California Criminal Litigation in Action

Similar documents
The Impact of Regulatory Law on American Criminal Justice

Litigating in Federal Court

Capital Punishment s Collateral Damage

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION Spring 2010

Catholic Legal Perspectives

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION. Spring Professor Susan Leff 1

Introduction to Criminal Justice

Discretionary Criminal Justice in a Comparative Context

Florida Family Law. Text and Commentary Statutes. Phyllis Coleman CAROLINA ACADEMIC PRESS PROFESSOR OF LAW NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Catholic Legal Perspectives

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

The Empowered Paralegal Cause of Action Handbook

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit X Pre-trial

CLAIM FOR SERVICES OR EXPENSES

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

Florida s Criminal Justice System

Detailed Contents SECTION I: THE PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN COURTS

STAT E ST AND A RDS F OR AP P OINTM ENT OF COU NS EL I N DE ATH P EN ALTY CAS ES

Arizona Legal Research

Court Records Glossary

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

kakar 00 fmt f2.qxp 7/27/17 3:25 PM Page i Human Trafficking

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

Starting Off Right in Law School

Immigration Law for Paralegals

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cr HES All Defendants

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

EL PASO CRIMINAL DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURT SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR THE COMPENSATION OF COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL SEPTEMBER 2015

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT

Practice Test. Law & the Courts -1-

Legislative Drafting Step-by-Step

Criminal Law and Practice

Immigration Law for Paralegals. by MARIA ISABEL CASABLANCA, ESQ. GLORIA ROA BODIN, ESQ.

June 19, 2015 PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL COURT RULES

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER THREE

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of Cases... Introduction and User Notes...

The Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger

Res Judicata. A Handbook on Its Theory, Doctrine, and Practice. Robert C. Casad

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL. Fifth Edition JEROLD H. ISRAEL

Texas s Criminal Justice System

Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission Current Enabling Statute Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant.

Session Law Creating the New Mexico Sentencing Commission, 2003 New Mexico Laws ch. 75

paoline terrill 00 fmt auto 10/15/13 6:35 AM Page i Police Culture

APPENDIX F INSTRUCTIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MONTEREY

Criminal Law and Practice

Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.

Overcrowding Alternatives

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Indicate the answer choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Not Yet Democracy. West Africa s Slow Farewell to Authoritarianism. Boubacar N Diaye Abdoulaye Saine Mathurin Houngnikpo

Pretrial Release and Detention: A First Look

Bail, Innocence and Public Safety

UNDERSTANDING THE LAW OF TERRORISM

Courtroom Terminology

Misdemeanor Appeal Bonds. By: Dana Graves. Hillsborough, NC

y LEGAL ASPECTS OF EVIDENCE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 3 FALL 2015

Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial. Chapter 13

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Stages of a Case Glossary

63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

Politics, Policy, and Organizations

johns fmt 4/19/02 3:27 PM Page i The United States Legal System

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

ARTICLE 11A. VICTIM PROTECTION ACT OF 1984.

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY PERSON CONVICTED. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor]

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

knapp 00 4/5/16 10:37 AM Page i The Solitary Auditor

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

CHAPTER 10. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT AND THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit EUGENE EVAN BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, LORETTA E. LYNCH, et al.

Texas Law & Due Process (Chapter 10) Dr. Michael Sullivan. Texas State Government GOVT

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Table of Contents. Second Edition Foreword...xiii First Edition Foreword...xv Preface...xvii About the Authors...xix Introduction...

Senate Bill No. 361 Senators Cannizzaro, Segerblom, Manendo, Ratti, Farley; Atkinson, Cancela, Denis, Ford, Parks, Spearman and Woodhouse

Follow the instructions in each section carefully. Please ensure that your responses are legible.

Supreme Court of Virginia CHART OF ALLOWANCES

Oklahoma Legal Research

Course Syllabus. Introduction to the Criminal Justice System

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

WASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

2013 PA Super 132. BEFORE: MUSMANNO, PANELLA and STRASSBURGER*, JJ. OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.: FILED: May 28, 2013

5 North Gay Street 3rd Floor Mount Vernon, OH Telephone: (740) Fax: (740) mountvernonmunicipalcourt.

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test

DISTRICT COURT APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES

Transcription:

California Criminal Litigation in Action

California Criminal Litigation in Action third edition Laura Berend & Jean Ramirez professors of law university of san diego school of law Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina

Copyright 2016 Carolina Academic Press All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Berend, Laura, author. [Criminal litigation in action] California criminal litigation in action / Laura Berend and Jean Ramirez. -- Third edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-61163-148-7 (alk. paper) 1. Criminal procedure--california. I. Montoya, Jean, author. II. Title. KFC1155.B47 2015 345.794'05--dc23 2015036409 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, NC 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America

We dedicate the third edition of this book to our spouses, Bill Ziegler and Kellie Cardona.

Contents Introduction xi Chapter 1 Arrest 3 Questions and Notes 7 Procedural Stages in a Criminal Case 8 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and Cois Byrd, Sheriff of Riverside County, Petitioners, v. Donald Lee McLAUGHLIN, et al. 9 Questions and Notes 18 Chapter 2 Charging 25 Uniform Crime Charging Standards 26 Questions and Notes 37 Evaluating the Data 39 Charging Exercise 43 Felony Complaint 44 Victims Bill of Rights Marsy Rights 56 Chapter 3 Arraignment and Interviewing 59 Questions and Notes 61 Interviewing 62 Interviewing Exercise 67 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 68 California Rules of Professional Conduct 72 Cal. Evid. Code 950 956.5 72 Adult In-Custody Defendants ( 3rd Dayers ) 74 Chapter 4 Pretrial Release 77 In re DAVID ANTHONY YORK et al. on Habeas Corpus, In re JOHNNY CADENAZ et al. on Habeas Corpus, In re PAUL BLAISE ATKINS et al. on Habeas Corpus 80 Questions and Notes 85 In re GEORGE CHRISTIE III on Habeas Corpus 86 Questions and Notes 88 Bail Review Exercise 89 vii

viii CONTENTS Chapter 5 Preliminary Hearings 113 Laura Berend, Proposition 115 Preliminary Hearings: Sacrificing Reliability on the Altar of Expediency? 114 Proposition 115 Changes 116 Thomas Paul WHITMAN, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent, The PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest 118 Questions and Notes 125 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Steven WIMBERLY, Defendant and Respondent 127 Questions and Notes 130 Preliminary Hearing Exercise 131 Non-Hearsay Preliminary Hearings 133 Hearsay Preliminary Hearings 135 Chapter 6 Grand Jury Proceedings 137 Questions and Notes 138 UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr. 140 George H. BERARDI, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest. 146 Questions and Notes 153 Grand Jury Exercise 155 Indictment 156 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 158 Chapter 7 Discovery 161 Information 162 Discovery 164 Questions and Notes 165 Arnulfo MAGALLAN, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Monterey County, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest 166 Questions and Notes 171 Discovery Exercise 173 Criminal Discovery Statutes 173 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 175 Chapter 8 Motions 179 Motions Exercise 182 Local Rules, County of San Diego, Superior Court, Div. III: Criminal 192 Chapter 9 Trial Preparation 197 In re ANTONIO CORDERO, JR., on Habeas Corpus 197 Questions and Notes 207 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 208 Case Evaluation Exercise 209 Excerpts from the Preliminary Hearing Transcript in People v. Battistone 210 Chapter 10 Plea Bargaining 229 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Jose Luis LABORA, Defendant and Respondent 230

CONTENTS ix Questions and Notes 234 Plea Bargaining 235 Jose PADILLA, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY 237 Questions and Notes 242 Plea Bargaining Exercise 244 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 245 Change of Plea Forms 250 Chapter 11 Sentencing 263 People v. Superior Court (Du) 266 Questions and Notes 274 People v. Williams 275 Questions and Notes 281 Sentencing Exercise 283 Terms of Probation 312 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice (4th ed. 2015) 315 Chapter 12 Selected Statutes and Court Rules 317 Crimes 318 Jury Instructions 323 Sentencing-Related Statutes 331 Rules of Court: Sentencing 348

Introduction The book is a primer on criminal litigation in the trial courts. The book is based on the fictitious but realistic criminal case of People v. Roger Battistone and tracks the case from arrest through sentencing. Students learn by doing. When the class addresses bail, students participate in a simulation exercise as a prosecutor, defense counsel, or judge at a bail review hearing. Similarly, students participate in simulation exercises on charging, interviewing and counseling, preliminary hearings, grand jury proceedings, discovery, motions, plea bargaining, and sentencing. Along the way, students become familiar with the various stages of a criminal case by applying the law found in judicial opinions, statutes, rules of court, professional responsibility rules, local rules, and jury instructions, to the facts of the Battistone case. Jurisdiction, Disclaimer, and Dates The case is set in the jurisdiction of Ocean Beach in San Diego County in the State of California. Ocean Beach and San Diego are very real and beautiful cities in the very real and beautiful San Diego County in Southern California where we have the good fortune to live and teach. Cases, statutes, and other legal and written sources are also real. However, any similarities to people, places, or fact situations are the product of our combined imaginations and are purely coincidental. References to years are in relation to the present; for example YR-0 refers to this year, and YR-22 refers to twenty-two years ago. Second Edition In addition to updating the materials, we have expanded references to professional responsibility obligations throughout the text. The materials are informed by our personal experiences in criminal trial practice, our teaching experience, our return to practice during sabbatical leaves, our research, and the generous contributions and helpful critiques from the San Diego criminal practice community. As they have transitioned from students to alums to seasoned lawyers, our students have continued to enrich our teaching. xi

xii INTRODUCTION Third Edition In large part, the third edition was necessitated by the recent sea change in California corrections policy. This policy shift is driven primarily by fiscal concerns and overcrowding in state prisons. It is driven somewhat by a resurgence of interest in rehabilitation, as opposed to punishment. The related legislation provides for some prison sentences being served in county jails (Realignment), and lesser penalties for some theft- and drug-related crimes (Proposition 47). Acknowledgments The first edition of this book benefitted greatly from the contributions of the following people and organizations: Desirae Wooden, for creating Rosie s injuries, and Sue Hegle, for modeling Rosie s injuries. Gabrielle Cerda, M.D., and Barb Dodd-Waddington, R.N., for sharing their medical expertise. Vince Brunkow, Federal Public Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Jacqueline Crowle, Department of the Alternate Public Defender, County of San Diego, and Lisa Rodriguez, Office of the District Attorney County of San Diego, for sharing their legal expertise. Cheré Smith and Roger Stattel, University of San Diego School of Law, for providing technical support. The former criminal clinicians at the University of San Diego School of Law, who may have contributed to the original Battistone arrest report. Professor Daniel Rodriguez, Dean of the University of San Diego School of Law, for awarding research grants to prepare these materials. For the second edition, Professors Berend and Ramirez thank the University of San Diego for approving their sabbaticals with the San Diego County Office of the Alternate Public Defender and the San Diego County Office of the District Attorney, respectively. Both sabbatical terms offered experiences that updated our criminal trial court skills and enriched our teaching and this book. We thank former Dean Kevin Cole and the University of San Diego School of Law for supporting the completion of the second edition of this book with a research grant. First and foremost, we express our gratitude to Deputy District Attorney Lisa Rodriguez for her extraordinary assistance with this edition, being available for questions, teaching classes with us, mentoring our students, critiquing this book, and for being generally a cheerful and indispensable resource. We are very proud of this University of San Diego School of Law alumnus and former student who became familiar with the case file and some of the materials in this book when she was a law student. We thank Jacqueline Crowle, retired from the San Diego Office of the Alternate Public Defender, for her helpful comments and suggestions to both editions. We deeply appreciate Deputy District Attorney Chris Lindberg s assistance with the chapter on the grand jury and for bringing that chapter alive in the classroom. We are grateful to the many other capable and generous alums and other San Diego criminal practitioners who have contributed their expertise to our teaching and our classes over the years, and enabled us

INTRODUCTION xiii to forge a mutually beneficial relationship between our students and the criminal practice community. We thank Andrew Burnett, University of San Diego School of Law class of 2012 for his extraordinary research assistance, technical abilities, steadfast support, and boundless energy in preparing this edition. We also thank Eric Yaeckle and Kevin Fard, University of San Diego School of Law class of 2010, for their research assistance. We thank our indispensable executive assistant, Leilani Sharrett, for her creativity in preparing exhibits and documents, and for creating the CD that accompanies this book. We thank Leilani and Roger Stattel, our technology specialist, for their invaluable technical expertise, endless patience, and constant availability. We appreciate Carolina Academic Press s Tim Colton s steadfast availability for unraveling a seemingly endless number of formatting and code dilemmas that surfaced as we prepared this edition. For the third edition, we continue to acknowledge Lisa Rodriguez, recently installed as a San Diego County Superior Court Judge, formerly the Chief of the Complaints & Extraditions Division of the San Diego County District Attorney s Office, and both then and now widely considered a leading authority on sentencing in the California state courts. She has generously given of her time and expertise on multiple topics covered in our text. We also acknowledge Keisha Mello-Hall and Bardia Moayedi for their research assistance. Copyright Acknowledgments We thank the following for permission to reproduce their copyrighted material: California District Attorneys Association, for giving us permission to reproduce portions of the Uniform Crime Charging Standards. Office of the General Counsel, Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, for giving us permission to reprint selected materials from CALCRIM jury instructions.