General Principles for International Remittance Services Marc Hollanders* Special Adviser on Financial Infrastructure Geneva, October 2013 * Views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily the views of the BIS Restricted
Remittances as a payment system issue KEY IDEA: Remittance services are part of the broader retail payment systems - both domestic and cross-border Remittances are cross-border retail payments with particular access requirements (on both the demand and supply sides) An efficient domestic payment system infrastructure is key to reducing costs of remittance services, especially in receiving countries Payment system oversight can help to enhance transparency and improve efficiency in the retail payment sector 2
Key problems Focus is on payment system aspects (not developmental, immigration, balance-of-payments or other aspects) Usually expensive Sometimes slow Sometimes inconvenient Occasionally unreliable As part of the 2004 Sea Island remittance initiative, the G8 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors called for work towards developing prudential standards or guidelines for remittance services. 3
The thinking behind the General Principles Premise is that best way to reduce cost is to have competition as much as possible The principles are not a call for remittances to be regulated. Sometimes it may be more important to remove existing regulation They do not aim to set specific service levels. Low price may often be more important than high level of service Purpose is to tackle weaknesses in the market that inhibit competition (including poor regulation) 4
The 5 General Principles 1. The market for remittance services should be transparent and have adequate consumer protection 2. Improvements to payment system infrastructure that have the potential to increase the efficiency of remittance services should be encouraged 3. Remittance services should be supported by a sound, predictable, non-discriminatory and proportionate legal and regulatory framework in relevant jurisdictions 4. Competitive market conditions, including appropriate access to domestic payment infrastructures, should be fostered in the remittance industry 5. Remittance services should be supported by appropriate governance and risk management practices 5
GP2: Payment system infrastructure Improvements to payment system infrastructure that have the potential to increase the efficiency of remittance services should be encouraged Domestic payment infrastructure Remittance services usually depend to some extent on this. But the infrastructure may not always be very efficient, especially in receiving countries Cross-border payment infrastructure Greater standardisation to help STP in correspondent banking? Direct links between domestic systems as an alternative to correspondent banking? 6
Possible actions concerning GP 2 Domestic payment infrastructure 2.4 Organisations that have large branch networks, such as major banks or national postal services, are widely accessible in many countries. Where relevant, particularly in receiving countries, these organisations could be encouraged to play a bigger role in providing remittance services. 7
GP4: Market structure and competition Competitive market conditions, including appropriate access to domestic payment infrastructures, should be fostered in the remittance industry Importance of contestability and removing barriers to entry Avoid exclusivity conditions (whereby an agent offers only one remittance service) Are there problems with direct or indirect access to domestic payment systems? 8
Further information... The General principles for international remittance services were published in January 2007 and can be found at www.bis.org and www.worldbank.org The Guidance Report for the Implementation of the CPSS- World Bank General Principles for International Remittance Services was published in October 2012 and can be found at www.worldbank.org 9