Deportation Appeals. Challenging the Home Office decision to deport you before you can appeal (Certification under s.94b)

Similar documents
Deportation Appeals. Challenging the Home Office decision to deport you before you can appeal (Certification under EEA Regulation 33)

Deportation Appeals for non-eea Nationals. A Basic Overview

A basic guide to making an application to revoke a Deportation Order for Non EEA Nationals based on family and/or private life (Article 8) in the UK

Exceptional Funding. Applying for Legal Aid in Deportation Cases. A Guide for Individuals

Deportation Appeals. Fees for Deportation Appeals A Basic Guide

Deportation Appeals. EEA Nationals. Length of Residence

GETTING PROBATION APPROVAL FOR YOUR IMMIGRATION BAIL ADDRESS (PRIVATE ADDRESS)

Deportation Appeals. Representing Yourself in the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) in an Article 8 Deportation Appeal

Deportation Appeals. Preparing your Article 8 Deportation Appeal

Schedule 10, Immigration Act 2016

This submission 4. This submission addresses each of the questions raised in the Committee s consultation paper in turn.

HOWTO GET OUT OF DETENTION

2. Appellants who are in immigration detention are already expedited through the Detained Immigration Appeals (DIA) process. 1

HOW TO GET OUT OF DETENTION

BRIEFING: Immigration Bill, House of Lords Second Reading, 22 December 2015.

BID Volunteer Caseworker

Appealing to the Support Tribunal

Consultation on the 2011 Bail Guidance Joint submission from the Immigration Law Practitioners Association and Bail for Immigration Detainees

JUSTICE CONFERENCE 2017: IMMIGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS UPDATE: ARTICLE 8 ECHR AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Judicial Reviews. Judicial reviews and legal aid

Alison Harvey, Legal Director ILPA for AVID 12 June 2015

Section 94B: The impact upon Article 8 and the appeal rights. The landscape post-kiarie. Admas Habteslasie Landmark Chambers

Immigration Detention

SUBMISSION FROM BAIL FOR IMMIGRATION DETAINEES (BID) FOR THE CONSULTATION ON CODES OF PRACTICE FOR CONDITIONAL CAUTIONS

Gheorghiu (reg 24AA EEA Regs relevant factors) [2016] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Appealing Decisions - Centrelink

Summary and recommendations

The bail tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to assess the lawfulness of detention.

A guide to completing IAFT-5 Appeal Form

Criminal casework Standard paragraphs for bail summaries

Bail for Immigration Detainees: Submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee s Inquiry on Home Office delivery of Brexit: Immigration

Update re cuts to legal aid for immigration advice: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

GATWICK DETAINEES WELFARE GROUP

Response to Immigration and Asylum Appeals: Proposals to Expedite Appeals by Immigration Detainees consultation

Justice Select Committee Inquiry: Impact of changes to civil legal aid under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012

Deportation and Article 8 ECHR. Matthew Fraser 3 October 2018

2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN IMMIGRATION RULES

Information from Bail for Immigration Detainees: Families separated by immigration detention August 2010

VITAL REQUIREMENTS A GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE UP-DATE TO BAIL APPLICATIONS 20TH MAY 2015

IMPORTANT TOEIC UPDATE. Directions given for all TOEIC cases in the Court of Appeal on 20 December 2018

Guidance on Immigration Bail for Judges of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

Ministry of Justice - Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England & Wales RESPONSE FROM BAIL FOR IMMIGRATION DETAINEES

Immigration Act 2014 Article 8 ECHR

Asylum and Humanitarian Document Retention Processes

Immigration Bail Hearings

RECOMMENDATION FOR DEPORTATION FOLLOWING A CRIMINAL CONVICTION

2. Do you think that an expedited immigration appeals process should apply to all those who are detained? If not, why not?

Tribunal Procedure Committee

PRACTICE NOTE 1/2015

Submission to UN Human Rights Committee Treaty Body Process: the UK s compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

IMMIGRATION DETENTION OF PERSONS WITH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DA/00303/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Practical Tips for Possession: The View from the Housing Possession Duty Desk and Exceptional Funding under LASPO

JUDGMENT JUDGMENT GIVEN ON. 14 June Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Wilson Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge Lord Toulson. before

Reforming support for failed asylum seekers and other illegal migrants

KEY FINDINGS Adults at Risk: the ongoing struggle for vulnerable adults in detention

It is important that you apply for asylum as soon as you enter the UK and that you seek legal advice as soon as possible.

Briefing for the Liberal Democrat Policy Review on Asylum, Immigration and Identity

Breach of Human Rights and S4

Pembele (Paragraph 399(b)(i) valid leave meaning) [2013] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before

Laura frequently acts for NGOs and both legally aided and high net worth individuals.

COSTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICAL TIPS

LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS. These Regulations came into force on 1 October 2017

EEA3: PERMANENT RESIDENCE

Notice of [intention to proceed with] an application for a financial order

Claiming asylum. The exception to this is if you arrive to the UK in Northern Ireland - in this situation you claim asylum at Bryson House in Belfast.

Asylum and Immigration Act 2004: An update

Forensic Science Regulator Bill

Prison Reform Trust response to the Parole Board for England and Wales Triennial Review - January 2014

No8 Chambers Immigration Seminar Please complete and return your registration/feedback forms to ensure you are registered for

Information Leaflet for Applicants for International Protection in Ireland (Appeals Procedure)

FACTSHEET THE DETENTION OF MIGRANTS IN THE UK

Recent challenges to accelerated procedures involving detention in the UK

IMMIGRATION LAW TIME LIMITS CHEAT SHEET (Version 3, 21 March 2018) 1. Application for Administrative Review of an eligible decision

BAIL. Guidance Notes for Adjudicators. (Third Edition)

QUESTIONNAIRE RELATED TO

Key pressures on local authority NRPF service provision

CASEWORK BULLETIN. Introduction. Social security Number 1 Law Centre (NI)

The illusory right to liberty: Improving access to immigration bail

REPORT. The liberty deficit: long-term detention & bail decision-making. A study of immigration bail hearings in the First Tier Tribunal

Before : HIS HONOUR JUDGE BIRTLES Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Between :

European Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers

Immigration and Asylum Accreditation - Probationer, level 1 and level 2 Accreditation guidance notes

Ukus (discretion: when reviewable) [2012] UKUT 00307(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Mr C.M.G. Ockelton, Vice President Upper Tribunal Judge Jordan

Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

Application to be released on First-tier Tribunal bail. Form B1. Personal Information of the Applicant. G Are you male or female?

Instruction to transfer-up (if necessary) and enforce a County Court order of possession by Writ of Possession

Parliamentary Inquiry into the use of immigration detention in the UK Submission by the Vulnerable People Working Group of the Detention Forum

Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. 23 July September Before MR C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between

Do Lawyers Pay for Themselves?

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 8 May 2018 On 10 May Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON. Between. KAMAL [A] (anonymity direction not made) and

MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998

Immigration Bail and Studying Coram Children's Legal Centre s briefing, March 2018

Frequently Asked Questions

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/24186 /2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Annex 2: New eligibility category for higher education student support response form

No.8 Chambers Immigration Seminar 2017 CURRENT LAW UPDATE STEPHEN VOKES

CRB checks: eligibility guidance

Transcription:

Deportation Appeals Challenging the Home Office decision to deport you before you can appeal (Certification under s.94b) June 2017

Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) is a national charity that provides legal advice and representation to individuals held under immigration powers to secure their release from detention. We also provide legal advice and representation to detainees facing deportation. BID works with detainees in all removal centres in the UK, and with immigration detainees held in prison at the end of their sentence. We provide free legal advice, information and support to immigration detainees to help them exercise their right to liberty and access to justice, and to help them challenge their deportation. We prepare and present (free of charge) applications for release on bail or temporary admission. We carry out research and use evidence from our legal casework to influence decisionmakers, including civil servants, parliamentarians, and regulatory bodies through policy advocacy. The Article 8 Deportation Advice project (ADAP) is a project that provides free legal advice and representation to individuals challenging deportation on the grounds of their long residence in the UK and/or their family life in the UK. The right to respect for family and private life is protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Disclaimer Although every effort is made to ensure the information in this factsheet is accurate and up to date, it should not be treated as a complete and authoritative statement of the law. BID cannot be held liable for any inaccuracies and their consequences. The information in this factsheet is not legal advice. If you have a legal problem you should talk to a lawyer or legal adviser before making a decision about what to do. Please check that this factsheet is up to date before using it. Please also check whether BID has written other factsheets or leaflets that might be relevant to you. All BID factsheets and leaflets can be found at www.biduk.org Copyright 2017 BID Page 1

The Purpose of this Leaflet and Model Letter The recent Supreme Court case of Kiarie & Byndloss v SSHD [2017] UKSC 42 has found that the system of `certification of a deportation decision under section 94B breaches human rights law because it prevents a person from having an effective right of appeal. This factsheet explains what the Supreme Court judgment means for you if your case has been certified and how you can challenge the certification. You can write to the Home Office using the model letter to be found at the end of this factsheet. Q. What is certification under section 94B? A. The Home Office can `certify the decision to deport a Foreign National Offender who is not an EEA national or the family member of an EEA national. If a case is certified, it means that a person can only appeal the decision to deport once they have been removed from the UK and cannot return to the UK to give evidence at their appeal hearing. The Home Office can only lawfully certify a case if removal from the UK during the appeal period would not be in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. Q. How will I know whether my case has been certified under section 94B? A. The Home Office `Notice of Decision to Deport, which is the letter in which the Home Office gives full reasons for deciding to deport you and is usually served with a Deportation Order, will state whether the decision is certified. You will find this towards the end of the letter. Also, it will state at the very end that you can appeal within 28 days of leaving the UK. Page 2

Q. What does the Supreme Court case of Kiarie & Byndloss mean for people whose cases have been certified under Section 94B? A. The judgment found that the system of certification under s.94b does not provide for an effective right of appeal and therefore breaches the Human Rights Act 1998. It found that a person cannot effectively bring their appeal from abroad because of the very significant obstacles to gathering the evidence needed for the appeal to have any real chance of success. In particular, the Court noted that removal from the UK before an appeal makes it very difficult to: Gather the necessary evidence of length of residence in the UK and of integration into British society; Gather the necessary evidence of the strength of family life in the UK. In particular, it would not be possible to obtain expert reports such as an Independent Social Work report to comment on the relationship between the individual and their children because the expert would need to be able to observe them with the children; Obtain expert evidence on the risk of reoffending, such as a Forensic Psychologist report. This is because the individual would need to be present in the UK for the assessment by the expert to take place for the report to have any real weight as evidence. The court also found that the person who is appealing should be able to give evidence at their appeal. It found that: Evidence in person is more valuable to the court than evidence by video link; A video link may not be generally available and may be very difficult to arrange. It is therefore unlawful to maintain the certificate in deportation cases. The certificates should be cancelled by the Home Office and individuals allowed to remain in the UK to lodge an appeal to the Immigration & Asylum Chamber First-tier Tribunal. They should also be allowed to remain in the UK until their appeal has been finally decided by the Immigration & Asylum Chamber. Page 3

Q. How can people whose cases have been certified under section 94B use the case of Kiarie & Byndloss to get the Home Office to cancel the certificate? A. People facing deportation whose decisions have been certified under section 94B should write to the Home Office urgently to request that the certificate is withdrawn and any removal directions arising from certification are cancelled immediately. A model letter is at the end of this factsheet. The letter can be sent directly to the Home Office section that is dealing with your case. You will find the contact details on the Notice of Decision to Deport letter. You need to add your personal details to the letter. It is best to fax it if you can so that you can keep the evidence of the fax transmission. If you do not have access to a fax, you should post it by Recorded Delivery. It is important that you keep the evidence of postage. Q. What if I already have Removal Directions arising from certification of my case under section 94B? A. The model letter requests that the Home Office cancels removal directions immediately upon receipt of the letter and provides you with written confirmation that this has been done. Q. What happens if the Home Office does not reply to my letter or does not cancel the 94B certificate or the Removal Directions? A. If this happens you will need to obtain legal advice from a solicitor on whether you can take judicial review legal action against the Home Office. If you are in an Immigration Removal Centre, you should book an appointment with the Detention Duty Adviser (DDA). If you are in prison, you could ask a family member or a friend to contact a lawyer on your behalf. Q. If the certificate is cancelled, what does this mean for the appeal? A. It means that you will be able to stay in the UK to lodge and prepare your appeal and attend the hearing to give evidence. You will be able to remain until your appeal is finally decided by the Immigration and Asylum Chamber. If it is finally decided in your favour, the Deportation Order will not be enforced and you will be able to stay in the UK. Q. If my certificate is cancelled and I am being held in Immigration Detention, can I apply for release? A. Yes, you should apply for release. This is because you can only be detained under immigration powers if your removal from the UK is imminent. If you have a pending in-country appeal, this will take some time to be finally decided and so your removal from the UK cannot be said to be imminent. Page 4

How to contact BID By post: Freepost RTSU-ZJCB-XCSX Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) 1b Finsbury Park Road London N4 2LA Fax: 020 3745 5226 General enquiries: Casework enquiries: enquiries@biduk.org casework@biduk.org Advice Line: 020 7456 9750 (Mon-Thurs, 10am - 12 midday) Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) is a registered Charity No. 1077187. Registered in England as a Limited Company No. 3803669. Accredited by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner Ref. No. N200100147. @BIDdetention BIDdetention www.biduk.org Page 5

Model Letter Home Office [Insert the address of the Home Office dealing with your case] Date: My Name: My Address: My Home Office Reference Number: Dear Sir/Madam URGENT Re. Request to cancel certificate under S.94B following the Supreme Court case of Kiarie & Byndloss v SSHD [2017] UKSC 42 The Notice of Decision to deport me dated [.] certified my case under section 94B. This means that I am unable to appeal to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber against the decision until I have been removed from the UK. It also means that I am not allowed to return to the UK to give evidence at my appeal hearing. The recent Supreme Court case of Kiarie & Byndloss v SSHD [2017] UKSC 42 has found that the system of certification under section 94B does not provide for an effective right of appeal and breaches the Human Rights Act 1998. If I am removed before my appeal, I will not be able to effectively prepare my appeal from abroad because I will not be able to: Gather the necessary evidence of my length of residence in the UK and of my integration into British society; Gather the necessary evidence of the strength of my family life in the UK. In particular, I will not be able to obtain expert reports as may be required such as an Independent Social Work report to comment on my relationship with my children because the expert would need to be able to observe me with my children; Obtain expert evidence on my risk of reoffending, such as a Forensic Psychologist report. This is because I would need to be present in the UK for the assessment by the expert to take place.

I need to be present in the UK to give oral evidence at my appeal hearing. This is because I need to be able to answer points taken against me by the Home Office through cross-examination; I do not have access to video link facilities abroad to give evidence from abroad; In any case, giving evidence by video link would be unfair as it would be too difficult for me to try to follow the hearing process from abroad on a small screen. I need to be able to follow references in the process to pages in the Home Office Appeal Bundle. I also need to be able to properly see and hear the Home Office representative, the Immigration Judge and all participants at my hearing so as to follow my appeal and to be able to give my evidence in a fair and effective manner. It is therefore unlawful to maintain the certificate in my case. I request that you immediately cancel the certificate and allow me to remain in the UK until my appeal is finally decided by the Immigration and Asylum Chamber. I also request that any removal directions issued to remove me under section 94B be cancelled immediately. If there are no outstanding Removal Directions in my case, please provide me with a written reply within 7 working days of the date of this letter confirming that the certificate has been withdrawn and granting me an in-country right of appeal. If I do not receive written confirmation within 7 working days that the certificate in my case has been withdrawn, I will have no alternative but to seek legal advice and permission to apply for judicial review of your failure to withdraw the certificate. If there are Removal Directions outstanding arising from certification under section 94B, please provide me with confirmation that they have been cancelled immediately upon receipt of this letter, and please confirm that I will be granted an in-country right of appeal. As I am entitled to an in-country right of appeal my removal can no longer be said to be imminent. I therefore also request that you immediately release me from immigration detention. Signature: Date: / /.