DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Similar documents
DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

PINELLAS DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY

Juvenile Detention Center Statistics Quarter 1, 2010 Report (period includes January March 31, 2010)

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

Correctional Population Forecasts

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

Prepared by: Meghan Ogle, M.S.

Baseline Measures for Illinois. The MacArthur Foundation s Juvenile Justice Initiative

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

SPARTANBURG ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared for the Broward Sheriff s Office Department of Community Control. September Prepared by:

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1552

BECCA PETITIONS AND THE USE OF DETENTION IN WASHINGTON STATE. Amanda B. Gilman, PhD Rachael Sanford

DETENTION SERVICES. Detention Services. detention facilities with 1,302. beds in operation in the State. of Florida.

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

DETENTION SERVICES Detention Services. Julia Strange Assistant Secretary for Detention Services (850)

Seventy-three percent of people facing

Pinellas County Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2016 Work Plan

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Analysis of Senate Bill

Select Strategies and Outcomes from DMC Action Network and Replication Sites

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Examining the Trends and Use of Iowa s Juvenile Detention Centers

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Juvenile Justice Referrals in Alaska,

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

Disproportionate Representation of Minorities in the Alaska Juvenile Justice System. Phase I Report

2014 Kansas Statutes

New Jersey Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) 2010 Annual Data Report

At yearend 2012, the combined U.S. adult

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015

Offences Against the Administration of Justice Statistical Report Summary Report 1 ISBN

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

M E M O R A N D U M. Bill Smith, Esquire Attorney for John Doe. Meredith Patti, Esquire Mary Cate Rush, Chief Statistician. DATE: August 5, 2014

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

Ramsey County, Minnesota

Jail Population Trend Report April - June 2016

Disproportionate Minority Contact. by Moire Kenny Maine Statistical Analysis Center Muskie School of Public Service

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon

REALIZING POTENTIAL & CHANGING FUTURES

Racial Disparities in Youth Commitments and Arrests

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

Juristat Article. The changing profile of adults in custody, 2006/2007. by Avani Babooram

Jail: Who is in on bail?

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Highlights. Federal immigration suspects 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

Using Data to Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Justice. 10:30 a.m. -12:00 p.m.

RAMSEY COUNTY JDAI / DMC QUARTERLY STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETING JANUARY 19, 2011

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Juveniles Charged as Adults and Held in Adult Detention Facilities: Trend Analysis and Population Projections

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Detention, Commitment, and Parole Population Projections

State Court Processing Statistics: Background, Current Findings, and Future Directions

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

Delinquency Hearings

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Local Justice Reinvestment: The Challenge of Jail Population Projection

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

Juvenile Drug Arrests in CY2011- Disproportionate Minority Contact

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

REPORT TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND ON LAW ELIGIBLE TRAFFIC STOPS

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

bulletin 139 Youth justice in Australia Summary Bulletin 139 MArch 2017

JUVENILE JUSTICE & DISPROPORTIONALITY: Patterns of Minority Over-Representation in Washington's Juvenile Justice System*

Palm Beach County Jail Population Forecast: 2003 to 2015 March 25, 2003

Youth at High Risk of Disconnection

TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN JUSTICE REFORM

HALIFAX COUNTY PRETRIAL RELEASE RISK ASSESSMENT PILOT PROJECT

New Jersey JDAI: Site Results Report Prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation September, 2006

Aroostook and Cumberland County Jails Census Report

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

63M Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications.

Options of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter,

John MacDonald Department of Criminology University of Pennsylvania

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Youth Justice Statistics 2014/15. England and Wales. Youth Justice Board / Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin

Transcription:

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE 2015 Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Rick Scott, Governor Christina K. Daly, Secretary

The youth population (age 10-17) in Broward County decreased by 3% over the past 5 fiscal years, from 183,699 in FY2009-2010 to 178,927 in FY2013-2014. N = 183,699 N = 182,551 N = 182,205 N = 180,642 N = 178,927 ***These youth population estimates differ from those reported in the 2011 study due to different methodology. The 2011 study used census data whereas the current study uses EDR data to provide a more accurate estimate on youth population in Florida counties.

The number of arrests continued to trend downward in Broward County over the past 5 fiscal years. Since the last fiscal year, there was a 24% reduction in arrests. 10,955 Arrests 10,400 Arrests 8,992 Arrests 7,249 Arrests There was an 8% decrease in felony arrests since last fiscal year 5,530 Arrests There was a 26% reduction in felony arrests from FY2009-2010 to FY2013-2014.

Not only are the ratios of youth arrests per 1,000 youth age 10-17 in the population decreasing for each race/ethnicity category over time, but the disparities between the categories have been decreasing as well. During FY2013-2014, there was a 49 arrest per 1,000 youth disparity between Black and White youth arrest rates. This is down from the 62 arrests per 1,000 youth disparity that was seen during FY2009-2010 During FY2013-2014, there was only an 5 arrest per 1,000 youth disparity between White and Hispanic youth arrest rates. This is down from the 17 arrests per 1,000 youth disparity that was seen during FY2009-2010.

Annual racial and ethnic disparities in arrest rates have been on an overall decline over the past 5 years in Broward County Disparities in arrest ratios between Black youth and Hispanic youth and between White youth and Hispanic youth have been declining over the past 5 years

Annual admissions to secure detention in Broward County have been on an overall decline over the past 15 fiscal years, with a downward slope in the most recent year. Admissions to secure detention decreased by 4% since last fiscal year. During the same time period, felony arrests decreased by 8%

The percent of Black, White, and Hispanic youth admitted to secure detention has remained stable over the past 3 fiscal years 77% of youth admitted to secure detention in Broward County in FY2013-14 were Black while only 13% were White. *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Seventy-seven percent of youth admitted to secure detention in Broward County during fiscal year 2013-2014 were Black Black youth are overrepresented in arrests and secure detention admissions relative to the percent of Black youth in the population The percent of Black youth admitted to secure detention in FY2013-2014 was 77% while the percent of Black youth arrested was 73% and the percent of Black youth (age 10-17) in the population was only 35% *Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding and the fact that Other youth were excluded from comparison

Gender of Youth Admitted to Secure Detention in Broward County During FY2013-2014 (N=1,400)

Three quarters (75%) of youth admitted to secure detention in Broward County in fiscal year 2013-2014 were between the ages of 15 and 17.

60% of admissions to secure detention in Broward County were related to new charges while 40% of admissions to secure detention were related to court orders. There were 1,131 less admissions to secure detention in the current study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. A larger proportion of admissions to secure detention (3 percentage points more) were related to court orders in the present 18- month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. *N = number of admissions. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period

Of youth screened and remanded to secure detention in Broward County, 10% of youth were DRAI screened on the basis of an underlying charge. There was a 2 percentage point increase in youth screened on an underlying charge and sent to secure detention between this 18- month period and the comparable 2010-2011 study period *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Distribution of most serious current offense for youth detained in Broward County There was a 5 percentage point decrease in the proportion of youth detained whose most serious current offense scored 0 on Section III of the DRAI since the 2010-2011 comparison period, suggesting detention is being used for more serious presenting offenses *Includes all detained youth administered a DRAI screening within 1 day of (either before or after) beginning secure detention. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Of youth admitted to secure detention in Broward County, 35% have never been in secure detention before. The proportion of youth with no previous detention stays decreased by 6 percentage points from the 2010-2011 comparison study period. The proportion of youth with 7+ stays increased by 5 percentage points from the 2010-2011 comparison study period, suggesting detention is being used for more serious offenders *N=First admission to secure detention within the 18-month study period for each youth

39% of youth in secure detention in Broward County are only detained for 2 days. Both the percent of youth in secure detention for longer than 22 days and the percent of youth in secure detention for less than 24 hours have remained stable since the comparable 2010-2011 study period. *N= number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period.

The overall average length of stay as well as each categorical average length of stay is shorter in Broward County than the statewide average. Statewide Average LOS: 10 days Broward Average LOS: 8 days The average length of stay in secure detention in 2 days shorter in Broward County than the statewide average. *N = number of releases. Individual youth may have been admitted and released multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Decision at Broward Regional Juvenile Detention Center Actual Outcome Of all youth with DRAI records (including youth with 0 scores): 55% were detained. This is 4 percentage points more than in the 2010-2011 comparison period 27% were released. This is 11 percentage points less than in the 2010-2011 comparison period 17% were placed on home detention. This is 4 percentage points more than in the 2010-2011 comparison period *N = all youth administered a DRAI screening. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: C. Prior History - Broward County Distribution Nearly one-quarter (24%) of youth detained had 2 or 3 felony adjudications (16 percentage points more than these categories represented in the 2010-2011 comparison period), suggesting detention is being used for more serious offenders. 31% of youth detained had no prior history. This is 19 percentage points less than the 2010-2011 comparison period. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

DRAI Section III Risk Assessment: D. Legal Status Broward County Distribution 35% of youth with non-zero DRAI scores detained in Broward County do not have any active legal status. This is a 25 percentage point decrease from the 2010-2011 comparison period. The proportion of detained youth scoring 2) Active probation cases with last adjudication or adjudication withheld more than 90 days ago on this section more than doubled (from 14% to 30%) since the 2010-2011 comparison period. *N = all detained youth administered a DRAI screening with a non-zero score. Individual youth may have been scored multiple times during the study period.

Broward County Detention Overview: Strengths, Concerns, and Serious Concerns Strengths Concerns Serious Concerns Fewer detention admissions Between FY2012-2013 and FY2013-2014, there was a 4% decrease in detention admissions. Fewer first time offenders 31% of youth with a non-zero DRAI score detained had no prior history. This is 19 percentage points less than the 2010-2011 comparison period. 1/3 of admissions are not for new charges 32% of youth sent to secure detention have a court order or technical offense as their most serious current offense More youth new to detention 35% of admissions to secure detention are youth who have never been to secure detention before Long lengths of stay 238 youth spent more than 22 days in secure detention More court order and technical admissions A larger proportion of admissions to secure detention (3 percentage points more) were related to court orders and technical violations in the present 18-month study period than in the comparison 2010-2011 study period. Almost ¼ of stays are less than 24 hour stays 21% of youth spend less than 2 days (often less than 24 hours) in secure detention Majority screened are detained 55% of youth screened go to secure detention as opposed to release, home detention, or respite