GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

Similar documents
Utility Model Protection in Germany

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

MANUAL FOR THE HANDLING OF APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD (THE BROWN BOOK)

Foundation Certificate

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

... Revision,

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS

Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges

Intellectual Property Teaching Kit IP Advanced Part I

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Utility Models in Southeast Asia and Europe and their Strategic Use in Litigation. Talk Outline. Introduction & Background

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Final Diploma Syllabus

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

WHAT HAS CHANGED for TRADEMARKS with THE NEW TURKISH IP CODE?

HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

The Assertion of Patents in Germany. Dr. Roland Kehrwald Wildanger Kehrwald Graf v. Schwerin & Partner mbb

LUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998

PSMP. In contrast to a patent the duration of protection of a utility model is limited to ten years from the date of application.

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (PHILIPPINES)

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES Fortified with transparency

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

POST-GRANT AMENDMENT JOHN RICHARDS

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT (RAISING THE BAR ACT) 2012

AUSTRIA Utility Model Law

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

Düsseldorf. KRIEGER GENTZ MES & GRAF v. der GROEBEN March 19, 2004 AIPPI

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

Utility Model Law I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

Contributing firm. Author Henning Hartwig

Candidate's Answer - DI

"Grace Period" in Japan

Patent Resources Group Federal Circuit Law Course Syllabus

Practice for Patent Application

LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS. No. 50-XVI of March 7, Monitorul Oficial nr /455 din * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS.

5 Multiple Protection of Inventions

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Patents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy

Recognized Group Thailand Report

Germany. Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs. McDermott Will & Emery

A New World (Patent) Order. How the US Patent Reform Act (AIA) Compares with European Patent Regulations

24 Criteria for the Recognition of Inventors and the Procedure to Settle Disputes about the Recognition of Inventors

Part 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights

Standing Committee on Patents. Questionnaire on the Publication of Patent Applications

Guidebook. for Japanese Intellectual Property System 2 nd Edition

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

PATENT. 1. Procedures for Granting a Patent

Patents in Europe 2011/2012. Greece Lappa

E U R O L AW CONFERENCE 2018 JUNE 11, 12 & 13, MUNICH E V E N T PA R T N E R

SWITZERLAND Patent Law as last amended on March 20, 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: January 1, 2012

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Your Guide to Patents

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

IP Litigation in Life Sciences Germany 2016

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

Schedule of Fees and Charges. Effective: 1st January 20 16

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014 REPUBLICATION PATENT LAW NO.64/1991 1

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan

SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

Patent protection in Latin America: Main provisions and recommended strategy

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS. Antonella Carminatti INTRODUCTION

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)

B+/SG/2/10 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 27/05/2015. B+ Sub-Group OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES, WITH COMMENTARY ON POTENTIAL OUTCOMES. prepared by the Chair

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

Courtesy translation provided by WIPO, 2012

Bulletin. SABA ip. In this Issue: KSA. Bahrain. Qatar. Yemen. Ethiopia. Middle East. GCC Trademark Law Published

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

Nullity Proceedings in Germany

Guide to WIPO Services

INFORMATION FOR INVENTORS SEEKING PATENT PROTECTION

Information Disclosure Statements 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP

IP CONCLAVE 2010, MUMBAI STRATEGIES WITH US PATENT PRACTICE NAREN THAPPETA US PATENT ATTORNEY & INDIA PATENT AGENT BANGALORE, INDIA

US Patent Reform Act (AIA) Selected amendments of the AIA compared to European Regulations

How patents work An introduction for law students

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

New IP Code changes regarding patents, new post-grant opposition and enforcement provisions

AIPPI Study Question - Conflicting patent applications

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

Transcription:

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

INTRODUCTION In Germany the utility model is an unexamined, technical IP right having a duration of a maximum of 10 years: Can protect technical products, apparatus and substances. Cannot protect processes and biotechnological inventions. Registration has the effect of creating an exclusive right for the holder corresponding to a granted patent. Third parties are prohibited from making, selling, marketing or using the subject matter of the utility model, and from importing for those acts. The holder can require the infringing party to pay compensatory damages, to desist from the infringement, and to provide information on the extent of the infringement.

OUTLINE Prerequisites Application Effect of the utility model Cancellation procedures Enforcement Summary

PREREQUISITES Protectable subject matter Novelty Inventive step Industrial applicability

PROTECTABLE SUBJECT MATTER Technical products, apparatus and substances Exclusion Non technical matter Biotechnological inventions Methods Exception from exclusion: second medical use claim is considered not to be a process ( pharmaceutical product utility model )

WAYS TO GET A UTILITY MODEL Direct filing with / without priority National phase entry Branch-off

APPLICATION Request Application fee (no claim fees) Applicant (no declaration of inventor needed) At least 1 claim Description Possibly drawings Translation (3 months after filing; PCT national phase on filing)

PRIORITY Priority based on previous patent or utility model (12 month period) Priority based on foreign design possible (6 month period) for technical features

EXHIBITION PRIORITY Exhibition priority: if the invention has been presented at certain trade fairs up to 6 months before the filing date Accumulation with grace period of 6 months for own publications possible

NATIONAL PHASE ENTRY Entry within 30 month deadline in Germany Combination with patent application possible Translation needed on national phase entry No claim fees (in contrast to Patent)

BRANCH OFF ( 5 GebrMG) Utility model has effective filing date of the pending patent application from which it is branched off Requirements: Pending patent application designating Germany (i.e. pending international, European or German patent application) Deadline: within 2 months from the end of the month in which processing of the patent application or any opposition procedure, if any, is terminated Same invention Same applicant Until 10 years after application date of patent application

BRANCH OFF - ADVANTAGES Fast protection (against infringement activities during grant proceedings in Germany) -> flanking protection Adaptation of the wording of the claims to the infringing product Fall-back position for patent (different prior art, different definition of novelty) Alternative to a costly divisional application Possible after grant of a patent during opposition

REGISTRATION Only formal examination Very fast (within days) Amendments of description and drawings not possible after registration Documents become prior art Restricted claims can be filed after registration

PUBLICATION / POSTPONING PUBLICATION Publication after formal examination by the GPTO (typically a matter of several weeks) Protection is provided after publication Publication of a utility model constitutes prior art (e.g. for a further patent application for a development that is based on the same subject matter of the utility model) Upon request publication of the utility model can be postponed for up to 15 months from the filing date. However, protection only commences with publication of the utility model.

DURATION The maximum term of protection of a German utility model is 10 years after the end of the month of filing Renewal fees after 3, 6 and 8 years (exception for branch-off applications)

SEARCH Registration without substantive examination (i.e. as to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability) Search request possible and highly advisable before enforcing the utility model

EFFECTS OF THE UTILITY MODEL Exclusive right for the holder corresponding to a granted patent. Third parties are prohibited from making, selling, marketing or using the subject matter of the utility model. The utility model holder can require the infringing party to pay compensatory damages, to desist from the infringement, and to provide information on the extent of the infringement. Dependent on validity of the utility model (risk of compensation of damages)

CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS First instance - Utility model division at the German PTO Second instance - German Federal Patent Court (BPatG) Effect of cancellation ex tunc Proceedings similar to nullity actions for patents Effect in civil procedures

GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION Lack of protectability ( 1 to 3 GebrMG, i.e. "wrong" subject matter, lack of novelty, lack of inventive step, lack of industrial applicability Validly protected prior rights Non-entitled filing

NOVELTY Definition of novelty differs from the definition of novelty regarding patents Not novelty destroying: Oral disclosure Use abroad (i.e. not within the territory of DE) Prior rights Grace period for own publication (6 month) No assessment of novelty upon registration

INVENTIVE STEP Even though the codes are legally different, assessment of inventive step is the same as the assessment of inventive step for patents No assessment of inventive step upon registration

CHARACTERISTICS Possibility of amendment of the claims during cancellation proceedings Decision on validity and on costs Decision open for appeal

COSTS Losing party bears the costs for the proceedings based on the amount in dispute Exceptions: Immediate acknowledgment of the cause of action: the applicant bears the cost Withdrawal of the request: the applicant bears the costs No need to adjudicate: decision on costs based on reasonable discretion No reimbursement for double representation (attorney at law and patent attorney)

ENFORCEMENT OF A UTILITY MODEL Enforcement at patent chamber of civil courts Thorough searches should be conducted to make sure that your application actually meets the requirements applying to effective IP rights. Otherwise you may not invoke any rights based on the utility model registration The validity of a German utility model can be assessed upon request during infringement proceedings by a Civil Court (unlike a German patent or German part of a European Patent) Interlocutory injunction possible, however validity of the utility model has to be confirmed

SUMMARY - Low official fees - Fast protection - Different definition of novelty (e.g. relevant prior art, grace period) - Alternative to an expensive divisional application - Utility model branch-off - Maximum term of protection of 10 years - Limitation to technical products, apparatus and substances - Unexamined IP right - Fast application (prior art for further developments)

THANKS TO THE AUDIENCE! Dr Ben Grau Graham Murnane German Patent Attorney Director, Patents T. +49 (0)89 3090 71100 T. +44 (0)141 307 8400 E. ben.grau@murgitroyd.com E. graham.murnane@murgitroyd.com