Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Similar documents
Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:16-md VC Document 292 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 14

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1100 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 5. February 5, In re Roundup Prod. Liab. Litig., No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case MDL No Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791

Case abl Doc 164 Entered 05/02/14 12:43:53 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1461 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 3

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 4:11-cv CEJ Doc. #: 23 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 677

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

Case MDL No Document 255 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Motion to Certify under 28 U.S.C.

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 17 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 185

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 557 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class (See FRAP 3(c)(3))

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:12-cv VC Document 119 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 13 (Counsel listed on signature page)

Case 3:16-md VC Document 279 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 799 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:25158

Case 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 44 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Case MDL No Document 46 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Case 2:12-cv Document 210 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 33896

PlainSite. Legal Document

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:15-md LHK Document 408 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 48 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 17 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Baltimore Division ANSWER

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 255 Filed: 05/04/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:3640

Defendants. Judge: Hon. Manuel L. Real

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case NYE/1:11-cv Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case: 4:15-cv CAS Doc. #: 34 Filed: 10/13/15 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 503

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case5:11-cv RMW Document72 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 6

PlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11

Mann et al v. United States of America Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. JOMAR OIL LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company, Plaintiff,

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 88 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 17

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Transcription:

Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Michael L. Baum, Esq. (SBN: ) mbaum@baumhedlundlaw.com R. Brent Wisner, Esq. (SBN: 0) rbwisner@baumhedlundlaw.com Pedram Esfandiary, Esq. (SBN: ) pesfandiary@baumhedlundlaw.com BAUM, HEDLUND, ARISTEI, & GOLDMAN, P.C. 00 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) 0-; Facsimile: (0) 0- Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe G. Hollingsworth (pro hac vice) (jhollingsworth@hollingsworthllp.com) Eric G. Lasker (pro hac vice) (elasker@hollingsworthllp.com) HOLLINGSWORTH LLP 0 I Street, N.W. Washington, DC 000 Telephone: (0) -00; Facsimile: (0) - Attorneys for Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: Sterling Bates, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc; Phillip Cobb, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Gerald R. Feranec, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Lonnie Harvey, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-00-vc; Thelma Lewis, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc; Howard Montaigne, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc; Jafurl Parks, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Joseph Robichaud, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Steve Salvaggio, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Patricia Turner, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-VC; Sherlene Ward, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. :-md-0-vc MDL No. JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING REMAND TO STATE COURT JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT (:-md-0-vc)

Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Pursuant to Civil L.R. -, Plaintiffs in the eleven above-captioned individual lawsuits and Defendant Monsanto Company ( Monsanto ) hereby stipulate as follows and request entry of the proposed order set forth below: RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiffs originally filed the eleven above-captioned individual lawsuits in the nd Judicial Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, Missouri (collectively, Missouri Lawsuits ); WHEREAS Monsanto removed the Missouri Lawsuits to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in March 0, based on federal question jurisdiction and the federal officer removal statute, U.S.C. (a); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed motions to remand the Missouri Lawsuits to the nd Judicial Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, Missouri; WHEREAS, Monsanto filed oppositions to Plaintiffs remand motions in certain of the Missouri Lawsuits; WHEREAS, Monsanto has not yet filed oppositions to Plaintiffs remand motions in some of the Missouri Lawsuits due to stay orders entered by Eastern District of Missouri judges in those cases; WHEREAS, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the Missouri Lawsuits to this Court for consolidated and/or coordinated pretrial proceedings with other Roundup lawsuits; WHEREAS, Monsanto removed another Roundup lawsuit, Pennie, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., from California state court to this Court in March 0; WHEREAS, the bases for Monsanto s removal of the Pennie lawsuit federal question jurisdiction and the federal officer removal statute, U.S.C. (a) are the same bases at issue in Monsanto s removals of the Missouri Lawsuits; WHEREAS, on July, 0, this Court granted plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court in Pennie, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc (N.D. Cal.), ECF JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT (:-md-0-vc)

Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 No. ; In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig., Case No. :-md-0-vc (N.D. Cal.), ECF No. ( Pennie Remand Order ); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in the Missouri Lawsuits and Monsanto hereby agree that the holding in the Pennie Remand Order is transferable to the remand motions filed by Plaintiffs in the Missouri Lawsuits; WHEREAS, Monsanto recognizes that the Court s reasoning set out in the Pennie Remand Order also requires remand of the Missouri Lawsuits and that any further objection to remand in these cases would be futile and waste the Court s and the parties time and resources; WHEREAS, in the interests of conserving judicial and litigants time and resources, Plaintiffs and Monsanto hereby request that the Court enter the proposed order set forth below to remand the Missouri Lawsuits for the reasons addressed in the Pennie Remand Order. STIPULATION THEREFORE, Plaintiffs in the eleven above-captioned individual lawsuits and Defendant Monsanto Company hereby stipulate that the Pennie Remand Order applies to the remand motions filed by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned lawsuits and request that the Court enter the proposed order set forth below to remand the above-captioned lawsuits to state court for the reasons set forth in the Pennie Remand Order, with the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. 0 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT (:-md-0-vc)

Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 DATED: July, 0 Respectfully submitted, /s/ R. Brent Wisner R. Brent Wisner, Esq. (SBN: 0) rbwisner@baumhedlundlaw.com Michael L. Baum, Esq. (SBN: ) mbaum@baumhedlundlaw.com Pedram Esfandiary, Esq. (SBN: ) pesfandiary@baumhedlundlaw.com BAUM, HEDLUND, ARISTEI, & GOLDMAN, P.C. 00 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) 0- Facsimile: (0) 0- /S/ Jim Corrigan James T. Corrigan James D. O Leary Onder, Shelton, O Leary & Peterson, LLC 0 E. Lockwood, nd Floor St. Louis, MO Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Joe G. Hollingsworth Joe G. Hollingsworth (pro hac vice) (jhollingsworth@hollingsworthllp.com) Eric G. Lasker (pro hac vice) (elasker@hollingsworthllp.com) HOLLINGSWORTH LLP 0 I Street, N.W. Washington, DC 000 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Attorneys for Defendant Monsanto Company JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT (:-md-0-vc)

Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation set forth above, it is hereby ordered that the eleven abovecaptioned individual lawsuits are remanded to the nd Judicial Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, Missouri for the reasons addressed in the Court s Order Granting Motion to Remand, Pennie, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-vc (N.D. Cal.), ECF No. ; In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig., Case No. :-md-0-vc (N.D. Cal.), ECF No., with the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 0 0 DATE:, August 0 THE HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT (:-md-0-vc)