Seizure of property in cross-border crime on the territory of Common Market

Similar documents
Moscow (Russian Federation) 9 10 November Contribution presented by the Ministry of Justice of

S/2003/487. Security Council. United Nations

1. An outline of the domestic asset recovery regime; 2. An overview of the way in which the UK can assist overseas

S/2002/727. Security Council. United Nations

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

GENERAL DISCUSSION. 22/09/ Isabel Vicente Carbajosa.

HUMAN TRAFFICKING National Situation Report Press-release summary -

Act on the Amendments to the Act on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Member States of the European Union

OUTCOME REPORT OF THE

Legislative Decree No 195 of 19 November 2008 Amendments and integrations to currency legislation, implementing Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/69/489)]

KRAM We NORODOM SIHAMONI KING OF CAMBODIA

3.1 The specific sections in the Act, which regulate the production of SALW, are as follows:

CAC/COSP/IRG/2011/CRP.4

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Asset Recovery in Ukraine. Practice Guide

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Operation Pandora shows that Europe is NOT a haven for cultural property looted from war zones

Passive aggressive - Sweden combats organised crime

Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament

Revised EU-Ukraine Action Plan on Freedom, Security and Justice. Challenges and strategic aims

The information contained in this table should be updated on a yearly basis.

Further information about the publication of legislation on this website can be found by referring to the Frequently Asked Questions.

LEGISLATIVE CONSENT MEMORANDUM CRIMINAL FINANCES BILL

Guide to Asset Recovery in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 May 2015 (OR. en)

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Efforts for Recovery of Assets

CLOSING SPEECH COMMISSIONER KOVACS. It is really a pleasure for me to be here today to close this successful event

CONFERENCE OF THE STATE PARTIES TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION

Slide 2 We will discuss different areas where co operation with the judicial authorities may be important for prosecutors of environmental crime.

THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN - ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND PROCEEDS OF CRIME LAW

Delegations will find enclosed the declaration on combating terrorism as adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 25 March 2004.

S/2001/1309. Security Council. United Nations

ICCWC Indicator Framework for Combating Wildlife and Forest Crime

2005 ORGANISED CRIME SITUATION REPORT FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

International legal assistance in criminal matters

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL SECOND REPORT UNDER THE VISA SUSPENSION MECHANISM. {SWD(2018) 496 final}

Application of Domestic Cybercrime Legislation. Presentation by Kerry-Ann Barrett Ministry of National Security Trinidad and Tobago

Addis Abeba International Conference. Italian Experience and Framework on Asset Recovery in Fighting and Cracking Down Organized Crime and Corruption

The information contained in this table should be updated on a yearly basis. Procedure for search (asset-tracing) and seizure

DIRECTIVES. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 83(1) thereof,

BERMUDA PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT : 34

Obtaining Foreign Evidence and Confiscating Proceeds of Crime in the EU

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND SURRENDER PROCEDURES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES ACT (ZENPP) I. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS. Article 1

Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)

COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders

Code of Practice Issued Under Section 377A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

EU update (including the Green Paper on the Presumption of Innocence) ECBA Conference, Edinburgh April 2006

Regional Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Ukraine.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 November /11 COPEN 338 EUROJUST 200

III ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY

PROFILES ON COUNTER-TERRORISM CAPACITY

VISA LIBERALISATION WITH KOSOVO * ROADMAP

Confiscation and Criminal Lifestyle

Criminal Procedure Code. Surrender

L 76/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union (Acts adopted pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union)

Cooperation between customs authorities and business organizations in combating drug trafficking

Effective Asset Recovery and Confiscation of the Proceeds of Crime in the EU: Challenges

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

BERMUDA 2008 : 36 ANTI-TERRORISM (FINANCIAL AND OTHER MEASURES) AMENDMENT ACT 2008

ORGANISED CRIME INVESTIGATIONS: POLICE STATION LEVEL. Doraval Govender

Arab Republic of Egypt The People s Assembly. Law No. (64) of 2010 regarding Combating Human Trafficking

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Screening report Montenegro

Protection of Freedoms Bill. Delegated Powers - Memorandum by the Home Office. Introduction

TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ORDINANCE Arrangement of Sections CONFISCATION. Interpretation for this Part. Confiscation Order

14032/11 GS/np 1 DG H 2B

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 February /12 COPEN 45 EUROJUST 17 FIN 153

REQUESTS FOR MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS. Guidance for Authorities Outside of Kenya

Number 31 of 1996 CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU ACT 1996 REVISED. Updated to 30 June 2016

Page 10 Volume 133 Part 144 A Government Gazette 30 December 2559 (2016) (Unofficial Translation)

UNODC/CCPCJ/EG.1/2014/3

Conference of States parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. St. Petersburg, Russian Federation 2-6 November 2015

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 January /08 COPEN 1 EUROJUST 1 EJN 1

MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Service Procedure THE SEIZURE, RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF EVIDENCE RELATED PROPERTY

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING, TERRORISM FINANCING AND PROLIFERATION FINANCING

Countering Illicit Firearms Trafficking in the Context of Organized Crime and Terrorism Work of UNODC s Global Firearms Programme

Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime

Act No. 4 of 2016 BILL

Legality and struggle against organised crime: Legality and struggle against organised crime: Confiscation and social re-use of criminal assets

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/55/383)]

Dublin City Joint Policing Committee Tuesday 13 th September Report of Assistant Commissioner Jack Nolan Dublin Metropolitan Region

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels 2 September /11 CRIMORG 124 COPEN 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122

WHY WE ARE REVIEWING THE ACT

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM.

INTERIM REPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Criminal Finances Bill

Chapter 11 The use of intelligence agencies capabilities for law enforcement purposes

BRIEFING: MANDATE AND ACTIVTIES DIRECTORATE FOR PRIORITY CRIME INVESTIGATION(DPCI): 17 SEPTEMBER 2014

LAW CONCERNING SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR THE NARCOTICS AND PSYCHOTROPICS CONTROL LAW, ETC. AND OTHER MATTERS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACTIVITIES

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 5 March 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0036 (COD) PE-CONS 121/13 DROIPEN 156 COPEN 229 CODEC 2833

Albania has met all the benchmarks regarding the security of passports/travel documents, ID cards and breeder documents:

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. First Report under the Visa Suspension Mechanism. {SWD(2017) 480 final}

Statutory Law Nº The Congress of the Republic of Peru has enacted the STATUTORY CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST ASSET LAUNDERING

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Transcription:

Seizure of property in cross-border crime on the territory of Common Market

Schengen area and cross-border crime Membership in the Schengen area has long raised many questions in the context of potential benefits and risks.

The first are mainly associated with the possibility of free movement of generically various goods and people, which has certainly contributed to the revival of international cooperation of EU member states and to encouraging their citizens to travel freely between countries.

The other side of the Schengen area is a growth of risks, like national and international crime (cross- border crime).

Benefits in the form of increased opportunities of free movement of people and goods were quickly recognized and taken advantage of by international criminal groups.

This involves, for example, an easier flow of weapons, drugs and possessions derived from crime. It also facilitates illegal trading within the community, tax frauds or legalization of funds coming from criminal activity the so-called money laundering.

Protection of property in the international context The concept of asset recovery by a judicial body shall be understood broadly as: - Seizure and procedural recovery in Poland or outside its borders of property earlier lost as a result of a criminal offence, yet recoverable by the victim or - Seizure of the suspect s property in his mother country or abroad for future penalties and claims for damages.

Property seizure and recovery are associated with one of the most important elements of the strategy of the Police of Greater Poland, which is to safeguard the interests of the victim in the criminal process.

This is reflected, among others, in their efforts to achieve a positive balance of profits, that is the value of seized property and the value of the recovered property compared with the value of the goods lost or damaged as a result of crime.

These activities are in accordance with the socially acceptable process of depriving perpetrators of so-called fruit of crime, located both within the home country and abroad.

Because of the cross-border nature of crimes, property recovery-related activities are often of international character.

The European Union has long devoted much attention to issues related to prevention of taking advantage from so-called "fruit" of a crime. We shall distinguish two levels of cooperation among EU member states.

The first one is judicial cooperation (Prosecutor's Office and courts) in the area of legal proceedings. It is formal in nature and it is based on international agreements.

Its aim is to create, develop and put into practice legal instruments that allow effective legal assistance concerning seizure and confiscation of illicit profits.

In order to be able to use these mechanisms and remain effective, first the property subject to seizure must be found by the police, also beyond the borders of our country.

Hence the second level of interest for the European Union is collaboration of operational police services in the area of verification and findings.

Its goal is to expand the practical possibilities of criminal investigation abroad concerning financial investigation on illicit financial transfers, transactions and disclosure of assets by an effective exchange of information and intelligence data among law enforcement authorities.

It is usually informal and dictated by common operational needs.

In practice, this implied a significant simplification of existing procedures in order to accelerate the flow of information among the countries concerned.

The consequence of these expectations and concept was the establishment of national offices for the recovery of property in most EU countries. In Poland, this role is played by the Asset Recovery Department of the Criminal Service Bureau of National Police.

The system created in this way enables correct, quick and effective exchange of information with similar offices situated in other countries, which plays a fundamental role in providing direct access of a contact person to databases containing information relevant to the recovery of property coming from criminal acts.

However, the quality of information depends on legal systems and databases available in individual countries.

An example of positive solutions is Italy, which uses e.g. "Progetto Molecola" (Project molecule), i.e. a powerful computer system connected to multiple databases that are currently in use, including a banking system; and Romania, which is a rapidly developing European country in the area of asset recovery.

Poland belongs to the group of countries with severe restrictions on acceding bank and fiscal information databases, which frequently prevents the police from acting quickly and effectively. Western patterns indicate that this problem has long ago been recognized and solved by giving the police greater access to such information.

Currently in Poland, there are ongoing activities to create the National Register of Bank Accounts, which will be available for the police, among others.

The main activities of the General Inspector of Financial Information concentrate on blocking financial resources of entities performing suspicious transactions in international trade, which constitutes a great support for law enforcement authorities.

This institution also promotes the idea of constructive cooperation with law enforcement authorities with respect to exchange of information on entities who might be suspected of putting into circulation funds coming from a criminal activity.

Another element indispensable for effective asset recovery system in the international context is an active participation of the prosecutor's office in preparatory proceedings.

It is the prosecutor s office where we address requests to obtain permission to seize the suspect s overseas assets.

Only on condition that we obtain the prosecutor s support, can we request for international legal assistance concerning physical seizure of the suspect s property on the territory of third countries.

Without constructive cooperation between police and prosecutors, many instances of assets seizure in the home country and abroad could not have been carried out.

SIS and asset recovery Increasing the mobility of international groups resulting from facilitated travelling without any border controls resulted in the need for the application of compensatory measures aimed at ensuring a high security level of the entire zone.

One of these instruments is the Schengen Information System (SIS) - a modern tool for providing a guarantee of information security. SIS is the largest database in Europe, which processes precisely defined by the law categories of persons and objects sought and entered into the system by the states of the Schengen area.

SIS is also a support for the recovery and seizure of property in the international context. Objects and stolen vehicles recorded in our databases, thanks to the SIS, are easily identifiable beyond the borders of our country and we receive feedback without any delay.

Due to the right legal provisions, we can obtain information about vehicles driven by our figurehead / suspect abroad. Then, we can easily correlate it with the places he has visited, which enables a search of his property.

Covert surveillance gives us similar opportunities, thanks to which we gather information showing where exactly we should seek our figureheads / suspects assets.

Conclusions International cooperation in the field of broadly understood asset recovery gives the Polish Police a fairly wide range of possibilities from the operational and procedural point of view.

A major problem, however, for Polish police officers, constitute legal barriers preventing access to databases, which contain important information about figureheads / suspects assets (banking or fiscal details).

This exchange is meant to improve the efficiency of local solutions, often weak ones, and through the prism of losses caused by organized crime groups - harmful for the state.

In order to eliminate these barriers, we must consistently point them out in the context of international trainings, conferences or other meetings whose main goal is to share experiences and good practices.