Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Similar documents
EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Erika Morales, et al., v. ABM Industries Inc., et al.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --0 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools Judge James L. Robart Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools Keywords EEOC, Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc., Harbor Freight Tools, 0-0-JLR, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, Sexual Harassment, Termination, Sex, Female, Manufacturing, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page 1 of HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1Ü Plaintiff, SANDY BERNHARDT, Plaintiff Int erven or, REBECCA MYER, Plaintiff hrtervenor, and CASE NO. 0-0-JLR CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 JARMAN MJNAR as Personal Representative for the ESTATE OF NATALIE M1NAR, Plaintiff Intervenor HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC., d/b/a HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, (I-CV-00-OR]) III 1 Defendant. 2 2 2 2 L INTRODUCTION 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Sandy Bernhardt ( Ms. Bernhardt nr Charging Party ) with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or Plaintiff ). The Charging Party alleged, inter alia, that Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. ( Harbor Freight Tools or Defendant ) subjected her and other female employees to harassment based on their sex at its Everett, Washington facility in violation of 0 o f Title VII, 2 U.S.C. CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - 1

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page 2 of 2 1 00e-2(a), and when Defendant terminated her from her head cashier posit toil in March 0 instead of a male employee. 2. The EEOC sent Defendant a Letter of Determination with a finding o f reasonable cause that it had violated Title VII dated March 2,0.. The EEOC filed this lawsuit on June 2, 0 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle on behalf of the Charging Party and a class of similarly situated females (hereinafter, the Class or individually, Class Member ), alleging that Defendant had subjected Charging Party and the Class to harassment based on their sex, and then also discriminated against Charging Parly based on her sex when she was terminated in March 0. Charging Party and two of the Class Members then intervened in the EEOC*S lawsuit.. Defendant requested mediation prior to filing an answer to the allegations of discrimination in the EEOC's complaint and those brought separately by Charging Patty and two of the Class Members.. The parties want to conclude fully and finally all claims arising out of the EEOC s complaint, and the charge of d is crimination tiled with EEOC by Charging Party. They enter into this Consent Decree to further the objectives of equal employment as set forth in Title VII. IS 1 2 2 2 II NQNADMiSSlQN OP LIABILITY AND NONDETERMINATION BY THE COURT. This Consent Decree is not an adjudication or finding on the merits of this case and shall not be construed as an admission by Defendant of a violation of Title Vll. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 2 U-S-C. 1, 1,, and 1.. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 00(f)(1) and () of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 00e-(fXl) and () ("Title VIT), and Section 2 of the Civil Rights Act of, 2 U.S.C. 11a. The employment practice alleged to CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - 2

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of 2 be unlawful in the EEOC s complaint filed herein occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District o f Washington. 1«IV. SETTLEMENT SCOPE. Tills Consent Decree is the final and complete resolution of all Title VII allegations of unlawful employment practices contained in the complaint filed on behalf of charging Party and the Class, including all claims by the parties for attorney fees and costs. The scope of this Consent Decree will be limited to Defendant s Washington State facilities. The Consent Decree resolves all issues and claims arising out of this complaint, and is binding and final as to all such issues and claims, V. MONETARY RELIEF. hi settlement of this lawsuit, Harbor Freight Tools agrees under separate agreements to provide a total of $,000 to Charging Part;/ and two of the Class Members, payment of which is to be provided, to Daniel Johnson, attorney for Charging Party and die two CIsss Mem hers by certified mail to Short C res smart & Burgess PLLC, Third Ave,, Suite 000, Seattle, Washington, oil or before October,0, with copies to the EEOC, No monetary relief was provided to any other Class Member. 1 2 2 2 2 VL AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER RELIEF A. General Provisions. Harbor Freight Tools, its officers, agents, managers, assistant managers and other supervisors at its Everett, Washington facility and all human resource professionals wh.o provide advice and assistance to the foregoing individuals will refrain from engaging in practices which constitute harassment based on an employee s sex, unlawfully discriminate against any employee based on sex, and which constitute retaliation for an individual engaging in protected EEO activity. In recognition of its obligations under Title VII, Harbor Freight Tools will institute the policies and CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of practices set forth below to the extent that such policies and practices have not heretofore been 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 instituted. B. Anti-Discrimination Police1; and Procedures. Harbor Freight Tools will evaluate and, where appropriate, modify the practices of its managers and supervisors in order to continue to prevent harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. Harbor Freight Tools will continue to provide training to its managers and supervisors to understand its Equal Employment Opportunity ( EEO ) policies and how those policies define and identify what constitutes harassment, discrimination and retaliation, and will make managers and supervisors personally accountable by linking their performance appraisals and compensation to the effective implementation o f its EEO policies,. Within one-hundred-and-eighty (10) days of th e date of the effective date of thi s Consent Decree, Harbor Freight Tools will: (a) review its EEO policy and the method and/or administrative process in which internal complaints are investigated, and revise it as necessary to ensure that it adequately prohibits harassment, discrimination, and retaliation, addresses Harbor Freight Tools obligation to provide a work environment free of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation for its employees, and reaffirms its commitment not to retaliate against any employee For engaging in protected EEO activity, e-g., filing an internal harassment or discrimination complaint, and/or filing a charge with the RF-OC; and (b) distribute its EEO policy to all present and future employees, both management and non-management at its Everett, Washington facility. C. Training, Within ninety (0) days o f the execution of this Consent Decree, Harbor Freight Tools will develop and present to all managers, assistant managers, and supervisors at its Everett, Washington facility, all managers with oversight responsibilities for its Everett, Washington facility, and all human resource professionals who provide advice and assistance to the foiegoing individuals, no less than two (2) hours of facc-to-face training by a qualified trainer on harassment, employment discrimination, and retaliation for engaging in protected EEO activity. Harbor Freight Tools also agrees to provide at least one (1) hour of training on harassment, employment discrimination and CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of retaliation to the employees at its Everett, Washington facility. The EEOC will have an opportunity n 1 1 1 to review the training materials prior to the training date. Annually thereafter for the life of this Consent Decree, Harbor Freight Tools will require: (1) all managers, assistant managers and supervisors at its Everett, Washington facility, all managers with oversight responsibilities for its Everett, Washington facility, and all human resource professionals who provide assistance to the foregoing individuals to complete two (2) hours of face-to-face training by a qualified trainer on harassment, employment discrimination and retaliation; and (2) all employees at its Everett, Washington facility to complete at least one (1) hour of training on harassment, employment discrimination and retaliation, D. Expungement of Records. Harbor Freight Tools will not disclose any information or make reference to any charge of discrimination that is the subject of the lawsuit or this lawsuit in responding to employment reference requests for information about Charging Party, and each of the Class Members.. Harbor Freight Tools will expunge from the personnel file of Charging Party and each Class Member, any reference to Charging Party s discrimination charge against Harbor Freight Tools and this lawsuit, If Charging Party and/or any Class Member wishes to do so, Harbor FreightTools will permit each to review her personnel file to ensure that all such references have been expunged, provided, however, that reasonable advance notice is provided to either Harbor Freight Tool's legal department or personnel department located at its corporate office. Harbor Freight Tools will not add any information or references to the personnel files of Charging Party and/or any Class Member regarding this charge of discrimination and this lawsuit after such references have been expur ged- 2 Ti. Policies Designed to Promote Supervisor Accountability 2 2 2. Harbor Freight Tools will continue to advise all managers and supervisors of their duty to ensure compliance with its EEO policies, and to report any incident or complaint of harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, of which they become aware. If a manager or supervisor violates Harbor Freight Tools 's EEO policies, he/she may be subject to discipline up to and CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of 1 including termination and compensation may be affected. Harbor Freight Tools will also remind all managers and supervisors that there will be no retaliation against any employee for reporting or relaying any incident of discrimination or retaliation under Harbor Freight Tools s EEO policy, or for participating in or conducting an investigation of such an incident,. Harbor Freight Tools agrees that it shall include commitment to equal employment opportunity or similar designa tion as a criterion for qualification for evaluation of supervisory S positions, F. Reporting 1 1 2 2 1. Harbor Freight Tools shall report in writing and in affidavit form to the EEOC beginning six () months from the date o f the entry of this decree, and thereafter every six months for the duration o f the decree the following information: a. Certification of the completion of training and list of attendees set forth in Paragraph above, and a list of all attendees including job titles. b. Certification that its EEO policy has been sent to all current and newly hired employees as described in Paragraph above, e. A list of any changes, modifications, revocations or revisions to its EEO policies and procedures which concern or affect the subject of discrimination and retaliation. d. A summary of all harassment, discrimination and retaliation complaints, if any, filed by employees working at Harbor Freight Tools s Everett, Washington facility which are reported to management and the resolution o f each complaint; and e. A statement listing the other provisions of this Decree that Defendant is required to perform and certifying that Harbor Freight Tools has complied with the terms of the Decree.. If Harbor Freight Tools has not complied with any term of the Decree, the statement will specify the areas of non-compliance, the reason forth? noncompliance, and the steps taken to bring the Defendant into compliance. 2 2 G, Posting CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - <i

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of 1 1. Harbor Freight Tools will post a Notice, attached as Exhibit I to this Consent Decree. The Notice shall be posted on a centrally located bulletin board at Harbor Freight Tools s Everett, Washington State facility for the duration o f the Consent Decree. VI. ENFORCEMENT. If the EEOC determines that Harbor Freight Tools has not complied with the terms of this Decree, the EEOC will provide written notification of the alleged breach to Harbor Freight Tools. The EEOC will not petition the Court for enforcement of the decree for at least thirty (0) days after providing written notification of the alleged breach. The 0-day period, following the written notice shall he used by the parties tor good faith efforts to resolve the dispute, or for Harbor Freight Tools to cute the breach. In those cases where it would take longer than thirty (0) days to cure the breach, Harbor Freight Tools may have such additional time as may be necessary by agreement with the EEOC so long as Harbor Freight Tools takes all reasonable efforts to cure the breach within tlie thirty (0) day period. 1 1 2 2 Vlll RETENTION OF JURISDICTION. The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the duration o f [lie decree. IX. DURATION AND TERMINATION, This Decree shall he effect, for three () years beginning October, 0, and ending October j 0, If the EEOC petitions the Court for breach of the Decree, and the Court finds Harbor Freight Tools to be in violation o f the terms of the Decree, tlie Court may extend the duration of the Decree. 2 2 X, CONCLUSION 2. The parties are not bound by any provision of this decree until it is signed by CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of 2 authorized representatives o f each party and isentered by the Court Dated this day o f October, 0, IS 1 2 A, LUIS LUCERO, JR. Regional Attorney KATHRYN OLSON Supervisory Trial Attorney DAMIEN A, LEE Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Seattle District Office 0 First Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington Telephone ()2- Damien, I j; e@eeoc.gov BY: Attorneys for Plaintiff MARC FRIEDMAN General Counsel USA MUNDRAKE-HATLER Assistant General Counsel HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC. 1 Mission Oaks Blvd. Camarillo, CA 0 Telephone (0) -00, ext. 1 Mfriedniar'igiharborlfejfiht.eoin ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel Office of the General Counsel 101 "L" Street NW Washington, D.C. 0 2 BY: --------^ Attorneys for Defendant 2 2 DANIEL JOHNSON CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of 2 SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS, P.LX.C. Third Ave., Suite 000 Seattle, WA Telephone () 2- dioimsoti@iicblaw.com BY: Attorney for Plaintiff Intervenin' Sandy Bernhardt, Rebecca Myer, and Jarman Minar, Personal Representative of the Estate of Natalie Minar IS 1 2 2 2 2 CONSENT DECREE - HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE The Court having considered the foregoing stipulated agreement of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the foregoing Consent Decree be, and the same hereby is, approved as the final decree of this Court in full settlement of this action. This lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party, The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the Consent Decree approved herein. DATED this I K day of,, 0. THE HONO CABLE JAMES L ROBART UNITED SI ATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:0-cv-00-JLR Document Filed /0/0 Page of U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Seattle District Office HARBOR FREIGHT USA, INC. NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES Federal law requires an employer to take prompt and effective action to stop the sexual harassment of any employee. Federal law also prohibits an employer from discriminating against any individual based on the individual's sex with respect to hiring, promotion, demotion, terms and conditions of employment, and/or termination. Furthermore, federal law prohibits retaliation against any individual by an employer because the individual complains of discrimination, cooperates with an investigation by Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and/or a government agency of a charge of discrimination, participates as a witness or potential witness in any investigation or legal proceeding, or otherwise exercises his or her rights under the law. Any employee who is found to have sexually harassed any other employee, failed to report harassment when required to do so by federal law or Harbor Freight USA, Inc. policy, discriminated against any employee and/or retaliated against any other employee because such employee participated in this lawsuit will be subject to substantial discipline, up to and including immediate discharge. Should you have any complaints of discrimination, you should contact your supervisor, or any individual in upper level management Employees have the right to bring complaints of discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Seattle District Office at 0 1st Avenue, Suite 00, Seattle, WA -1, /2-B, 1-00-000. Employees may also bring complaints of discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation to Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Vice President of Human Resources,, ph. (0) -00, ext.. This notice has been posted in mutual resolution of EEOC, Sandra Bernhardt. Rebecca Mver. and Estate of Natalie Minarv. Harbor Freight Tools USA. Inc, d/b/a. Harbor Freight Tools. Case No: CV-Q-0 (W.D. Wash, filed June 2, 0). EXHIBIT 1