ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND THE DETENTION SYSTEM A Growing Concern

Similar documents
County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Detention Facilities in Orange County

Overcrowding Alternatives

Review of Orange County Detention Facilities

County Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet

County Parole Board Report of the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury SUMMARY The Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) reviewed the County Parole Board, a

Immigration Violations

LIFE UNDER PEP-COMM. What has changed?

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

LIFE UNDER PEP COMM I 247D ICE IMMIGRATION HOLD REQUEST ~~~~ I 247N ICE REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF RELEASE ~~~~ I 247X ICE CATCHALL CUSTODY REQUEST

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE ADULT UNDOCUMENTED PERSONS

DEPORTATION UNLIMITED: THE SANTA BARBARA PROBATION DEPARTMENT-ICE PARTERSHIP TO DEPORT IMMIGRANT JUVENILES

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Corrections Division Policy and Procedure Manual Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

Facility Directive. Title: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Priority Enforcement Program

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures. Authority: Effective Date: Page 1 of Owens/Hodges 9/15/09 9

JONES & MAYER Attorneys at Law CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM

Immigration Violations

September 14, Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,

DIGNITY NOT DETENTION

ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY

AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER TO ACCEPT FIRST YEAR GRANT FUNDING FOR THE CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROTECTION PROGRAM ALL DISTRICTS (3 Votes)

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

Delegation of Immigration Authority Section 287(g)

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Does My Jail Cooperate with ICE? RESEARCH REPORT. February A Know Your Rights Guide for Marin County

San Francisco No New Jail Town Hall Meeting

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( January 05, 2019 Public Safety Employees-7(k) Exemption

CIVIL IMMIGRATION DETAINERS

DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER. Rev. 29 Sep 97. Index as: Lineups Prisoner Lineups Show-Ups, Prisoner M-6 PRISONER LINEUPS

The State of Orange County Jails

The changes will affect three populations of youth differently depending upon their status on the day the bill was enacted on Oct.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Ben Lomond Conservation Camp, CC#45

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

Santa Clara County, California Baseline and Alternative Jail Population Projections Report

San Joaquin County Grand Jury SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY. JAIL GRIEVENCES Denied or Not Denied Case No. 0913

CALIFORNIA JUVENILE COURT PROCESS FOR DELINQUENCY CASES

LATE NIGHT/EARLY MORNING RELEASE

ICE Scheduled Departure

For Informational Purposes (916) July 15, 2011

An Act. ENROLLED HOUSE By: Billy, Cannaday and Hoskin of the House

APPROVED FOR INMATE VIEWING

First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

King County. Legislation Details (With Text) 6/17/2013 In control: Committee of the Whole

NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

The Superior Court GRAND JURY RELEASES REPORT ON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL GRIEVANCES

Privatization of Prisons: Costs and Consequences

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Number August 31, 2017 IMMEDIATE POLICY CHANGE GJ-14, VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS DO-1, INTAKE PROCESS

State Inmate Cost Study for Calendar Year 2015 Executive Summary

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

Local Justice Reinvestment: The Challenge of Jail Population Projection

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR SCHOOL OFFICIALS: WHAT TO DO IF ICE SHOWS UP AT YOUR SCHOOL

2014 Kansas Statutes

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

Understanding New Jersey Policies That Drive Mass Incarceration

Jail: Who is in on bail?

CLE Alabama. Legal Issues Facing City & County Governments. Hampton Inn & Suites Orange Beach, Alabama Friday & Saturday, May 6-7, 2016

Youth Law T.E.A.M. of Indiana

OPERATIONS ORDER. Releases

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

PRETRIAL SERVICES. Why Sheriffs Should Champion Pretrial Services

New Mexico Sentencing Commission

BUILDING TRUST WITH COMMUNITIES, UPHOLDING DUE PROCESS SUPERVISING ATTORNEY IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER SEPTEMBER 2015

Mental Illness Commitments

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

ADULT CORRECTIONAL SERVICES IN CANADA,

A Report on Immigration Enforcement and the Child Welfare System

ASSOCIATION of ARKANSAS COUNTIES

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

State Policy Implementation Project

Criminal Justice Today An Introductory Text for the 21 st Century

Whitmire (Madden, et al.) ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/18/2007 (CSSB 909 by Madden) Continuing TDCJ, inmate health care board, parole board duties

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

I have today decided to disclose the located information to you in full, along with context for the statistics provided.

2012/2013 Human Rights First s Public Dialogues Series

There were 6.98 million offenders

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

STATE OF MAINE IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN S.P L.D Sec A MRSA c. 13, sub-c. 2-A is enacted to read:

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

NC General Statutes - Chapter 148 Article 3 1

Overview of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Correctional Population Projections, Recidivism Rates, and Costs Per Day

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

Transcription:

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND THE DETENTION SYSTEM A Growing Concern SUMMARY Much attention has been given to the impact of illegal immigration on the country, especially by the news media and politicians. Although Santa Barbara County may not be experiencing some of the more serious problems reported from other more impacted counties, e.g. Los Angeles County, illegal immigration is having a variety of negative influences on operations in Santa Barbara County detention facilities. This report deals only with measurable effects related to jail population and incarceration costs. It is important to emphasize that all inmates and detainees in the detention system were incarcerated because they committed crimes, not because they were suspected of being in the country illegally. INTRODUCTION During the inquiry into management of the detention system in the county, it became apparent that illegal immigrants are a growing financial burden on the system. After numerous interviews with detention officials and review of data on the inmate and detainee populations, it became clear that the county alone cannot control the problem. Until the challenges created by uncontrolled immigration are dealt with through a comprehensive national program, which includes management and cost sharing between county and federal government, the burden on county detention facilities is likely to increase. Here we can only present the facts found during this limited inquiry in the hope that they will contribute to the effort to address the problem. OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS In order to understand the impact of illegal immigration on detention facilities, the Law, Justice and Public Safety Committee of the Grand Jury requested specific information and met with officials in charge of these facilities. In a letter to the management of the Main Jail and the Probation Department Institutions, we asked the following three questions: 1. What is the average number of days that an inmate or detainee is incarcerated in your facility? 2. What is the average cost per day to incarcerate an inmate or detainee in your facility? 1

Illegal Immigrants and the Detention System 3. What are the average number and the average percentage of inmates and detainees who are illegally in this country? Is a federal data base used to determine legal status? If not, how is it determined? Consider first the Probation Department Institutions wherein the impact of illegal immigration remains relatively small. The Probation Department Institutions surveyed include Santa Barbara Juvenile Hall, Susan J. Gionfriddo Juvenile Justice Center, and the Los Prietos Boys Camp/Academy (LPBC/LPBA). The average length of stay in Juvenile Halls has been about 14 days over the past ten years but it rose to 16 days during fiscal year 2005-2006, and the average cost per day has risen from about $140 to $220 over the past ten years. The average length of stay in LPBC/LPBA has been about 150 days over the past five years, and the average cost per day has risen from about $100 to $160 over the past ten years. It is important to understand that the institutions in which individuals are incarcerated in Santa Barbara County, including the Main Jail, have no enforcement role with regard to illegal immigration. Jail personnel are charged only with identifying inmates or detainees who are suspected of being born outside of the United States and of being illegally in this country. Various indicators such as the following are used to make an identification: self-reported illegal status, previous pobation contact, law enforcement record of status, previous Homeland Security hold placed, no parent living in the U.S., and inability to communicate in English. When such an individual is identified, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) unit of Homeland Security is notified. Homeland Security rules require a hold on any individual who appears to be in the country illegally. Homeland Security has indicated that it uses a federal data base in conjunction with state data and eventually conducts a personal interview in order to determine immigration status. If evidence supports the supposition that an individual on hold is probably in the country illegally, he is held over until judicial evaluation is completed by an immigration judge. Judicial review can lead to various outcomes ranging from parole to deportation. Considering the third question, the Los Prietos Boys Camp and Academy do not admit any wards with Homeland Security holds, so illegal immigration has no identifiable impact on those institutions. In contrast, the Juvenile Halls report that a total of 22 (two duplicated) minors were released to Homeland Security during fiscal year 2005-2006. This total is less than one percent (0.8%) of total Juvenile Hall admissions. These 22 bookings resulted in 353 total bed days (amounting to 0.9% of actual bed days) and the average length of stay was 16 days each, prior to release to Homeland Security. Thus, the total cost impact of illegal immigration in Juvenile Halls was about (353x$220=) $77,660 in fiscal year 2005-2006. 2

2006-2007 Santa Barbara County Civil Grand Jury The impact of illegal immigration on operations in the County Main Jail is much greater than that in the Juvenile Halls. Because ICE is not required to review every potential immigration hold identified by jail personnel, it is easy to understand why jail personnel indicated that the number of illegal immigrants is probably greater than that reported. Jail personnel are not allowed to hold a detainee solely because the individual is identified as an immigration hold. In other words, if ICE does not take custody of a detainee prior to his/her scheduled release, the detainee must be released without review by ICE. Furthermore, ICE has no obligation to visit the jail to review cases. Jail personnel indicated that ICE reviews are often perfunctory and not all cases are examined. Hard data indicate that the average number of immigration holds made by ICE was 11% of the jail population in 2006, which averaged about 980 individuals. There is considerable scatter in the data, apparently due to the vigilance or lack thereof by ICE, and jail staff indicated that a reasonable range for the average number of illegal immigrants is 10%-20% of the jail population. During the past three years, the average population in the Main Jail and the associated Medium Security Facility (MSF) was as follows: AVERAGE POPULATION IN THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MAIN JAIL, 2004-2006 FACILITY: 2004 2005 2006 MAIN JAIL 717 739 712 MSF 207 241 270 The average number of days that an inmate was incarcerated in the Main Jail during fiscal year 2005-2006 was 23 days. In the preceding three years, the average number was about 20 days. The average cost for housing an inmate in the Main Jail for fiscal year 2004-2005 was about $102 and for fiscal year 2005-2006 it was about $122 per day. This 20% increase in one year results from two changes. First, there was an increase in wages and benefits to jail personnel, and second, pursuant to a court order, there was a movement of inmates from the Main Jail to the Medium Security Facility. Taking account of this transfer of inmates, the adjusted number for fiscal year 2005-2006 drops from about $122 to $112 per day, indicating a one-year increase closer to 10% per day. 3

Illegal Immigrants and the Detention System Combining the above numbers, the cost impact of illegal immigration in the Main Jail was in the range $200,000-$400,000 in fiscal year 2005-2006. FINDINGS Finding 1 Immigration holds at the County Main Jail are not always regularly or completely reviewed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and such inaction likely results in the release of some immigrants illegally in the county. Finding 2 The population of immigrants illegally in Santa Barbara County contributes to inmate overcrowding and incarceration costs in county detention facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 County officials should request the permanent assignment of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer to the County Main Jail and seek intervention by Congressional representatives if ICE is not responsive to the request. Recommendation 2 County officials should take a proactive role in making our state and national representatives more accountable for costs to the detention system associated with inaction on the problem of illegal immigration. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE In accordance with Section 933(c) of the California Penal Code, each agency and government body affected by or named in this report is requested to respond in writing to the findings and recommendations in a timely manner. The following are the affected agencies for this report, with the mandated response period for each: Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors 60 days Santa Barbara County Sheriff s Department 60 days County Probation Department 90 days Findings All Recommendation All 4

2006-2007 Santa Barbara County Civil Grand Jury Representative Lois Capps Information Only Representative Elton Gallegly Information Only 5