Case 1:10-cv AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 37. May 8, 2017

Similar documents
Approved by Monitor, 5/15/17 INTERIOR PATROL

Case 1:10-cv SAS-HBP Document Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 19 REVISED EXHIBIT E

Approved by Monitor, 11/20/15 INTERIOR PATROL

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS 1

Know Your. Help End Discriminatory, Abusive & Illegal Policing!

Case 1:10-cv SAS-HBP Document 241 Filed 12/15/12 Page 1 of 11

. \ seek documents and record's\frói the M~nhattfffrpistrict Attorney's Office (the "District

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016 ANTONIO JOHNSON STATE OF MARYLAND

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

When used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meanings designated:

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution

Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

Show Me Your Papers. Can Police Arrest You for Failing to Identify Yourself? Is history repeating? Can this be true in the United States?

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 28, NO. 35,017 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

0'*'1""/[~1_.,... Case 1:12-cv AT-HBP Document 296 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 48 VSDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED.

Fourth Amendment United States Constitution

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

ESSAY QUESTION NO. 4. Answer this question in booklet No. 4

USA v. Terrell Haywood

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant.

LESSON PLAN FOR CONDUCTING A UNIT OF INSTRUCTION IN MIRANDA v. ARIZONA YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT

BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

A GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

McCormick Hall Security Overview

Tanko v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 32418(U) September 24, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Alexander M.

When Shoplifting Prevention Escalates to a Shoplifter Detention

Defiant Trespass and Ban Policy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Youth Justice: your guide to cops and court in New South Wales. Supplement - February Transit Officers

Case 1:13-cv PKC-JO Document 123 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 2541

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

People v. Ross, No st District, October 17, 2000

Subject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

4/3/2018. Someone s Knocking at the Door: Are you ready for increased immigration compliance? I-9 Audit. Lori Chesser

MEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs MODEL POLICY OFFICER-INVOLVED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA case no.: 5D

Case Name: R. v. Graham. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Roy Graham. [2014] O.J. No Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario. G.S. Gage J.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Police Shooting of Ruka Hemopo

This General Order contains the following numbered sections:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYI ANTHONY STEFFENS, Defendant-Appellant.

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS REFERENCE GUIDE

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Residence Hall Policies

Case 5:08-cr DNH Document 14 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 1 CASE NO. 08-CR-519 (DNH) NOTICE OF MOTION

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,212. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOHN W. BANNON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

BUILDING TRUST WITH COMMUNITIES, UPHOLDING DUE PROCESS SUPERVISING ATTORNEY IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER SEPTEMBER 2015

A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO

Leicestershire Constabulary Counter Allegations Procedure

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Can officers lawfully pat search a person based solely on an anonymous telephone tip that the person is carrying a concealed weapon?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

identified in a commercial B & E

State of Texas Community Safety Education Act Instructor s Guide

l. Plaintiff is a Caucasian male. (See Zgodny Decl. Ex. A, Pl. Amend. Compl. at

SECTION: ADMINISTRATION ADM-133

STATE OF OHIO STEVEN GROSS

FINAL EXAMINATION DIRECTIONS: Write your answers on the ANSWER SHEET provided.

Case: 3:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence

Protective Orders No-Trespass/No-Contact Order What happens after a police report is filed? Miscellaneous Criminal Justice Information

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.28

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.7 DOMESTIC MATTERS

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Ohio

National Survey Toplines (n=1003; gun owners = 451) January 14, CODE, BUT DO NOT ASK: Male Female

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,799 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

MULTISTATE PERFORMANCE TEST FEBRUARY 2010

Search & Seizure Warrants

The Dog Sniff Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution

Subject DEPARTMENTAL AWARDS AND COMMENDATION. 4 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

Marion County Attorney s Office 214 E. Main Knoxville, IA (641) TO ALL BUSINESSES/PERSONS UTILIZING THE BAD CHECK PROCEDURE

How to Host a Member of Congress at Your ESOP Company

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr EAK-MAP-1.

Canvassing (Door to Door)

Supreme Court of Florida

4-H Club Officer Handbook

4-H Legislature Preparation IV: Mock Legislature

POLICE TRAFFIC STOPS & HOW SHOULD YOU ACT? WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS. Special Report Handling A Police Traffic Stop

2014 PA Super 234 OPINION BY STABILE, J.: FILED OCTOBER 14, The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting a motion to

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT LA CROSSE COUNTY

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Transcription:

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 37 Peter L. Zimroth +1 212.715.1010 Direct Peter.Zimroth@aporter.com May 8, 2017 VIA ECF Honorable Analisa Torres United States District Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Davis, et al. v. City of New York, et al., 10-CV-0699 (AT); Recommendation regarding roll call training scripts on policies for stops in NYCHA buildings Dear Judge Torres: I am pleased to submit my recommendation regarding one aspect of training for the court-approved NYPD policies and practices concerning enforcement activities in and near New York City Housing Authority ( NYCHA ) buildings. The training subject to this recommendation consists of two videos of PowerPoint presentations with a voiceover to be shown to officers in commands at roll call. The script for the voice-over for each slide appears at the bottom of that slide. The parties are still working on additional training materials for officers in the Housing Bureau. The settlement in Davis requires a Patrol Guide provision for the interior patrol of NYCHA buildings that promotes constitutional interactions between NYPD officers and persons encountered during interior patrols. The court approved this new policy, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 250 West 55th Street New York, NY 10019-9710 www.apks.com 78953153v3

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 2 of 37 May 8, 2017 Page 2 P.G. 212-60, in June 2016 (Dkt. No. 358). Since then, the parties have been working to resolve their differences concerning this training and the related training for interior patrols of TAP buildings; those differences are now resolved. I believe that the proposed training materials meet the requirements of the court s order approving the settlement in Davis v. City of New York (Dkt. No. 339). The parties in Davis have informed me that they support the approval of these roll call training materials. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter L. Zimroth Peter L. Zimroth Monitor Attachments: (1) P.G. 212-60 Interior Patrol of Housing Authority Buildings Roll Call Video PowerPoint Presentation with Voice-Over Script, 1 of 2 (2) P.G. 212-60 Interior Patrol of Housing Authority Buildings Roll Call Video PowerPoint Presentation with Voice-Over Script, 2 of 2 78953153v3

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 3 of 37 Attachment 1

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 4 of 37 Patrol Guide procedure 212-60 entitled Interior Patrol of Housing Authority Buildings has been revised. The following are the highlights of the new procedure. 1

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 5 of 37 All officer inquiries, interactions and enforcement activities in Housing Authority buildings must be conducted with the courtesy, professionalism and respect to which all persons are entitled in their own homes Residents of Public Housing and their guests have the same rights as anyone else 2

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 6 of 37 Interior patrol fundamentals: Notify the radio dispatcher and provide the address of the building prior to beginning an interior patrol 3

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 7 of 37 Stay with your partner at all times do not split up! 4

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 8 of 37 Patrol Guide section 212-11 applies to interior patrols in NYCHA and establishes the standards for conducting all investigative encounters 5

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 9 of 37 Be alert for persons who may be violating Housing Authority rules and regulations commonly referred to as House Rules A person may not be stopped or arrested for violation of a house rule unless it is also a criminal offense However, violation of a house rule may provide an objective credible reason to approach a person. You can only ask nonaccusatory questions because they are not a suspect Prepare a Field Report for violations of House Rules 6

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 10 of 37 Lingering is an example of a house rule Lingering occurs when an individual remains in a common area of a NYCHA residential building for an unreasonable period of time in light of the area s intended purpose. Waiting in the lobby for a cab or a food delivery is NOT lingering since those activities are consistent with the area s intended purpose. Lingering, without more, is not a criminal offense for which a person may be stopped or arrested However, lingering may provide the basis to approach a person and make further inquiries 7

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 11 of 37 Trespass investigations: Be alert for persons engaged in criminal activity including potential trespassers To establish a charge of trespass, you must show that the person knowingly entered or remained unlawfully in a NYCHA building or upon NYCHA property 8

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 12 of 37 Mere presence in or around a NYCHA building does not provide the basis to approach a person and conduct an investigative encounter Merely passing through a door with a broken lock or that is propped open does not provide a basis to stop a person 9

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 13 of 37 Restricted Areas: Typical restricted areas include: the roof, roof landing and boiler rooms Any person found in a restricted area may be arrested for trespassing if there is probable cause that the person knows that their presence in the area is prohibited. For example: there are conspicuously posted signs prohibiting entry, or the person has previously been found in the same type of restricted area and notified that it s restricted If the person resides in the building, you should exercise your discretion and instruct them to leave the restricted area. 10

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 14 of 37 If there are no signs or the signs are illegible and it cannot be established that the person knows the area is restricted, a resident or authorized visitor should be instructed to leave the restricted area. If they are not a resident or authorized visitor, they should be instructed to leave the building. 11

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 15 of 37 A reasonable investigation is required before making an arrest or issuing a summons for trespass Remember, a Stop Report must be prepared anytime a person is stopped 12

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 16 of 37 The Trespass Crimes Fact Sheet (TCFS) must be prepared for all trespass arrests 13

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 17 of 37 Uniformed members of the service may exercise their discretion when encountering a trespasser. Consider all of the facts and circumstances when determining whether to arrest a person for trespassing in NYCHA. 14

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 18 of 37 Members of the service are to read the updated procedure. Direct any questions to your Training Sergeant or call the Legal Bureau at 646-610-5400. For further information, consult the Investigative Encounters Resource Center on the NYPD intranet, or Watch the training videos on NYPD-U 15

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 19 of 37 Attachment 2

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 20 of 37 This is the second video going over the new Patrol Guide section regarding interior patrols of NYCHA buildings. In the first video, we reviewed the procedure. Today, we ll go through some scenarios that show what you can and cannot do during an interior patrol. 1

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 21 of 37 Remember, when you are in a NYCHA Building, you are in someone s home, and you should treat the people you encounter there with courtesy, professionalism and respect Patrol Guide 212-11, Investigative Encounters, applies in NYCHA buildings Mere presence in or around a NYCHA building does not provide a basis for an officer to approach Before you make an arrest or issue a summons for Trespass, you must conduct a reasonable investigation Let s run through some interior patrol scenarios. 2

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 22 of 37 You and your partner approach 10 Catherine Slip in order to conduct an interior patrol of that building. As you enter the building, a young man and young woman are walking out of the front door. 3

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 23 of 37 Which of the following actions can you take with respect to them? A) Approach them and ask them for identification B) Ask them what they were doing in the building C) Stop them on suspicion of trespass D) None of the above 4

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 24 of 37 The answer is D) None of the above Mere presence inside of or near a NYCHA building does not constitute an Objective Credible Reason to approach an individual. You should say hello to the individuals and continue on to your Interior Patrol. 5

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 25 of 37 As you and your partner exit the elevator at the top floor and enter the stairwell you observe two young women sitting on the stairs. 6

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 26 of 37 Do you have an Objective Credible Reason to approach them? 7

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 27 of 37 Yes, you are at level 1, Request for Information. You may approach them, but remember, while sitting in a NYCHA stairwell is against the House Rules, it is not a criminal offense. You may inform the two women that they are violating a NYCHA house rule, and ask them nonaccusatory questions, including whether they live in the building, are visiting someone in the building or have business in the building. They do not have to answer your questions, they can walk away, or even run away. 8

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 28 of 37 While you are conducting the interior patrol you receive an anonymous radio call complaining of two males wearing white T-shirts and jeans with guns in the 5 th floor hallway. You proceed to the 5 th floor and observe 2 males, matching the description, standing in the hallway. 9

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 29 of 37 Can you stop these individuals? 10

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 30 of 37 No, not without more information. Since the information you received came from an anonymous caller, you are at level 2, Common-Law Right of Inquiry. You have a couple of options that may help you get to Level 3. First, use your Smartphone to call the caller back to get more information or verify their identity. If that isn t successful, you need to attempt to corroborate the criminal possession of a weapon through your observations. For example, seeing a waistline bulge would allow you to both stop and frisk, since you would then have reasonable suspicion of a violent crime. If one or more of these individuals run away, you would be allowed to pursue and stop them, since that would also escalate the encounter to Level 3. Even if you are stuck at Level 2, you are allowed to ask these individuals to keep their hands out of their pockets, and forcibly remove them if they do not comply. 11

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 31 of 37 Let s go back to the young women you encountered sitting in the stairwell earlier. They provide conflicting answers about whether they live in the building, and then one of them states that they are visiting a friend in Apartment 7B. 12

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 32 of 37 Can you take steps to verify their authority to be in the building? 13

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 33 of 37 Since, based on these facts, you have Reasonable Suspicion of Trespass, you may call for another sector to come stay with the women while you and your partner go to the apartment to ask the resident whether he or she is expecting anyone or if someone left the apartment recently. While you are waiting for the sector to arrive, be sure to take appropriate safety measures such as ensuring you can see the women s hands. Whatever the outcome of this encounter, since you conducted a level three Terry Stop of these individuals, you must prepare a Stop Report. If you do not arrest them, offer a What is a Stop? information card. 14

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 34 of 37 As you walk up to conduct your patrol of the roof, you observe a conspicuously posted sign on the door that prohibits anyone from being on the roof. As you open the door, you observe a man standing on the roof. When you approach him, he states that he lives in the building and all the residents go out on the roof. 15

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 35 of 37 Do you have to arrest the man? 16

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 36 of 37 Based on the conspicuously posted sign, you have probable cause to arrest the man for trespass. However, even when there is probable cause to arrest a person for trespassing, you should exercise your discretion to refrain from arresting that person, and instead instruct the person that the roof is a restricted area and tell him or her to leave. There s no way to provide guidance for every possible situation you will encounter, but exercising your discretion not to arrest in this type of situation can be appropriate, especially if the person is a resident. Use your best judgment and stay safe. 17

Case 1:10-cv-00699-AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 37 of 37 18