UCDP Battle-Related Deaths Dataset Codebook:

Similar documents
Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. This version compiled and updated by Marie Allansson and Mihai Croicu (2017)

Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. This version compiled and updated by Marie Allansson and Mihai Croicu (2017)

Definitions, sources and methods for Uppsala Conflict Data Program Battle-Death estimates

UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset Codebook v

UCDP One-sided Violence Codebook

UCDP Non-State Conflict Codebook

UCDP One-sided Violence Codebook

UCDP Non-state Actor Dataset Codebook

UCDP Actor Dataset Codebook

UCDP Actor Dataset Codebook

UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook 1

UCDP Non-State Conflict Codebook

UCDP Dyadic Dataset Codebook

UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook 1

UCDP External Support Project - Disaggregated/Supporter Dataset Codebook

Non-State Actor Mass Atrocity Dataset

UCDP External Support Project. Primary Warring Party Dataset Codebook

Online Supplement to Female Participation and Civil War Relapse

International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW)

A Major Challenge to the Sustainable Development Goals. Andrew Mack and Robert Muggah

How and When Armed Conflicts End: Web appendix

The Impact of Conflict on Trade Evidence from Panel Data (work-in-progress draft)

In the second half of the century most of the killing took place in the developing world, especially in Asia.

ICB Non-State Actor Data. Jordan Roberts, David Quinn, and Kyle Beardsley 21 December 2017

THE IMPACT OF EXTERNAL SUPPORT ON INTRASTATE CONFLICT

UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset

What Is Conflict Towards Conceptual Clarity MVZ208 Ethnic Conflicts in South Caucasus

Select Publically Available Conflict and Violence Datasets- Regional Typology Overview (October, 2015)

Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook 1

Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths. Codebook. Bethany Lacina 1

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED)

Education Inequality and Violent Conflict: Evidence and Policy Considerations

UCDP Dyadic Dataset. Version History and Known Errata

An empirical test of the New War thesis. Anouk S. Rigterink (Department of International Development) London School of Economics and Political Science

Interview with Peter Wallensteen*

Peace Agreements Updating the UCDP Peace Agreement Dataset

Partial Peace. Rebel Groups Inside and Outside of Civil War Settlements. Abstract

Datasets on Violence: Assessing Size & Trends of Global Violence and Conflict

Data Comparison 2: All Country Years and a Focus on Nigeria and South Africa

Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers

Partial Peace Rebel Groups Inside and Outside Civil War Settlements

Just War or Just Politics? The Determinants of Foreign Military Intervention

Appendix 2A. Patterns of major armed conflicts,

Table of Contents. 1 P a g e

Nils Petter Gleditsch, Erik Melander, and Henrik Urdal: Chapter 1 Introduction Patterns of Armed Conflict Since 1945

Civilizational Conflicts: More Frequent, Longer, and Bloodier?*

Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook 1

Causes of War. Håvard Hegre and Håvard Mokleiv Nygård. Syllabus. January 10, 2012

Climate change a threat to the waning of war?

Introducing the Strategies of Resistance Data Project

Has the Decline of Violence Reversed since The Better Angels of Our Nature was Written? Steven Pinker

Roving and Stationary Bandits in African Armed Conflicts. Kyle C. Beardsley Kristian Skrede Gleditsch Nigel Lo

Kristine Eck Dept. of Peace and Conflict Research Uppsala University Box 514, Uppsala, Sweden +46 (0)

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics

I. Historical trends in external support in civil wars

Research on Bias in Mediation: Policy Implications

Women at War: Explaining Differential Levels of Female Participation in Rebellion

Introduction: Definition and Scope of Conflict Economics

Obligations of International Humanitarian Law

A study on rebel group dynamics and third party intervention

Andrew Testa / Panos Pictures

[Expert consultation process on general issues relevant to the ICC Office of the Prosecutor:] Helge Brunborg

External support in civil wars and its impact on civilians

Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict (SVAC) Dataset. Codebook and User Instruction Guide

Towards a more peaceful world?

Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset (ACLED) Codebook

Issue: Measures to ensure continued protection of civilians in war zones

Management of Civil Wars and Genocidal Violence: Lessons from Statistical Research

Fuel on the Fire: The Case Against Arming Nonstate Actors in Intrastate Conflicts. Hall, Thomas C. 28 November 2017

Natural Resources and the Dynamics of Civil War. Duration and Outcomes

The conditional impact of military intervention on internal armed conflict outcomes

Hälsokonsekvenser krig & konflikter

Explosive weapons in populated areas - key questions and answers

Approximately 13,000 Civilians Killed at the Hands of Syrian Regime Forces in Eastern Ghouta, including 1,463 Children

Conflict Resolution MAIDS

Appendix To Estimating War Deaths: An Arena of Contestation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 53, No.6 December 2009

Draft 1.1. Chapter 2 of In What do we know about Civil War? David Mason and Sara Mitchell, eds., Rowman and Littlefield

Conflating Terrorism and Insurgency

How (wo)men rebel: Exploring the effect of gender equality on nonviolent and armed conflict onset

APPENDIX II: EXTENDED DISCUSSION OF CODING METHODOLOGY

Violent Conflict and Inequality

Measuring political violence in Pakistan

Population at Risk in Asia- Pacific

Foreign Sanctuary and Rebel Violence: The Effects of International Borders on Rebel. Treatment of Civilians. Robert P. Allred

PITF - STATE FAILURE PROBLEM SET: Internal Wars and Failures of Governance,

Safeguarding against possible conflicts of interest in nutrition programmes

Afghanistan - Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 23 February 2011

Explaining Civil War Severity: Aformalmodelandempiricalanalysis

Power-Sharing Coalitions and Ethnic Civil War

Does Democracy Promote Transnational Terrorist Incidents?

Appendix Accompanying Unpacking Nonviolent Campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 Dataset

PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO THE HUMANITARIAN HARM RESULTING FROM THE USE OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS IN POPULATED AREAS

OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Report to the Human Rights Council on the impact of arms transfers on human rights.

Roving Bandits? The Geographical Evolution of. African Armed Conflicts 1

POWER PLAYS: EXPLORING POWER AND INTERVENTION IN PROXY WARS. Ryan Justin Youra. Under the guidance of. Professor Benjamin Jensen,

SDG16+ PROGRESS REPORT 2019 A COMPREHENSIVE GLOBAL AUDIT OF PROGRESS ON AVAILABLE SDG16 INDICATORS

POL 135 International Politics of the Middle East Session #7: War and Peace in the Middle East

Associated Document for the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, Version 3.0 April 14, 2003

Environmental and resource conflicts: State of the art and conceptual approaches. Jürgen Scheffran

Regime Type and Terrorism Revisited:

Transcription:

UCDP Battle-Related Deaths Dataset Codebook: Version 5.0-2015 June 2015 Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University This version compiled and updated by Therése Pettersson (2014) Replacing the earlier version by Ralph Sundberg (2010) This codebook presents the variables in the UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset, and clarifies the definitions and methods, and provides explanations concerning the treatment of the sources consulted. The document focuses specifically on the coding of estimates for battlerelated deaths, published since 2005 in the Human Security Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press). The UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset project was developed with support from the Human Security Report Project, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada. When using the data, please refer to it with its correct name: the UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset with the correct version number, and provide the URL for the UCDP website.

The UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset The definition of conflict inclusion in this dataset follows the UCDP definition of armed conflict. More information about the definitions and coding rules is available in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset 1946-2014 Codebook (version 4-2015) 1 A. ConflictID The unique identifier of all conflicts, as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. B. DyadID The unique identifier of a dyad in a conflict, as given in the UCDP Dyadic Dataset. In the conflict version of this dataset, DyadID is a string variable where the different dyad-ids are separated by a comma (, ) C. Year The year of observation. D. LocationInc The name of the country/countries whose government(s) has a primary claim to the object in dispute (the incompatibility), as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. E. SideA The name of the country/countries of Side A in a conflict. Always the government side in intrastate conflicts, as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. F. SideA2nd SideA2nd lists all states that enter a conflict with troops to actively support side A in the dyad. By definition, only independent states can be a secondary warring party in conflict. A secondary warring party on side A shares the position in the incompatibility with Side A in the conflict. SideA2nd does not need to meet the 25 battle-related deaths criterion to be included in the dataset; an active troop participation is enough. SideA2nd is a string variable, where the different names are separated by a comma (, ). 1 For more information about the UCDP/PRIO Dataset, see Gleditsch et al. (2002)

G. SideB The name of the country or opposition organization(s) of side B in a conflict, as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. H. SideBID Side B ID is the unique identifier of the actor on side B in the conflict. For government actors, the Gleditsch & Ward (2007) country codes are used. For non-state actors, the ID is taken from the UCDP Actor Dataset (http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/). IDs for the state(s) on side A, as well as on SideA2nd and SideB2nd are found in GWNOA, GWNOA2nd and GWNOB2nd. I. SideB2nd SideB2nd lists all states that enter a conflict with troops to actively support side B in the dyad. By definition, only independent states can be a secondary warring party in conflict. A secondary warring party on side B shares the position in the incompatibility with Side B in the conflict. SideB2nd does not need to meet the 25 battle-related deaths criterion to be included in the dataset; active troop participation is enough. SideB2nd is a string variable, where the different names are separated by a comma (, ). J. Incompatibility A general coding of the conflict issue, if the conflict is an incompatibility over government or over territory, as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. Incompatibility over territory is coded as 1, and incompatibility over government as 2. K. TerritoryName The name of the territory over which the conflict is fought, provided that the incompatibility is over territory, as given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. L. BdBest The UCDP Best estimate for battle-related deaths in the conflict/dyad in the given year. M. BdLow The UCDP Low estimate for battle-related deaths in the conflict/dyad in the given year. N. BdHigh The UCDP High estimate for battle-related deaths in the conflict/dyad in the given year.

O. TypeOfConflict The UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset identifies four different types of conflict: extrasystemic (1), interstate (2), internal (3) and internationalized internal (4). See the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for specific definitions of the four types. P. BattleLocation The name of the country/countries in which battle-related deaths that can be related to the incompatibility have been recorded. BattleLocation is a string variable, where the different countries are separated by a comma (, ). Q. GWNoA The Gleditsch and Ward country code of SideA (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). R. GWNoA2nd The Gleditsch and Ward country code of the state/states supporting SideA (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). S. GWNoB The Gleditsch and Ward country code of SideB (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). T. GWNoB2nd The Gleditsch and Ward country code of the state/states supporting SideB (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). U. GWNoLoc The Gleditsch and Ward country code of the country in which the incompatibility is located (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). V. GWNoBattle The Gleditsch and Ward country code of the country/countries in which battle-related deaths relating to the incompatibility have been recorded (see UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset codebook for list of countries and codes). W. Region Identifies the region of the location. The following regions are given in the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset; Europe (1), Middle East (2), Asia (3), Africa (4), and the Americas (5).

X. Version Identifies the version of the dataset. Definition of Armed Conflict The Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) defines an armed conflict as a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory over which the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, has resulted in at least 25 battle-related deaths in one calendar year. The separate elements of this definition are defined as follows. (a) Incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory. The incompatibility must concern government and/or territory and it refers to the stated generally incompatible positions of the parties. An incompatibility that concerns government refers to the type of political system, the replacement of the central government or the change of the composition of the current government. An incompatibility that concerns territory refers to the status of a territory, for example, the change of the state in control of a certain territory (interstate conflict), secession or autonomy (intrastate conflict). (b) Use of armed force. This refers to the use of arms by the military forces of the parties resulting in at least 25 deaths in a year. Arms are defined as any material means of combat, for example, manufactured weapons as well as sticks, stones, fire, water, and so on. (c) Party. This refers to the government of a state or an opposition organization or alliance of opposition organizations. The government of a state is the party controlling the capital of a state. An opposition organization is any non-governmental group which has announced a name for the group and its political goals and has used armed force to achieve them. (d) State. A state is an internationally recognized sovereign government controlling a specified territory or an internationally non-recognized government controlling a specific territory which is not disputed by an internationally recognized sovereign government, which previously controlled the same territory.

Definition of Battle-related Deaths Battle-related deaths refer to those deaths caused by the warring parties that can be directly related to combat 2. This includes traditional battlefield fighting, guerrilla activities (e.g. hitand-run attacks/ambushes) and all kinds of bombardments of military bases, cities and villages etc. Urban warfare (bombs, explosions, and assassinations) does not resemble what happens on a battlefield, but such deaths are considered to be battle-related. The target for the attacks is either the military forces or representatives for the parties, though there is often substantial collateral damage in the form of civilians being killed in the crossfire, indiscriminate bombings, etc. All fatalities military as well as civilian incurred in such situations are counted as battle-related deaths. Sources The data presented by UCDP is based on information taken from a selection of publicly available sources, printed as well as electronic. The sources include news agencies, journals, research reports, and documents of international and multinational organizations and NGOs. This includes documents of the warring parties (governments and opposition organizations) when such sources are available, since they serve as a crucial complement when identifying statements about the parties incompatible positions. Global, regional and country-specific sources are used for all countries. Both the independence and the transparency of the sources are deemed crucial. Each source is judged according to the context in which it is published, that is, according to the potential interests of the source in misrepresenting political or violent events. Since most sources are secondary sources, UCDP attempts to trace reports back to the primary source in order to decide whether they are reliable. In cases of biased sources or in situations where there is unreliable information, the events are normally only included in the high estimate. Little information on the exact number of deaths in conflict is usually available, and media coverage varies considerably from country to country. It is important to emphasize that the fatality estimates given by UCDP is based on publicly accessible sources. Due to the lack of available information, it is possible that there are more fatalities than the UCDP high estimate, but it is very unlikely that there is fewer than the UCDP best estimate. One 2 Battle-related deaths, which concern direct deaths, are not the same as war-related deaths, which includes both direct as well as indirect deaths due to disease and starvation, criminality, or attacks deliberately directed against civilians only (one-sided violence).

important caveat is that the precision of the numbers belies the uncertainty of the estimates; while UCDP estimates are based on aggregated totals of all incidents recorded in our sources, we acknowledge that numerous events are not reported in the media. Figures are revised retroactively each year as new information becomes available. In addition to deciding the level of reliability of available sources, the project strives to identify the existence of censorship. Thus, other sources than regular news sources must be used to establish what is occurring in a country. Documents and reports issued by international and multinational organizations and NGOs are consulted for this purpose. Methods The data on armed conflicts are compiled by calendar year. They include data on conflict location, type of incompatibility, year the incompatibility was formed, year the warring party began its use of armed force, warring parties, secondary support, negotiations, and battle-related deaths during the year. The data on battle-related deaths constitute the largest part of the data collection. The Factiva news database (previously known as the Reuters Business Briefing) 3 is indispensable for the collection of general news reports. The UCDP retrieves all reports which contain information about individuals killed or injured. Each news report is then read by UCDP staff, and every event that contains information about individuals killed is coded manually into an events dataset. For every event, the following information is recorded: the date of the event, the reporting source, the primary source, the actors involved, where the event took place, what occurred, and an estimate of fatalities. Ideally, these individual figures are corroborated by two or more independent sources. These fatalities are later aggregated into a low, high, and best estimate for every calendar year. The aggregated figures are also compared to total figures that appear in official documents, special reports and the news media. This serves as a contribution to clarify the context in which events occur, thus facilitating proper interpretation of the reporting in published sources. 3 Factiva is a news and information service database which contains over 35,000 sources.

Best, Low and High Estimate of Battle-related Deaths The general rule for UCDP s estimation of battle-related deaths is moderation. All battlerelated deaths have to be verified in one way or another, and all estimates reported are based on UCDP expertise of each particular conflict. As a general rule, all figures are disaggregated as far as possible and any figures that are not trustworthy are disregarded in the coding process. Due to the great uncertainty of reports from conflict areas, the project provides three estimates concerning battle-related deaths for each year. (a) Best estimate. The UCDP Best estimate consist of the aggregated most reliable numbers for all battle-related incidents during a year. If different reports provide different estimates, an examination is made as to what source is most reliable. If no such distinction can be made, UCDP as a rule include the lower figure given. (b) Low estimate. The UCDP Low estimate consists of the aggregated low estimates for all battle-related incidents during a year. If different reports provide different estimates and a higher estimate is considered more reliable, the low estimate is also reported if deemed reasonable. (c) High estimate. The UCDP High estimate consists of the aggregated high estimates for all battle-related incidents during a year. If different reports provide different estimates and a lower estimate is considered more or equally reliable, the high estimate is also reported if deemed reasonable. If there are incidents when there is some uncertainty about what parties have been involved, these are also included in the high estimate. Missing data problems The missing data code is -99. In v.5-2015 there is one case of missing data when it comes to battle-related deaths, namely the low estimate in Syria in 2014. See Themnér & Wallensteen (2014) for a more in-depth discussion on the case of Syria. References: Gleditsch, Nils Petter; Peter Wallensteen; Mikael Eriksson: Margareta Sollenberg & Håvard Strand, 2002. Armed Conflict 1946-2002, A New Dataset, Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615-637.

Themnér, Lotta & Peter Wallensteen, 2014 Armed Conflicts 1946-2013, Journal of Peace Research 51 (4)