Group Chairs: Jerry Hyman, Dale Erickson & Dr. Michael Baranick. Rapporteur: John Applebaugh UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Similar documents
CONCEPT NOTE Anti-Corruption Measures in Afghanistan Time Frame: January 2010 December 2012

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 1

CORRUPTION AND CONFLICT INTEGRITY WATCH AFGHANISTAN. Lorenzo Delesgues

UN Justice Reform in Afghanistan by Sandro Calvani UNICRI Director. School of Applications and Institute of Military Studies, Turin, 13 November 2008

The Afghan War: A Campaign Overview

A 3D Approach to Security and Development

PEACEBRIEF 10. Traditional Dispute Resolution and Stability in Afghanistan. Summary

Afghan Local Police-An Afghan Solution To An Afghan Problem

Inter Agency Essay. Preventing Conflict: Interagency Village Stability Operations Model. by Matthew Denny

Afghanistan and the Uncertain Metrics of Progress Part Six: Showing Victory is Possible

Country Summary January 2005

STATEMENT BY. COLONEL JOSEPH H. FELTER, PH.D., USA (Ret.) CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND COOPERATION (CISAC) STANFORD UNIVERSITY BEFORE THE

Countering Corruption and Organized Crime to Make Afghanistan Stronger for Transition and a Good Future

Afghan Perspectives on Achieving Durable Peace

The Afghan War at End 2009: A Crisis and New Realism

Police Perception Survey The Afghan Perspective

Stabilization Efforts in Afghanistan Introduction to SIGAR

5. Unaccountable Supply Chain Security Contractors Undermine U.S. Counterinsurgency Strategy

AFGHANISTAN: TRANSITION UNDER THREAT WORKSHOP REPORT

TESTIMONY FOR MS. MARY BETH LONG PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

White Paper of the Interagency Policy Group's Report on U.S. Policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan INTRODUCTION

Proposed by Afghan Development Association (ADA) Terms of Reference (TOR)

Host Nation Information Requirements: Achieving Unity of Understanding in Counterinsurgency. George Franz, David Pendall and Jeffrey Steffen

THE AFGHANISTAN CAMPAIGN:

Afghanistan. Endemic corruption and violence marred parliamentary elections in September 2010.

THERE HAS BEEN much discussion as of late about reintegration and

Overview of the Afghanistan and Pakistan Annual Review

Fusion A BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO COUNTERINSURGENCY

Civil War and Political Violence. Paul Staniland University of Chicago

6 December Excellency,

th Street, NW, Washington, DC t f

Just over half of respondents (52%) say Afghanistan is moving in the right direction, up from 46% in It

Report. Deep Differences over Reconciliation Process in Afghanistan

The Afghan-Pakistan War: Status in 2009

Afghanistan --Proposals: State Rebuilding, Reconstruction and Development-- (Outline) July 2004

Official LOEs with Metrics by LOE Owner

Kabul, August (Revision 2)

How Does State Fragility Affect Rural Development? Evidence from Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Yemen, Nepal and Bolivia

The Uncertain Metrics of Afghanistan (and Iraq)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

POLICY BRIEF Extractives for sustainable development in Afghanistan

Letter dated 12 May 2008 from the Secretary-General to the President of the Security Council

HOW DEVELOPMENT ACTORS CAN SUPPORT

Failure to incorporate political goals and requirements into. Dan Green

The United States' Feasibility of Remaining in Afghanistan

AFGHANISTAN IN 2008 A Survey of the Afghan People

Status quo or New Power Structure. By Dr. Hussain Yasa

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1806 (2008) Resolution 1806 (2008) Distr.: General 20 March Original: English

Euiyoung Kim Seoul National University

Interview with Ali Ahmad Jalali*

ANNEX 7. Public. Glossary and Table of Abbreviations

WOMEN LEADING THEIR PROVINCES A leadership and political decision-making program for Women Provincial Councilors, their colleagues and constituents

The Soviet Transition in Afghanistan. Brigadier (Retired) Tom Longland

A Tale of Two Districts

The Benefit of Negative Examples: What We Can Learn About Leadership from the Taliban

Marika Theros Iavor Rangelov. Working Paper WP 01/2010. April Field Notes from Afghanistan: Perceptions of Insecurity and Conflict Dynamics

Center for Strategic & Regional Studies

FIGHTING DRUGS AND CREATING ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS

Transparency is the Key to Legitimate Afghan Parliamentary Elections

Civil Society Capacity Building Needs and Oversight Assessment in Kabul

Afghanistan: The Failed Metrics of Ten Years of War

Self-Reliance through Mutual Accountability Framework (SMAF) Second Senior Officials Meeting Kabul, Afghanistan, 5 September Co-Chairs Statement

Causality Reality A military view from 4 decades

Appendix H. Engagement with Beneficiaries through Social Media

Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan

The motivations behind Afghan Taliban leaders arrest in Pakistan. Saifullah Ahmadzai 1 15 th March 2010

Britain and Afghanistan: policy and expectations 1 Jon Bennett, Oxford Development Consultants June 2009

Strategy Research Project

Operational Plan DFID Afghanistan

A SURVEY OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION ON ELECTIONS AND CIVIC EDUCATION AFGHANISTAN

Public Opinion Trends in Afghanistan. CSIS Feb. 11, 2009 Gary Langer, Director of Polling, ABC News

Strategic plan

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL KARL W. EIKENBERRY, U.S.

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

LINKAGES BETWEEN STATE SYSTEMS IN EASTERN AFGHANISTAN AND NON-STATE JUSTICE EVIDENCE FROM JALALABAD, NANGARHAR AND AHMAD ABA, PAKTIA

MISSION REPORT. Visit of the Special Representative for Children & Armed Conflict to AFGHANISTAN

A Survey of the Afghan People

The Soviet Transition in Afghanistan Presented by Andrzej Frank on behalf of Brigadier (Retired) Tom Longland

AFTER NINE YEARS of war in Afghanistan, a predominant societal

Jodi Vittori, PhD. Senior Policy Advisor, Global Witness November 15, 2017

PERSPECTIVES Provincial Reconstruction Teams and Security Assistance: Comments on an Evolving Concept

Afghan Sub-National Governance: Enabling Success by 2014

BUILDING SECURITY AND STATE IN AFGHANISTAN: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT Woodrow Wilson School Princeton University October Conference Summary

Legislative Newsletter

Press Conference Transcript 19 February Launch of Annual Report 2012: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict

Afghanistan beyond 2014: Elections, Political Settlement, Reforms Recommendations from Afghan Civil Society

ICT4COP. The Road Ahead: A preliminary insight into the workings of Police Experts Networks in Post- Conflict Societies.

SPARK Expert Meeting 2014

Creativity in Action

It was carried out by Charney Research of New York. The fieldwork was done by the Afghan Centre for Social and Opinion Research in Kabul.

APPLICANT INFORMATION CLASS OF 2018

On behalf of people of Afghanistan, it is my pleasure and privilege to. welcome you to this milestone conference, marking a new phase in the

Oral Statement of General James L. Jones, USMC, Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 21 Sep 06

SECURITY & STABILITY. Operation Hope Hero 58 Pg. 2 Village Assessment Pg. 4

Husain Haqqani. An Interview with

Rule of Law and COIN environment

ANNEX 5. Public. Chronology of relevant events

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX

Voices of Moderate Islam (VoMI)

CORRUPTION AND VIOLENT CONFLICT

Transcription:

Group Chairs: Jerry Hyman, Dale Erickson & Dr. Michael Baranick Rapporteur: John Applebaugh

1. Corruption and Information Operations in Afghanistan 15 Minute Presentation/15 Minute Q&A: Ms. Leah Werchick Senior Advisor, USAID/Office of Transition Initiatives 30 Minute Discussion 2. Key Questions 30 Minute General Overview of MG Flynn s Questions MG Flynn s Questions; Ex: How does local population perceive/relate to local army, police versus the insurgency? What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

UN ESCAP: the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented The World Bank defines governance as the exercise of political authority and the use of institutional resources to manage society's problems and affairs. The Worldwide Governance Indicators project of the World Bank defines governance as The traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This considers the process by which governments are selected, monitored and replaced; the capacity of the government to effectively formulate and implement sound policies and the respect of citizens and the state of the institutions that govern economic and social interactions among them. An alternate definition sees governance as the use of institutions, structures of authority and even collaboration to allocate resources and coordinate or control activity in society or the economy. According to the United Nations Development Programme's Regional Project on Local Governance for Latin America: Governance has been defined as the rules of the political system to solve conflicts between actors and adopt decision (legality). It has also been used to describe the "proper functioning of institutions and their acceptance by the public" (legitimacy). And it has been used to invoke the efficacy of government and the achievement of consensus by democratic means (participation).

The collective `process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented Governance analysis includes three components: Process Participation Accountability

Traditional/customary governance processes gutted by decades of war At local (village) level, need for governances arises from collective issues over: 1) Security 2) Civil justice (rule of law) Less emphasis on delivery of hard services Stratified authority basis at local level: 1) Tribal consensus (not elected), 2) Religious, 3) Patronage (wealth), 4) Strongmen (militia leadership) No nation-wide standard; authority base composition varies by region Tragedy of the commons distribution of collectively owned resources Extension of Central government reach (i.e. services) is a new venture. Historical approach- central government selection of intermediary (from the existing to represent the village to the government (malik) New processes e.g. emergent role of the Community Development Council (CDC) and community councils

#6: What are components of political legitimacy for the local population? #9 & 10: How much does corruption impact perceptions of local, provincial, and central governance in Kabul? How does government corruption impact the Afghan population? #50: Is there a correlation between perceptions of governance and support for the insurgency?

Who are the formal leaders / leadership organizations? From what source do they draw authority? Who are the informal leaders? Measures: Are leaders present identifiable, do they exist? What is their affiliation? Impediments: Village granularity difficult to achieve and relevant? Data sources Triangulation for false positives Ask District leaders, Provincial Ask police Bottom up-balance against Afghan population perceptions Corruption impact/who do they go to for adjudication Coalition District Assessments CIDNE, UK databases (RC-S) IDC

#3: What drives popular support/ tolerance for the insurgency vs. the government? #7: What is popular perception of effectiveness/intent of local/national governing officials? #17: What services do the insurgents provide that the Afghan government/isaf have been unable to deliver?

Measures Distinction between active / passive support and between Disenfranchisement from GIRoA resources (development, jobs, land) & power Perceived inequities Number of villages with QST (officials) present Nature of the enemy integral to society & not monolithic Perception that support for Taliban improves economic or social opportunity? Generational conflict GIRoA perceived as predatory? Metrics of fear how do we measure fear? Number of leadership who stay overnight in governed area How many bodies? Number of reports and relationships of people reporting disputes to ANP Number of local community meetings held & enforceability of community decisions Population movement displaced persons

Means: Population survey TCAPF Poll Trusted agent Knowledge management issue We have the data how do you make tacit, qualitative knowledge explicit for the commander

#4: How does population accept/see governance? What is historic response to governance? #20: How would the population design their local, district, provincial and national government if given the opportunity? #39: What would be the accepted (active) role of the government in business development?

Measures: Acceptance of current & emergent governance processes (e.g. CDC) Is governance working? Means: Are decisions made? Who exerts control over the process? Tracked over time - Proportion of decisions actually made against those that need to be made Are decisions challenged Do the right people participate in jirga / shura process where higher level issues are concerned? Looking down from the district level- Are decisions challenged/accountable/acted upon? District assessments

Measures: Reliance on alternative (Taliban) adjudication Means: Polls Surveys Opinion groups Coordination across commands/organizations

How does corruption affect and impact governance in Afghanistan? How does information operations affect and impact governance in Afghanistan? Make the important things measurable (not vice versa)

What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

Measures: Underlying Taliban narrative (delivery of security & justice) GIRoA ownership of resources Failure of coalition to deliver expectations Career path for aspiring mullah Means: What does the populace believe? How many have heard about Taliban justice? Are Taliban decisions enforced? Counter-shouter

What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

What operational and analytical questions are we trying to answer? What are the key measures? What are the data requirements? What data are available and where does it come from? How are data assessed and who does the assessments? What tools are we using for analysis? What is the unit of analysis and what are its characteristics? What impediments to data collection and analysis? Who is collecting the data? How do we improve the state of data in Afghanistan? How are these data sources linked and integrated? What are the common activities and requirements that require data support?

UN ESCAP: the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented The World Bank defines governance as the exercise of political authority and the use of institutional resources to manage society's problems and affairs. The Worldwide Governance Indicators project of the World Bank defines governance as The traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This considers the process by which governments are selected, monitored and replaced; the capacity of the government to effectively formulate and implement sound policies and the respect of citizens and the state of the institutions that govern economic and social interactions among them. An alternate definition sees governance as the use of institutions, structures of authority and even collaboration to allocate resources and coordinate or control activity in society or the economy. According to the United Nations Development Programme's Regional Project on Local Governance for Latin America: Governance has been defined as the rules of the political system to solve conflicts between actors and adopt decision (legality). It has also been used to describe the "proper functioning of institutions and their acceptance by the public" (legitimacy). And it has been used to invoke the efficacy of government and the achievement of consensus by democratic means (participation).