How to Write a Brief Thursday, March 7 pm ET Presenter Sherry Olsen Kaplan University Writing Center Please click here to view this recorded

Similar documents
Negligence: Elements

Page 1 of 7. Fall 2015 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2015 E

IRAC ORGANIZATION EXAMPLES

PET. Professional Employment Test.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING A COMPLAINT IN A NEVADA DISTRICT OR JUSTICE COURT (Generic)

101 Ways Your Intern Can Triple Your Website Traffic & Performance This Year

Torts Tutorial Chapter 6 Joint Tortfeasors

A. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11, [2009] 1 AC 874, [2009] 2 WLR 481, [2009] 3 All ER 205 HL

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

CED: An Overview of the Law

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS BASIC INFORMATION

ssessment Flexible Design and Liability John Maiorana ...the need to be flexible is written into documents that are the foundation for highway design.

Cause No NUMBER 3

Guernsey Chamber of Commerce. Website User Guide

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.

Resource Guide for the APS Website

Welcome! Please sit anywhere you like (within reason).

Never Run Out of Ideas: 7 Content Creation Strategies for Your Blog

ecourts Attorney User Guide

Lawyering Skills I Professor David E. Sorkin Fall 2006

Torts I review session November 20, 2017 SLIDES. Negligence

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests

SNSF policy on plagiarism, self-plagiarism and recycling of text in research proposals

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

Social Networking & Bar Association Communication -- What You Should Know About How to Use it to Your Advantage

Work Based Learning & Safety. Work Based Learning & Safety. Work Based Learning & Safety. Do you remember this incident! WORK BASED LEARNING & SAFETY

Name Date Period. Approximate population in millions. Arizona Colorado Connecticut Georgia Idaho Iowa 3.

Cause Number (Complete the heading so it looks exactly like the Petition) In the (check one):

on your blue computer graded bubble sheet in the appropriate location.

The Role and Importance of Depositions

TORTS. University of Houston Spring, Deana Pollard-Sacks, Visiting Professor of Law

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies

Business Law Fundamentals Exam #1 Page 1 of 7

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

Negligent In Your Legal Knowledge?

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Cites for Sore Eyes. Case Law Analysis That Works. Randall H. Warner is an appellate practitioner at Jones Skelton & Hochuli, PLC BY RANDALL H.

a) test the strength of the opposing positions and encourage the parties to reach a compromise b) ensure that all documents are in order before trial

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

Bruce M. Sabados. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries.

Component Part Supplier Claims and Asbestos Equipment Litigation

ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5

How Community Associations Can Minimize the Legal Risks Associated With Board Meeting Minutes. William W. Sleeth III, Esq. Elizabeth L. White, Esq.

Creating & Sharing Videos for Your Law Firm Website. Allison Gagliardi PaperStreet

HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION

STEP 1. Site Section Management (Building & Intranet Management) - Content Management Page Components

Understanding the RM Process

Illinois YMCA Youth and Government. Judicial Program Pre-Leg II

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

Terms of Service Overview

Mojdeh Nikdel Patty George

13 ADVANCED TRIAL TIPS. Gary K. Burger BURGER LAW BurgerLaw.com

Intentional Torts. Intentional Torts, Generally. Legal Analysis Part Two Fall Types of Intentional Torts 10/23/16

Proofmaking Model. Legal Source eg. common law or statute. Level ONE. Cause of Action. Level TWO

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

Advocacy Resources: What NACDL Can Do for You. Monica L. Reid Grassroots Advocacy Manager National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Question Farmer Jones? Discuss. 3. Big Food? Discuss. -36-

Safety & Liability Does pursuit of safety expose an agency to liability? liability for action liability for inaction liability for trying something ne

Constance Popineau 4, rue Meissonier Paris FEI Nomination committee. Paris, April the 29th

'Disturbing' Forced Deportation Audio Prompts Calls For Home Office Investigation 'People need to be treated with dignity.'

Seventh Circuit Permits Parol Evidence to Prove Fraud in the Inducement Despite Lack of Fraud in Integration Clause

Stock Show Online Nomination Process Step-by-Step Instructions

CONTRACTS. A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties whereby they make the future more predictable.

Why Would A Specialist Be Sued?

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT ANALYSIS

JOMC 457: Advanced Editing Spring 2014

4/3/2018. Someone s Knocking at the Door: Are you ready for increased immigration compliance? I-9 Audit. Lori Chesser

UNIFORM CRIMINAL RECORDS ACCURACY ACT UNIFORM CIVIL REMEDIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES ACT

Legal Liability in Adventure Tourism

I. DELEGATE GUIDE MUN

Frontier Justice and the End of Contract A

HID Headlights Victim Precaution No Vest 8% 3% Vest 5% 1%

A Competence Statement for Solicitors

Free Speech on the Internet Jeremy D. Mishkin

ACE of Birmingham Quarter-Year Handbook: 2019 Spring Season

To gain access to the available handouts please click the handout tab then double click the document to download.

Prepared for Gina Varcone, Vice President of Professional Services

DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTS: EMERGING JUDICIAL TRENDS

7. How many states are there in the USA? 8. How many Senators does each state get?

Procedure for Handling Incidents of Academic Dishonesty

What s a clerk to do?

Chapter 12: Products Liability

Autumn-Elections 2017 Candidate Information Pack

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. We have already addressed the issues currently before this Court related to

California Bar Examination

Pre-Incorporation Contracts Who Owns Them?

Social Networking in Many Forms

Legal Ethics and Social Media. Do you Tweet?

Minimum Wage Increases: The Left s Magic Boat Strategy for Higher Wages. Western Pallet Association Palm Springs, January 15, 2017

Fall 1997 December 20, 1997 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

11 Green Bag 2d 51. Green Bag Autumn, Article. HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION A Guide for New Law Students. Orin S. Kerr a1

JUNE 2016 LAW REVIEW LEGAL RELATIONSHIP SHAPES AED USE REQUIREMENT

Proving Breach of Duty, Medical, and Legal Malpractice

General Issues in Remedies. Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com. Konomark Most rights sharable. Law vs. Equity

Lunch & Learn (L&L) Advocacy and the Importance of Voter Registration

Transcription:

How to Write a Brief Thursday, March 23 @ 7 pm ET Presenter Sherry Olsen Kaplan University Writing Center Please click here to view this recorded webinar: http://khe2.adobeconnect.com/p9rpqxe3301/ 1

IRAC-FIRAC Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion 2

What is the FIRAC/IRAC formula? IRAC forms the fundamental building blocks of any legal analysis. It is the process by which all lawyers think about any legal problem. The wonderful thing about IRAC is that it allows us to reduce the complex to the simple. It allows us to reduce the complexities of the law and the case by use of a simple formula. Facts Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion 3

Building Blocks Facts> Set out the material facts Legal Issue> Why are these parties in court? What facts and circumstances brought them to court? Rule of law> What law governs the specific legal issue? Analysis> How does the rule of law identified apply to these specific facts? Conclusion> What is the decision of the court? 4

Issue Spotting and Material Facts Facts A brief starts with the facts. What are the facts that give rise to the case? What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue? Key: MATERIAL FACTS A "material fact" is a fact that is crucial to the determination of an issue at hand. Without this particular fact, the court's determination of the issue would have been different. Material facts can be thought of as those facts which a party would use to prove his or her case. Think about who the parties are, what their dispute is, and how they got to where they are. 5

How to IRAC Issue The legal issue is the most important element in the analysis. It is the identification of the legal issue and must be stated in a way to show what is in controversy. The legal question ties together the rule and the facts particular to the problem you identified. Key: The issue is always phrased as a question. State the issue by creating the legal question presented by the facts. To find the issue, ask: What is in controversy in these facts? Example: The issue is whether John committed the tort of conversion when he refused to return the borrowed tools? 6

State the Law Rule - R After we have the issue, we have to locate the applicable rule of law. The rule and the facts are inextricably linked, and our analysis of the facts will not make sense unless we have first identified the rule of law which determines the legal meaning we are to give those facts. The rule could be common law that was developed by the courts or a law that was passed by the legislature (statute). >Elements >Definitions >Defenses Elements to consider for the Rule 7

Rule R, Continued Questions to Ask when Reading a Case: What are the elements that prove the rule? (Negligence = Duty, Breach, Causation, Damages) What are the exceptions to the rule? From what authority does it come? Common law, statutes, or a new rule? Final Consideration What does application of the rule mean here? What will be its effect? 8

Analysis - A The analysis or application is the heart of the discussion. It is where we examine the issues raised by the facts in light of the rule of law we identified. Our statement of the rule is what will help us organize the analysis. You simply match up each element you have identified in the rule (in order) with a fact, to make the connection between rule and fact. This important area is relatively simple. For every relevant fact, you need to ask whether the fact helps to prove or disprove the rule. If a rule requires that a certain circumstance is present in order for the rule to apply, then the absence of that circumstance helps you reach the conclusion that the rule does not apply. The analysis is the most important element of IRAC since this is where the real thinking happens. 9

Conclusion C > From the analysis you come to a conclusion as to whether the rule applies to the facts. The conclusion is the shortest part of the equation. It can be a simple "yes" or "no" as to whether the rule applies to a set of facts. > We always want to take a position one way or the other on an issue. The bottom line is to take a position and support it. 10

Conclusion, continued C Be sure to conclude each issue before drawing your final overall conclusion. Key Note: Repeat the process for each issue you identify where each issue forms the basis for a separate IRAC analysis. So if we have a battery claim, a conversion claim, and a fraud claim, each one of those claims must have their own IRAC analysis. Remember the brief is to simplify, and allow another to read the brief and understand the case. 11

Conclusion- C, Continued Warning > Avoid a conclusion that concludes something without having a basis for the opinion. In other words we don t want to spot an issue, add the rule, and conclude. We have to perform the analysis Make the application of law to facts in order to have a sustainable legal conclusion. Remember that the position you take is always whether or not the rule applies. > If a rule does not apply, we can t conclude whether a party is liable or not. There may be another rule by which the party should be judged. We may need to raise another rule and analyze the facts again. > In addition, the conclusion should always be stated as a probable result. Courts differ widely on a given set of facts, and there is usually flexibility for different interpretations. Be sure to look at the validity of the opponent's position. If your case has flaws, it is important to recognize those weaknesses and identify them. It is better to say that Therefore, it is likely that, than to provide a definitive conclusion. 12

Questions 13

For more writing support, connect with the KUWC s newly redesigned public webpage. You can actually Google and find this page. This is also a great way for you to stay connected to the KUWC through our blog and Twitter. Many of our resources are here as well. 14

Come visit the Academic Support Center. We can be found under the My Studies tab, then under Academic Support Center. 15

You will find more citation and plagiarism resources under the heading Manage Your Studies and Time (Citation (APA and More) and Plagiarism Information). Other Writing Center services include Connect with a Tutor, Submit a Paper or Question, Webinars, and more. Notice, you can access the Kaplan Guide to Successful Writing on the left hand side in both print and audio form. 16

Contact Information Sherry Olsen, J.D. colsen@kaplan.edu Amy Sexton, Tutor, Webinars kuwc@kaplan.edu Workshops are recorded and recording links, with an accompanying PowerPoint, are posted on the Writing Center Workshops page after the workshop. Additional Kaplan University Writing Center Resources Introductory Video Survey Link Writing Center 2017 Kaplan University Writing Center Connect with the Academic Support Centers. ASC Blog @KaplanASC on Twitter 17