IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability

Similar documents
Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO

The New Post-AIA World

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences

New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by

America Invents Act: The Practical Effects of the New USPTO Post-Grant Proceedings

Strategic Use of Post-Grant Proceedings In Light of Patent Reform

ITC Litigation in the U.S. MIP Global IP Briefing August 26, 2015, Singapore

Post Grant Review. Strategy. Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER

Friend or Foe: the New Patent Challenge Procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Inter Partes and Covered Business Method Reviews A Reality Check

IPRs and CBMs : The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown. Seattle Intellectual Property Inn of Court A Presentation by Group 6 April 17, 2014

Intersection of Automotive, Aerospace, & Transportation: Practical Strategies for Resolving IP Conflicts in Multi-Supplier Sourcing

BCLT Back to School: The New Patent Law Explained (Post-Grant Procedures) Stuart P. Meyer

July 12, NPE Patent Litigation. The AIA s Impact on. Chris Marchese. Mike Amon

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

Patent Practice in View Of PTAB AIA Proceedings

2012 Winston & Strawn LLP

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

Inter Partes Review vs. District Court Litigation

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of

Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Proposed Rules for Post-Issuance Patent Review under the America Invents Act

PROCEDURES FOR INVALIDATING, CLARIFYING OR NARROWING A PATENT IN THE PATENT OFFICE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA)

AIA Post-Grant Implementation Begins - Is Your Business Strategy Aligned? August 27, A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP

Patent Litigation With Non-Practicing Entities: Strategies, Trends and

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

Factors Affecting Success of Stay Motions Pending Inter Partes & Covered Business Method Review

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

America Invents Act September 19, Matt Rainey Vice President/Chief IP Policy Counsel

Post-Grant Patent Practice: Review & Reexamination Course Syllabus

Inequitable Conduct Judicial Developments

$2 to $8 million AMERICA INVENTS ACT MANAGING IP RISK IN THE NEW ERA OF POST GRANT PROCEEDINGS 7/30/2013 MANAGING RISK UNDER THE AIA

IP system and latest developments in China. Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 2015

Licensing & Management of IP Assets. Covenant Not to Sue

How Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies. MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing

The America Invents Act: Key Provisions Affecting Inventors, Patent Owners, Accused Infringers and Attorneys

Venue Differences. Claim Amendments During AIA Proceedings 4/16/2015. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board

The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011

Post-Grant Proceedings at the Patent Office After Passage of the America Invents Act

America Invents Act (AIA) The Patent Reform Law of 2011 Initial Summary

Multidistrict Litigation, Forum Selection and Transfer: Tips and Trends Julie M. Holloway Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP

Preemptive Use Of Post-Grant Review Vs. Inter Partes Review

Intellectual Property: Efficiencies in Patent Post-Grant Proceedings

Post-Grant Patent Proceedings

Discovery and Fact Investigation: New Patent Office Procedures under America Invents Act

THE ITC S GROWING ROLE IN PATENT ADJUDICATION. The View from the Bar

USPTO Post Grant Trial Practice

Policies of USPTO Director Kappos & U.S. Patent Law Reform

18-MONTHS POST-AIA: HOW HAS PATENT LITIGATION. Rebecca Hanovice, Akarsh Belagodu, Lauren Bruzzone and Clay Holloway

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings. Jeffrey S. Bergman Kevin Kuelbs Laura Witbeck

INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS IN JAPAN. July 25,2014 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual Property High Court

A Rebalancing Act: Early Patent Litigation Strategies in Light of Recent Federal Circuit Cases ACC Litigation Committee Meeting

Post-Grant Reviews Before The USPTO

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.

Part V: Derivation & Post Grant Review

Litigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Paper 21 Tel: Entered: February 12, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

OUTLINE AND EVALUATION OF THE DOUBLE TRACK SYSTEM IN JAPAN--- INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS AND INVALIDITY TRIALS AT JPO

How Post Grant Challenges Have Evolved from Proposed Rules to Practice. Prepared by W. Karl Renner Principal & Co Chair of Post Grant Practice

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

America Invents Act H.R (Became Law: September 16, 2011) Michael K. Mutter Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch October 11-12, 2011

Oil States, SAS Institute, and New Approaches at the U.S. Patent Office

Trends From 2 Years Of AIA Post-Grant Proceedings

Is Inter Partes Review Set for Supreme Court Review?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Anthony C Tridico, Ph.D.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Changes at the PTO. October 21, 2011 Claremont Hotel. Steven C. Carlson Fish & Richardson P.C. Bradley Baugh North Weber & Baugh LLP

Paper Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

By Saria Tseng and John Schnurer

The Changing Landscape of AIA Proceedings

Case 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

CORRECTION OF ISSUED PATENTS

The Royal Society of Chemistry IP Law Case Seminar: 2017 in the U.S.

What is Post Grant Review?

Patent Office Litigation By the Numbers How effective are the new procedures for resolving litigation? And how dangerous are the new procedures to

PATENT TROLL LEGISLATION How it could affect your IP portfolio

TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC

IP Law and the Biosciences Conference

Winds of Change: Patent Reform in 2011 Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas

Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, Tokyo, San Diego, Silicon Valley 7/2/2012

HCCH and Intellectual Property

Inter Partes Review Part I: Pretrial

Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?

Supreme Court of the United States

Patent Pending: The Outlook for Patent Legislation in the 114th Congress

T he landscape for patent disputes is changing rapidly.

White Paper Report United States Patent Invalidity Study 2012

What Merchants Need to Know About How the Key Players in the Mobile Payments Services Ecosystem Relate to Each Other. Patent Infringement Disputes

Patent Litigation in China

LESSONS WE CAN LEARN FROM PRIOR USER RIGHTS IN JAPAN

Strategic Use of Patent Reissue: Whether and When to Pursue a Reissue Application

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

AMERICA INVENTS ACT. Changes to Patent Law. Devan Padmanabhan Shareholder, Winthrop & Weinstine

ITC Remedial Orders in the. Real World. more effective way to enforce those rights than by turning to the United States International

Transcription:

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability David W. Hill Partner October 11, 2012 1

U.S. is the most IP-litigious Nation 10 Most Litigious Countries With # Of Patent Litigation Filings (1997-2010); Most Active Court In Each Country* Canada: 1088 Toronto/Ottawa/Vancouver 1 court, sits in 3 cities pharma majority of pat lit, equal number of PMNOC cases United States: 37,203 CD Cal. 96 courts England: 895 London 2 courts 48% DJ plaintiffs (06-09) Germany: 12400* Dusseldorf 12 courts France: 3400* Paris 1 court Italy 1600* Milan 12 courts Netherlands: 840* Hague 1 court China: 30,630 Beijing 2nd for invention and utility models Zhejiang Hangzhou for design patents and overall 71 courts Japan: 2864 Tokyo 2 courts Australia: 556* Sydney/Canberra/Melbourne 1 court, sits in 3 cities 2

Dual Forums for Patent Litigation in the U.S. Federal District Court Patent Infringement Suits International Trade Commission 337 Investigations Influence of PTO Invalidity Proceedings Enforceability in the Dual Forums Duration of Litigation Cost of Litigation Overview 3

Dual Forums for Patent Litigation The Federal Courts System The ITC System 4

Comparison of the Dual Forum Forum ITC District Court Nature of Forum Independent, non-partisan, quasijudicial, federal agency Federal judiciary Jurisdiction In rem In personam Decision maker Administrative Law Judge Judge or Jury Remedies Exclusion order, no monetary damages Monetary damages, injunctions Speed 15-16 months (to final decision) 8-30 months (to trial) Discoveries Very Broad Disputes heard by ALJ by phone Broad (not as broad as ITC) Disputes handled by magistrate judge Many patent owners file in both district court and ITC 5

Influence of PTO Invalidity Proceedings New Post-Grant Proceedings under AIA Post Grant Review Inter Party Review Transitional PGR When March 16, 2013 September 16, 2012 September 16, 2012 What Time Limits Scope Any patent issued from an application filed on or after March 16, 2013 Within nine months of issuance Any invalidity ground under 35 USC 282 Procedural Advantages Any patent Within 12 months of being sued for infringement Limited to patents and printed publications Lower burden of proof: preponderance of evidence Broadest reasonable claim constructed Lower cost and shorter duration May stay the case in a district court Any covered business method where petitioner charged with infringement Sunset after eight years (September 16, 2020) Any invalidity ground under 35 USC 282 6

Enforceability U.S. District Courts 2010 Top 10 U.S. Patent Infringement Courts (# of Filings) ND Ohio 65 S.D.N.Y. 105 D.Mass. 68 N.D. Cal. 248 ND Texas 60 N.D. Ill. 214 D. NJ 131 D. Del. 205 C.D. Cal. 186 E.D. Tex. 522 Litigation hotbeds: E.D. Tex., N.D. Cal., N.D. Ill., D. Del. 7

Enforceability U.S. District Courts Case to Trial Rate (2010-2011) 8

Enforceability U.S. District Courts Patentee Winning Rate (2010-2011) 9

Enforceability U.S. District Courts Average Damage Awarded (1995-2011) 1010

Enforceability U.S. District Courts Non-Practicing Entity Filings (1995-2011) Damage Awards to NPE v. Non- NPE (1995-2011) NPE Non-NPE 1111

Enforceability - ITC Resulted in Violation Found Infringement Patent Invalid 2009 40% 39% 15% 2010 41% 36% 21% 1212

Duration ITC investigation is much fasterpaced than district court proceedings PTO proceedings might take longer under AIA 1313

Duration U.S. District Court Years Time to Trial in District Courts (1995-2011) Only the Rocket Dockets district courts (E.D. Va, W. Wisc) are comparable with ITC Some slower courts still take years to get a case to trial 1414

Duration ITC Timeline Timeline for ITC Section 337 Investigation (12-month case) Investigation Initiated ALJ Decision; ITC Review Post-hearing Filing Hearing ITC Decision Presidential Review Pre-hearing Filing Final Order Discovery Complaint Month -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1515

Duration v. Damages Months Damage seems to be lower when the litigation lasts longer 1616

Cost of Litigation Average Cost at District Court or ITC $ at Risk <1 Million 1-25 Million >25 Millions Discovery Cost Cost to Trial Cost of PTO Proceedings $350,000 $1,500,000 $3,000,000 $600,000 $2,500,000 $5,000,000 IPR PGR/ TPGR Ex Parte Reexam Filing Fee Institution Fee Min. Fee $9,000 + $200 per claim in excess of 20 $12,000 + $250 or each claim in excess of 20 $2,520 (proposed to increase to $15,000) $14,000 + $400 for each claim in excess of 15 $18,000 + $550 for each claim in excess of 15 N/A $23,000 $30,000 N/A 1717

Sources Mark A. Lemley, Where to File Your Patent Case, 38 AIPLA Q. J. 1, 13 14 (2010). PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 2012 Patent Litigation Study (2012). America Intellectual Property Law Association, Report of the Economic Survey, 35-39 (2011). A review of 2010 s Patent Ligation Trends at the United States International Trade Commission, Intellectual Property and Technology News (2011). 1818

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Thank You David W. Hill 202.408.4013 david.hill@finnegan.com 901 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-4413 Questions? 1919