IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY PLAINTIFFNAME. - and - DEFCONTRACTORNAME. And DEFENDANTOWNERNAME

Similar documents
CALGARY ALBERTA TREASURY BRANCHES AND ALBERTA LTD.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

- 2 - on August 7, 2014 (the Receivership Order ), applies for an order, substantially in the form attached as Schedule A hereto:

JUDGMENT INTEREST ACT

Court of Queen s Bench

2 ;:: 6._...Clr~L:~~~.I.d~~~~..n._~ c

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA EDMONTON

Court of Queen s Bench

MAKING AN APPLICATION FOR A

Adjudication Claim Dated [insert date]

Writ of Enforcement Seizure

[Rule 6.3 and 10.52(1)] COURTFILENO FLED COURT COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA NOV

Calgary, Originating Application for Judicial Review returnable on September 26, 2012, respective clients. application

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/27/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/27/2016

BUILDERS LIEN FORMS REGULATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION MECHANICS LIEN SECTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/30/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2014

THE QUEEN'S BENCH Winnipeg Centre. MARLENE BILES and SHAWNA PAULSEN, - and - AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM

Construction Law: Recent Developments of Importance

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED

Whereas the Recipient intends to participate in the Comprehensive Study in relation to the Project;

Civil Enforcement of Restitution Orders and Probation Orders With Outstanding Restitution Information For Victims of Crime

$700,000 against defendants Monadnock Construction Inc. (hereinafter "Monadnock"),

Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies

The Attachment of Debts Act

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018

What Happens After Conviction: Traffic and Criminal Divisions

WAREHOUSEMEN S LIEN ACT

Embassy Cargo, Inc. v Europa Woods, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 31259(U) May 31, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Eileen

CALGARY. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, RSC 1985, c C-36, AS AMENDED

Court of Queen s Bench

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

DECLARATION OF CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Specific Claims Tribunal Rules of Practice and Procedure

COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA. r)3 _nns-r)

Michael A. Loberg Professional Corporation Barrister & Solicitor. February 26, 2015 By

Instructions Consent Order

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT SCHEDULES Forms in Civil Actions. Schedules

COMMERCIAL CREDIT APPLICATION LEGAL NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SIN #: CORPORATION/LTD/LLC SOCIETY COOPERATIVE PROPRIETORSHIP PARTNERSHIP OTHER

THE PERSONAL DIRECTIVE A GUIDE

ALL STATE INTERIOR DEMOLITION INC. WITH CROSS-CLAIMS

The Crown Minerals Act

1. A Case Management Order directing the timing and scheduling of the within Application;

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND UNDERTAKING

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2011

J)NTAR/0 YEGALROSEN. -and- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. FRESH AS AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM

AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD ACT

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Without Prejudice (save as to costs) Letter of Demand pursuant to. Magistrates' Court General Civil Procedure Rules of the Magistrates Court

Alberta Electric System Operator

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

AUCKLAND DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY INC. JAMIE WAUGH- BARRISTER TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT

HEALTH PROFESSIONS AMENDMENT ACT, 2008

1. An appellant is the person appealing a decision of the Provincial Court. The respondent is the other party in the original application.

CBI KEYSTONE INVESTMENT CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2016 EXHIBIT C

Issues raised from Adjudication Determinations. The Security of Payment (SOP) Act came into effect on 1 April 2005.

ALBERTA REGULATION 55/2001. Provincial Court Act PROVINCIAL COURT CIVIL CLAIMS FORMS REGULATION

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment Filing. Costs Award

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL. -and-

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA STEAM WHISTLE BREWLNG INC.

Instructions Consent Order

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy


IBHUBHEZI POWERLINES CC

Evictions. What to do? How to Respond?

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY OF LARCH MANAGEMENT LTD.

STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2014 (NO. 2)

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/26/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2016 EXHIBIT A

Business Details. Contact Details. Director/Principal Details. Business Addresses. Trade References

STANDARD CFA TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CASES TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF TRADE

SCHEDULE 2 OF BYLAW 7900 CITY OF KELOWNA SERVICING AGREEMENT

Supreme Court of Virginia

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/18/ :11 PM

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

FOURTEENTH REPORT TO THE COURT BY ERNST & YOUNG INC. AS CCAA MONITOR OF THE UBG GROUP OF COMPANIES BENNETT JONES LLP

Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta FEB t

Overview of the Builders Lien Act

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014

MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT. - and - - and - - and. NORTHERN SUNRISE COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as "NSC") - and

FORM 32 PERFORMANCE BOND UNDER SECTION 85.1 OF THE ACT Construction Act

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF ) COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV

PROPOSED MODEL HOME AGREEMENT BAYRIDGE CROSSING PHASE 2 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS 1, 16, 17, 25 AND 26.

ENMAX Power Corporation

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

FOIP Guidelines and Practices 2002 Edition Now Available

GUARANTEES ACKNOWLEDGMENT ACT

Province of Alberta QUEEN S COUNSEL ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter Q-1. Current as of May 14, Office Consolidation

Case 5:18-cv UJH-MHH Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 11

cv 1S~'S~V I&~ Court File No.

Attached are the following documents with respect to your claim as a Resident in the Claims Process:

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

Chief Mountain Gas Co-op Ltd. and County of Cardston

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals. Boykin Contracting, Inc., Respondent, K. Wayne Kirby d/b/a Carolina Gold Bingo, Appellant.

Doc#: 3 Filed: 07/09/18 Entered: 07/09/18 15:00:36 Page 1 of 4

Transcription:

Action No: BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY PLAINTIFFNAME Plaintiff - and - DEFCONTRACTORNAME And DEFENDANTOWNERNAME Defendants STATEMENT OF CLAIM 1. PLAINTIFFNAME, ( PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME ), is an Alberta Corporation carrying on business as a XXXXXXXXXXXX in Alberta. 2. The Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORNAME, ( DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME ), at all times relevant to this action, was a registered Alberta Corporation carrying on business as a homebuilder in the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta and is a Contractor as defined under the Builders Lien Act RSA 2000 c. B-7, hereinafter referred to as the Lien Act. 3. The Defendant, DefendantOwnerName ( DefendantOwnerShortName ), at all times relevant to this action, resided and, to the best knowledge of the Plaintiff, still resides in the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta and is an Owner as defined under the Lien Act of those lands and premises described on Certificate of Title CertificateOfTitleNo and municipally described as MunicipalAddress in the City of Calgary in the Province of Alberta and legally described as: PLAN PlanNumber BLOCK BLOCKNUMBER LOT LOTNUMBER EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS (the Property ).

- 2-4. PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME prepared a quotation for electrical work for DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME on QUOTATIONDATE in the amount of QUOTATIONAMOUNT, not including GST, on the project known as MunicipalAddress, Calgary, Alberta (the Project ). 5. DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME issued a FORMOFCONTRACT(Contract or Purchase Order or Subcontract) for QUOTATIONAMOUNT to PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME on CONTRACTDATE for work on the Project, (the Contract ). 6. There were a number of additional work items added to the scope of the work of the Contract on the instructions of the DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME supervisor which caused the Contract price to increase. 7. PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME completed the work and issued invoices as follows: Invoice Number Date Amount Invoice#1 Date1 Amt1 Invoice#2 Date2 Amt2 Invoice#3 Date3 Amt3 Invoice#4 Date4 Amt4 Invoice#5 Date5 Amt5 Total 4,391.28 8. PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME received payments from DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME for PAYMENTAMOUNT leaving an amount of CLAIMAMOUNT outstanding for the work performed. 9. PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME demanded payment for the work done on September 14, 2001 and when no payment was received, a Builders Lien was filed on LienDate. 10. PLAINTIFFSHORTNAME, through their solicitor, demanded payment of the outstanding amount on DemandDate1 and received no response.

- 3-11. The Work that was done was an improvement to the Property as defined by the Lien Act and the Plaintiff states that, as a result of the Work performed, the Property has increased in value by, at least, the amount of CLAIMAMOUNT. 12. The Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME, in breach of the agreement, failed to pay the Plaintiff the monies owed to the Plaintiff for the performance of the Work. 13. The Plaintiff states that it provided labour, equipment and services in accordance with the instructions of the Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME, having a value of CLAIMAMOUNT and such amount remains owing by the Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME, and the Defendant, DefendantOwnerShortName, and each of them to the Plaintiff. 14. The Plaintiff states that the Defendants have wrongfully withheld the amount of CLAIMAMOUNT from the Plaintiff and the said amount is a just debt. 15. As a result of the wrongful actions of the Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME, with the consent, either express or implied, of the Defendant, DefendantOwnerShortName, and the failure of either or both of them to pay the debt owing to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff filed a Builders Lien against the Property on LienDate registered as Instrument No. LienInstrumentNo in the amount of CLAIMAMOUNT plus interest plus solicitor and client costs. 16. By reason of the supply of materials and services, the Property has increased in value to an amount not less than the amount for which the Plaintiff claims to be entitled to a lien. 17. The Plaintiff claims interest calculated from the date of the invoices to the date of the judgment at the rate of MonthlyInterestRate per month or AnnualInterestRate per year as shown on the face of the invoices presented to the Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORSHRTNAME. 18. The Plaintiff claims interest calculated from the date of the judgment to the date of payment on the amount of judgment to be awarded in its favour, pursuant to the provisions of the Judgment Interest Act RSA 2000 c. J-1. 19. The Plaintiff refers to Section 69 of the Lien Act and states that it is entitled to its solicitor and client costs as well as costs of the proceedings as a result of the failure of the Defendants and each of them to fulfil the terms of the agreement for engagement for the Work in respect of which the liens are sought to be enforced.

- 4-20. Further, or in the alternative, the Defendants have been unjustly enriched by the unpaid improvements provided by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff claims restitution or quantum meruit in the amount of CLAIMAMOUNT. 21. In the opinion of the Plaintiffs, the trial of this action will not take more than 25 days. 22. The Plaintiff proposes that the trial of this action take place in the Court House in the City of Calgary in the Province of Alberta. WHEREFORE THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AND EACH OF THEM: (a) Judgment, or in the alternative, damages in an amount of CLAIMAMOUNT; (b) Judgment, or in the alternative, damages in such further and other amounts that may be proven at trial; (c) A Judgment, Declaration or Order that the Plaintiff is entitled to a valid and subsisting charge under the Lien Act upon the said lands and premises hereinafter described; (d) In default of payment of the Plaintiff's claim, together with such interest as is allowed and the costs of this action, that the Lands and premises be sold pursuant to the Lien Act and the proceeds thereof to be applied in payment of the Plaintiff's claim as aforesaid or other claims against the said property in order of their priority; (e) Interest calculated from the date of the invoice until the date of judgment, such interest to be calculated monthly and added to any amount unpaid at the interest rate of MonthlyInterestRate per month or AnnualInterestRate per year, determined pursuant to the terms of the invoices; (f) Interest calculated from the date of judgment until the date of payment, such interest to be calculated monthly and added to any amount unpaid at the interest rate of MonthlyInterestRate per month or AnnualInterestRate per year, determined pursuant to the terms of the invoices, or alternatively, calculated pursuant to the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. I-1. (g) Solicitor and his or her own client costs of this action, or, in the alternative, costs on a party and party basis; and (h) Such further relief as this Honourable Court deems appropriate.

- 5 - DATED at the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta, this day of, 2004, AND DELIVERED BY ROBERT SCHUETT, BARRISTER & SOLICITOR, Solicitor for the Plaintiff, whose address for service is in care of the said solicitors at 200, 630 4 th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 0J9. ISSUED out of the Office of the Clerk of the Court of Queen s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary, this day of, 2004. CLERK OF THE COURT

TO: DEFCONTRACTORNAME and DEFENDANTOWNERNAME You have been sued. You are the Defendant. You have only 15 days to file and serve a Statement of Defence or Demand of Notice. You or your lawyer must file your Statement of Defence or Demand of Notice in the office of the Clerk of the Court of Queen s Bench in Calgary, Alberta. You or your lawyer must also leave a copy of your Statement of Defence or Demand of Notice at the address for service for the Plaintiff named in this Statement of Claim. WARNING: If you do not do both things within 15 days, you may automatically lose the law suit. The Plaintiff may get a Court judgment against you if you do not file, or do not give a copy to the Plaintiff, or do either thing late. This Statement of Claim is issued by the Solicitor for the Plaintiff, whose address for service is: ROBERT SCHUETT BARRISTER & SOLICITOR 200, 630 4 th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 0J9 The Plaintiff has its residence in Alberta. The Defendant, DEFCONTRACTORNAME, so far as known to the Plaintiff, has its residence in Alberta. The Defendant, DefendantOwnerName, so far as known to the Plaintiff is a resident of Calgary, Alberta. Action No. 2002 IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY Between: PLAINTIFFNAME - and - DEFCONTRACTORNAME and DEFENDANTOWNERNAME STATEMENT OF CLAIM Plaintiff Defendants ROBERT SCHUETT Barrister and Solicitor 200, 630 4 th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 0J9 Phone No. 705-1263 Fax: 777-9199 Matter: FILENUMBER