THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 : : : : : : : : : :

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV TDS-JEP. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:16-CV-1164 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

-SMS Owens v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc Doc. 19

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 353 Filed: 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:4147

Case: 1:10-cv SO Doc #: 19 Filed: 10/18/10 1 of 9. PageID #: 1267 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:13-cv-704-T-33TBM ORDER

v. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-861

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 155 Filed: 12/17/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1288 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

rdd Doc 79 Filed 06/13/17 Entered 06/13/17 09:06:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

which shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF REMOVAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT United States Courthouse 219 S Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois DOCKETING STATEMENT

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 3:13-cv JHM-DW Document 40 Filed 03/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 646

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ENTRY ON DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No.

Case 1:14-cv PLM Doc #5 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: Document: 26-1 Filed: 12/04/2014 Pages: 6 NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:16-cv JCH Document 20 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:74-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 06/02/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:105

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

scc Doc 928 Filed 03/12/12 Entered 03/12/12 18:37:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case Document 1590 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/12 Page 1 of 4

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv SPM-GRJ ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) 11 CVS ) ROBERT RUCHO, et al., ) Defendants )

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.4 (Chicago) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:97-cv-03475

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.

United States District Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Mann et al v. United States of America Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. In the Matter of a Special Use Application. for Address: Board Calendar No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al

Case 1:03-cv NG Document 492 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:07-CV DCK

Case 1:09-bk Doc 328 Filed 09/30/09 Entered 09/30/09 23:09:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-mc VAR-MKM Document 3 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case LMI Doc 490 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case bjh11 Doc 338 Filed 01/11/19 Entered 01/11/19 16:18:50 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 22 Filed: 12/01/17 1 of 9. PageID #: 1107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Boateng v. OneMain Financial, Inc. Doc. 22 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GLORIA BOATENG, Plaintiff, v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant. Case No. 12-CV-07735 Honorable Gary Feinerman DEFENDANT S MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY, CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND ENTER JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT S FAVOR Defendant ONEMAIN FINANCIAL, INC. ( OneMain, by and through its attorneys and pursuant to Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act ( FAA, 9 U.S.C. 9, and the terms of the company s Employment Arbitration Policy, hereby moves the Court to lift the stay in this matter, entered on January 22, 2013 [Docket Doc. No. 13], confirm the arbitration award rendered by Arbitrator Joseph Gagliardo and enter final judgment in favor of OneMain, thereby dismissing Plaintiff Gloria Boateng s ( Boateng claims. In support of its Motion, OneMain states as follows: 1. On September 27, 2012, Boateng filed suit in this Court alleging claims of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and the Race Discrimination in Employment Act. [Docket Doc. No. 1, Complaint 1, 13, 14.] 2. On January 15, 2013, OneMain filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration [Docket Doc. Nos. 10, 11] because the race discrimination claims made in Boateng s Complaint are subject to final and binding arbitration under a company Employment Arbitration Policy. A copy of the Employment Arbitration Policy was submitted with the aforementioned motion and is also attached in support of this Motion as Exhibit A. Dockets.Justia.com

3. On January 22, 2013, this Court entered an order [Docket Doc. No. 13] staying proceedings in the federal court pending arbitration. 4. As stated in the Joint Status Reports that the parties filed on July 8, 2013 and November 14, 2013 [Docket Doc. Nos. 17, 19], Ms. Boateng s claims were submitted to the American Arbitration Association ( AAA, with Joseph Gagliardo selected to preside as arbitrator. A copy of AAA s April 29, 2013 letter advising of Mr. Gagliardo s appointment as arbitrator is attached as Exhibit B. 5. In December, 2013, after discovery in the arbitration matter had closed, OneMain filed a motion for summary judgment on Boateng s race discrimination claims with AAA. On March 25, 2014, Arbitrator Gagliardo granted summary judgment in OneMain s favor on all of Boateng s claims. A copy of the Final Award of Arbitrator is attached as Exhibit C, with the specifics of the arbitrator s Award set forth at pages 12-13 thereof. 6. The company Employment Arbitration Policy provides that [t]he award of the arbitrator may be enforced under the terms of the Federal Arbitration Act (Title 9 U.S.C. and/or under the law of any state to the maximum extent possible and that [p]arties to these procedures shall be deemed to have consented that judgment upon the arbitration award may be entered in any federal or state court having jurisdiction thereof. (Exhibit A, 21, 22(a. 7. Section 9 of the FAA, 9 U.S.C. 9, provides, in relevant part: If the parties in their agreement have agreed that a judgment of the court shall be entered upon the award made pursuant to the arbitration, and shall specify the court, then at any time within one year after the award is made any party to the arbitration may apply to the court so specified for an order confirming the award, and thereupon the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 10 and 11 of this title.... 2

8. As stated in Paragraph 6 above, pursuant to Paragraph 22 of the company Employment Arbitration Policy, the parties have consented that judgment upon the arbitration award may be entered in any federal or state court having jurisdiction thereof and therefore the agreement requirement of Section 9 of the FAA has been satisfied. Additionally, this Court clearly has jurisdiction over this matter, having stayed Boateng s federal court action pending arbitration before AAA, thereby satisfying Section 9 s jurisdictional requirement. 9. Because Boateng s race discrimination claims have been fully litigated and resolved in arbitration, this action should no longer be stayed. Further, pursuant to Section 9 of the FAA and Paragraphs 21(a and 22 of the company Employment Arbitration Policy, the Court should confirm Arbitrator Gagliardo s March 25, 2014 Final Award of Arbitrator and enter final judgment in OneMain s favor. 10. On May 6, 2014, OneMain s counsel emailed Boateng s counsel advising of OneMain s intent to seek dismissal of Boateng s federal court action because all of Boateng s claims were disposed of in the arbitration and asked whether OneMain could mark the motion agreed or unopposed. On May 15, 2014, OneMain s counsel phoned and emailed Boateng s counsel to discuss whether the parties could file an agreed or unopposed motion to dismiss. As of the filing of this Motion, Boateng s counsel has not responded. 11. In compliance with Section 13 of the FAA, 9 U.S.C. 13, OneMain has attached copies of (a the Employment Arbitration Policy (Exhibit A; (b AAA s April 29, 2013 letter advising of Arbitrator Gagliardo s appointment (Exhibit B; and (c the March 25, 2014 Final Award of Arbitrator (Exhibit C. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant ONEMAIN FINANCIAL, INC. respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order lifting the stay previously entered in this case, confirming 3

the Final Award of Arbitrator and entering final judgment in OneMain s favor on Plaintiff GLORIA BOATENG s race discrimination claims. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL, INC. By: /s/ Tracey L. Truesdale One of Its Attorneys Tracey L. Truesdale (IL ARDC #6207891 Jennifer L. Colvin (IL ARDC #6274731 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4300 Chicago, IL 60606 (312 558-1220 Dated: May 16, 2014 c/m: 004849-266 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that on this 16 th day of May, 2014, the foregoing DEFENDANT S MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY, CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND ENTER JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT S FAVOR was filed electronically. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.9, Notice of this filing will be sent to all Filing Users by operation of the Court s electronic filing system, and such Notice of Electronic Filing constitutes service upon such Filing Users, including counsel identified below. Parties may access this filing through the Court s system. Ms. Anita Kontoh Scott KONTOH SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 260 S. Schmidt Road Suite A Bolingbrook, IL 60440 anita@kontohscottlaw.com /s/ Tracey L. Truesdale One of Defendant s Attorneys 17857585.1