Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

Similar documents
National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Idaho Prisons. Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy Brief. October 2018

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Department of Justice

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

The Electoral College And

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

State Complaint Information

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Millions to the Polls

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

Bulletin. Probation and Parole in the United States, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Revised 7/2/08

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Testimony on Senate Bill 125

Components of Population Change by State

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Applications for Post Conviction Testing

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

2010 State Animal Protection Laws Rankings

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

MEMORANDUM SUMMARY NATIONAL OVERVIEW. Research Methodology:

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

America is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined:

Probation Parole. the United States, 1998

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

American Government. Workbook

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

How Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States?

Prisoners in Bulletin. Bureau of Justice Statistics

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

The Changing Face of Labor,

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

A Skyrocketing Prison Population

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

FUNDING FOR HOME HEATING IN RECONCILIATION BILL? RIGHT IDEA, WRONG VEHICLE by Aviva Aron-Dine and Martha Coven

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

If you have questions, please or call

Committee Consideration of Bills

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

The Impact of Ebbing Immigration in Los Angeles: New Insights from an Established Gateway

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Fiscal Year (September 30, 2018) Requests by Intake and Case Status Intake 1 Case Review 6 Period

YOU PAY FOR YOUR WRONG AND NO ONE ELSE S: THE ABOLITION OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

Nominating Committee Policy

Employment debate in the context of NAFTA. September 2017

Results and Criteria of BGA/NFOIC survey

How Utah Ranks. Utah Education Association Research Bulletin

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Subcommittee on Design Operating Guidelines

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

Transcription:

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 03 According to the latest statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice, more than two million men and women are now behind bars in the United States. 1 The country that holds itself out as the land of freedom incarcerates a higher percentage of its people than any other country. The human costs wasted lives, wrecked families, troubled children are incalculable, as are the adverse social, economic and political consequences of weakened communities, diminished opportunities for economic mobility, and extensive disenfranchisement. Contrary to popular perception, violent crime is not responsible for the quadrupling of the incarcerated population in the United States since 1980. In fact, violent crime rates have been relatively constant or declining over the past two decades. The exploding prison population has been propelled by public policy changes that have increased the use of prison sentences as well as the length of time served, e.g. through mandatory minimum sentencing, three strikes laws, and reductions in the availability of parole or early release. 1 Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 02, April 6, 03, available at: http://www. ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/pjim02.htm. 2 See Human Rights Watch, Punishment and Prejudice, at http://www.hrw.org/reports/ 00/usa/ 3 Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 01, July 02, p. 12, available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ abstract/p01.htm. 4 Ibid. Figure 1 Race, Population, and Incarceration U.S. Population by Race Although these policies were championed as protecting the public from serious and violent offenders, they have instead yielded high rates of confinement of nonviolent offenders. Nearly three quarters of new admissions to state prison were convicted of nonviolent crimes. 2 Only 49 percent of sentenced state inmates are held for violent offenses. 3 Perhaps the single greatest force behind the growth of the prison population has been the national war on drugs. The number of incarcerated drug offenders has increased twelvefold since 1980. In 00, 22 percent of those in federal and state prisons were convicted on drug charges. 4 Even more troubling than the absolute number of persons in jail or prison is the extent to which those men and women are African- American. Although blacks account for only 12 percent of the U.S. population, 44 percent of all prisoners in the United States are black (Figure 1). Census data for 00,which included a count of the number and race of all individuals incarcerated in the United States, reveals the dramatic racial disproportion of the incarcerated population in each state: the proportion of blacks in prison populations exceeds the 12.32% 43.91% Hispanic 12.55% Other 6% State and Federal Inmates by Race Hispanic 18.26% Other 3.11% 69.13% Source: U.S. Census, 00. and excludes Hispanics. 34.72% Source: Percentages calculated from data in Table 13, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 02, April 6, 03. and excludes Hispanics.

Figure 2 Ratio of Percent of s Among Resident Population to s Among Incarcerated Population 5 and over 2.5-5 1-2.5 1 and below Percentage of State Residents Percentage of Incarcerated Population Ratio Alabama 26% 61.9% 2.4 Alaska 3.5% 10.6% 3.0 Arizona 3.1% 13.3% 4.3 Arkansas 15.7% 44.4% 2.8 California 6.7% 28.7% 4.3 Colorado 3.8% 22.1% 5.7 Connecticut 9.1% 46.1% 5.1 Delaware 19.2% 63.1% 3.3 District of Columbia 60.0% 92.8% 1.5 Florida 14.6% 48.1% 3.3 Georgia 28.7% 61.7% 2.2 Hawaii 1.8% 3.9% 2.2 Idaho 0.4% 1.7% 3.9 Illinois 15.1% 62.9% 4.2 Indiana 8.4% 37.8% 4.5 Iowa 2.1% 19.7% 9.3 Kansas 5.7% 34.0% 5.9 Kentucky 7.3% 35.3% 2.2 Louisiana 32.5% 72.1% 2.2 Maine 0.5% 4.1% 7.7 Maryland 27.9% 72.3% 2.6 Massachusetts 5.4% 26.3% 4.9 Michigan 14.2% 48.9% 3.4 Minnesota 3.5% 28.5% 8.2 Mississippi 36.3% 70.5% 1.9 Missouri 11.2% 41.2% 3.7 Percentage of State Residents Percentage of Incarcerated Population Ratio Montana 0.3% 2.0% 6.6 Nebraska 4.0% 25.5% 6.4 Nevada 6.8% 27.3% 4.0 New Hampshire 0.7% 6.5% 8.9 New Jersey 13.6% 59.7% 4.4 New Mexico 1.9% 10.0% 5.3 New York 15.9% 54.3% 3.4 North Carolina 21.6% 61.1% 2.8 North Dakota 0.6% 3.3% 5.4 Ohio 11.5% 50.2% 4.4 Oklahoma 7.6% 31.3% 4.1 Oregon 1.6% 11.1% 6.8 Pennsylvania 10.0% 49.7% 5.0 Rhode Island 4.5% 35.9% 8.0 South Carolina.5% 67.2% 2.3 South Dakota 0.6% 6.9% 11.1 Tennessee 16.4% 49.0% 3.0 Texas 11.5% 36.8% 3.2 Utah 0.8% 5.9% 7.4 Vermont 0.5% 5.2% 10.3 Virginia 19.6% 61.7% 3.1 Washington 3.2% 18.1% 5.6 West Virginia 3.2% 34.9% 11.0 Wisconsin 5.7% 38.8% 6.8 Wyoming 0.8% 5.9% 7.8 National 12.3% 43.7% 3.5 Figures calculated on basis of U.S. Census Bureau data from Census 00 on state residents and incarcerated population.

proportion among state residents in every single state. In twenty states, the percent of blacks incarcerated is at least five times greater than their share of resident population (Figure 2). The official figures confirm what those who live in African-American communities know full well too many blacks are behind bars, particularly black men. Indeed, nearly five percent of all black men, compared to 0.6 percent of white men, are incarcerated. 5 In many states the rate is far worse. According to Human Rights Watch s calculations based on the 00 U.S. Census, in twelve states more than ten percent of black men ages 18 to 64 are incarcerated. 6 The Justice Department reports that nationwide, a similar percentage of black men in the ages - are behind bars. The absolute level of black incarceration should be cause for national concern. But so should the striking disparity with white incarceration. Nationwide, black men of all ages are incarcerated at more than seven times the rate of white men, according to the Justice Department. 7 Again, shocking as such a national average is, it masks even worse racial disparities in individual states. In thirteen states, black men are incarcerated at more than ten times the rate of white men. 8 No state is free of significant disparities. The national war on drugs has perhaps been the primary factor behind the extraordinary rates at which blacks are incarcerated. Drug offenses account for nearly two out of five of the blacks sent to state prison. More blacks are sent to state prison for drug offenses (38 percent) than for crimes of violence (27 percent). In contrast, drug offenders constitute 24 percent of whites admitted to prison and violent offenders constitute 27 percent (Figure 3). African-Americans are arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned for drug offenses at far higher rates than whites. This racial disparity bears little relationship to racial differences in drug offending. For example, although the proportion of all drug users who are black is generally in the range of 13 to 15 percent, blacks constitute 36 percent of arrests for drug possession. s constitute 63 percent of all drug offenders admitted to state prisons. In at least fifteen states, black men were sent to prison on drug charges at rates ranging from twenty to fifty-seven times those of white men. (Figure 4 and Figure 5). 5 Department of Justice, Midyear 02, p. 11, Table 14. 6 Human Rights Watch, Race and Incarceration at: http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/race/ pdf/table3.pdf 7 Data calculated from Department of Justice, Midyear 02, p. 11, Table 14. 8 Human Rights Watch, Race and Incarceration at: http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/race/ pdf/table2a.pdf Figure 3 Drug Offenders as a Percent of State Admissions by Race 24% 0 10 30 %40% Source: Calculated from National Corrections Reporting Program, 1996 data. 38% The high and disproportionate rate of minority incarceration, particularly in the context of the war on drugs, is a grave challenge to the country. It exposes and deepens the racial fault lines that weaken the country; contradicts principles of justice and equal protection of the laws; and undermines faith among all races in the fairness and efficacy of the criminal justice system.

Figure 4 Prison Admissions for Male Drug Offenders by Race Alabama 340 34 Arkansas 123 California Colorado Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin 19 23 25 60 12 9 24 43 32 22 12 11 6 9 19 39 33 36 33 30 39 23 60 18 34 26 25 13 43 57 56 72 139 278 260 252 1 279 314 3 303 301 321 358 381 372 402 424 463 455 440 460 486 479 514 669 696 628 623 689 779 850 869 968 1,146 0 0 400 600 800 1,000 1,0 Source: Calculated from National Corrections Reporting Program, 1996, and Bureau of Census, 00 data.

Figure 5 Male Drug Offender Admissions by Race: Ratio of and Rates Rates calculated per 100,000 residents - over 10-5 - 10 1-5 No data Source: Calculated from National Corrections Reporting Program, 1996, and Bureau of Census, 00 data. States have choices in the means by which to promote community well-being, protect public safety and curb the drug trade. Over the last two decades, the choice was imprisonment. Prison is, of course, a legitimate criminal sanction, but it should be used as a last resort i.e. used only for serious crimes -- and the length of the sentence should be commensurate with the conduct and culpability of the offender. Unfortunately, too many states have opted instead for sentencing policies that mandate long sentences even for nonviolent, low-level drug offenders. The budgetary demands of swollen prison populations at a time of fiscal crisis are currently forcing states to reconsider their sentencing policies. We believe they should examine the cost-effectiveness, fairness, and wisdom of adopting shorter sentences, eliminating mandatory minimums and increasing the use of alternatives to incarceration. Although financial pressures now compel the reassessment of sentencing policies, public officials should take the opportunity to consider the damage caused by unnecessary and excessive incarceration, and the consequences of dramatic racial disparities among those who are placed behind bars. Extensive statistical data on prison and jail populations can be found at the Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Web site: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ Related Human Rights Watch Reports: Race and Incarceration in the United States, February 02, http://www.hrw.org/ backgrounder/usa/race/ Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs, May 00, http://www.hrw. org/reports/00/usa/ Collateral Casualties: Children of Incarcerated Drug Offenders in New York, June 02, http://www.hrw.org/reports/02/usany/ Cruel and Usual: Disproportionate Sentences for New York Drug Offenders, March 1997, http://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/usny/ Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States, October 1998, http://www.hrw.org/reports98/ vote/