Case 6:15-cv TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 6:15-cv TC Document 163 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 6:15-cv TC Document Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 17

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 144 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:15-cv AA Document 389 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 95

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 15 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 26

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2011 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 486 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:15-cv AA Document 440 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 625 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 140 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:13-cv MC Document 12 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#: 60

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Pakootas, Donald R. Michel, and State of Washington,

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 46 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2011 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 77 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID#: 998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Respondents. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD OF THE STATE OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complainant, Respondent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s) vs. Case No: 3:09-CV-642-HU. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr

Oregon State Bar Public Meeting Notice As of August 23, 2018

Case 6:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc. Doc. 769

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

JOINT NOTICE REGARDING POTENTIAL SPECIAL MASTER. Pursuant to this Court s instructions on August 27, 2018, ECF 142 in 1:16-cv-

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UE and OAR , and by this Petition asks the Public Utility Commission of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv APG-VCF Document 107 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. To: Thomas M. Christ, John A. Bennett, Margaret S. Olney and Gregory A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

v. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-861

Case 1:14-cv BAH Document 68-1 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv CWR-FKB Document 79 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:13-cv REB-KLM Document 385 Filed 01/06/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv ADB Document 527 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Motion to Certify under 28 U.S.C.

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 158 Filed 03/27/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 4:16-cv K Document 27 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID 501

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Case3:14-cv RS Document66 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 9

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:13-CV-658

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 25 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 262 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 77 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 1036

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF OREGON

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case: Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/ , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NON-PARTY TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH SUBPOENA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (Alexandria Division) Plaintiff, 1:07cv846 JCC/TRJ Judge Cacheris

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 138 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Transcription:

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 7 C. Marie Eckert, OSB No. 883490 marie.eckert@millernash.com Suzanne C. Lacampagne, OSB No. 951705 suzanne.lacampagne@millernash.com 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-5858 Facsimile: (503) 224-0155 Frank R. Volpe fvolpe@sidley.com Mark D. Hopson mhopson@sidley.com Benjamin E. Tannen btannen@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants National Association of Manufacturers American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers American Petroleum Institute UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. Case No. 6:15-cv-01517-TC INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS Expedited Consideration Requested Page 1 -

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 7 LR 7-1 CERTIFICATION The Intervenors certify that the parties have conferred regarding this motion but have not been able to reach an agreement. Plaintiffs oppose the Intervenors request for extension of time. The Federal Defendants take no position with respect to the request. MOTION For the reasons provided in the accompanying memorandum, the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, and the National Association of Manufacturers ( Intervenors ) move the Court for an order extending the time to respond to Plaintiffs Request for Admission to Intervenor Defendants. Specifically, the Intervenors request an extension to respond until Wednesday, June 7, 2017, which is one week after the date by which Defendants Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must respond to a separate set of requests for admissions propounded by the Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM Intervenors hereby request an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs Requests for Admission to Intervenors, issued on March 24, 2017. Currently, the responses are due by May 15, 2017. In support of their motion, Intervenors state as follows: 1. Plaintiffs request for admission to Intervenors consist of 98 requests. The purpose of issuing these requests for admission was to determine whether the Intervenors would contest issues that the Federal Defendants have already admitted to in their Answer to the First Amended Complaint. Each of the 98 requests consists of nearly verbatim statements taken from the Federal Defendants Answer. 2. Many of these requests raise complex scientific issues, such as predictions of climate change effects on water supplies, crop diseases, agricultural yield, and future temperatures. The Intervenors have not previously taken a position on many of these issues, necessitating extensive meetings among the Intervenors staff and legal counsel in order to formulate their responses. This exercise is extensively complicated by the vague nature of many Page 2 -

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 3 of 7 of the assertions that Intervenors are required to admit or deny (e.g., how challenging it is for humans and natural systems to adapt to climate change; some unidentified changes may be irreversible; climate change will lead to unsuitable working conditions ). 3. Intervenors have held extensive discussions regarding their responses. Due to the breadth and scientific nature of the requests, the Intervenors obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the need to limit the contested issues in this case, Intervenors have had to consider a number of factors in formulating their responses, including a review of their prior public statements and agency comments, expert witness issues, the availability of resources for the type of trial contemplated by the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs likely characterization of Intervenors responses, given that Plaintiffs have worked closely with the media to publicize nearly every aspect of this case. 4. The Intervenors do not anticipate being able to reach a definitive conclusion regarding many of the requests for admission by May 15, 2017. 5. A significant issue in preparing Intervenors responses is the increasing likelihood that the Federal Defendants will change their position on several key issues in this case. In their Objections to Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge, Dkt. No. 149 (May 5, 2017) at 12, n. 5, the Federal Defendants foreshadowed moving to amend their answer to reflect the policy of the current administration. Further, Defendants Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will be providing Plaintiffs with their responses to a separate request for admissions on May 31, 2017. These requests cover many of the same issues as the requests for admissions to Intervenors, such as whether atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations above 350 parts per million threaten the public health and welfare of future generations, claims about third party scientific research, and predictions of vague risks and harms in the future. 6. If the Federal Defendants do reverse their position on these issues, either through a motion to amend their answer or through their responses to Plaintiffs request for Page 3 -

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 4 of 7 admissions, then the Intervenors responses reached through great expenses of time and resources would not serve the purpose of narrowing the issues before the Court. Given that the sole purpose of the requests for admissions is to determine which issues conceded by the Federal Defendants are contested by the Intervenors, if any, a reversal by the Federal Defendants would render the exercise wasted. Further, Intervenors would likely receive new requests for admissions to determine if their positions accord with the new positions of the Federal Defendants. 7. For purposes of conserving time and resources (as well as considerable frustration), Intervenors request that the Court allow Intervenors with an extension of time whereby the Intervenors will have one week to review the responses of the Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before submitting their own responses. This date would be Wednesday June 7, 2017, equating to an extension of about three weeks. During this time, Intervenors would continue working to reach agreement on responses to the requests for admissions time that would be required regardless of any action taken by the Federal Defendants with contingencies developed for a change in the Federal Defendants positions. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, Intervenors request the Court to grant their motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' requests for admission until June 7, 2017. Page 4 -

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 5 of 7 Intervenors respectfully request expedited consideration of this motion in view of the current impending response deadline. DATED this 10th day of May 2017. /s/ C. Marie Eckert C. Marie Eckert, OSB No. 883490 marie.eckert@millernash.com Suzanne C. Lacampagne, OSB No. 951705 suzanne.lacampagne@millernash.com 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-5858 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP /s/ Frank R. Volpe Frank R. Volpe fvolpe@sidley.com Mark D. Hopson mhopson@sidley.com Benjamin E. Tannen btannen@sidley.com 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants National Association of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, and American Petroleum Institute Page 5 -

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 6 of 7 I hereby certify that I served the foregoing Intervenor-Defendants' Motion for An Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' on: Julia A. Olson Wild Earth Advocates 1216 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 E-mail: juliaaolson@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Philip L. Gregory Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, California 94010 E-mail: pgregory@cpmlegal.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Daniel M. Galpern Law Offices of Daniel M. Galpern 1641 Oak Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 E-mail: dan.galpern@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Sean C. Duffy Marissa Piropato United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 E-mail: sean.c.duffy@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendants Charles M. Tebbutt Law Offices of Charles M. Tebbutt, P.C. 941 Lawrence Eugene, Oregon 97401 E-mail: charlie@tebbuttlaw.com Attorney for Amici Curiae Global Catholic Climate Movement and Leadership Council of Women Religious Michelle A. Blackwell Blackwell Law PC P.O. Box 10326 Eugene, Oregon 97440 E-mail: mblackwell@blackwell.law Attorney for Amicus Curiae John Davidson Page 1 - Certificate of Service T: 503.224.5858 F: 503.224.0155

Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 7 of 7 Courtney B. Johnson Crag Law Center 917 S.W. Oak St., Suite 417 Portland, Oregon 97205 E-mail: courtney@crag.org Attorney for Amici League of Women Voters of the United States/League of Women Voters of Oregon by the following indicated method or methods on the date set forth below: CM/ECF system transmission. DATED this 10th day of May, 2017. /s/ C. Marie Eckert C. Marie Eckert, P.C. Oregon State Bar No. 883490 Of Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants National Association of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, and American Petroleum Institute Page 2 - Certificate of Service T: 503.224.5858 F: 503.224.0155