The 2008 DNC Presidential Nomination Process

Similar documents
2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Overview. Strategic Imperatives. Our Organization. Finance and Budget. Path to Victory

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

2008 Democratic Nomination

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Overall, in our view, this is where the race stands with Newt Gingrich still an active candidate:

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

If you have questions, please or call

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on

2016 us election results

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004

Nominating Committee Policy

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

American Dental Association

Background Information on Redistricting

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

The Electoral College

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

CRS Report for Congress

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

Subcommittee on Design Operating Guidelines

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

The US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

SELA Antenna in the United States SELA Permanent Secretary No th Quarter 2007

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

THE RULES OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 2012 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

VOTING WHILE TRANS: PREPARING FOR THE NEW VOTER ID LAWS August 2012

THE RULES OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. As adopted by the 2012 Republican National Convention August 28, 2012

the rules of the republican party

A survey of 200 adults in the U.S. found that 76% regularly wear seatbelts while driving. True or false: 76% is a parameter.

Swarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws. The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

American Government. Workbook

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS

Results and Criteria of BGA/NFOIC survey

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

State Complaint Information

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

ARTICLE I ESTABLISHMENT NAME

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Bias Correction by Sub-population Weighting for the 2016 United States Presidential Election

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

Department of Justice

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES

Judicial Selection in the States

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

votenet [ur: t' ;{ I i{ Raj Naik Vice President Thursday, May 21,2009

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

BYLAWS OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF DEMOCRATIC WOMEN (Revisions 2015; 2016)

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

The United States Presidential Election Process: Undemocratic?

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Blue Roof Franchisee Association. By Laws

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

o Yes o No o Under 18 o o o o o o o o 85 or older BLW YouGov spec

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

America is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined:

8. Public Information

The name of this division of FBLA-PBL, Inc. shall be Phi Beta Lambda and may be referred to as PBL.

2006 Assessment of Travel Patterns by Canadians and Americans. Project Summary

Transcription:

The 2008 DNC Presidential Nomination Process A Crisis Of Legitimacy May 26, 2008 John Norris john.norris.2@gmail.com 1

Obama s Claim to the Nomination "I have won the majority of pledged delegates, so I am the choice of the party." Pledged Delegates (without FL & MI) 1,500 1,658 Clinton Obama 1. By itself, a majority of pledged delegates is not sufficient. 2. This year, the legitimacy of the pledged delegate count is uncertain. Results as of May 21, 2008 2

1. A Majority Of Pledged Delegates Is Not Sufficient. The nominee must win a majority of all delegates to clench the nomination. Super delegates comprise about 20% of the total number of delegates: (A) The super delegate system adds discretionary judgment to balance out quirks in the mechanical pledged delegate system. (B) They are intended to be thinking delegates, and their decision process is free of rules, guidelines or measures. (C) They can wait until the first ballot on the convention floor to make their decision; and their endorsements are non-binding. A majority of pledged delegates is an argument for the nomination. It is not, however, a qualifying event. Election results as of May 21, 2008 3

2. The Legitimacy Of The Pledged Delegates Is Unclear The Democratic Party uses a proportional system of nominating pledged delegates. It is not a one-person, one-vote standard. In fact, it is designed to add bias in favor of certain states: Voters prefer Candidate A DNC rules Individual state rules Distortions defy voter preferences But the system also produces random distortions. Occasionally, these can produce sharply undemocratic results. The mechanical pledged delegate system was not designed to correct even the most obviously undemocratic distortions. Election results as of May 21, 2008 4

Total Pledged Delegates (Primaries + Caucuses) An estimated 33.9 million votes have been cast in 49 elections: Pledged Delegates 1,500 1,658 1,613 1,732 Clinton Obama Without FL & MI With Florida, Not MI The spread in pledged delegates is 5.3% / 3.6%. Election results as of May 21, 2008 5

Primaries Only (No Caucuses) 32.9 MILLION votes cast in 34 elections: Primary-Only Delegates 1,353 1,373 1,466 1,447 Clinton Obama Without FL & MI With Florida, Not MI The PRIMARY-ONLY pledged delegate spread is LESS THAN one percent. Election results as of May 21, 2008 6

Caucuses Only (No Primaries) An estimated just ONE million votes were cast in 15 caucuses: Caucus Delegates 284 148 Clinton Obama The SPREAD IS ALMOST 2-1. The caucuses give Obama a 136 delegate advantage. Election results as of May 21, 2008 *IA, ME, NV, WA results are RCP estimates 7

Once More - Primary Versus Caucus Results ALL of Obama s lead is from the 15 caucus elections: Election Type Voters Spread # Elections Primaries 32.9 million Less than.01% 34 Caucuses 1 million* 200% 15 Combined 33.9 million 3.6% - 5.3% 49 The primary states more closely resemble the one-person/one-vote ideal. There is significantly less chance for distortion. Obama s wins in the caucus states account for nearly all his pledged delegate lead. Election results as of May 21, 2008 8

How Caucuses Can Distort The Entire Process The caucuses account for just 2.9% of voters Voters Primaries Caucases 2.9% Pledged Delegates Primaries Caucases 15% 32.8 2,726 Yet they represent 15% of the pledge delegates awarded so far. One caucus vote is equivalent to five primary votes. Election results as of May 21, 2008 9

We Don t Know The True Vote Count Four caucus states Iowa, Maine, Nevada & Washington don t report raw vote totals. Instead, they report equivalents. State Caucus Turnout Winner Washington* 238,000(e) Obama Minnesota 211,103 Iowa* 161,000(e) Maine* 43,000(e) Nebraska 38,571 Hawaii 37,182 Kansas 36,634 Nevada* 31,000(e) Idaho 20,535 North Dakota 18,573 Alaska 8,868 Wyoming 8,689 *Calculations based on RCP estimates. State numbers were tallied according to an article by Clint Hendler published on May 2, 2008 in the Columbia Journalism Review: The Inestimable Popular Vote Estimates - How to account for different counts. Combined, the four have more than 13.4 million people (nearly 5% of the U.S. total) yet we will never know the precise vote. Election results as of May 21, 2008 10

The Caucuses Are Samples Of Samples The average caucus turnout was 40% the size of recent same-state primary elections. State Caucus Turnout Comparable Primary Turnout % Comparable Primary Wyoming 8,689 81,405 11% 2006 Primary/Gov Hawaii 37,182 238,033 16% 2006 Primary/Gov Alaska 8,868 50,000 18% 2006 Primary/Gov Nevada 31,000 117,842 26% 2006 Primary/US Sen North Dakota 18,573 58,231 32% 2006 Primary/US Sen Iowa 161,000 473,446 34% 2006 Primary/Gov Washington 238,000 691,381 34% Feb 19 2008 State Primary Nebraska 38,571 94,905 41% May 20 2008 State Primary Kansas 36,634 76,046 48% 2006 Primary/Gov Minnesota 211,103 316,470 67% 2006 Primary/Gov Idaho 20,535 30,443 67% 2006 Primary/Gov Maine 43,000 53,175 81% 2006 Primary/Gov Sampling small samples is an invitation to distortion. Election results as of May 21, 2008 11

Obama s Top Ten Voting By Spread: Nothing Coincidental Obama (A) won all twelve caucus states; (B) eight of his top-ten victories are from caucus states. State % of US Population Spread (Votes) Spread (%) Primary or Caucus Idaho 0.5% 13,225 62% Caucus Hawaii 0.4% 19,512 52% Caucus Alaska 0.2% 4,480 51% Caucus Kansas 0.9% 17,710 48% Caucus Nebraska 0.6% 13,681 35% Caucus Georgia 3.1% 374,221 35% Primary Washington* 2.1% 84,000 35% Caucus Minnesota 1.7% 73,115 34% Caucus Colorado 1.6% 41,274 34% Caucus South Carolina 1.4% 153,908 29% Primary The likelihood of a candidate winning (A) and (B) and it being a legitimate accounting of a voter intent is low. Election results as of May 21, 2008 12

Obama Scored Well In Over-Represented States He won all of the ten states with the least voters per pledged delegate; Clinton won seven of the ten states with the most voters per pledged delegate. Least Voters Per Pledged Delegate: State Voters Per Pledged Del Winner Alaska 682 Obama Wyoming 724 Idaho 1,141 Kansas 1,145 Nevada 1,240 North Dakota 1,429 Nebraska 1,607 Maine 1,792 Hawaii 1,859 Colorado 2,163 Most Voters Per Pledged Delegate: State Voters Per Pledged Del Winner Indiana 17,726 Clinton Ohio 16,421 Clinton Wisconsin 14,876 Obama Texas 14,638 Clinton Pennsylvania 14,606 Clinton North Carolina 13,389 Obama Kentucky 13,118 Clinton Mass 13,085 Clinton Illinois 12,981 Obama California 12,959 Clinton The ten states with the least votes/pledged delegates were all caucus states. The ten states with the most were all primary states. Election results as of May 21, 2008 13

Real Clear Evidence Two caucus states so far have also held non-binding primaries: State Caucus Date Obama Delegates Primary Date Obama % Vote Primary Vs Caucus Turnout Washington Feb 9 th 68% Feb 19 th 51% 3 x 1 Nebraska Feb 9 th 68% May 20 th 49% 2.5 x 1 Idaho Feb 5 th 83% May 29 th?? Obama s performance decreases substantially when the same state caucus is tested by a primary. Election results as of May 21, 2008 14

Caucuses Are Exclusionary / The Results (This Year) Biased Compared to casting a vote, caucuses are difficult: They are held at a set time. They require time generally two to four hours. They can be intimidating - enthusiastic supporters garner votes until the end. They can be frustrating - particularly to voters not versed in the rules. Many people are totally shut out: Voters serving in the active military. Those who are sick, confined to their homes, older or who don t drive at night. Blue collar workers, people working shifts, families with children. All the above worked for Obama and against Clinton. Obama had an energized network of young people; Hillary s base demographics were the working class and the elderly. Election results as of May 21, 2008 15

The Disease ( Caucus Bias ) Is Not The Cure Caucus bias distorts voter intent. The distortion creates a false inevitability factor - further tainting the process. Voting Phase Contaminated Checks & Balances Contaminated Inevitability factor sways the super delegates, who are designed to be a system of checks & balances. Democratic ideals are undermined Voters alienated Weakened DNC Illegitimate candidate Contaminated Nominee Voting Nomination General Election Election results as of May 21, 2008 16

Caucuses Are Inherently Undemocratic The irony is that the only antidote is the superdelegates. If they fail to act, it will cast an irreparable shadow on the process. Election results as of May 21, 2008 17