BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS AGREED INTERLOCUTORY ORDER OF SUSPENSION

Similar documents
ofthe State Bar of Texas appeared by attorney and announced ready. Respondent, Bryan P. Cartall,

disciplinary action was ca lled for hearing before the Board of Discipl inary Appeals. Petitioner

CAUSE NO. DC JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT CHRISTOPHER L. GRAHAM COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE

BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Rule 1A:8. Military Spouse Provisional Admission.

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST REPEAT VIOLENCE

March, Tex. B.J Disciplinary Actions

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL/TRAFFIC DIVISION PLEA IN ABSENTIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

Georgia Petition for Change of Name

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Military Spouse Provisional Admission.

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR COMPULSORY DISCIPLINE

HENDERSON COUNTY BAIL BOND BOARD LOCAL RULES

KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS

FINAL JUDGMENT OF INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING (AFTER NOTICE)

United States District Court Northern District of California

APPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section

on a probated suspension from the practice of law in Texas beginning November 17, 2017, and ending November 16, BODA Cause No

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER. 24, 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted

United States District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,165(OSC) REPORT OF REFEREE

ARD/DUI EXPUNGEMENT ACT 122 AND 151

APPENDIX F INSTRUCTIONS

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

PETITION TO EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD

NEW MEXICO. New Mexico 1

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING

People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and

18 Pa. C.S.A Expungement

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

NO. EX PARTE IN THE DISTRICT COURT. TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS PETITION FOR EXPUNCTION OF RECORDS

On this day came to be heard the above styled and numbered cause. Petitioner

OCCAOnline Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals

INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

Disciplinary Procedure 2.25, Bragg has. of 30 days from the date of the judgment

Information & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment. 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following:

BYLAWS OF THE WYOMING STATE BAR

BOND FORFEITURE Table of Contents

IN THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COURT OF DERBY, KANSAS

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

December, Tex. B.J. 1040

On Sept. 19, 2006, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of the complainant

No. D-1-GN STEVE SMITH, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Respondent-Contestee. 250th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

Enforcement in Criminal Cases

Steven M. Mezrow, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS KENTUCKY PEST CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE. vs. DOH CASE NO.: LICENSE NO.: ME FINAL ORDER

JUVENILES. For forms related to civil cases for truant conduct, see the Texas Truancy Resource Manual for truancy courts.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

Case 1:14-cr SS Document 50 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURI Western District of Texas AUSTIN DIVISION

JUDICIAL STANDING ORDER #1 Personal Recognizance Bonds Jail Credit on Plea

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

COMMUTATION OF SENTENCE

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILD(REN)

Committee issued a public reprimand in Case No. S on June 13, BODA cause number

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

BYLAWS OF LEGACY AT LAKESHORE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

PART 6 COURT CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COURT

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Feedback on the attached documents should be sent to the National Center on Full Faith and Credit at 800/ , ext. 2 or

TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1 ADOPTION, CITATION, PURPOSE AND SUSPENSION OF LOCAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE AS ADOPTED JANUARY 30, 2009

JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Case 8:16-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California

NAME CHANGES IN TEXAS

Information Memorandum 98-11*

Rule Change #2000(20)

Indiana Rules of Court Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-6 STATE BAR OF TEXAS AGREED JUDGMENT OF PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

THE LOUISIANA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION COUNSELORS LICENSING ACT

No. 12 of 2016 THE MINING (MINE SUPPORT SERVICES) REGULATIONS, 2017 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS

REINSTATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. To facilitate the processing of Petitions for Reinstatement to practice law the

IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AND IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, TEXAS

H 5293 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE SENT IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE:

NO. NATHAN MACIAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

WESTCHESTER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION CRIMINAL ASSIGNED COUNSEL PANELS

Sealing & Expunging Records

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE AS AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION

Current through 2016, Chapters 1-48, ARTICLE XI-B PROMPT CONTRACTING AND INTEREST PAYMENTS FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

LIONE & LEE, P.C STECK AVENUE SUITE A-119 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

(2) Definitions. As used in this part 5, unless the context otherwise requires:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

1. Admission to the Bar. A lawyer is qualified for admission to the bar of the district if the lawyer meets the following requirements:

Bylaws of the Illinois CPA Society

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF BAIL AND BONDS IN THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR BANNOCK COUNTY

Transcription:

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF WALTER E. DEMOND STATE BAR CARD NO. 05736600 CAUSE NO. 48985 AGREED INTERLOCUTORY ORDER OF SUSPENSION On this day, the above-styled and numbered compulsory disciplinary action was called for hearing before the Board of Disciplinary Appeals. Petitioner appeared by attorney and Respondent appeared pro seas indicated by their respective signatures below and announced that they agree to the findings of fact, conclusions of law and orders set forth below. The Board of Disciplinary Appeals, having reviewed the file and in consideration of the agreement of the parties, is of the opinion that Petitioner is entitled to entry of the following findings and orders: Findings of Fact. The Board of Disciplinary Appeals finds that: (I) Respondent,, whose State Bar Card number is 05736600, is licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas to practice law and is authorized to practice law in the State of Texas. (2) On or about June 17, 2009, Walter Demond was charged by Indictment with Misapplication of Fiduciary Property; Theft; and Money Laundering in Cause No. CR01016, styled The State of Texas v. Walter Demond, in the 424'h Judicial District Court of Blanco County, Texas. (3) On or about June 15, 2011, a Judgment of Conviction by Jury was entered in Case No. CR-1016 Count I, styled The State oftexas v. Walter Demond, in the 424'h District Court of Blanco County, Texas, wherein Respondent was found guilty of Misapplication offiduciary Property and was committed into the custody of the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to be imprisoned for a total term of ten (I 0) years. The Court suspended the confinement and placed Demond on community supervision for ten (I 0) years, ordered him to pay a fine of$1 0,000, court costs of$378 Page I of6

and restitution of $212,000. Demond is jointly and severally liable for $86,000 of that amount with the defendant in the case CR 1015. As a condition of community supervision, the Court ordered Demond to be confined in the Blanco County Jail for one hundred and forty days (140) over seven periods of incarceration: those periods being January I through January 20, March I through March 20, July I through July 20, September I through September 20 and November 21 through December 10. The Court ordered the periods to be over several years with the first period of incarceration beginning when the conviction is final and further ordered that this 140-day period shall run consecutively with the terms of incarceration order in the terms of Counts II and III. (4) On or aboutjune 15,2011, a Judgment of Conviction by Jury was entered in Case No. CR-1016 Count II, styled The State of Texas v. Walter Demond, in the 424'h District Court of Blanco County, Texas, wherein Respondent was found guilty of Theft and was committed into the custody of the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to be imprisoned for a total term often (I 0) years. The Court suspended the confinement and placed Demond on community supervision for ten (I 0) years, ordered him to pay a fine of$i 0,000 and restitution of$212,000. Demond is jointly and severally liable for $86,000 of that amount with the defendant in the case CR 1015. As a condition of community supervision, the Court ordered Demond to be confined in the Blanco County Jail for one hundred and eighty days (180) over nine periods of incarceration: those periods being January I through January 20, March I through March 20, July I through July 20, September I through September 20 and November 21 through December I 0. The Court ordered the periods to be over several years with the first period of incarceration beginning when Demond has served the jail time as condition of community supervision for Count I and further ordered that this 180-day period shall run consecutively with the terms of incarceration order in the terms of Counts I and Ill. (5) On or about June 15,2011, a Judgment of Conviction by Jury was entered in Case No. CR-1 016 Count Ill, styled The State oftexas v. Walter Demond, in the 424'h District Court of Blanco County, Texas, wherein Respondent was found guilty of Money Laundering and was committed into the custody of the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to be imprisoned for a total term of ten (I 0) years. The Court suspended the confinement and placed Demond on community supervision for ten (1 0) years, ordered him to pay a fine of $10,000 and restitution of $212,000. Demond is jointly and severally liable for $86,000 of that amount with the defendant in the case CR 1015. As a condition of community supervision, Page 2 of6

the Court ordered Demond to be confined in the B Janco County Jail for one hundred and eighty days (180) over nine periods of incarceration: those periods being January I through January 20, March I through March 20, July I through July 20, September I through September 20 and November 21 through December I 0. The Court ordered the periods to be over several years with the first period of incarceration beginning when Demond has served the jail time as condition of community supervision for Count II and that this 180-day period shall run consecutively with the terms of incarceration order in the terms of Counts I and II. ( 6) Respondent,, is the same person as the Walter Demond who is the subject of the Demond criminal cases described above. (7) Respondent has appealed the criminal convictions. Conclusions oflaw. Based upon the foregoing findings of facts the Board of Disciplinary Appeals makes the following conclusions of law: (I) This Board has jurisdiction to hear and determine this matter. Rule 7.08(0), Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. (2) Respondent,, having been convicted of Misapplication of Fiduciary Property; Theft; and Money Laundering has been convicted of Intentional Crimes as defined by TRDP 1.06(T). (3) Respondent has also been convicted of Serious Crimes as defined by TRDP 1.06(Z). ( 4) Having been found guilty and convicted of Intentional and Serious Crimes and having appealed such convictions, Respondent,, should have his license to practice law in Texas suspended during the appeal of his criminal convictions. TRDP 8.04. (5) The Board retains jurisdiction to enter a final judgment in this matter when the criminal appeal is final. It is, accordingly, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Respondent, Walter E. Demond, State Bar Card No. 05736600, is hereby SUSPENDED from the practice oflaw in the State of Texas effective immediately upon entry of this order and continuing hereafter until further order Page 3 of6

ofthis Board. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Respondent,, during said suspension is hereby prohibited, effective immediately, from practicing law in Texas, holding himself out as an attorney at law, performing any legal service for others, accepting any fee directly or indirectly for legal services not completed before the date of this order, appearing as counsel in any proceeding in any Texas court or before any Texas administrative body, or holding himself out to others or using his name, in any manner, in conjunction with the words "attorney," ''counselor," or ''lawyer." It is further ORDERED that Respondent,, shall notify in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, each and every justice of the peace, judge, magistrate, and chief justice of each and every court in which Respondent,, has any legal matter pending, if any, of his suspension, of the style and cause number of the pending matter( s ), and of the name, address, and telephone number of the client( s) Respondent is representing in that court. Respondent is also ORDERED to mail copies of all such notifications to the Statewide Compliance Monitor, Office of the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel, State Bar oftexas, P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711. It is further ORDERED that Respondent,, shall immediately notify each of his current clients, if any, in writing, of his suspension. In addition to such notification, Respondent is ORDERED to return all files, papers, unearned fees paid in advance, and all other monies and properties which are in his possession but which belong to current or former clients with active cases pending, if any, to those respective clients or former clients with active cases pending Page 4 of6

within thirty (30) days after the date of this Order. Respondent is further ORDERED to file with the Statewide Compliance Monitor, Office of the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel, State Bar of Texas, P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711, within the same thirty (30) days, an affidavit stating either (a) that all current clients have been notified of his suspension and that all files, papers, unearned fees paid in advance, and all other monies and properties belonging to clients and former clients with active cases pending have been returned as ordered herein or (b) that Respondent has no current clients, files, or papers, and that any unearned fees paid in advance or other monies or properties belonging to clients have previously been returned to the appropriate client. If Respondent is unable to return any file, papers, money or other property to any client or former client with active cases pending, Respondent's affidavit shall state with particularity the efforts made by Respondent with respect to each particular client and the cause of his inability to return to said client any file, paper, money or other property. Respondent is also ORDERED to mail a copy of all notification letters to the Statewide Compliance Monitor, Office of the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel, State Bar of Texas, P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711. It is further ORDERED that Respondent,, immediately surrender his Texas law license and permanent State Bar Card to the Statewide Compliance Monitor, Office of the Chief Disciplinary, State Bar of Texas, P.O. Box 12487, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711, for transmittal to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas. It is further ORDERED that a certified copy of the Petition for Compulsory Discipline on file herein, along with a copy of this Order, be sent to the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas, P.O. Box 12487, Austin, Texas 78711. Page 5 of6

It is further ORDERED that this Order is interlocutory and that the Board retains jurisdiction to enter a final judgment when the appeal of the criminal conviction is final. In the Matter of Mercier, 242 SW 3d 46 (Tex. 2007). It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall promptly notify the Board and the State Bar of Texas Chief Disciplinary Counsel when the appeal of the criminal conviction is final. It is further ORDERED that the Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas shall monitor the status of the appeal of the criminal conviction on at least a quarterly basis and promptly file an appropriate motion for entry offinaljudgment with the Board when the appeal of the criminal conviction is final. Signedthi~dayof ~Dt( 2011. tf~iil Chairman Presiding Board of Disciplinary Appeals APPROVE~AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: ~ Alex Veltman Assistant Disciplinary Counsel State Bar Card No. 00795698 Attorney for Petitioner ~ Dd State Bar Card No. 05736600 Respondent Page 6 of6