An introduction to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and electoral reviews

Similar documents
Polling Districts and Polling Places Review 2015 Public Consultation Document

New electoral arrangements for Crawley Borough Council. Final recommendations

Electorate Forecasts. A Guide for Practitioners. October 2011

Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Huntingdonshire District Council. Electoral review

New electoral arrangements for Norwich City Council. Final recommendations

Individual Electoral Registration

In Attendance: Sharon Salvanos, Carl Whistlecraft, Spencer Wilson, Diane Sims, Richard Dunne

Guidance for candidates and agents

Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for the London Borough of Bexley. Electoral review

Guidance for candidates and agents

Guidance for candidates

Introduction for non-party campaigners

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR MOLE VALLEY IN SURREY LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

Local Residents submissions to the Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council electoral review

New electoral arrangements for Dover District Council

Embargoed until 00:01 Thursday 20 December. The cost of electoral administration in Great Britain. Financial information surveys and

ELECTORAL REGISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATION BILL

New electoral arrangements for Babergh District Council. Final recommendations

Submission by Peterborough City Council on warding arrangements to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England

New electoral arrangements for Carlisle City Council. Draft recommendations

Supply of the Electoral Register

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act amendments relating to European Parliamentary Elections; and for connected purposes.

Minutes of the Scottish Parliament Political Parties Panel

Information from the. Essential Features of the System of Local Government Elections in Lower Saxony

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR BEXLEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL REPORT. Sleaford & North Hykeham Westminster Parliamentary By-election 8th December 2016

Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Derbyshire County Council. Electoral review

Guidance for candidates and agents

FINAL REPORT. Referendum on UK membership of the European Union (Warrington Observation) 23rd June 2016

Local elections. Referendum on the voting system used to elect MPs to the House of Commons

WHY IS TORONTO DRAWING NEW WARD BOUNDARIES? Ward Population Background Brief. Revised, July 2015

Regional Execuitve Role Descriptions 2019

Easy Read Guide to Voting in the May local elections in England

Constitution of the Reading Liberal Democrats

ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT: FURTHER LIMITED CONSULTATION

Attitudes of Electoral Agents on the Administration of the 2017 General Election

DISCUSSION DOCUMENT FOR MĀORI WARD OPTIONS

New electoral arrangements for Nottingham City Council. Final recommendations

You must print off the forms in this pack before submitting them

Guidance for candidates and agents

SUNDERLAND CITY COUNCIL (ADVANCE VOTING AND SIGNING FOR BALLOT PAPERS) PILOT ORDER 2007

NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REFERENDUM - GUIDE TO CAMPAIGNERS AND LOCAL WARD, TOWN AND PARISH COUNCILLORS

This diagram shows the relationship between the NSW Electoral Commission, the Electoral Commissioner and the Parliament of NSW.

THE SPEAKER S COMMITTEE ON THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Croydon Borough Council. Electoral review

PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES (AMENDMENT) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

Freedom of Information and Members correspondence with Public Authorities

PERMANENT ELECTORAL AUTHORITY. The implementation of the electoral registry in Romania. Targets and challenges

Lisbon Treaty Referendum Bill

Holding an Election Forum

FINAL REPORT. Woking Surrey County Council Elections 4th May 2017

New electoral arrangements for Babergh District Council. New draft recommendations

WHY IS TORONTO DRAWING NEW WARD BOUNDARIES? Ward Population Background Brief. November 2014

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Introduction. to a referendum. This document is for people and organisations who want to know what a referendum is and the key roles.

QUEENSLAND PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE

Stockbridge Parish Council. Guidance in respect of Elections, Casual Vacancies and Co-option processes

Report back for Saturday 8th March 2. Please note that timings are approximate only. Some items of business may occur earlier than indicated.

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

PARISH MEETINGS AND PARISH POLLS

Communications, Campaigning and political activities by charities. Sarah Miller, Head of News

ELECTIONS FOR PARISH COUNCILS

Voting in Scotland. Scottish Government Consultation on Electoral Reform 2018

Analysis of cases of alleged electoral fraud in 2012

Scottish Parliamentary election

Care to Vote? Young people looked after by local authorities and the referendum on Scottish independence. Graham Connelly. Jamie Kinlochan.

Getting involved in your Local Party. or how to grow your own

Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Basingstoke & Deane in Hampshire. Further electoral review

COMMUNICATION OF ELECTION DOCUMENTS ADVICE

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER AND THE COMMISSIONER FOR LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS. Business Plan

The Rule Book Section J Rules for the Nomination of Parliamentary Candidates

2010 UK Parliamentary general election

December Election 2005: Northern Ireland The combined UK Parliamentary and local government elections

Council Roles, Duties and Responsibilities

Local Government Elections 2017

Reading the local runes:

KENYA GAZETTE SUPPLEMENT

Local resident submissions to the Dorset County Council electoral review

SUMMARY REPORT KEY POINTS

g the mber 1.3 or, if in Decem 1.5 Elections durin Elections s of elections in

Elevation Networks Report Ethnic Diversity within Parliamentary Candidates across the UK

Minutes of the Wales Electoral Practitioners Working Group Date: 28/03/18 Present:

OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION & PRIVACY COMMISSIONER for Prince Edward Island. Order No. PP Re: Elections PEI. March 15, 2019

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 FOR HOUSING PROFESSIONALS

Elections in Haiti October 25 General Elections

CONSTITUTION 2017 AVON LOCAL COUNCILS ASSOCIATION

New electoral arrangements for Carlisle City Council. Final recommendations

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE 5

The 2017 local government elections in Wales. Report on the administration of the elections held on 4 May 2017

Standing for office in 2017

ELECTORAL OFFICE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Engender Response to the Scottish Government Consultation on Electoral Reform

SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION Referendum on Scottish independence: draft section 30 order and agreement Written evidence

Political snakes and ladders. If you decide to cast your vote in person where do you go?

Forwarded message From: Date: Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:41 PM Subject: WASHWOOD HEATH BIRMINGHAM To:

Summary of the Administration of DEA Elections in 2019

Elections. New Brunswick. Strategic Plan

Welsh Language Impact Assessment

Office of the Chief Electoral Officer

Transcription:

An introduction to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and electoral reviews

Contents About us page 3 - The Commission - Our role - How to find us online Electoral reviews page 4 - What is an electoral review? - Why do we conduct electoral reviews? - How might an electoral review affect you? The electoral review process page 7 - Figure One: typical electoral review timetable page 8 Useful links page 9 Contact us page 9 2

About us The Commission The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our organisation is made up of a Chair and five Commissioners who are supported by 25 members of staff. Our role Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities in England. The aim of an electoral review is to: Deliver electoral equality for voters; Establish electoral areas (wards or divisions) for local authorities that reflect, as far as possible, community identities in that area; Promote effective and convenient local government. We also provide independent advice to the government about boundaries between local authorities (from correcting minor boundary anomalies to whole-council mergers) and we have responsibility for advising government on proposed structural change for local authorities. How to find us online You can find out more about the Commission and our work at www.lgbce.org.uk. Our website also includes an interactive consultation portal where you can look at our proposals in detail and have your say in one of our consultations at consultation.lgbce.org.uk. Our website also provides details of all current reviews, completed reviews and other information on past changes from 1974 for local authorities and parishes across England. 3

Electoral reviews The Commission s main role is to carry out electoral reviews of district, borough and county councils in England. What is an electoral review? An electoral review examines and proposes new electoral arrangements for a local authority. These include: The total number of councillors to be elected to the council. The names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions. The number of councillors to be elected from each ward or division. We must, by law 1, take into account several key factors when taking decisions on an electoral review. The need to secure equality of representation across the local authority area. The need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities. The need to secure effective and convenient local government. The need to ensure that the electoral arrangements of a local authority reflect its electoral cycle. These are known as our statutory criteria. As we take decisions on the most appropriate electoral arrangements, we will seek to achieve a balance between these criteria. Why do we conduct electoral reviews? a) Electoral equality: The Commission will often carry out electoral reviews in local authority areas which have high levels of electoral inequality. The population of any local authority changes constantly with people moving into, and out of, an area as well as movements of people within it. For example, a major housing development in a council ward can increase the number of electors living there in comparison to neighbouring wards. Where the number of electors in a ward becomes significantly larger or smaller, compared to other wards in that local authority, it results in an electoral imbalance where some councillors represent many more voters than others in the same area. Put simply, electoral imbalances mean that the value of your vote in elections varies depending on where you live in the local authority area. 1 Schedule 2, Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 4

As part of an electoral review, we aim to ensure that the ward or division boundaries of a local authority are such that each councillor represents roughly the same number of electors. Every year, we examine data which give details of levels of electoral inequality for every local authority in England. We use this information to determine which local authorities have significant levels of electoral inequality and as such - could be subject to an electoral review 2. b) Reviews on request: We also carry out reviews on request. For example, councils may wish to make changes to their electoral arrangements in order to improve the way they represent and serve people in their area. Examples of requests to the Commission for reviews include: Some councils believe that they have too many or too few councillors for them to work most effectively and will ask us to conduct a review with a view to increasing or decreasing the number of elected members representing the authority. Some councils which have wards represented by more than one councillor wish to change to wards which cover a smaller area and are represented by a single councillor. These are known as single member ward reviews or single member division reviews for county councils. Councils are also able to change their cycle of elections. For example, councils that hold elections in three out of every four years could decide to move to a single election for all councillors every four years. Councils can approach us at any time to request an electoral review. We will consider each request and will seek to accommodate a review whilst balancing our other priorities. c) Boundary changes, mergers and structural changes: Where a local authority s external boundary has changed or where a new local authority has been formed (e.g. a new unitary authority) we may also carry out an electoral review to ensure that the council has the most appropriate electoral arrangements for the future. 2 Significant levels of electoral inequality in a local authority are defined by the Commission as: more than 30% of its wards/divisions have an electoral imbalance (ratio of electors to members) of more than 10% from the average for the authority; and/or it has one ward/division with an electoral imbalance of more than 30%; and the imbalance is unlikely to be corrected by population change within a reasonable period. 5

How might an electoral review affect you? Our reviews will usually propose new electoral arrangements for a local authority. This means proposing potential changes to: The total number of councillors on the council (known as council size ); The number, names and boundaries of wards or electoral divisions; and The number of councillors to be elected for each ward. Every electoral review will be different and the extent of the changes will vary. An electoral review in your area may propose no change to the size of the council. It may also mean no changes to the boundaries of the ward or division in which you live. In most cases, though, an electoral review is likely to lead to extensive changes to the ward boundaries of the council, especially where a change in council size has been proposed. Parishes: We cannot make recommendations for changes to parish boundaries or create new parishes. However, we can change the electoral arrangements within parishes including creating parish wards but only where they are affected by our changes to district wards or county electoral divisions. Polling districts: We do not determine the size and shape of polling districts or the location of polling stations. These are the responsibility of your local council. The results of an electoral review may lead the council to consider reviewing polling districts. District/County boundaries: If we are carrying out a review of a district council within a county, the review will not affect the county council s electoral division boundaries or the external boundaries of the district. Similarly, a review of county council electoral divisions will not alter district council ward boundaries. However, an electoral division will never cross the external boundary of a district. Parliamentary constituency boundaries: We cannot change, or take account of, the boundaries of parliamentary constituencies. Those boundaries are reviewed by a separate body, the Boundary Commission for England, under different rules and legislation, (http://consultation.boundarycommissionforengland.independent.gov.uk/). In practice, the Boundary Commission for England use the wards that we put in place as a result of an electoral review. Other issues: Our recommendations do not affect local taxes or result in changes to your address or postcode. Nor is there any evidence that our recommendations have an impact on house prices or insurance premiums. In addition, the Commission has no powers to determine issues such as school catchment areas or the organisation of local services. 6

The electoral review process Around six months before the formal start of a review, we will aim to meet councillors and senior officers of the local authority. We will also try to meet the parish councils in the area. In a series of meetings, we explain the review process and gather the information we will need to conduct the review. Thereafter, an electoral review will broadly follow the following timetable: 7

Figure One: typical review timetable Stage Activity Time Comments Preliminary Stage Desk research by the Commission, information gathering (e.g. local statistics) and meetings with the council and partner organisations. 6-8 weeks This stage allows the Commission to gather information about the local authority (e.g. electorate figures) and brief the local authority about the review process. Council size Public consultation on the number of councillors who should represent the council in the future. 6 week consultation + 6 weeks to consider consultation responses Your chance to have your say on how many councillors should represent your council area. We will not ask you about ward boundaries at this stage of the review as we aim to come to a conclusion on the number of councillors to represent the local authority. Information gathering Public consultation on new ward or division boundaries. 8-12 week consultation + 10-12 weeks to consider responses Your first chance to have your say on new ward boundaries in your area. Before the Commission devises new boundaries in your area, we will ask local people and organisations to put forward suggestions for a new pattern of wards so that we can ensure that, as far as possible, our recommendations are community driven and based on local knowledge. Publication of draft recommendations The Commission publishes its draft recommendations for new electoral arrangements for the local authority: the number of councillors representing the authority and the number, names and boundaries of all wards and divisions 6-10 week consultation + 6-12 weeks to consider responses Your chance to have your say on our draft recommendations for new electoral arrangements. We ask local people and organisations if they agree with our proposals and, if not, what alternative boundaries they would like to suggest Publication of final recommendations The Commission publishes its final recommendations for new electoral arrangements based on the evidence it has received throughout the review End of review The Commission will now put its final recommendations to both Houses of Parliament for approval. If accepted by Parliament, the new arrangements will come into to force at the next local elections. You can keep track of the timetable for your review by logging on to the dedicated web page which we create for each electoral review at www.lgbce.org.uk. 8

Useful links You can find out more about the Commission, Commissioners and their work on our website at www.lgbce.org.uk. Our website includes the following information which you might find useful: Technical guidance on electoral reviews and advice about getting involved in the consultation stages of a review. www.lgbce.org.uk/ documents/lgbce/guidance-policy-andpublications/guidance/electoral-review-guidance-august-2012.pdf A dedicated web page for each review which includes its timetable, the Commission s recommendations and feedback we have received from local groups and people. www.lgbce.org.uk Our interactive consultation portal allows you to follow the progress of your review and look in detail at our proposals and compare them to the existing arrangements. consultation.lgbce.org.uk Contact us Website: www.lgbce.org.uk. Email: reviews@lgbce.org.uk. Post: Local Government Boundary Commission for England 3 rd Floor, Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG Telephone: 020 7664 8534 9