UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2012 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2016 Page 1 of 15

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:17-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2017 Page 1 of 45

Case 1:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2017 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 1:17-cv JLK Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2018 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

CASE NO. C O M P L A I N T. Attorney, and sues the Defendants, JUSTIN BIEBER ( BIEBER } and HUGO HESNY

Case 1:18-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:07-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv ILRL-DEK Document 1 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. ADRIAN LOVELL, Civil Action No.

Case 3:13-cv Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/22/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiffs JOHN DOE No. 70 ("JOHN No. 70"), and JOHN DOE No. 71 ("JOHN No.

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT v.

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

Case 3:11-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

In the Supreme Court of Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

JANE DOE, FIRST AMENDED COMPLMNT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAzND Plaintiff, PARTIES

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 6:12-cv TC Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 1

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 3:18-cv HZ Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

Case 0:14-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2014 Page 1 of 12

2:16-cv DCN-MGB Date Filed 06/06/16 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Plaintiff, MARK JOHNSON, currently incarcerated at Bayside State. Prison, 4293 Route 47, P.O. Box F-2, in the Town of Leesburg, County of

~D la'ls DISTRIC;iO~e 2

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 24 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Plaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Filing # E-Filed 03/29/ :29:03 AM

COMPLAINT. STEPHEN MISKELL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of KATHLEEN

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

9:12-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 BEAUFORT DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

LAW DIVISION: MORRIS COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MRS-L CIVIL ACTION. Plaintiff, Richard Balestrino, residing in Vernon, Sussex

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Jane Doe, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff, SeaDream Yacht Club Limited, Rui Manuel Duarte Guerreiro Defendants. / Plaintiff sues Defendants and alleges: COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1. Plaintiff is a resident of the state of North Carolina and Defendant SeaDream Yacht Club is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Bahamas, having its principal place of business in Miami. 2. This matter arises out a brutal rape and/or sexual assault by one of SeaDream Yacht Club s bartenders on one its passengers. Herein, Plaintiff seeks all damages available by law, including punitive damages, in an amount of $25,000,000.00 3. The matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum specified by 28 U.S.C. 1332. In the event diversity jurisdiction does not apply, then this matter is brought under the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of this Court. 4. Defendant, at all times material hereto, personally or through an agent: a. Operated, conducted, engaged in or carried on a business venture in this state and/or country or had an office or agency in this state and/or county; 1

b. Was engaged in substantial activity within this state; c. Operated vessels in the waters of this state; d. Committed one or more of the acts stated in Florida Statutes, 48.081, 48.181 or 48.193; e. The acts of Defendant set out in this Complaint occurred in whole or in part in this county and/or state; f. The Defendant, as a common carrier, was engaged in the business of providing to the public and to the Plaintiff in particular, for compensation, vacation cruises aboard the vessel, Seadream I. 5. Defendant Rui Manuel Duarte Guerreiro is a Portugese citizen who was a bartender working aboard the Defendant s vessel. 6. Defendants are subject to the jurisdiction of the Courts of this state. 7. The causes of action asserted in this Complaint arise under the General Maritime Law of the United States. 8. At all times material hereto, Defendant owned, operated, managed, maintained and/or controlled the vessel, Seadream I. 9. On or about June 24, 2015, Jane Doe was a paying passenger on Defendant s vessel, which was in navigable waters. 10. On said date, Jane Doe was brutally raped and/or sexually assaulted by the Seadream Bartender Guerreiro. The defendant held the Plaintiff against her will behind a bar on the subject vessel and closed all nearby windows. He thereafter proceeded to forcibly rape the plaintiff/victim vaginally, orally and anally. The 2

rape continued for an extended period of time while the Plaintiff begged the Defendant to stop and repeatedly asked Why are you doing this? 11. Plaintiff Jane Doe was a frequent, repeat cruiser on SeaDream Yacht Club voyages. Plaintiff believed that when she was on the ship, she was in a safe place. Tragically, Jane Doe was mistaken. COUNT I VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR RAPE / SEXUAL ASSAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT The Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one (1) through eleven (11) as though alleged originally herein. 12. At all times material hereto, the individual who sexually assaulted and/or raped Jane Doe was a member of the crew aboard the Seadream I. 13. At all times material hereto, the individual who sexually assaulted and/or raped Jane Doe was hired, retained and/or employed by Defendant. 14. At all times material hereto, Defendant is vicariously liable for the tortious actions of its crewmembers/employees, including the individual who sexually assaulted and/or raped Jane Doe. 15. As a direct and proximate result of the tortious actions of the individual who sexually assaulted and/or raped Jane Doe, for which Defendants are vicariously liable as set forth above, the Plaintiff was injured about her body and extremities, suffered physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, physical disability, impairment, inconvenience in the normal pursuits and pleasures of life, feelings of economic insecurity caused by disability, disfigurement, 3

aggravation of any previously existing conditions therefrom, incurred medical expenses in the care and treatment of her injuries including psychiatric care, suffered physical handicap, lost wages, income lost in the past, and her working ability and earning capacity has been impaired. The injuries and damages are permanent or continuing in nature, and the Plaintiff will suffer the losses and impairments in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands judgment for all damages recoverable under the law, including punitive damages, against Defendants and demands jury trial of all issues so triable. COUNT II NEGLIGENCE AGAINST DEFENDANTS The Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one (1) through eleven (11) as though alleged originally herein. 16. At all times material hereto, it was the duty of Defendant to provide the Plaintiff with reasonable care under the circumstances while she was a passenger aboard the subject cruise. 17. On or about June 24, 2015, Defendant breached its duty to the Plaintiff through the following acts and/or omissions: a. Failing to provide reasonably safe conditions for the Plaintiff aboard the subject cruise vessel; said safe conditions include, but are not limited to, the prevention of permitting an atmosphere to exist wherein crewmembers could sexually assault and/or rape passengers; and/or 4

b. Failing to promulgate and/or enforce adequate policies and procedures designed to prevent crewmembers from targeting passengers generally and minors specifically; and/or c. Failing to promulgate and/or enforce adequate policies and procedures designed to prevent sexual assaults and/or rapes by crewmembers on passengers; and/or d. Failing to protect passengers specifically from getting targeted by crewmembers aboard the subject cruise; and/or e. Failing to protect passengers from sexual assaults and/or rapes aboard the subject cruise; and/or f. Failing to have adequate security aboard the subject cruise; and/or g. Failing to adequately supervise and/or monitor crewmembers aboard the subject cruise; and/or h. Failing to adequately monitor passengers aboard the subject cruise; and/or i. Failing to adequately monitor public areas aboard the subject vessel; and/or j. Failing to adequately train crewmembers aboard the subject cruise with regard to fraternizing with passengers; and/or k. Failing to adequately train crewmembers aboard the subject cruise with regard to sexual assaults and/or rapes; and/or l. Failing to perform adequate background check(s) on the individual who sexually assaulted and/or raped the Plaintiff. 18. All or some of the above acts and/or omissions by Defendants and/or their agents, servants, and/or employees, caused and/or contributed to the Plaintiff being 5

sexually assaulted and/or raped and/or suffering severe emotional distress following the sexual assault and/or rape. 19. At all times material hereto, Defendants knew of the foregoing conditions causing the Plaintiff s incident and did not correct them, or the conditions existed for a sufficient length of time so that Defendants, in the exercise of reasonable care under the circumstances, should have learned of them and corrected them. Insofar as it relates to conditions that the Defendants did not create, this knowledge was or should have been acquired through (a) Defendants monitoring passengers; (b) Defendants supervision over crewmembers, including, but not limited to, the alleged assailant; and/or (c) prior incidents of sexual assault occurring aboard Defendants vessels; and/or (d) prior instances of sexual assault occurring aboard cruise ships and reported within the industry. 20. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, the Plaintiff was injured about her body and extremities, suffered physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, physical disability, impairment, inconvenience in the normal pursuits and pleasures of life, feelings of economic insecurity caused by disability, disfigurement, aggravation of any previously existing conditions therefrom, incurred medical expenses in the care and treatment of her injuries including psychiatric care, suffered physical handicap, lost wages, income lost in the past, and her working ability and earning capacity has been impaired. The injuries and damages are permanent or continuing in nature, and the Plaintiff will suffer the losses and impairments in the future. 6

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands judgment for all damages recoverable, including punitive damages, under the law against Defendant and demands jury trial of all issues so triable. COUNT III NEGLIGENCE AGAINST DEFENDANT GUERREIRO Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one (1) through eleven (11) as though alleged originally herein. 21. It was the duty of Defendant Guerreiro to act with reasonable care as it pertained to the Plaintiff. 22. On or about June 24, 2015, Defendant Guerreiro, breached his duty to act with reasonable care as it pertained to the Plaintiff. 23. On or about the above date, Plaintiff was injured due to the fault and negligence of Defendant Guerreiro, as follows: a. Raping the Plaintiff; and/or b. Sexually assaulting the Plaintiff; and/or c. Assaulting and/or battering the Plaintiff 24. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant Guerreiro, the Plaintiff was raped and/or sexually assaulted. 25. As a result of the negligence of Defendant Guerreiro, the Plaintiff was injured about her body and extremities, suffered physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, physical disability, impairment, inconvenience in the normal pursuits and pleasures of life, feelings of economic insecurity caused 7

by disability, disfigurement, aggravation of any previously existing conditions therefrom, incurred medical expenses in the care and treatment of her injuries including psychiatric care, suffered physical handicap, lost wages, income lost in the past, and her working ability and earning capacity has been impaired. The injuries and damages are permanent or continuing in nature, and the Plaintiff will suffer the losses and impairments in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands judgment for all damages recoverable, including punitive damages, under the law against Defendant and demands jury trial of all issues so triable. COUNT IV INTENTIONAL TORT OF RAPE AND/OR SEXUAL ASSAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT GUERREIRO Plaintiff realleges, adopts, and incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs one (1) through eleven (11) as though alleged originally herein. 26. On or about June 24, 2015, the Plaintiff was brutally raped and/or sexually assaulted and battered by Defendant Guerreiro. 27. As a direct and proximate result of the intentional tort by Defendant Guerreiro, the Plaintiff was raped and/or sexually assaulted. 28. As a result of the intentional tort by Defendant Guerreiro, the Plaintiff was injured about her body and extremities, suffered physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, physical disability, impairment, inconvenience in the normal pursuits and pleasures of life, feelings of economic insecurity caused by disability, disfigurement, aggravation of any previously existing conditions 8

therefrom, incurred medical expenses in the care and treatment of her injuries including psychiatric care, suffered physical handicap, lost wages, income lost in the past, and her working ability and earning capacity has been impaired. The injuries and damages are permanent or continuing in nature, and the Plaintiff will suffer the losses and impairments in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands judgment for all damages recoverable, including punitive damages, under the law against Defendant and demands jury trial of all issues so triable. DATED February 23, 2017 LIPCON, MARGULIES, ALSINA & WINKLEMAN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Suite 1776, One Biscayne Tower 2 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 373-3016 Fax: (305) 373-6204 Email: mw@lipcon.com By /s/ Michael Winkleman MICHAEL A. WINKLEMAN FLORIDA BAR NO. 36719 JACQUELINE GARCELL FLORIDA BAR NO. 104358 JASON R. MARGULIES FLORIDA BAR NO. 57916 9