WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE

Similar documents
WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE

Support the Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015 (S / H.R. 2867)

WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL 1037 PROPOSED COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE H1037-PCS30488-BK-40

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2015 Report on North Carolina Business Court [G.S. 7A-45.5] March 1, Report on Enhanced Firearms Reporting October 1, 2014 Page 1

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL 717 RATIFIED BILL

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SENATE BILL 127 PROPOSED COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE S127-PCS75316-MN-1

Case 1:12-cv EGS-TBG-RMC Document 16 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CONSTITUTION NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES ARTICLE I. NAME AND OBJECTIVES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A Article 7 1

Medicaid Eligibility Determination Timeliness. Session Law , Sec. 12H.17.(a)

Special Superior Court Judges

TEMPORARY RULE-MAKING FINDINGS OF NEED [Authority G.S. 150B-21.1]

NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK ISSUE BRIEF. S.1945 and H.R. 3899

Statement of. Sherrilyn Ifill President & Director-Counsel. Ryan P. Haygood Director, Political Participation Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-00949

The Voting Rights Act: What Is the Basis for the Section 5 Baseline

NC General Statutes - Chapter 17E 1

1. INTRODUCTION. On March 25, 1965, 10 days after President Lyndon Johnson's. dramatic appeal to Congress for effective voting rights legislation,

NC General Statutes - Chapter 143B Article 1 1

Disruptive Demographics and North Carolina s Global Competitiveness Challenge

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

THE NORTH CAROLINA PROBATION AND PAROLE ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE ARTICLE I OFFICIAL TITLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS

To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to 1

CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS. MULTIPLE DISTRICT 31 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA LIONS INTERNATIONAL Adopted June 12, 1939

Testimony of Tomas Lopez, Democracy North Carolina. Before the United States Commission on Civil Rights. February 2, 2018

Bylaws School Nutrition Association of North Carolina

NC General Statutes - Chapter 143 Article 24 1

Technology Services Division January 1, 2016

Technology Services Division October 1, 2015

United States House of Representatives

STATEMENT OF WADE HENDERSON, PRESIDENT & CEO THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Assessment of Voting Rights Progress in Jurisdictions Covered Under Section Five of the Voting Rights Act

COMMUNICATION TIPS. Tips for Writing Your Legislator

COMMUNITY- BASED GUIDELINES FOR POST-SHELBY MONITORING

Government by the People: Why America Needs a Constitutional Right to Vote

March 1 Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders. June 17 Republicans release redistricting

International Government Relations Committee

Shelby County v. Holder and the Demise of Section 5: What is Next for Voting Rights in Texas?

PREAMBLE: The Mission Statement of the Presbytery of New Hope

TESTIMONY OF Jeremy Meadows Senior Policy Director: Trade & Transportation State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 817

VOTING RIGHTS 2014 Sweet Home Alabama

THE AMICUS CHAIRMAN S REPORT

Judicial Districts in North Carolina. North Carolina Courts Commission James Drennan UNC School of Government September 23, 2014

THE NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF SHAW UNIVERSITY, INCORPORATED CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS

NENA NATIONAL EMERGENCY NUMBER ASSOCIATION NORTH CAROLINA CHAPTER. Bylaws. Adopted September 11, Revised September 09, 1994

Case 5:06-cv FL Document 31 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 19

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

North Carolina General Assembly New Members: Senate and House

Chapter 44. Liens. Article 1. Mechanics', Laborers', and Materialmen's Liens Repealed by Session Laws 1969, c. 1112, s. 4.

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Introduction: The Right to Vote

TITLE 28 JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

Overview. Strategic Imperatives. Our Organization. Finance and Budget. Path to Victory

THE STATE OF VOTING IN 2014

Before They Were States. Finding and Using Territorial Records by Jack Butler

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act: Necessary then and necessary now.

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON VOTING RIGHTS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Office of the State Auditor

December 12, Re: House Bills 6066, 6067, and Dear Senator:

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

New Voting Restrictions in America

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

States Still Fighting Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

NC Court System History, Mode of Selection, Judicial Districts

The Evolution of US Electoral Methods. Michael E. DeGolyer Professor, Government & International Studies Hong Kong Baptist University

Summary Overview of Upcoming Joint Report Lining Up: Ensuring Equal Access to the Right to Vote

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 847

The Electoral College And

Testimony of Adam Gitlin

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

April 28, 2018 Greenville, NC

LIBERTY WATCH. North Carolina Legislative Report Card Session

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-cv-00399

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Case 1:14-cv JRH-BKE Document 17-1 Filed 04/30/14 Page 1 of 14

VOTERS MINORITY NOT DONE PROTECTING OUR WORK IS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A REPORT BY THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON VOTING RIGHTS

S.C. Code Ann (2013) (Methods of election of council; mayor elected at large; qualifications). 4

A Practical Guide to Understanding the Electoral System. Courtesy of:

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

2016 Supreme Court Primary Election GUIDE

111th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R To secure the Federal voting rights of persons who have been released from incarceration.

ARTICLE RIDING WITHOUT A LEARNER S PERMIT: HOW TEXAS CAN GUARANTEE THE VOTING RIGHTS OF MINORITIES ON ITS OWN HOOF. Ann McGeehan

J.P. Coleman collection MSS.381

LOOKING FORWARD: DEMOGRAPHY, ECONOMY, & WORKFORCE FOR THE FUTURE

March 18, Re: Lessons Learned from the 2008 Election Hearing. Dear Chairman Nadler and Ranking Member Sensenbrenner:

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Chapter 17 Reconstruction and the New South ( ) Section 2 Radicals in Control

8. Public Information

Six Disruptive Demographics That Will Change the U.S. Forever

Healthcare 411: What You Need to Know About How the New Law Affects YOUR Business and How NFIB is Fighting For YOU! July 28, 2010

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

I. South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301; 86 S. Ct. 803; 15 L. Ed. 2d 769 (1966)

Transcription:

DATE: March 22, 2017 TO: FROM: WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE 1156 15 TH STREET, NW SUITE 915 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 P (202) 463-2940 F (202) 463-2953 E-MAIL: WASHINGTONBUREAU@NAACPNET.ORG WEB ADDRESS WWW.NAACP.ORG Concerned Parties ISSUE ALERT Hilary O. Shelton, Director, NAACP Washington Bureau CONGRESS MUST IMMEDIATELY INTRODUCE AND PASS BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO REPAIR, RESTORE, AND STRENGTHEN THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT ON THE EVENT OF THE 52 ND ANNIVERSARY OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 AND THE WEAKENING IMPACT OF THE SHELBY DECISION, NEW LEGISLATION IS NEEDED TO ENSURE PROTECTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR ALL AMERICANS THE ISSUE: The right to vote is one of the most valuable, and many would argue even sacred constitutional rights granted to most Americans. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was enacted to insure that those Constitution 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, no one, including federal, state or local government may in any way impede people from registering to vote or voting because of their race or ethnicity. Most provisions in the VRA, and specifically the portions that guarantee that no one may be denied the right to vote because of his or her race or color, are permanent. Section 5 of the VRA requires certain states or jurisdictions, which have an established history of laws or policies which result in the disenfranchisement of a group of racial or ethnic minority voters must obtain advance approval or preclearance from the US Department of Justice or the US District Court in D.C. before they can make any changes to voting practices or procedures. Examples of these changes include any change in the date, time, place, or manner under which an election is held. Federal approval is to be given as soon as the state or jurisdiction proves that the proposed change would not abridge the right to vote on account of race or color. On June 25, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Shelby v. Holder in which the Court did not invalidate the principle of preclearance. The Supreme Court did decide, however, that Section 4(b) of the VRA, which establishes the formula that is used to determine which states and jurisdictions must comply with preclearance, is antiquated and thus unconstitutional and can no longer be used. Thus, although Section 5 survives, it is currently not being used and will not be used until Congress enacts a new formula to determine who should be covered by it. The Voting Rights Advancement Act was introduced in the last Congress (114 th ) in both the House and the Senate and had bipartisan support in the Senate and was supported in the U.S. House by the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and the Congressional Asian and Pacific American Caucus among others. NAACP President/CEO, Cornell William Brooks and NAACP leaders were arrested demonstrating in the hometown of the House Judiciary Committee Chairman New legislation is needed in the 115 th Congress that will: modernize the preclearance formula to cover states with an historical pattern of discrimination; ensure that last-minute voting changes won t adversely affect voters; protect voters from the types of voting changes most likely to discriminate against people of color and language minorities; enhance the ability to apply a preclearance review when needed; expand the effective Federal Observer Program; and improve voting Rights protections for Native Americans and Alaska Natives. Furthermore, this legislation includes all of the priorities necessary for a strong VRA restoration as established by the NAACP National Board of Directors. We are urging this legislation to be re-introduced in the 115 th Congress (2017 2018) soon. We must tell Congress both the House and the Senate that the time to act is now! We must not delay and allow one more American to face unnecessary, unconstitutional, and undemocratic obstacles as they try to vote. THE NAACP STRONGLY SUPPORTS THE INTRODUCTION AND PASSAGE OF NEW VOTING RIGHTS LEGISLATION TO REPAIR, RESTORE AND STREGNTHEN THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965.

THE ACTION WE NEED YOU TO TAKE: Contact your Representative and both your Senators and URGE THEM TO SUPPORT THE REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND STRENGTHENING OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT. URGE THEM TO BE ORIGINAL CO-SPONSORS OF VOTING RIGHTS LEGISLATION. To contact your Senators and Representative, you may: Make a Phone Call: Call your Senators and your Representative in Washington by dialing the Capitol Switchboard and asking to be transferred to your Senators'/Congressman s offices. The switchboard phone number is (202) 224-3121 (see message section, below). Write a Letter To write letters to your Senators, send them to: The Honorable (name of Senator) U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 To write a letter to your Representative, send it to: The Honorable (name of Representative) U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Send a Fax A SAMPLE LETTER IS ATTACHED If you would like to send a fax, call your Senators or Representative s offices (through the Capitol switchboard) and ask for their fax numbers (you can use either the attached sample letter or the message box, below). Send an E-Mail To send an e-mail to your Senators, go to www.senate.gov; click on Find Your Senators. Look up your Senators by state; go to their web sites for e-mail addresses. To send an e-mail to your Representative, go to www.house.gov, and click on Write Your Representative (on the left hand side, just under find your Representative). This will help you identify who your congressman is and how to contact him/her. REMEMBER TO CONTACT BOTH YOUR SENATORS!!!!! THE MESSAGE As a result of the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby v. Holder, there are currently no states or jurisdictions which are required to comply with the preclearance directive under Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. This means that states or jurisdictions with a proven history of discrimination are able to make changes to their election laws and policies without proving to the U.S. Department of Justice or the District Court in D.C. in advance that the proposed changes will not disenfranchise racial or ethnic minority voters. Only Congress can pass a law to replace the criteria for which states or jurisdictions must comply with Section 5 preclearance. Members of the US House and Senate need to hear from their constituents that the repair, restoration, and strengthening of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is a priority and MUST HAPPEN NOW!!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS IMPORTANT MATTER!!! If you have any questions, call Hilary Shelton at the Washington Bureau at (202) 463-2940. MEMBERSHIP IS POWER! JOIN THE NAACP TODAY. To become an NAACP member or to sign up for e-mail legislative and press updates, visit www.naacp.org

(date) Sample Letter The Honorable United States Senate / House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 / 20515 RE: THE URGENT NEED TO REPAIR, RESTORE, AND STRNGRHEN THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. Dear Senator / Representative ; As your constituent, I urge you in the strongest terms possible to work toward the repair, restoration, and strengthening of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA). Congress must act as soon as possible, so I hope that you will contact your leadership and demand immediate action. It is vital that we address this crucial issue. Specifically, I support and urge you to be an original cosponsor of the comprehensive provisions in The Voting Rights Advancement Act. I urge you to work toward maximum coverage, ensuring the right to vote of as many Americans as possible is protected. As you know, as a result of the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby v. Holder, there are currently no states or jurisdictions which are required to comply with the preclearance directive under Section 5 of the VRA. This means that states or jurisdictions with a proven history of discrimination are able to make changes to their election laws and policies without proving to the U.S. Department of Justice or the District Court in D.C. in advance that the proposed changes will not disenfranchise racial or ethnic minority voters. In Shelby v. Holder the Supreme Court also explicitly said that Congress could and should update Section 4(b) of the VRA, which it struck, which establishes the formula to determine which states and jurisdictions must obtain preclearance before making any changes to the time, place, or manner in which its elections are conducted. Thus, it is now up to Congress to do the work which must be done to repair, restore and strengthen the 1965 VRA and allow it continue to protect all American voters, so we are ensured that we are able to cast a free and unfettered vote and we can be assured that our vote has been counted. As we as a nation commemorate the 52 nd Anniversary of Bloody Sunday in Selma, Alabama and the historic enactment of the 1965 VRA, we cannot allow Congressional inaction to dismantle 52 years of progress towards a more perfect union. Thus, I urge you again to contact your leadership and demand immediate action on the repair, restoration, and strengthening of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in light of the Supreme Court s devastating decision in Shelby v. Holder. I look forward to hearing from you soon to know what you are doing to move this issue along, and to also receiving your thoughts on what more I can do to precipitate action. Sincerely, (sign and print your name and remember to include your address) Remember to contact your Representative and BOTH your Senators.

WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE 1156 15 TH STREET, NW SUITE 915 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 P (202) 463-2940 F (202) 463-2953 E-MAIL: WASHINGTONBUREAU@NAACPNET.ORG WEB ADDRESS WWW.NAACP.ORG Jurisdictions Previously Covered by Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act Prior to the 6-25-2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby v. Holder States Covered as a Whole Applicable Date Fed. Register Date Alabama Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Alaska Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 49422 Oct. 22, 1975 Arizona Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Georgia Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Louisiana Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Mississippi Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 South Carolina Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Texas Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Virginia 1/ Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Covered Counties in States Not Covered as a Whole California: Florida: New York: North Carolina: Applicable Date Fed. Register Date Kings County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23. 1975 Merced County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Monterey County Nov. 1, 1968 36 FR 5809 Mar. 27, 1971 Yuba County Nov. 1, 1968 36 FR 5809 Mar. 27, 1971 Yuba County Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 784 Jan. 5, 1976 Collier County Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 34329 Aug. 13, 1976 Hardee County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Hendry County Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 34329 Aug. 13, 1976 Hillsborough County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Monroe County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Bronx County Nov. 1, 1968 36 FR 5809 Mar. 27, 1971 Bronx County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 Kings County Nov. 1, 1968 36 FR 5809 Mar. 27, 1971 Kings County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 43746 Sept. 23, 1975 New York County Nov. 1, 1968 36 FR 5809 Mar. 27, 1971 Anson County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Beaufort County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966

South Dakota: Bertie County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Bladen County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Camden County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 3317 Mar. 2, 1966 Caswell County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Chowan County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Cleveland County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Craven County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Cumberland County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Edgecombe County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Franklin County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Gaston County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Gates County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Granville County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Greene County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Guilford County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Halifax County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Harnett County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Hertford County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Hoke County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Jackson County Nov. 1, 1972 40 FR 49422 Oct. 22, 1975 Lee County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Lenoir County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Martin County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 19 Jan. 4, 1966 Nash County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Northampton County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Onslow County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Pasquotank County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Perquimans County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 3317 Mar. 2, 1966 Person County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Pitt County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Robeson County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Rockingham County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Scotland County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Union County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 5081 Mar. 29, 1966 Vance County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Washington County Nov. 1, 1964 31 FR 19 Jan. 4, 1966 Wayne County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Wilson County Nov. 1, 1964 30 FR 9897 Aug. 7, 1965 Shannon County Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 784 Jan. 5, 1976 Todd County Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 784 Jan. 5, 1976

Covered Townships in States Not Covered as a Whole Michigan: New Hampshire: Applicable Date Fed. Register Allegan County: Clyde Township Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 34329 Saginaw County: Buena Vista Township Nov. 1, 1972 41 FR 34329 Cheshire County: Rindge Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Coos County: Millsfield Township Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Pinkhams Grant Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Stewartstown Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Stratford Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Grafton County: Benton Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Hillsborough County: Merrimack County: Rockingham County: Antrim Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Boscawen Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Newington Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912 Date Aug. 13, 1976 Aug. 13, 1976 Sullivan County: Unity Town Nov. 1, 1968 39 FR 16912