No End in Sight The Imprisonment and Indefinite Detention of Indigenous Australians with an Intellectual Disability and Acquired Brain Injury

Similar documents
Jun Qtr 17 Mar Qtr 17 to Jun Qtr 17. Persons in full-time custody 41, % 6.5% Persons in community-based. 67, % 4.

bulletin 139 Youth justice in Australia Summary Bulletin 139 MArch 2017

NATIONAL CRIMINAL RECORD CHECK CONSENT FORM

QUEENSLAND S MENTAL HEALTH COURT. The Hon Justice Catherine Holmes. October 2014

Making Justice Work. Factsheet: Mandatory Sentencing

Examinable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 30 September 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY

Introduction 3. The Meaning of Mental Illness 3. The Mental Health Act 4. Mental Illness and the Criminal Law 6. The Mental Health Court 7

The Honourable Paul Lucas MP Attorney-General, Minister for Local Government and Special Minister of State PO Box CITY EAST QLD 4002

The Mental Health of Children and Young People in Northern Ireland

General information on the national human rights situation, including new measures and developments relating to the implementation of the Covenant

Submission to the House of Representatives Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Issues

Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Transforming Criminal Justice

Bail Act 1977 Stage Two - to commence 1 July 2018

Dignity at Trial. Key Findings of the Czech National Report

Crimes (Mental ImpaIrment and Unfitness to be TrIed) Bill

NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE OF AUSTRALIA. Current issues in Sentencing

Submission of the. to the. NSW Department of Health

YACWA submission to the review of The Young Offenders Act 1994

Police interviews. Role of the Responsible Adult or Independent Person

NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM (ACCREDITED AGENCIES - CUSTOMERS)

Submission by YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTRE INC. Inquiry of the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee. Human Rights Bill 2018

Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Portugal*

Sentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes

STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM (ACCREDITED AGENCIES - CUSTOMERS)

Francis Burt Law Education Programme

Human Rights and Arrest, Pre-Trial and Administrative Detention

Submitted on 12 July 2010

Agency Disclosure Statement

A submission from the Criminal Law Section of the Law Institute of Victoria (Submission: CRIM16)

THE QUEEN. D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner SENTENCE OF RANDERSON J

STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM

Penalties for sexual assault offences

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe

Government Response to the Bail Review (Advice provided by the Hon Paul Coghlan QC on 3 April 2017)

International Standards and Norms on Juvenile Justice and law reform

CCPR/C/USA/Q/4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

Interstate Transfer Application Kit

ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION

Section 810. This booklet explains the 810 process, what your rights are and how to get legal help.

RESPONSE TO NORTHERN IRELAND PRISON SERVICE CONSULTATION ON AMENDMENTS TO PRISON RULES

ACJRD SUBMISSION. The Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 and the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2010

Funding of the Custody Notification Service, Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW & ACT)

The Government is committed to the development of modern and technologically advanced State Courts.

Review of the Northern Territory Sentencing Amendment (Mandatory Minimum Sentences) Act 2013

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

THE SENTENCING OF OFFENDERS WITH

Northern Territory youth justice models. Northern Territory youth justice models Fixing a broken system. 24 October 2017

Sentencing and the Correctional System. Chapter 11

THE VALUE OF A JUSTICE REINVESTMENT APPROACH TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AUSTRALIA

Bravehearts Position Statement

To: Alcohol Policy Unit, Drugs Policy and Services Branch, Department of Human Services

1. Commonwealth. Relevant Provisions of the Australian Legislation. Summary/Description of Relevant Provision. Cth/ State.

Chapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty

6.0 ENSURING SAFETY AND JUSTICE

SUBMISSION: NSWLRC BAIL: QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION PRIMARY AUTHOR: DAVID PORTER

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976

PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA. Magistrates' Court Amendment (Mental Health List) Bill 2009

CED/C/NLD/1. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill [HL]

STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM (ACCREDITED ORGANISATION - CUSTOMERS)

Introduction. I - General remarks: Paragraph 5

STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM (ACCREDITED AGENCIES - CUSTOMERS)

Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015

CRIMINAL LAW CONSOLIDATION (MENTAL IMPAIRMENT) AMENDMENT ACT 1995

Annual Report 2016/17

Council of Social Service of New South Wales

By

Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION 8 November 2013

APPG on Refugees and APPG on Migrants: Inquiry into the use of Immigration Detention

Introduction to Sentencing and Corrections

INQUIRY INTO THE EFFICIENCY AND PERFORMANCE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PRISONS

The Categorisation and Recategorisation of Adult Male Prisoners SELF HELP TOOLKIT

Solitary confinement of prisoners Extract from the 21st General Report [CPT/Inf (2011) 28]

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 29 September /16. Human rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice

A GUIDE TO CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY (CICA) CLAIMS

PROBATION AND PAROLE SENIOR MANAGERS CONFERENCE

National Plan of Action

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

List of issues prior to submission of the sixth periodic report of the Czech Republic due in 2016*

List of issues prior to submission of the seventh periodic report of New Zealand *

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES IN AUSTRALIA

MENTAL HEALTH AND THE CRIMINAL LAW A BRIEF INTRODUCTION

Working in Partnership to Protect the Public

Youth Crime briefing

PRISONER VOTING RESTRICTIONS ENSURING JUSTICE

List of issues prior to submission of the seventh periodic report of New Zealand*

The Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing

Placing Children on Remand in Secure Accommodation: Consultation on Changes to the Children (Secure Accommodation) Regulations 1991

18 March Mr Noah Carroll ALP National Secretary via online form. Dear Mr Carroll

THE MENTAL HEALTH COURT. Joanne Capozzi Assistant Crown Attorney

A New Approach. to ending violence against women

Australia. Asylum Seekers and Refugees JANUARY 2018

The bail tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to assess the lawfulness of detention.

1. Introduction HRC

DETERMINING A CRIMINAL CASE

CHILDREN S RIGHTS - LEGAL RIGHTS

Safe Homes, Safe Families: Next steps

Transcription:

No End in Sight The Imprisonment and Indefinite Detention of Indigenous Australians with an Intellectual Disability and Acquired Brain Injury Aboriginal Disability Justice Campaign

Mental Impairment Legislation is the Judicial Option for People who commit crimes but are Unfit to Plead Unfortunately people with an ID / ABI subject to the Mental Impairment findings often experience Indefinite Detention People with an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) subject to mental impairment regimes are being detained indefinitely in prisons in Western Australia and the Northern Territory and in psychiatric units in Queensland and Tasmania Indigenous Australians with ID / ABI are particularly affected by this practice

Imprisonment and Indefinite Detention is disproportionately affecting Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI In WA, 11 of the 33 people detained under the mental impairment legislation are Indigenous Australians with 10 being detained in a prison In the NT there are 9 people with an ID / ABI detained in maximum security prisons under the mental impairment legislation, all are Indigenous Australians In Queensland, it is estimated that there are over 100 people with an ID / ABI detained under the Forensic Disability Act in psychiatric units with between 30 40 identifying as Indigenous Australians. Queensland does not collect data on how many people are detained or how many identify as Indigenous The absence of services in SA means that all Indigenous Australians subject to mental impairment legislation are detained in prison however SA does not collect any data on how many people are being detained or how many people are Indigenous

Mental Impairment (Unfit to Plead) Legislation Mental Impairment legislation provides an alternative pathway through the criminal justice system for people with a cognitive impairment who have committed a crime but: 1. May not understand the difference between right and wrong / guilt or innocence 2. May not be responsible for their actions because of their impairment Mental Impairment legislation tries to strike a balance between the protection of the community with the rights of the individual to justice

Treatment of Significant Benefit A person who is assessed as Mentally Impaired and found Unfit to Plead: Is not found innocent or guilty of any crime Is not convicted Cannot be considered a prisoner or an offender Instead they are placed on a supervision / custody order and detained for the purposes of TREATMENT

BUT THERE S A BIG PROBLEM... IF THERE ARE NO ACCOMMODATION AND SUPPORT OPTIONS WHERE TREATMENT CAN BE PROVIDED THEN. A PRISON OR A PSYCHIATRIC UNIT BECOMES THE ONLY OPTION WHERE THE DETENTION CAN OCCUR UNTIL 2012 PRISON WAS THE ONLY OPTION IN WA and the NT (which uses maximum security prisons)

Why Does Detention Become Indefinite? Detention can become indefinite if: 1. There is an assessment at the conclusion of the supervision / custody order that the person with an ID / ABI still constitutes a risk of harm to others 2. There is nowhere for the person with an ID / ABI to be safely accommodated upon leaving the prison

Why Are Indigenous Australians with ID / ABI Particularly Vulnerable to Indefinite Detention Over-representation in the criminal justice system: More likely to come to the attention of police More likely to be charged More likely to be remanded in custody More likely to be sentenced and imprisoned Spend longer in custody Less likely to be granted parole Have fewer treatment and support options available

Why Are Indigenous Australians with ID / ABI Particularly Vulnerable to Indefinite Detention Indigenous Australians understand disability differently Many Indigenous Australians live outside major metropolitan areas making it difficult to access specialist disability support Minor problems that occur when a child are often left to become entrenched, dangerous complex problems when an adult Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI are often marginalised and isolated within their communities Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI can be violent towards their families and communities Indigenous communities may not always have the capacity to support people with ID / ABI given the range of issues they confront

The Aboriginal Disability Justice Campaign decided to document the issue for the Federal Government No End in Sight : documents why mental impairment legislation leads to imprisonment and indefinite detention Outlines how Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI are disproportionately affected by the practice Provides a state by state analysis of the impact of mental impairment legislation on people with an ID / ABI, particularly Indigenous Australians

Main Themes Arising... That very few Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI require highly restrictive, secure facilities to manage their risk just targeted, structured support Prisons and psychiatric units are being used as accommodation options The majority of people responsible for mental impairment legislation are uncomfortable with the fact that it leads to indefinite detention Indigenous Australians with an ID / ABI under orders and in prisons and psychiatric units are generally not receiving treatment of significant benefit for their forensic behaviours Aboriginal families and communities are generally having to support, accommodate and manage their family members with an ID / ABI who often perpetrate violence against them The philosophies of Justice and Disability are often in conflict regarding the management of people subject to mental impairment legislation That few jurisdictions are collecting data relating to detaining people under mental impairment legislation

Indefinite Detention and International Human Rights Treaties Equality before the law (article 26 ICCPR) Deprivation of liberty based on disability (article 14 CRPD) Inhumane treatment (article 10 ICCPR) Capacity for trial (article 12 CRPD) Right to a fair trial (article ICCCPR)

What Needs to Change.. Stop using prisons as default accommodation options: only use prisons as last resort option Stop detaining people with an ID / ABI in psychiatric units Implement limiting terms Balance the right of the community to safety with the rights of individuals to access to justice People detained under mental impairment legislation are to have regular judicial reviews Provide secure, community based, treatment focussed, accommodation and support Recognise the centrality of culture when responding to Indigenous people