IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
January 24, Via Electronic Transmission

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch

December 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

Control N rnber: ' Item Number: 397. Addendurn StartPage: 0

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D PL-499

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

December 12, Via Electronic Transmission

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

Pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys,

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at

Case MFW Doc Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case MFW Doc Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014

Case 1:09-cv EJL Document 5 Filed 02/26/2009 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

Case MFW Doc Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CIVIL RIGHTS INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6

CAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1

U.S. Department of Justice

Case MFW Doc Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO CIV-KAM

Case MFW Doc Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:

CAUSE NO ZACK MAXWELL, IN THE DISTRICT COURT

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 580 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017. Exhibit UU

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:99-cv ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015

S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS OF MOELIS & CO., LLC TO SUBPOENA FROM AURELIUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP GENERAL OBJECTIONS

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case MFW Doc Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

It appearing that the civil actions listed on Schedule A, attached hereto -- which were

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

ACCESS TO PORT PUBLIC RECORDS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :37 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2017

CASE 0:13-cv PJS-LIB Document 59-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COURT FILE NO.

Case 0:17-cv CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM

BERMUDA LEGAL DEPOSIT ACT : 30

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to produce to Eric Wm. Hendon, Esq., Assistant Attorney

POLICY TITLE: Public Access to District Records Policy No.: Page 1 of 6

~/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON

Case KJC Doc 4929 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

Case MFW Doc Filed 05/01/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Counsel for Plaintiffs, LARRY BOWOTO, ET AL. (continued on next page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO

POLICY TITLE: ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS POLICY NO. 309 Page 1 of 10

Turner Environmental Law Clinic. Freedom of Information Act Request HQ F

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 23, 2017

Case MFW Doc Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Don t Get Burned: Proper Implementation of the Litigation Hold Process is Your Best SPF (Spoliation Protection Factor)

Case 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : : Chapter 11 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., : Case No. 08-1229 : (MFW) Jointly : Debtors. : : INTERROGATORIES OF EDWARD F. BACH, HENRY J. BERENS, AND MICHAEL R. ZARRO DIRECTED TO THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST Pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable by Rules 7026 and 7033 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Edward F. Bach, Henry J. Berens, and Michael R. Zarro (collectively, the Claimants ), hereby request that the Washington Mutual Inc. Liquidating Trust (WMILT ), respond under oath and in writing to the following interrogatories (the Interrogatories ). All responses to these Interrogatories should be directed to Kenneth E. Aaron, Esquire, Weir & Partners LLP, 824 North Market Street, Suite 800, Wilmington, DE 19801. INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS A. These Interrogatories are continuing in character, so as to require the WMILT to file supplemental answers if the WMILT obtains further, contradictory or different information. Such supplemental answers, if any, shall be filed from time to time promptly upon the discovery by you of such supplemental information. Each Interrogatory is to be answered separately and as completely as possible. The fact that an investigation is continuing and discovery is not complete shall not be used as a reason for failure to answer any such Interrogatory as fully as possible. The omission of any name, fact or other item of information from the answer shall be deemed a

representation that such name, fact or item is not known to the WMILT, its counselors other representatives or agents of the WMILT. Answers shall be based upon information known to the WMILT, its agents, attorneys, partners, associates, employees, servants, partners, associates, representatives, investigators or any other party or entity acting or who has acted by or on behalf of the WMILT. To the extent that the answer to any Interrogatory is not based upon information known to the WMILT, the WMILT shall specify that fact and the person or entity possessing such information. B. If the answer to all or any part of an Interrogatory is not presently known or available, include a statement to that effect, specifying the portion of the Interrogatory that cannot be completely answered. However, once information is available, the WMILT is required to furnish all information available in response to the entire Interrogatory by supplemental answer as required above. C. If the WMILT refuses to answer any Interrogatory or any part thereof on the grounds of privilege, the WMILT must identify the basis for the privilege claimed, the nature of any information that it refuses to disclose, referring specifically to the Interrogatory or any part thereof to which the Interrogatory applies and by identifying the form in which said information exists, the date of the document or oral communication and the general subject matter of the document or oral communication. D. As used in these Interrogatories, the following terms shall have the following meanings: 1. The terms you or your shall mean the WMILT, and/or any of its agents, attorneys, partners, associates, employees, consultants, servants, representatives, 2

investigators and any person or entity acting or who has acted by or on behalf of the WMILT. 2. Document and writing are used interchangeably and shall mean any written or graphic matter of any kind whatsoever, however produced or reproduced, any electronically or magnetically recorded matter of any kind or character, however produced or reproduced, and any other matter constituting the recording of data or information upon any tangible thing by any means, including but not limited to, the original and any non-identical copy of any of the following: books, records, contracts, agreements, promissory notes, invoices, purchase orders, statements of account, credit and debit memoranda, orders, loan agreements, bills, installment contracts, mortgages, deeds of trust, security agreements, certificates of title, financing statements, instruments, expense accounts, canceled checks, bank statements, bank books, receipt and disbursement journals, tax returns, financial statements, check stubs, drafts, certificates, tabulations, questionnaires, tables, sketches, tax reports, working papers, computer data (including information or programs stored in a computer, whether or not ever printed out or displayed), resumes, medical records, address books, appointment books or telephone logs, notes, speeches, schedules, worksheets, pictures, income statements, profit and loss statements, deposit slips, credit card receipts, records and notations of telephone or personal conversations, conferences, inter-office communications, letters, telexes, partnership agreements, articles of incorporation, catalogue price lists, sound, tape and video recordings, memoranda (including written memoranda of telephone activities), minutes, manuals, diaries, calendars or desk pads, calendar or diary entries, scrapbooks, notebooks, correspondence, bulletins, circulars, policies, forms, pamphlets, notices, 3

statements, journals, postcards, letters, emails, text messages, social media posts, telegrams, facsimile transmissions, reports, magazines, booklets, brochures, instructions, interoffice communications, Photostats, microfilm, microfiche, maps, deposition transcripts, pleadings, orders, releases, appraisals, estimates, valuations, opinions, studies, analyses, summaries, drawings, blueprints, photographs, negatives, graphs, charts, publicly viewable websites, non-public websites (such as company or employee intranets) and other data, information or statistics contained within any data storage modules, tapes, discs or any other memory devices (including flash drives, CDs, DVDs, or internet-based data storage or data backup or similar methods of storage for information, data and programs) or any other information retrievable on storage systems (including computer generated reports and printouts). 3. Communication or communication shall mean any spoken communication, contact, oral or written, formal or informal at any time or place or under any circumstances whatsoever, whereby information of any nature was transmitted, recorded, or transferred (whether telephonic, written, in person or otherwise). Where you are requested to identify or list any communications, your identification or list of such communications shall require you separately as to each communication, to identify the mode of such communication, to identify the persons who participated in such communication, to identify the persons who overheard or had access to such communication, and to state the date of such communication, the time and/or place of such communication, and the subject matter of such communication. 4. Identify or state the identity of shall have the following meaning when used in the following contexts: 4

a. When used in connection with a natural person, you are required to state his or her: (a) full name; (b) present or last known home address (including street name, number, city and state); (c) present position, business affiliation and job description and, if unknown, so state and set forth the corresponding last known instance of such information; (d) position, business affiliation and job description at the time in question, with respect to the Interrogatory or other request involved. b. When used in connection with a document or writing, you are required to state in the answer in each instance: (a) whether or not such document is known to be in existence at the time of the answer; (b) the date of the document; (c) type of document (e.g. letter, memorandum, computer printout, estimate, etc.); (d) identity of the author(s), addressee(s) and any other person to whom the document was shown or distributed; (e) any filing or identifying number; and (f) the present or last known location and/or custodian thereof. If any such document was, but is no longer in the possession of or subject to control of Plaintiff or any affiliated business entity, state what and when disposition was made of it. c. When used in connection with an oral communication, you are required to state in the answer in each instance: (a) the identity of each person communicating; (b) the identity of the recipient(s) and intended recipient(s) of the communication; (c) the identity of each person present or otherwise aware of the substance of the communication; (d) the date and the place where it was made; ( e) the identity of any document or writing that embodies, includes, reflects, 5

concerns, relates, refers to or is based upon such oral communication; and (f) a detailed description of the substance of the communication. d. When used in connection with a transaction, you are required to state in the answer in each instance: (a) a description of the property or thing that is the subject of the transaction; (b) the identity of the parties to the transaction; (c) the date of the transaction; (d) the place or site where the transaction took place; (e) the location of the property or thing that was the subject to the transaction at the time the transaction took place; (f) the identity of all persons who have knowledge of the transaction; and (g) identify all documents that refer or relate to the transaction. 5. The WMILT shall mean the Washington Mutual, Inc. Liquidating Trust and its agents, employees, consultants, servants, attorneys, accountants, partners, associates, representatives and any person or entity acting or who has acted on its behalf. 6. The Debtors shall mean, collectively and as appropriate, Washington Mutual, Inc. and WMI Investment Corp. 7. Petition Date shall mean September 26, 2008. 8. Claimants shall mean Edward F. Bach, Henry J. Berens, and Michael R. Zarro. 9. WMI shall mean Washington Mutual, Inc. 10. WMB, FSB shall mean Washington Mutual Bank, FSB. 11. WMB shall mean Washington Mutual Bank. 12. SERAP shall mean Supplemental Executive Retirement Accumulation Plan. 6

13. ETRIP shall mean Executive Target Retirement Income Plan. 14. Employee Agreements shall mean any employment agreement, employment incentive offer, leadership bonus offer, change in control agreement, special bonus opportunity offer, and/or long term incentive agreement. 15. 5th Omnibus Objection shall mean the Debtors Fifth Omnibus (Substantive) Objection to Claims [Docket No. 1233]. 16. 6th Omnibus Objection shall mean the Debtors Sixth Omnibus (Substantive) Objection to Claims [Docket No. 1234]. 17. 79th Omnibus Objection shall mean the WMI Liquidating Trust s Seventy-Ninth Omnibus (Substantive) Objection to Claims [Docket No. 10504]. 18. Omnibus Objections shall mean, collectively, the 5th Omnibus Objection, the 6th Omnibus Objection, and the 79th Omnibus Objection. All other terms used in these Interrogatories have the meaning given by the Bankruptcy Code or by common usage unless otherwise required by the context. E. The answers to the Interrogatories shall be signed and verified by an authorized representative of the Plaintiff and the objections signed by the attorney making them. INTERROGATORIES 1. Identify all documents relied upon or referred to (a) prepare the Omnibus Objections; and (b) in the answers to these Interrogatories. 7

2. Identify each person having knowledge of the facts relevant to the allegations and/or issues in the Omnibus Objections and the allegations contained in the Omnibus Objections, and provide a general description of the facts and/or subject matter known by such person. 3. Identify all documents, reports or analyses relied upon by the WMI board of directors or the WMB board of directors in any determination that a change in control occurred. 4. Identify all employees or consultants who provided reports or recommendations to the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of WMI or the Board of Directors of WMB on the adoption of or modifications or amendments to any employee benefit plans, recommendations for employee incentive compensation or bonus plans, change in control agreements or any other matters regarding employee compensation for the period of January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008. 8

5. For each of the Claimants, state all facts that support or relate to your contention that a change-in-control did not occur in connection with the Office of Thrift Services seizure of WMB and subsequent FDIC receivership. 6. Identify the documents relied upon by the Debtors or WMILT to determine the amount of each Claimant s vested benefits under ETRIP and SERAP. 7. Identify all persons with knowledge regarding the calculation or determination, at any time following the Petition Date, of each Claimant s benefits under ETRIP and SERAP. 8. For each of the Claimants, state all facts that support or relate to your contention that the Employee Agreements are not obligations of either Debtor as stated in the Omnibus Objections. 9

9. Identify all persons who have knowledge of the facts stated in response to Interrogatory no. 8 above. 10. Identify all Documents that support or relate to the facts set forth in response to Interrogatory no. 8 above. 11. For each of the Claimants, state all facts that support or relate to your contention that a change-in-control did not occur in connection with the Office of Thrift Services seizure of WMB and subsequent FDIC receivership. 10

12. For each of the Claimants, state their employment position and executive level designation (e.g. 1-8) within the Washington Mutual organization (including WMI and any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) during the period of January 1, 2005 through September 25, 2008. 13. For each of the Claimants, please describe their job duties and reporting duties within the Washington Mutual organization (including WMI and any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) during the period of January 1, 2005 through September 25, 2008. 14. Identify all persons with knowledge regarding the calculation or determination, at any time following the Petition Date, of each Claimant s benefits under ETRIP or SERAP. 15. Identify all persons involved in calculating or determining the offers or payments or terms of the employee agreements made following the Petition Date. 11

16. Identify all persons involved in calculating or determining the payments to be made to any of Claimants upon termination of their employment with WMI or any subsidiary or affiliate. Dated: December 7, 2012 /s/ Kenneth E. Aaron WEIR & PARTNERS LLP Kenneth E. Aaron (No. 4043) Abbe A. Miller, Esquire (admitted pro hac vice) 824 N. Market Street, Suite 800 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 652-8181 kaaron@weirpartners.com abbe.miller@weirpartners.com Attorneys for Defendants, Edward Bach, Henry J. Berens and Michael Zarro 12