IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division General Docket

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division GD COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division. No. GD COMPLAINT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:14-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

Case 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

9:12-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 BEAUFORT DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit A

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Courthouse News Service

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Courthouse News Service

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Actions at Law / Civil Action / Pleadings

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Steven M. Mezrow, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:13-cv JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

10-1Supreme Court Cover Sheet. Form

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2018

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 1:11-cv JTN Doc #1 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 02/17/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:163

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS


Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 4:12-cv JMM Document 1 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiffs, Case No.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JTM-JEM document 1 filed 11/13/18 page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

2016 WL (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States.

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY LAW DIVISION DOCKET NO.: CIVIL ACTION THEODORE WELLS, EDWIN E. WOOD, III, JAMES KEHOE,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Case 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 324 W. Market Street Greensboro, NC 27401

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

by DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)).

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

PA State System of Higher Education Board of Governors

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 14 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Transcription:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DAPREE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Civil Division General Docket No. GD. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY and the ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES COMPLAINT Defendant. Filed on Behalf of Plaintiff: DAPREE THOMPSON Counsel of Record for this Party: Joseph D. Pometto, Esq. PA I.D. # 316346 Michael L. Kraemer, Esq. PA I.D. # 314204 Kraemer, Manes & Associates US Steel Tower 600 Grant Street #660 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone No.: 412-613-9323 Facsimile No.: 412-637-0231 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DAPREE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Civil Division General Docket No. GD. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY and the ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES COMPLAINT Defendant. NOTICE TO DEFEND You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following papers, you must take action within TWENTY (20) days after the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally or by an attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any claims or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. If you do not have a lawyer, go to or telephone the office set forth below. This office can provide you with information about hiring a lawyer. IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, this office may be able to provide you with information about agencies that may offer legal service to eligible persons at a reduced fee or no fee. LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE The Allegheny County Bar Association 11th Floor Koppers Bldg. 436 Seventh Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 TELEPHONE: 412-261-5555

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DAPREE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Civil Division General Docket No. GD. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY and the ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES COMPLAINT Defendant. COMPLAINT AND NOW comes the Plaintiff, Dapree Thompson, by and through her undersigned counsel and files the following Complaint against Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services, and in support thereof avers as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, Dapree Thompson (hereinafter Plaintiff ), is an adult individual residing at 112 Hall Drive, Penn Hills, PA 15235 of Allegheny County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant, Allegheny County, is a County of the Second Class, organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with an office at 445 Fort Pitt Blvd., Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. 3. Defendant, Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services (hereinafter ACDES ) is a local entity, located within Allegheny County, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It employs, owns, operates, manages, directs and controls the emergency 9-1-1 communications and emergency dispatchers, including the other named defendants.

4. The ACDES is located within Allegheny County, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It has a business address of 400 North Lexington Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15208 of Allegheny County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 5. All management personnel described in the common facts below were employees of the ACDES at all times relevant to this Complaint and were subject to the control and supervision of Allegheny County and the ACDES. COMMON FACTS 6. Plaintiff is an adult African-American woman. 7. ACDES is a Pennsylvania governmental organization that employed four or more people when the unlawful conduct described below occurred. 8. Plaintiff became employed with the ACDES in 2003. 9. Plaintiff is currently employed by the ACDES and is a dispatcher who receives 9-1-1 calls and then relays them to emergency services in the field. 10. In mid-2011 Plaintiff was promoted to become a lead trainer. 11. Since Plaintiff became a lead trainer she has not been given a single trainee, while other Non-African-American trainers have been given several trainees. 12. In November of 2011, while Plaintiff was on the phone with an emergency unit that was in the field, someone from that unit called her a nigger. Plaintiff complained to the ACDES about being called a nigger. ACDES management personnel, including Chief Alvin Henderson, Communications Director Gary Thomas, Robert Harvey, and Brain Mach had a meeting with Plaintiff and told her they would investigate and find out who called her the racial slur. However, no investigation was ever conducted and no culprit was ever identified.

13. From 2011 onward, Plaintiff was frequently made to work mandatory overtime, while Non-African-American workers were rarely made to work mandatory overtime. 14. In November of 2012 Plaintiff got into an argument with a white female coworker. The argument escalated into yelling. Plaintiff and the co-worker walked away from the incident peacefully. Manager Rebecca Frazier suspended Plaintiff 5 days for the incident, but Ms. Frazier did not suspend the white co-worker at all. 15. In October of 2013, Manager Donnie Sands reprimanded Plaintiff for speaking too fast while taking calls. Plaintiff had worked in the same position for 10 years and was never once told before that she spoke too fast. 16. Additionally, Plaintiff and other African-American co-workers were made to receive calls from the inner city of Pittsburgh because ACDES told them that they could speak ghetto. 17. On January 25, 2014 Plaintiff filed a formal charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ). 18. On September 8, 2014 Plaintiff was issued a right to sue letter by the Department of Justice ( DOJ ). COUNT I Racial Discrimination in Violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ( PHRA ), 43 P.S. 955 v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 19. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 20. Plaintiff is an African-American. 21. Plaintiff was discriminated against on the basis of being an African-American by the ACDES in the following ways:

a. ACDES did not give the Plaintiff any trainees, while Non-African-American trainers were given trainees. b. Emergency services personnel called Plaintiff a nigger and the ACDES personnel conducted no investigation and took no disciplinary action against the culprit. c. ACDES made Plaintiff work mandatory overtime while Non-African- American workers were not made to work mandatory overtime. d. ACDES disciplined Plaintiff with a 5-day suspension after she engaged in a mutual argument with a white co-worker. The white co-worker was not disciplined at all for the argument. e. ACDES reprimanded Plaintiff for speaking too fast. f. ACDES made Plaintiff answer calls from the inner city of Pittsburgh because she could speak ghetto. 22. ACDES failed to take prompt remedial action to cure this behavior as it took place in a continuous and regular pattern from 2011 until late 2013. 23. The conduct described above resulted in racial discrimination towards the Plaintiff in violation of the PHRA. COUNT II Racial Discrimination in Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ) v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 24. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 25. Plaintiff is an African-American. 26. ACDES discriminated against Plaintiff and took several adverse employment actions against her on the basis of her race.

27. ACDES failed to take prompt remedial action to cure this behavior as it took place in a continuous and regular pattern from 2011 until late 2013. 28. The conduct described above resulted in racial discrimination towards the Plaintiff in violation of Title VII. COUNT III Hostile Environment Racial Discrimination in Violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ( PHRA ), 43 P.S. 955 v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 29. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 30. Plaintiff is an African-American female. 31. ACDES discriminated against Plaintiff and took several adverse employment actions against her on the basis of her race. 32. ACDES was aware that this discriminatory conduct was taking place. 33. ACDES failed to take prompt remedial action to cure this behavior. 34. The conduct described above resulted in hostile environment racial discrimination towards the Plaintiff in violation of the PHRA. COUNT IV Hostile Environment Racial Discrimination in Violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ( PHRA ), 43 P.S. 955 v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 35. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 36. Plaintiff is an African-American female. 37. ACDES discriminated against Plaintiff and took several adverse employment actions against her on the basis of her race. 38. ACDES was aware that this discriminatory conduct was taking place.

39. ACDES failed to take prompt remedial action to cure this behavior. 40. The conduct described above resulted in hostile environment sexual harassment towards the Plaintiff in violation of the PHRA. COUNT V Retaliation in Violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ( PHRA ), 43 P.S. 955 v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 41. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 42. Plaintiff complained and reported to ACDES about being called a nigger while on the phone with emergency services personnel. nigger. 43. This complaint is protected conduct under the PHRA. 44. No remedial actions were taken against the personnel who called Plaintiff a 45. Following the incident, ACDES punished Plaintiff with suspensions, mandatory overtime and reprimands. PHRA. 46. This conduct resulted in Retaliation for opposing practices made illegal under the COUNT VI Retaliation in Violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ) v. Allegheny County and the Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services 47. Preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 48. Plaintiff complained and reported to ACDES about being called a nigger while on the phone with emergency services personnel. 49. This complaint is protected conduct under the PHRA. 50. No remedial actions were taken against the personnel who called Plaintiff a

nigger. 51. Following the incident, ACDES punished Plaintiff with suspensions, mandatory overtime and reprimands. 52. This conduct resulted in Retaliation for opposing practices made illegal under Title VII. Request for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against Allegheny County and Allegheny County Department of Emergency Services for the following in a total amount in excess of the arbitration limits of this court: a. Loss of income; b. Back wages; c. Front wages; d. Emotional damages; e. Plaintiff s legal fees; f. Additional punitive damages; g. Pre-Judgment, interest, court costs and other such relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully Submitted, KRAEMER, MANES & ASSOCIATES BY: JOSEPH D. POMETTO Counsel for Plaintiff DAPREE THOMPSON

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED