IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

Similar documents
For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Dwi - Death To Another Person ( Y

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT v.

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION. No. 3:13-CV-0755

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 17, 2013 Oral Argument Case Summary

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT. Count I. Dwi - Death Of Another ( Y

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case: 4:13-cv HEA Doc. #: 27 Filed: 12/02/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 128

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session

VANDALIZING RAILROAD CROSSING DEVICES (N.J.S.A. 2C: ) Count of the indictment provides as follows: [READ COUNT OF THE INDICTMENT]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

Plaintiff, by his attorney Mc Carthy & Modelewski, as and for a Complaint PARTIES AND BACKGROUND FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patrick Hardy, by and through his attorney, Joshua D.

DC NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Courthouse News Service

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT - TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2002 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 24 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 9

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

The Honorable Chainnan and Members ofthe Board ofcounty Commissioners. William M. Davis, Interim Director, Risk Management

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DISTRICT CIVIL DIVISION

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

(Negligence, Negligence Per Se)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2012 Page 1 of 5

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No.

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :23 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2018

JERRY WAYNE WHISNANT, JR. Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERRERA, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 2 November 2004

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Page 1 of 10 N.C.P.I. MOTOR VEHICLE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Copyright Crash Data Services, LLC All rights reserved.

Case: 4:12-cv CAS Doc. #: 1-1 Filed: 09/28/12 Page: 1 of 22 PageID #: 10 INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ.

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT STATE REQUESTS A WARRANT

Count III. Tampering With Motor Vehicle 1st Degree ( Y )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Supreme Court of Virginia

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

By and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants:

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

The Below Average Defendant: Establishing BAC Evidence in DUI Cases

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI SALLY G. HURT, City, State, ZIP And SUSAN G. HURT, City, Street, ZIP Case No. Division Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE Serve at: City, State, Zip Defendant. PETITION FOR DAMAGES For their Petition for Damages, Plaintiffs allege the following: 1. Plaintiffs are over the age of eighteen and reside in Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Defendant is a resident of Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri. 3. This Court has jurisdiction because the Defendant committed a tortious act within the State of Missouri and resides in the State of Missouri. 4. Venue is proper under R.S.Mo. 508.010 because Plaintiffs' cause of action arose in Clay County, Missouri. 5. On or about Month, Date, Year, Plaintiff Sally G. Hurt was operating a motor vehicle traveling northbound on Interstate near Highway in Claycomo, Clay County, Missouri. Plaintiff Susan G. Hurt was a passenger in the front passenger seat.

6. Defendant was operating a motor vehicle traveling southbound in the northbound lane on Interstate near Highway in Claycomo, Clay County, Missouri and was driving under the influence of alcohol. 7. Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol when he crashed head-on into Plaintiffs' vehicle when driving the wrong way on an interstate highway. COUNT I NEGLIGENCE OF DEFENDANT JOHN DOE 8. Plaintiffs incorporate the paragraphs above as though fully set forth herein. 9. While Defendant was operating his vehicle he owed Plaintiffs a duty to operate the vehicle with the highest degree of care. 10. Defendant was negligent and failed to exercise the highest degree of care as required by law and was negligence in one or more of the following respects: a. He violated a traffic signal; b. He failed to keep a careful lookout; c. He drove at excessive speed; d. His automobile was on the wrong side of the road; e. He failed to stop his vehicle before colliding with Plaintiffs vehicle; f. He failed to swerve so that he would avoid collision; g. He failed to slacken his speed so that he would avoid collision; h. He failed to sound a warning; i. He drove his vehicle at a speed which made it impossible to stop within the range of his visibility; and j. He drove while intoxicated to the extent that his driving ability was impaired. 2

11. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s negligent operation of his vehicle on or about Month, Date, Year, Plaintiff, Sally G. Hurt, suffered bodily injury resulting in pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, and expense of medical treatments. 12. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s negligent operation of his vehicle on or about Month, Date, Year, Plaintiff, Susan G. Hurt, suffered bodily injury resulting in pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, and expense of medical treatments. Plaintiff Susan G. Hurt also suffered lost wages. 13. Plaintiffs went through extensive pain and suffering, and these losses and damages are either permanent or continuing and they will suffer these losses and damages into the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendant for a reasonable sum of money damages, for prejudgment interest thereon, and for such further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. COUNT II NEGLIGENCE PER SE OF DEFENDANT 14. Plaintiffs incorporate the paragraphs above as though fully set forth herein. 15. The traffic laws of the State of Missouri are designed to protect pedestrians, drivers, and passengers in the State of Missouri from automobile accidents, injury to person, and damage to property. 16. Defendant violated Section 300.140 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, which requires the driver of any vehicle to obey the instructions of traffic control devices. 3

17. Defendant violated Section 304.012 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, which requires every person operating a motor vehicle on the roads and highways to drive in a careful and prudent manner and to exercise the highest degree of care. 18. Defendant violated Section 304.015 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, which prohibits vehicles from driving on the left side of a highway which has been divided into two or more roadways by means of a physical barrier or a divided section. 19. Defendant violated Section 577.010 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, which prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated or drugged condition. 20. Plaintiffs were members of the class of persons intended to be protected by these statutes. 21. Plaintiffs injuries were of the kind the statutes were designed to prevent. 22. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violations of Missouri law on or about Month, Date, Year, Plaintiffs sustained severe injuries, loss of income, medical bills, pain and suffering, personal property damage, and other damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendant for a reasonable sum of money damages, for prejudgment interest thereon, and for such further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. COUNT III PUNITIVE DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANT JOHN DOE 23. Plaintiffs incorporate the paragraphs above as though fully set forth herein. 24. Defendant either knew or had reason to know that there was a high degree of probability that his conduct would result in injury. 25. Defendant s conduct showed complete indifference to the safety of others and conscious disregard for the safety of others. 4

26. Defendant s outrageous and reckless conduct caused or contributed to cause the collision at issue, and thereby caused or contributed to cause Plaintiffs to suffer and sustain severe injuries. 27. The imposition of punitive damages against Defendant is warranted in such a sum as to punish the Defendant and to deter him and others like him from similar conduct. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendant for punitive damages in such a sum as is fair and reasonable, for prejudgment interest thereon, for plaintiffs' costs incurred and expended herein, and for such further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby requests a jury trial on all issues so triable. Respectfully submitted, Jared A. Rose, Mo. Bar #60128 The Law Office of Jared A. Rose 919 West 47th Street Kansas City, MO 64113 Phone: 816.221.4335 Fax: 816.471.4321 E-mail: jared@roselawkc.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 5