ii (oio Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order to Show Cause,

Similar documents
l1o SEP Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order and Rule to

of Court and the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the

I Colorado Supreme Court 101 West Colfax Avenue, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80202

Upon consideration of the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P.

I Colorado Supreme Court

ORDER OF COURT. Upon consideration of the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P.

ORDER OF COURT. Upon consideration of the Order Entering Default Judgment Pursuant to

Upon consideration of the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the above cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the

Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order and Rule to. Show Cause and the Stipulation, Agreement and Affidavit Containing

Presiding Disciplinary Judge are Approved. Respondent is ENJOINED. from the Unauthorized Practice of Law.

Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order to Show Cause

ORDER OF COURT. Upon consideration of the Order Entering Default Pursuant to C.R.C.P.

ORDER OF COURT. Upon consideration of the Order entering default Judgment Pursuant to

Upon consideration of the Order Granting Motion for Default Judgment. Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 55(b) and Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P.

Unauthorized Practice of Law. premises, IT IS THIS DAY ORDERED that Respondent is Enjoined from the

Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order to Show Cause,

and now being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent, L. Tod Schlosser, d/b/a The Law

Upon consideration of the Report of Hearing Master Under C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the above cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

Upon consideration of the Order Entering Default Judgment Under C.R.C.P. 55(b) and Report of Hearing Master under C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the above

55(b) and Report of Hearing Master Under C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the above. cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding

RECEIVED. JlN 2 9 2U03 REGULATION. Petitioner: ATTORNEY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondent: JAMES JOHN JORISSEN, U alicia JAY J.

Assistant Regulation Counsel Presiding Disciplinary Judge. cc: James C. Coyle Hon. Roger Keithley. Suzanne Shell. Elbert, Co 80906

People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney

RECEIVE. M4y ATTORNEy. Supreme Court State of Colorado. Petitioner: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondent: DAVID HASKETT.

I Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th A venue RECEIVEO Denver, CO 80203

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

People v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014.

People v. Allyn. 10PDJ068. February 7, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn B. Allyn (Attorney Registration

People v. Romo-Vejar, 05PDJ057. March 31, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent

PRE-DECREE OR PRE-FINAL ORDERS

Upon consideration of the Stipulation, Agreement and Affidavit Consenting. above cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

People v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney

People v. Bigley. 10PDJ100. May 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Michael F.

People v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent

Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Response, the Report. of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a) and the Response to and Non

Respondent has been properly served with the Petition for. the premises, Injunction and Order to Show Cause,

Upon consideration of the Order Granting Petitioner s Motion for Judgment

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

People v. Smith. 10PDJ103. April 20, Attorney Regulation. Following a hearing, a Hearing Board dismissed the complaint against Matthew Smith

People v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017.

People v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory

and Case Number: 05DR Respondent. Courtroom: 5D INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P 16.2 (EFFECTIVE )

COURT FACILITATED PROCEDURE FOR DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES

TAKE NOTICE THAT YOU MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FORECLOSURE OF A DEED OF TRUST ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW:

17B-005. Civil injunction proceedings. A. Petition for civil injunction. If chief disciplinary counsel or, when necessary, chief disciplinary counsel

DECISION RE: SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P (b)

, Case Number: DR NOTICE OF INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE IN OFFICE 5E

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

People v. Lindsey Scott Topper. 16PDJ004. July 27, 2016.

Attorney for the Petitioner and my Utah Bar number is

Order: Stipulated (Between Defendant KONE Inc. and Plaintiff) Motion for a Continuance of Trial (also filed on behalf of Plaintiff)

People v. William F. Levings. 16PDJ082. April 17, 2017.

DEFENDANT CITY OF FORT COLLINS MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

People v. David William Beale. 16PDJ066. February 9, 2017.

People v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018.

Telephone: Facsimile: NOTICE OF RULE 120 MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING SALE RESPONSE DEADLINE November 16, 2018

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Sanction Imposed: Two Year and Three Month Suspension

People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.

Telephone Number (Daytime) Cell Number:

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING REINSTATEMENT

People v. Kem W. Swarts. 17PDJ038. March 1, 2018.

: : Upon the motion dated as of November 8, 2010 (the Motion ), 1 of Ambac Financial

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UE and OAR , and by this Petition asks the Public Utility Commission of

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

People v. Mascarenas. 11PDJ008. September 27, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Steven J. Mascarenas (Attorney

Case 1:12-cv CMA-MJW Document 39 Filed 05/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF EXPUNGEMENT FORM

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.


Attorney for the Petitioner and my Utah Bar number is

MOTION FOR TELEPHONE TESTIMONY OF W. SCOTT ROCKEFELLER WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and

Case 1:06-cv REB-MEH Document 39 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 6

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION JUDGE ADVOCATE PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/09/ :05 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 196 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2018

THE BOARD ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. On May 12, 2006 Relator Dayton Bar Association filed its Complaint against

mew Doc 303 Filed 10/19/17 Entered 10/19/17 13:17:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.

Division of Legal Services and Compliance Case No. 14 CHI 029. The parties to this action for the purpose of Wis. Stat. 227.

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

This matter comes before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment and preliminary injunction and cross motion for partial summary judgment.

ENFORCING A CUSTODY ORDER (CONTEMPT)

REPORT OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SECTION OF THE COLORADO BAR ASSOCIATION

DEFENDANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF. PARK ( Park County ) by its attorneys Hayes, Phillips, Hoffmann & Carberry, P.C.

The Louisiana Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board [hereinafter the

U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:11-cv Y

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

RULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY ORPHANS COURT DIVISION CHAPTER 1. LOCAL RULES OF ORPHANS COURT DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

People v. Kevin D. Heupel. 17PDJ005. July 11, 2017.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case MFW Doc 71 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi 2013 NY Slip Op 32638(U) September 10, 2013 Supreme Court, Albany County Docket Number: Judge: Jr., George B.

Case CSS Doc 783 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Respectfully Submitted, Robert Wayne Johnson, Pro Se

Transcription:

JfN Zflfl9 Colorado Supreme Court. 2 East 14th Ave., Fourth Floor Denver, CO $0203 Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel 2008UPL43 Petitioner: The People of the State of Colorado, Supreme Court Case No: 2009SA65 V. Respondents: Yasmeen Watson and Advantage Legal Services, LLC. ORDER OF COURT Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order to Show Cause, the Response to Petition for Injunction, the Order Appointing Hearing Master and the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a) filed in the above cause, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that said Respondent, YASMEEN WATSON shall be, and the same hereby is, ENJOINED from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent, ADVANTAGE LEGAL SERVICES, LLC shall be and the same hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ii (oio

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent, YASMEEN WATSON is assessed costs in the amount of $91.00. Said costs to be paid to the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, within (90) days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent, YASMEEN WATSON pay restitution to Dennis Williams in the amount of $399.00 and June Estala in the amount of $493.00. Said restitution payments would begin in June 2010 in the amount of $50.00 a month to Dennis Williams and $50.00 a month to June Estala for a total of $100.00 a month until repayment is complete. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court WAIVES any fines in this matter pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a). BY THE COURT, JANUARY 6, 2010.

Case Number: 2009SA65 Caption: People v Watson, Yasmeen CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies mailed via the State s Mail Services Division on January 7, 2010 Advantage Legal Services, LLC April M McMurrey 1451 21 st Street, Suite C OFFICE OF ATTORNEY Denver, CO 80250 REGULATION 1560 Broadway Ste 1800 Denver, CO 80202 William R Lucero Yasmeen Watson PRESIDiNG DISIPLINARY P.O. Box 461913 JUDGE Aurora, CO 80046 1560 Broadway Ste 675 Denver, CO 80202 Yasmeen Watson Yasmeen Watson 24590 E. Applewood Circle, #1028 8017 S. Coolidge Way Aurora, CO 80016 Aurora, CO $0016

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO,, ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW BEFORE THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE 1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 675 DENVER, CO 80202 Petitioner: Case Number: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, 09SA065 Respondent: YASMEEN WATSON and ADVANTAGE LEGAL SERVICES, LLC. REPORT OF HEARING MASTER PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 236(a) This matter is before the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ( PDJ ) on an Order Appointing Hearing Master issued by the Colorado Supreme Court ( Supreme Court ) on July 23, 2009. The Supreme Court remanded this matter to the PDJ to determine the facts and to make recommendations to the Court pursuant to C.R.C.P. 234(f). I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY April M. McMurrey, Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel ( the People ), filed a Petition for Injunction with the Supreme Court on March 17, 2009. On March 19, 2009, the Supreme Court issued an Order to Show Cause and ordered Yasmeen Watson and Advantage Legal Services, LLC ( Respondents ) to answer in writing and show cause within twenty days why they should not be enjoined from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in the State of Colorado. Respondents filed a response to the petition on June 16, 2009. The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the PDJ on July 23, 2009. On August 13, 2009, the PDJ held a Status Conference. Ms. McMurrey appeared on behalf of the People and Respondent Yasmeen Watson appeared pro se by telephone. The PDJ set various deadlines and scheduled the matter for a one-day hearing to commence on January 5, 2010. On December 22, 2009, the parties filed a Stipulation, Agreement and Affidavit Consenting to an Order of Injunction with the PDJ. AVk4 )/)

II. FINDINGS OF FACT For purposes of this report, and in the interests of judicial economy, the PDJ accepted the following findings of fact set forth in the stipulation. Respondent Yasmeen Watson is not licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. Respondent Advantage Legal Services, LLC ( ALS ) was registered with the Colorado Secretary of State as a Limited Liability Company. ALS and its agents are not licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. Ms. Watson was the registered agent of ALS. At all time pertinent hereto, Ms. Watson directed and supervised ALS activities. ALS advertised that the services it provided included document preparation and the opportunity to retain an attorney. In the first client matter, Ms. Watson, through ALS, selected and prepared legal pleadings for Dennis Williams and collected $399.00 for legal services. In the second client matter, Ms. Watson, through ALS, selected and prepared legal pleadings for June Estala and collected $493.00 for legal services. Ms. Watson is no longer directing, supervising or operating ALS. Therefore, as a part of the stipulation, the People stipulated to the dismissal of ALS, a defunct Colorado corporation. Ms. Watson also agreed to pay administrative costs and restitution related this matter. III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RECOMMENDATIONS By selecting and preparing legal pleadings for others, Ms. Watson engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. She does not fall within any of the statutory or case law exceptions. The parties stipulated to an order of injunction as well as an order requiring that Ms. Watson pay administrative costs and restitution related to this matter. The PDJ reviewed the stipulation, and in the interests of judicial economy, RECOMMENDS that the Supreme Court ACCEPT it and ENJOIN Respondent Yasmeen Watson from the unauthorized practice of law. The PDJ also RECOMMENDS that the Supreme Court DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Respondent Advantage Legal Services, LLC, a defunct Colorado corporation, as requested by the People. See Peopte v. Shell, 148 P.3d 162 (Cob. 2006); Denver BarAssn. v. P.U.C., 154 Cob. 273, 391 P.2d 467 (1964) (The unauthorized practice of law includes acting as a representative in protecting, enforcing or defending the legal rights and duties of another and/or counseling, advising and assisting that person in connection with legal rights and duties). 2

The PDJ further RECOMMENDS that the Supreme Court order Respondent to pay administrative COSTS in the amount of $91.00 within ninety (90) days of the Supreme Court s order of injunction. In addition, the PDJ RECOMMENDS that the Supreme Court order Respondent to pay RESTITUTION to Dennis Williams in the amount of $399.00 and June Estala in the amount of $493.00. Restitution payments would begin in June 2010 in the amount of $50.00 a month to Dennis Williams and $50.00 a month to June Estala for a total of $100.00 a month until repayment is complete. finally, the PDJ RECOMMENDS that the Supreme Court WAIVE any FINES in this matter pursuant to C.R.C.P. 236(a).2 DATED THIS 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2010. WILLIAM R. LUCERO PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE Copies to: April M. McMurrey Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel Via Hand Delivery Yasmeen Watson Respondent 23043 E. Ontario Drive, #105 Aurora, CO $0016 Advantage Legal Services, LLC Respondent 1451 21ST Street, Suite C Denver, CO 80250 Via First Class Mail Via First Class Mail Susan Festag Colorado Supreme Court Via Hand Delivery 2 See C.R.C.P. 236(a) (A report from the Presiding Disciplinary Judge approving the parties stipulation to injunction may be exempt from a fine). 3