The World of Government Partnerships @ WFP Induction Briefing for new EB Members Government Partnerships Division (PGG) 22 January 213
WFP s Collaborative Resourcing Roadmap : The Six Pillars Pillar I: Country-led, Resources from Host Governments US$ 14,33,245 (3.6%) Pillar II: Emerging Economies, the Gulf, Middle East, BRICS US$ 166,523,592 (4.3%) Pillar III: UN, Multi-Donor and Thematic Funds (MDG, CERF, GEF, Peace-building) US$ 21,22,442 (5.4%) Pillar IV: New Channels from OECD Donors (EU Food Facility, WB GAFSP, Bilateral Desks, Debt Swap, Twinning) Pillar V: Maintaining the Current Base of Donors and working to minimise donor conditionality Pillar IV+V: US$ 3,332,362,427 (85.4%) Pillar VI: Private Sector US$ 54,562,957 (1.4%)
US$ Billions 8 7 Funding levels & Programme of Work 25-213 Average Needs 28-213: US$6.21 billion 6 5 Average Needs 25-27: US$3.89 billion 4.5 3 5.4 2 1 2.72 2.7 2.72 4.2 3.81 3.68 3.9 2.64 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213.31 Average Funding 25-27: US$2.71 billion Average Funding 28-212: US$4.9 billion Confirmed Contributions Forecast Needs and Resourcing Gap Needs Average Contributions Average
Top Countries by Region NEEDS in US$ (212) (ODB) Pakistan (ODB) Afghanistan (ODB) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (ODC) Sudan (ODC) Yemen (ODC) Syrian Arab Republic (ODC) State of Palestine (ODD) Niger (ODD) Chad (ODD) Mali (ODJ) Zimbabwe (ODJ) Malawi (ODJ) Mozambique (ODN) Ethiopia (ODN) Republic of South Sudan (ODN) Kenya (ODP) Haiti (ODP) Colombia (ODP) Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Millions POW data as at 7.1.213
US$ Millions Top 1 Operations Funding 212 & 213 8 The overall percentage Resources / Needs 212 = 88% / 213 = 9% 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Chad Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Ethiopia Kenya Pakistan Republic of South Sudan Somalia Sudan Yemen Zimbabwe Resources 212 Resources 213 Needs 212 Needs 213 POW data as at 7.1.213
Global Contributions Distribution RECIPIENTS BY COUNTRY CLASSIFICATIONS (212) WFP HQ & Regional Bureaux: 15.6% 1.9% Senegal Lesotho Djibouti Lao People's Democratic Republic Bhutan Zambia Pakistan Honduras Philippines Algeria Colombia Cuba Cameroon Swaziland Sri Lanka Egypt Armenia Ghana Jordan Lower&Upper MICs: 9.8% Guatemala Nicaragua Bolivia, Plurinational State of Ecuador Indonesia Peru Lebanon El Salvador Paraguay Namibia India Tunisia Iran, Islamic Republic of Azerbaijan LDCs: 23.4% Ethiopia Niger Mali Malawi Burkina Faso Mauritania Bangladesh Uganda 7.3% Sudan Yemen Timor-Leste Tanzania, United Republic of Cambodia Mozambique Rwanda Gambia Madagascar Benin Fragile States: 1.5% Zimbabwe 19.4% Chad Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Afghanistan Somalia Myanmar Haiti Nepal Central African Republic Liberia Burundi Sierra Leone Guinea Guinea-Bissau Togo Others: 5.7% Kenya Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan Sao Tome and Principe 15.2% Republic of South Sudan Syrian Arab Republic State of Palestine Côte D'ivoire Iraq Congo Note: Sorted by descending order of contributions Data as at 6.1.213
Funding and Donor Trends WFP Top 1 Donors Comparison of 26 and 212 26 (94 Donors) European Commission (12%) Canada (7%) United Kingdom (5%) 212 (13 Donors) European Commission (12%) Canada (11%) UN CERF(4%) United Kingdom (6%) USA (53%) Netherlands (4%) Japan (3%) Australia (3%) Germany (3%) USA (45%) UN CERF (4%) Netherlands (2%) Japan (6%) Sweden (3%) UN Common Funds and Agencies (excl USA (53%) CERF) (3%) European Commission (12%) Canada (7%) United Kingdom (5%) UN CERF(4%) Netherlands (4%) Japan (3%) Australia (3%) Germany (3%) Sweden (3%) UN Common Funds and Agencies (excl CERF) (3%) Brazil (2%) USA (45%) European Commission (12%) Canada (11%) United Kingdom (6%) UN CERF (4%) Netherlands (2%) Japan (6%) Australia (4%) Germany (5%) Sweden (3%) Brazil (2%) Australia (4%) Germany (5%) Sweden (3%) Data as at 6.1.213
US$ Millions 212 Multilateral Contributions Multilateral US$49 million 1% By programme categories US$282 million 69% IRA US$42 million 1% Others (e.g. General Fund) US$15 million 4% Directed Multilateral US$3.5 billion Full flexibility US$7 million 17% 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 9% Multilateral to WFP projects: US$352 million Total Multilateral: US$49 million 2, 1,5 1, 5 29 21 211 212 Directed Multilateral Multilateral Note: bilateral contributions are excluded. Data as at 6.1.213
1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 197 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 US$ billions Cash and in-kind Contributions to WFP 197: US$ 157 million 198: US$ 989 million 199: US$ 1. billion 2: US$ 1.7 billion 21: US$ 3.8 billion 6 5 4 3 2 1 In-Kind Cash Data as at 6.1.213
Contributions US$ Millions Tonnage (MT) Twinning Arrangements 3 4, 25 35, Host Countries (212) by Tonnage (MT), total = 211,48 2 3, 25, Zimbabwe 16.% Bangladesh 8.8% Philippines 5.4% Senegal 2.4% Republic of Zambia 1.1% Cameroon.9% 15 2, Malawi 31.1% Kenya.7% Cote D'Ivoire.5% 1 15, 1, Pakistan 32.8% Sri Lanka.2% Congo, The Democratic Republic of the.2% 5 5, 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 In-kind (US$) Cash (US$) Tonnage (MT) Data as at 1.1.213
Way Forward - Innovation: Increase funding predictability: Strategic Partnership Agreement presents the donor and WFP to focus on mutual priorities and ensures continued implementation of programmes. Smooth out the resource pipeline: Advance financing allows WFP to spend in advance so projects run smoothly and minimize disruptions to projects caused by a non-linear resource supply. Front load the food pipeline Forward Purchase Facility enables WFP to reduce the long lead times of international procurement. Broaden donor base: unlock potential of up-and-coming economies, Twinning has enabled WFP to receive locally grown commodities from host governments and leverage cash from traditional donors. Partnership with host governments and emerging economies is increasing through tools like debt swap for development.