How best to protect your rights in US and EU Antitrust Investigations and Dawn Raids. Philip D. Bartz Robert S. K. Bell

Similar documents
Clarifying Competition Law: Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and EU/U.S. Competition/Antitrust Law. Robert S. K.

What Keeps You Up at Night?

When the cartel investigators come calling: Top ten do s, top ten don ts

DRAFT GUIDELINES ON IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION FOR CARTEL OFFENCES

David J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES

GCR. The Handbook of Competition. A Global Competition Review special report published in association with:

Managing a Corporate Crisis:

Search Warrants & Dawn Raids: Before, During, and After

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

FCA Consultation on Concurrent Competition Powers. Response of Norton Rose Fulbright LLP

Brexit: Securing the best legal framework for your businesses

ANTITRUST IN BRAZIL 2017

Ten years ago, the antitrust division

Private actions for breach of competition law

European Commission s investigative powers and the

CALIFORNIA S IMMIGRANT WORKER PROTECTION ACT FRAGOMEN WEBINAR

NextGen Committee Webinar: Criminal Law Issues Media Lawyers Need to Know. Hosted by: Pepper Hamilton LLP May 24, 2017

I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification & Employer Compliance in an Era of Heightened Worksite Enforcement

This diagram shows the relationship between the NSW Electoral Commission, the Electoral Commissioner and the Parliament of NSW.

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE QUALIFICATION SCHEME

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF AN AUSTRALIAN PRACTISING CERTIFICATE AS A VOLUNTEER SOLICITOR AND MEMBERSHIP OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A HANDY GUIDE

The Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act DAVID J. TUCKFIELD

Disclosure and Barring Service

Top 10 Tips for Responding to Search Warrants: Before, During, and After

LEGAL SUPERHEROES: VOL 2. MAKING YOU A LEGAL SUPERHERO!

INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS REPORT

IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012

Ethical Issues for In House Counsel

Board Basics: What a Nonprofit Board Should Know About Meeting in Executive Session

The European Commission s 2002 Leniency Notice after one year of operation. Bertus VAN BARLINGEN, Directorate-General Competition, unit E-1 (1 )

HANDLING IRISH COMPETITION INVESTIGATIONS

Today s Topics 8/22/2012. Records Involving Attorney Client Communications and Work Product Public Records Law Webinar Series

LEGAL GUIDE HANDY CLIENT GUIDE TO PRIVILEGE

Preparing Your Employees to be Witnesses in Civil Cases

Navigating the Globe: Cartel Enforcement Around the World

PROTECTING RIGHTS IN PRACTICE: THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE COMMON LAW. Nathalie Lieven QC Landmark Chambers

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: EVERYTHING A JUDGE NEEDS TO KNOW - ALMOST

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

LOBBYISTS. The Lobbyists Act. being

Comments on the European Commission s Proposed New Cartel Settlement Procedure

Responding to Government Requests for Information: Lessons Learned from the Indictment of A Former In-House Counsel.

General Regulations Updated October 2016

Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

ARBITRATION AND COMPETITION LAW NEW PROSPECTS OF RECOVERY FOR VICTIMS OF ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS

1.1 Common Law vs. Civil Law INTRODUCTION: Warm-up: Exercise 1: reading exercise: the common law and the civil law system

Andreas L. Meier. O:\c\LIP\Vorträge und Schulungen\ACCA\Biography.doc

Newsletter Competition law amendment may 2017

For the purpose of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:

WHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY

LOBBYING OVERVIEW. The following abbreviations apply:

Memorandum of Understanding. between. The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and. Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF AN AUSTRALIAN PRACTISING CERTIFICATE AS A SOLICITOR AND MEMBERSHIP OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES

Alberta Justice and Solicitor General. Information for Self-represented Litigants In. Provincial Court. Adult Criminal Court

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Responding to Government Investigations

The Antitrust Investigation

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

The President has signed the Act on the Change of the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection and the Act the Civil Procedure Code

STOCK SPIRITS GROUP PLC NOMINATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Commencement of Statutory Requirements for Garda Vetting

District of Columbia False Claims Act

NOTICE: THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT

Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION

Regional competition enforcement: Co-operation between SADC competition authorities in the investigation of cross-border cartels 1

General Rulebook (GEN)

INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS

Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness

English Law, UK Courts and UK Legal Services after Brexit

CHAPTER 44 HOUSE BILL 2434 AN ACT

Competition: revised Leniency Notice frequently asked questions (see also IP/06/1705)

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

DIFC LAW No.12 of 2004

PRACTISING RULES COSTS LAWYERS. Regulator: Costs Lawyer Standards Board. Effective date: 9 April 2014

Subject Access Requests and Investigations

WHAT TO DO WHEN THE GOVERNMENT COMES CALLING:

ICN AGENCY EFFECTIVENESS PROJECT ON INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS. Competition Agency Transparency Practices

2018 NBAA Regional Forum White Plains, NY June 21, 2018

The Cartels and Leniency Review

SFJCI301 Retain, record, review and reveal material as the appointed Disclosure Officer

Technology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez

Defined terms used in this guidance note and in the example language included hereunder are set out in Schedule 2 to this guidance note.

The UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive

Rules of Procedure and Evidence*

Ethical Culture. Speaking up: Information for CII members about whistleblowing. CII guidance series

Banking and Finance Committee Terms of Reference and Work Process

ANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY POLICY

Review of reporting on prospective financial information engagement questionnaire

HAULAGE PERMITS AND TRAILER REGISTRATION BILL DELEGATED POWERS IN THE BILL MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT

Memorandum of Understanding. between. Insolvency Service (INSS) and. Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME

ACCESS, OPENNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY: A Guide to the Newfoundland and Labrador Registry of Lobbyists

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation

WEBINAR: SECONDMENT. Bryan Cave European Labour and Employment Team 17 January 2017

Franchising (South Australia) Bill 2009

3RD SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 14. An Act with respect to the custody, use and disclosure of personal information

IPCC Police Staff 6/5/05 5:25 pm Page 1. You and the police complaints system

Compliance and Enforcement. Instructions

FEE ARBITRATOR BASIC TRAINING

Resolving tenancy disputes

Transcription:

How best to protect your rights in US and EU Antitrust Investigations and Dawn Raids Philip D. Bartz Robert S. K. Bell

Speakers Robert S. K. Bell Partner Bryan Cave London T: +44 (0)20 3207 1232 robert.bell@bryancave.com Robert Bell is head of the EU & UK competition team at Bryan Cave. He is a marketleading competition lawyer with over 20 years' experience in advising clients on their EU and UK competition law matters. He acts on a range of complex competition and regulatory matters and has been involved in some of the leading cases before the OFT, European Commission and the UK and European Courts. He is recognised as a leading individual by both Legal 500 and Chambers UK 2014. Robert is currently Chair of the City of London Law Society's Competition Law Committee, which liaises with the UK Government and the EU & UK competition regulators in connection with the reform of competition law and practice. 2

Speakers Philip D. Bartz Partner and co-leader of the Antitrust, Franchise and Consumer Law Group Bryan Cave Washington D.C. T: +1 202 508 6022 philip.bartz@bryancave.com Phil Bartz is co-leader of the firm s Antitrust, Franchise and Consumer Law Group and focuses on antitrust litigation, including the defense of antitrust class actions, complex commercial litigation, defense of federal and state investigations, and antitrust advice. During the course of his career, he has counseled Fortune 500 clients regarding antitrust matters related to merger and acquisitions, distribution channel issues and antitrust compliance. Mr. Bartz has also represented clients in matters involving the federal antitrust enforcement agencies. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Bartz held senior level positions in the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, including serving as the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Federal Programs Branch of the Division, which litigates on behalf of approximately 100 federal agencies. 3

Introduction This webinar will examine the US and EU perspective for the following issues: 1. What happens if you are investigated? 2. How do I deal with information requests, subpoenas and dawn raids? 3. Handling investigations 4. Can I protect my information and documents from disclosure? 5. What happens if the investigation leads to proceedings? 6. How do I negotiate a settlement or appeal a decision? 7. Top tips for dealing with investigators 8. Further reading 4

What happens if you are investigated? 5

What happens if you are investigated? US Perspective Federal antitrust investigations in the United States may be commenced by the U.S. Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission Investigations can be either criminal or civil in nature A company may be the target of the investigation or simply a witness The who, what, and nature of the investigation all serve to inform how to respond 6

What happens if you are investigated? Jurisdiction EU Perspective Domestic investigations led by Member State domestic competition authorities, EU wide investigations are carried out by the EU Commission Investigations are civil rather than criminal in nature Can start investigations on its own initiative or following complaints Starts with Information Requests and possibly dawn raids 7

Information Requests, Subpoenas and Dawn Raids 8

Information Requests, Subpoenas and Dawn Raids US Perspective Voluntary Information Requests Typically, advisable to comply if not the target Civil Investigative Demands Used in civil investigations Subpoenas Used in grand jury investigations Access Orders Implies that subject isn t trusted to produce material 9

Information Requests, Subpoenas and Dawn Raids EU Perspective There are two types of Information Request: Requests for information No obligation to reply but you can t lie or mislead! Penalties Decision requiring information Obligation to reply Penalties The importance of working out what type you are dealing with and agreeing a strategy with legal advisors 10

How do I deal with Information Requests EU Perspective Inspection powers of EU Commission Dawn raid powers commonly used Inspection by request or by Decision What does an inspection involve? Duty to assist inspectors and fines for non-compliance Don t be caught out: Have a procedure in place! Things to remember: Set aside a room Produce documents to them Take a careful note of documents taken 11 Commission can interrogate witnesses

12 Handling Investigations

Involve counsel ASAP Handling Investigations US Perspective Trust your counsel share too much instead of not enough Begin thinking of exit strategies from the beginning Can we cooperate and walk away? Can we negotiate a settlement? Will we have to litigate? Answering these questions informs the approach to handling the investigation 13

Handling inspections EU Perspective Early involvement of lawyers Scrutinise scope of investigators mandate Co-operate Dealing with procedural disputes Strong push to shut down investigation early Statement of Objections and access to file 14

Can I protect my information and documents from disclosure? 15

Can I protect my information and documents from disclosure? US Perspective General Confidentiality of Agency Investigations as a Matter of Federal Law Attorney/Client Privilege Complex issue Talk to counsel, don t assume a document needn t be disclosed without advising counsel Regulators in the past have asked for waiver of privilege, crucial decision during an investigation 5 th Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Does not apply to corporations, only individuals 16

Can I protect my information and documents from disclosure? EU Perspective Legal privilege What does this cover? Does it cover in-house lawyer communications? EU position UK position Privilege against self-incrimination Companies can refuse to answer questions which result in admission Doesn t extend to an ability to refuse to hand over evidence to the Commission 17

What happens if the Investigation Leads to Proceedings? 18

What Happens if the Investigation Leads to Proceedings? US Perspective FTC: Administrative Proceedings Complaint Pre-hearing Procedures Hearing/Trial Initial Decision and Final Commission Decision DOJ Proceedings in Federal Court Civil Proceedings Criminal Proceedings Trial 19

What Happens if the Investigation Leads to Proceedings? EU Perspective Administrative Procedure Issue of Statement of Objections Reply to the SO Access to the Commission s file Right of parties to be heard 20

How do I negotiate a settlement or appeal a decision? 21

How do I negotiate a settlement or appeal a decision? US Perspective Settlement Negotiations Criminal Settlements Amnesty Consent Orders (Civil Settlements) Appeal Criminal & Civil Cases Administrative 22

How do I negotiate a settlement or appeal a decision? EU Perspective Early push to close down investigation/administrative priorities Settlements Leniency procedure Cartels Cartel settlement procedure: Admit liability but advantages to avoid third party actions Commitments procedure Appeals Suitable for certain cases but not others Who hears the appeal and what are the costs? 23

Top Tips for Dealing with Investigators 24

Top tips for dealing with investigators US Perspective Talk to the investigators early and often Ask for narrowing of information requests to reduce burden Negotiations on most matters will be most successful in areas where the government attorneys have greater flexibility instead of areas that are generally deemed nonnegotiable from an institutional perspective (counsel can help) 25

Top tips for dealing with investigators EU Perspective Avoid a box ticking culture: effective compliance strategies Use of external lawyers Co-operate and derail investigation prior to formal commencement of proceedings Understanding the advantages and limitations of settlements and seeking leniency 26

Recap 1. Investigations: Who, where and why? 2. Information Requests, Subpoenas and Dawn Raids 3. Handling investigations 4. Protecting your information from disclosure 5. Proceedings 6. Settlement or Appeal 7. Top tips for dealing with investigators 27

28 FAQ Booklet

29 eu-competitionlaw.com

CPD Points CPD points and CLE credit are available for this webinar. CPD points and CLE credit may be collected by emailing: europe.marketing@bryancave.com 30

This presentation was prepared by Bryan Cave exclusively for the benefit of the persons attending the presentation and any other persons to whom material used in the presentation is distributed by Bryan Cave. The material used in relation to the presentation and any non-public information conveyed during the presentation is confidential and no part of that material or information may be disclosed or provided to any third party without the prior written permission of Bryan Cave. 31 #290399