critical Concepts in Political Science. Edited by Simon Usherwood

The Empowered European Parliament

Compliance in the European Union. A strategic analysis of the interaction between member states and the Commission in

Jonathan B. Slapin. University of Essex Tel: +44 (0) Wivenhoe Park Colchester, CO4 3SQ United Kingdom

Research on the European Union

Comparative Legislative Politics

Supranational Agenda Setters in the European Union: Rapporteurs in the European Parliament

Syllabus International Cooperation

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver. Tel:

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics. V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver Tel:

European Integration

DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY BEYOND THE NATION-STATE

Evidence with insight: what models contribute to EU research

Coalition-Formation, Cleavages and Voting Behavior in the Council of the European Union

Research on European Integration

Forum Section. Matthew Gabel. Simon Hix. Gerald Schneider. University of Konstanz, Germany

Strategic Roll Call Vote Requests

Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers*

Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers

ANTICIPATING RESISTANCE: THE EFFECT OF MEMBER STATE PREFERENCES COMMISSION S AGENDA- SETTING ACTIVITY ON THE EUROPEAN

The following books are required and available at the UR book store:

Christopher Wratil CONTACT INFORMATION. Cologne Center for Comparative Politics University of Cologne Herbert-Lewin-Str Cologne Germany

Do great expectations in Brussels fail due to political disagreement in Stockholm?

Western European Politics

Measurement, model testing, and legislative influence in the European Union

COMPARATIVE POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Political Science 7972

Rhodes College. Department of International Studies

Domestic Policy Dimensions and European Union Negotiations: Voting Rules in the Council

Chapter 2: Literature review

UC-BERKELEY. Center on Institutions and Governance Working Paper No. 3. Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament

Christopher Wratil CONTACT INFORMATION. Cologne Center for Comparative Politics University of Cologne Herbert-Lewin-Str Cologne Germany

The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives

The European Union: Politics and Political Economy (PS 338)

Il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux. (One must imagine Sisyphus happy.) Albert Camus, Le Mythe de Sisyphe

Domestic elections and the timing of international decisions 1

ISC340: An Introduction to the European Union Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday

Coalition formation on major policy dimensions: The Council of the European Union 1998 to 2004

Negative preference interdependence, continuous concessions, and the division of reform gains in the making of the Lisbon Treaty.

CURRENT CHALLENGES TO EU GOVERNANCE

PS489: Federalizing Europe? Structure and Behavior in Contemporary European Politics

Political Science 959 International Organizations Spring 2016

(Work in progress; comments are welcome) 1. Asya Zhelyazkova and Cansarp Kaya

Summer school of the ECPR Standing Group on International Relations

International Political Economy

European Integration: Theory and Political Process

SUSPENDING VETOES: HOW THE EURO COUNTRIES ACHIEVED UNANIMITY IN THE FISCAL COMPACT. George Tsebelis and Hyeonho Hahm. University of Michigan

Bargaining Power in the European Union An Evaluation of Competing Game-Theoretic Models

Barbara Koremenos The continent of international law. Explaining agreement design. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

Paper prepared for the workshop, Decision-Making in the European Union Before and After Lisbon, November 3-4, 2011, Leiden University.

V2. 1/23/17 Harvard University Department of Government Government 2335: Power in American Society Spring 2017

(The Informal Sector and Economic Growth in Economic Development)

POL-GA Comparative Government and Institutions New York University Spring 2017

The Impact of Enlargement on Legislative Decision Making in the European Union

Exit Costs, Veto Rights, and Integration: Bargaining Power in International Organizations and Federal Systems

Explaining the constitutionalization of the European Union

Post-accession compliance between administrative co-ordination and political bargaining*

European Integration, Intergovernmental Bargaining, and Convergence of Party Programmes

FEDERAL SYSTEMS: THE EU, US AND INDIA COMPARED

Syllabus for the Seminar on EU Federalism and Democracy 1st term, Fall 2012

DOES EUROSCEPTICISM MATTER? THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC OPINION ON INTEGRATION. Christopher J. Williams, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of

FORMAL AND INFORMAL RATIFICATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION APPOINTMENT, PREFERENCES, AND INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS

Voting Behavior in the Council of the European Union after the 2004 Enlargement

Matthew Joseph Gabel

The Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany

Political Science 201 Political Choice and Strategy. 115 Ingram Hall, Mondays/Wednesdays 2:30 to 3:45 p.m.

The Empowerment of the European Parliament

EU policy, domestic interests, and the transposition of directives

Neither Goethe nor Bismarck: on the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies

Political conflict within and between the European Parliament and Council of Ministers

Central European MEPs as Agents of Two Principals. Party Cohesion in the European Parliament after Enlargement

Bicameral Politics in the European Union

Political Science 6040 AMERICAN PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS Summer II, 2009

MA Seminar: The Lisbon Summit and European Narratives (HOMER- Seminar)

American Democracy and the Policymaking Process Prof. Steve Jackson Syllabus September 3, 2013

PPG1001: THE POLICY PROCESS School of Public Policy and Governance University of Toronto Winter 2016

POLI239: Introduction to European Government Spring 2014 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Political Science

Multilateralism and Referendum Success

Introduction to Comparative Politics or permission of the instructor.

Directed Research Seminar in Theories and Methods of Political Science, Part II (Spring Semester)

Political Science 274 Political Choice and Strategy

Working Title: When Progressive Law Hits Home: The Race and Employment Equality Directives in Austria, Germany and Spain

EUROPEAN UNION (NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

POLS 3210: Western European Government & Politics

Spring 2011; 3/4 credits

Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark and Matt Golder (2006) 'Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses', Political Analysis

POLICY ANALYSIS AND POLICY DESIGN

Course Description Teaching Methods and Evaluation

Working Paper Series

Transcription:

Seminar FS 2014 Professor Dr. Thomas König: Selected Topics in International Politics: International Institutions: Understanding European Decision Making (IP) Di 10.15 in B 143 Course Description: This seminar is about European decision making, which comprises decision making at the constitutional (treaty), legislative, implementation and enforcement level. For all these decisions, several explanations exist, which we attempt to examine empirically. Students can select a topic of their choice and search for scholarly articles on these topics. Ideally, this search reviews the state of research, the method used and the reported findings. Recommended search routines refer to scholarly journals, such as the special EU journals EUP, JEPP and JCMS, and the broader journals like IO, APSR, AJPS and BJPS, but systematic searches can also be done by using the SSCI. The Grading comprises a literature search fort he chosen topic (20%), the presentation of topic (20%), the paper on the topic (40%) and the participation in the discussions (20%) Recommended Literature: Simon Hix/, Bjørn Høyland (2011), The Political System of the European Union, Palgrave Mac Millan. Daniel Finke, Thomas König, Sven-Oliver Proksch, George Tsebelis (2012), Reforming the European Union: Realizing the Impossible, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Seite 2 Kenneth A. Shepsle, Mark S. Bonchek (2010), Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior and Instititutions: Rationality, Behavior and Institutions, Norton&Co. Recommended for: Master Students Political Science, CDSS students Registration: via Student Portal Office hours: Di, 14.00-15.00 und nach Vereinbarung, Raum A 354 (in A5, 6)

Seite 3 Schedule of Topics and Readings 1. Introduction to the course (11.2.) 2. Emergence of the European Union (18.2.) Andrew Moravcsik, 1998, The Choice for Europe, chapter 1 3. Accessions and the citizens support (25.2.) Frank Schimmelfennig, 2001, The Community Trap: Liberal Norm, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union, International Organization, 55 (1), 47-80. Thomas König and Thomas Bräuninger, 2004, Accession and Reform of the European Union A Game- Theoretical Analysis of Eastern Enlargement and the Constitutional Reform, European Union Politics, (5 (4), 420-439. 4. Agenda setting by the European Commission and Nominating Commissioners (4.3.) Christophe Crombez, 2000, Policy Making and Commission Appointment in the European Union, in: Decision Rules in the European Union: A Rational Choice Perspective, Peter Moser, Gerald Schneider and Gebhard Kirchgaessner eds., London: Macmillan Stefan Napel and Mika Widgrén, 2008, The European Commission- Appointment, Preferences, and Institutional Relations, Public Choice, Vol. 137, No. 1/2., Roland Vaubel, 1994, The Political Economy of Centralization and the European Community Public Choice, Vol. 81, No. 1/2, pp. 151-190 Page Scan Article PDF Article Summary 5. Voting in the Council and Delegating Council Representatives (11.3.) Mattila, Mikko an Jan- Erik Lane, 2001, Why unanimity in the Council?: A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting, European Union Politics, 2 (1): 32-52. Schulz, Heiner and Thomas König, 2000, "Institutional Reform and Decision- Making Efficiency in the European Union." American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 653-666. König, Thomas, 2008, "Why do member states waste their time? Legislative oversight in the EU decision making process." Political Science and Political Economy Conference on" Designing Democratic Institutions", London School of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 13. No. 15.5. 18.3. entfällt

Seite 4 6. Transposition in the EU (25.3.) Toshkov, Dimiter and Bernard Steunenberg, 2009, Comparing Transposition in the 27 Member States of the EU: The Impact of Discretion and Legal Fit. Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 16 (7), pp. 951-70. König, Thomas and Brooke Luetgert, 2009, "Troubles with Transposition? Explaining Trends in Member- State Notification and the Delayed Transposition of EU Directives." British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1): 163-194. Fabio Franchino and Bjørn Høyland, 2009, "Legislative Involvement in Parliamentary Systems: Opportunities, Conflict, and Institutional Constraints" American Political Science Review vol. 103, pp. 607-621. König, Thomas and Bernd Luig, 2013, "Ministerial Gatekeeping and Parliamentary Involvement in the Implementation Process of EU Directives", Public Choice, first published online 4 October 2013. 7. Compliance in the EU (1.4) Tallberg, Jonas, 2002, Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union, International Organization, 56(3): 609-643. König, Thomas and Lars Mäder, 2014, The Strategic Nature of Compliance: An Empirical Evaluation of Law Implementation in the Central Monitoring System of the European Union, American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1): 246 263. Thomson, Robert, Rene Torenvlied, and Javier Arregui, 2007, The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delay in Transposing European Union Directives. British Journal of Political Science, 37(4): 685 709 Toshkov, Dimiter, 2008, Embracing European Law: Compliance with EU Directives in Central and Eastern Europe. European Union Politics, 9(3): 379 402. 8. Public Support of the EU (8.4.) Finke, Daniel und Thomas König, 2009, Why risk popular ratification failure? A comparative analysis of the choice of the ratification instrument in the 25 Member States the EU, Const. Polit. Econ, 20: 341-365. Hug, Simon and George Tsebelis, 2002, Veto Players and Referendums Around the World, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14 (4): 465-515.

Seite 5 Anderson, Christopher J. and Karl C. Kaltenthaler, 1996, The Dynamics of Public Opinion toward European Integration, 1973-93, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (2):175-199. Gabel, Matthew,1998, Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories, The Journal of Politics, 60 (2): 333-354. Osterferien 9. Amending the European Parliament and Voting in parliamentary elections (29.4.) 10. The European Central Bank (6.5) 11. Popular parties in Europe (13.5.) 12. The EU and climate change (20.5.) 13. The EU in Crisis (27.5.) End