Integrity Matters ROLE OF THE MODERATOR

Similar documents
RULES AND REGULATIONS 2 ND OIC INTERVARSITY DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP 2012

DEBATING MANUAL. Nicholas Allan. Zuriberg Toastmasters

ARCHDALE DEBATING COMPETITION

An Introduction to Academic Debate

REGULATIONS FOR SHAREHOLDERS MEETINGS OF UNIONE DI BANCHE ITALIANE S.p.A. Chapter I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS. Article 1 Scope of application

RICHLAND COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM Vice-President s Manual

SPEECOM TOASTMASTERS CLUB WHAT TO DO MEETING PREPARATION CHECKLIST

KYA CHAIR & PARLIAMENTARIAN PACKET

Conduct of Chapter Meetings

Guidelines for Conducting a Forum

Before the Event: Choosing the Moderator The right moderator. does not have a personal relationship with a candidate involved

Contest Rules for Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Debating English Language Arts Mr. Mansour

RIBI Youth Speaks 2012

Conduct of Chapter Meetings

Never go to a competition until first reading and learning the contest rules.

DEBATES and FORUMS: FORMATS

Cross-Examination Debating

ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FFA Rules for Prepared Public Speaking CDE

1. What is Robert s Rules of Order 2. How to make a motion 3. How to vote on motions. I. Welcome. Evaluation

Debate Terms and Conditions

SECTION 1001: CROSS EXAMINATION DEBATE

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2017 OFFICIAL RULES (2017)

RICHLAND COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM President s Manual

2 nd DR. GURJEET SINGH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY AND JUDICIAL ACADEMY, ASSAM 20 th - 22 nd APRIL, 2018

Principles of Parliamentary Procedure. JO MARK M. LIBRE, MAPOS Head, SAWO/Student Activities Mindanao University of Science and Technology

4-H Club Officer Handbook

A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PARLIAMENTARIANS PUBLICATION NAP MEMBERSHIP STUDY GUIDE. The first step to learning how to master meetings

PRESENTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 RULES

Article I. Function. Article II. Organisation

PRESENTED BY: HOSTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2011 COMPETITION RULES

RULES OF THE WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS

Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order

ATTACHMENT 1 APPELLATE RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS

The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS

I. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE-ITS PURPOSE AND USE II. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE

Official Rules of the National Professional Responsibility Moot Court Competition

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015)

Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order

LOCAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2017 PROCEDURAL RULES. TITLE I General Rules

1 ST DACET-INTERSCHOOL DEBATE RULES MODIFIED OXFORD-OREGON FORMAT (for reference use only)

European Law Moot Court The Rules

ROUNDTABLE GUIDELINES AND MATERIALS

The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia September 2017 THE RULES

Henry County 4-H Club Vice-President Resource & Record Book

OPSEU Reference Guide for Local Elections March 2013 REFERENCE GUIDE FOR LOCAL ELECTIONS

CONTENTS TYPES OF MOTIONS An Outline of Rules of Order (Parliamentary Procedure)

CLOSING ARGUMENT COMPETITION 2014 RULES

CHARTER. In order to further these aims, all participating nations agree that:

Board Chairman's Guide

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2013 OFFICIAL RULES (2013)

2012 Hogan & Lovells Cup Rules and Procedures

WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIPS TOURNAMENT COMMITTEE AND DEBATE RULES

Rules of Procedure. International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition ICC Moot Court Competition

Traditional Agenda Example:

Round of the Americas

PROPER PARLIAMENTARY POINTS

MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION RULES

PRESIDENT S DINNER & EXCELLENCE IN MANUFACTURING AWARDS. October 3 rd, 2017

Final Report of the Rules Committee th Congressional District Republican Convention of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Rules Change PROPOSALS for the OHSSL to consider, April 2018 Official Ballot State Speech

PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETITION. Guidelines 2015/2016

MUNA 2018 PROCEDURES

Irish Association of Change Ringers

SPOKEN WORD SCHEDULE 2018

Quick and Easy Guide for Parliamentary Procedure

International Migration and Refugee Law Moot Court VU Amsterdam Migration Law Clinic 2019 RULES

I. INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION

Empire Mock Trial Educate. Connect. Empower. A Guide for Competitors from Canada

FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

4-H 448-W. President s Guide

PREPARED PUBLIC SPEAKING LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT EVENT

BYLAWS OF THE DAVIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY 1. MEMBERSHIP

Our topics. Disclaimer. Unanimous consent. I. Meeting discussion. Thank you ENDURIS for your sponsorship of this presentation!

Robert's Rules of Order Revised

7 minutes Interpretation of motion or Prime Minister

GENERAL RULES FOR DEBATE

14TH NATIONAL IHL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (2017)

9TH GRADE PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE CDE

Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order from:

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANTS (AAMA) A REFERENCE MANUAL FOR DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES

Donoghue v Stevenson MiniTrial SCLR Edition. MiniTrial Starter Pack Chapter 2 The Student Handout

GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE MOOT COURT SOCIETY

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE TEAM (550) Secondary

COMPETITION, 2016 RULES & REGULATIONS THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA

RULES OF PROCEDURE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEES

The Bylaws of The Harvey Milk Lesbian / Gay / Bisexual / Transgender Democratic Club

Legislative Program Action Plan

Welcome to the Jungle

ETH Model United Nations

What are Robert s Rules of Order/Parliamentary Procedure and Why Are They Important?

Faculty of Law. Defining tomorrow. Faculty of Law. Debating Competition for Schools in Nelson Mandela Bay

Competencies This event is composed of two (2) parts: completion of an objective test and a performance.

CONTENTS. 1. Outline Structure of the way CLEIMUN works Page A Delegate s Guide to the Model United Nations programme Page 5

CONGRATULATIONS... YOU HAVE BEEN ELECTED! NOW WHAT?

42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot (2016)

VITSOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION

Transcription:

Integrity Matters ROLE OF THE MODERATOR The role of The Moderator is to control the debate and ensure it is conducted in an orderly and effective manner. The Moderator should sit between the two teams. The Moderator must remain impartial during the entire debate. The Moderator has absolute control over all procedural aspects of the debates, and his or her decision on these matters is final. VENUES AND DATES Venue for debates: Cipriani Labour College Preliminaries March 11/12 at 6.30pm Semi-Finals, Final and Prize giving March 18 at 6pm DEBATE TEAMS FOR 2014 Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business Caribbean Nazarene College COSTAATT SITAL College The Institute of International Relations University of the Southern Caribbean University of Trinidad and Tobago University of the West Indies Each Team shall consist of two Speakers and one substitute Speaker (known as Members ) Speakers may be substituted between debating nights only if absolutely necessary, and the Commission must be advised up front. Speakers may not be substituted during a Debate DEBATE LENGTHS AFFIRMATIVE Affirmative 1 8 mins Affirmative 2 7 mins Summation 3 mins NEGATIVE Negative 1 8 mins Negative 2 7 mins Summation 3 mins

PREPARING FOR THE DEBATES Members Debaters (Members) should arrive at the venue 45 minutes before the debate begins. Members may use printed material during preparation and during the Debate. Printed material includes books, journals, newspapers and other similar materials. The use of electronic equipment is prohibited during preparation and in the debate. The use of props, bad language, racial or religious slurs, derogatory or insulting comments are not permitted. Set Up Make sure the room is set up correctly, and that the Adjudicators have all information they may require, including the motions to be debated, the institutions debating them, and the names of the members. Introduce yourself to the debaters, the Adjudicators and the Timekeeper. You will be introducing them to the audience, so make sure that you have written down the speakers' names in the order they will be speaking, noting especially which speakers will be making the summary speeches. Ensure the Adjudicators are comfortable with their ability to see and hear the debate, and have been provided with scoring sheets. Ensure that the competitors are present and seated. The proposition team should sit on your right, the opposition team on your left. Obtain the names of the persons from the debating teams who are making the Summations. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE DEBATES Say I call this Debate to order. Then give a brief speech of introduction, which includes the following: Welcome the Adjudicators, the audience, and the debating teams to the Integrity Commission of Trinidad and Tobago s Integrity Matters Debates Championship Thank the Convener (the Integrity Commission) and all those who have helped the Championship take place. Introduce the Adjudicators and the Timekeeper: - Mr. Martin Daly, SC, Former Head of the Law Association - Mr. Christo Gift, SC, Chairman of the Tobago Forum for Consensus on the Constitution - Dr. Marjorie Thorpe, former Ambassador to the UN and Chairman of the Public Service Commission. Describe the format of the debate including the timing requirements. Mention how long each speech will be for, giving the minimum and maximum times, and calling upon the Timekeeper to demonstrate the sound of warning. - A bell will be rung at 1 minute, which opens the floor to Points of Interests. - In the case of the first speakers on either side, the bell will be rung at 7 minutes, and a double bell at 8 minutes, and at regular intervals after that.

- In the case of the second speakers on either side, the bell will be rung at 6 minutes, and a double bell at 7 minutes, and at regular intervals after that. For each debate, read the motion and introduce the two teams. Name their institutions and read the name of each speaker. Before you do this, please ensure that the Adjudicators are ready to begin. Then call on the speakers in the following order, thanking them each as they finish: First Proposition, First Opposition, Second Proposition, and Second Opposition. No amendment to the Motion is permitted. After the fourth speech (the Second Opposition) call on the teams to make their summary speeches. Remember that the Proposition summary comes first. No Points of Information are allowed during these Summation speeches. During Debating Rounds announce a ten-minute break between debates (to allow for seating of the new teams) and then move on into the next debate, and follow the same pattern. AFTER THE DEBATES At the Preliminary Stage, there are four rounds, two per night. The Adjudicators will announce winners each night, in each of the rounds. So, there is a winner in each of Rounds 1-4. When the two rounds have been concluded, invite the Adjudicators to convene for a few minutes to reach their verdicts. The Adjudicators will advise the Moderator when they have decided the results. The Moderator will advise the Chief Adjudicator to deliver the results to the Teams and the audience. When the Adjudicators are ready, call the House to order again and invite the Adjudicators to announce the results and to offer their comments. Finally, make a brief concluding speech, congratulating the winners, thanking the Adjudicators and everyone else for coming, and the Convener. HEATS Four teams in total will go forward after the Preliminaries to the Semi- Finals. 2 teams will go forward from the Semi-Finals to debate the last Finals. One winning institution will be declared the National Winner and will take home the Integrity Matters Challenge Trophy! The Trophy and prizes will be given immediately after the final debate. Note: In case of a draw in any of the debates, the teams will be required to debate on a random theme for a total of 5 minutes each, and the winner from that play off will move forward. GENERAL CHAIRING SKILLS The Moderator should ensure that speakers keep to the time limits. Speakers should not be interrupted if they exceed the time limit by a few

seconds, but if they continue speaking for more than thirty seconds after a double bell, ask them to stop immediately. Points of Interest Points of Information (PoI) may only by made by the opposing team PoI may be requested between the 1 minute and the 7 minute bells (first speakers) or 6 minute bell (second speakers) The person making the POI must not take more than 15 seconds to do so or the Moderator will close them down. Acceptance of a PoI is at the discretion of the Member holding the floor No more than 2 PoI are permitted per Presentation To ask a PoI, a Member should stand, place one hand on his or her head and extend the other towards the Member speaking. The Member announces that he or she would like to ask a "Point of Information. No PoI are permitted during the Summary presentations You may need to remind the audience or the competitors of the courteous behaviour expected from them, for example when there is excessive talking. It is your job to ask them to be quiet. Competitors are allowed to speak quietly during the debate but if a competitor is speaking loudly during an opponent's speech, it is recommended that you pass them a note telling them to stop. The Moderator should intervene if the speaker or any person present is conducting him or her self in an unseemly manner, or using personal abuse or offensive language. The Moderator may also warn, and has the discretion to take action against any member of the House who acts in a discourteous manner, harasses the speaker holding the Floor, or obstructs the debate in any way. If absolutely necessary, the Moderator can ask that the clock be stopped while he or she intervenes. However, every effort should be made not to interrupt a speaker.

MODERATOR INTRODUCTION FORMAT Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen. Welcome to tonight s debate. My name is... and I am the Moderator and... is the timekeeper. The Adjudicators are Mr./Miss/Mrs.... The topic of this debate is Be it resolved that:... (topic). The Affirmative Team seated to my right is from... (school). The Negative Team seated to my left is from... (school). The speaking time for this debate is 7 to 8¼ minutes. A single bell will sound 1 minute before the speaking time commences (indicate to Timekeeper to ring bell once) and a double bell will sound at the speaking time (indicate to Timekeeper to ring bell twice). Please ensure that your mobile phones are switched off (wait if needed). I declare this debate open and call upon the First Affirmative speaker... (name and school) (Wait for the Timekeeper s signal before calling each speaker) I call upon the First Negative speaker... (name and school) I call upon the Second Affirmative speaker...(name and school) I call upon the Second Negative speaker...(name and school) I call upon the Third Affirmative speaker...(name and school) I call upon the Third Negative speaker...(name and school) Thank the teams that have just debated, invite the audience to take a 10- minute break at the next debate will start promptly then. Invite the Adjudicators to complete their deliberations. At the end of Night 2 of the Preliminaries, the Adjudicators will send forward 4 teams, 1 winner from each of the 4 rounds. On Night 3, after the Semi-Finals, the Adjudicators will put forward 2 teams for the Finals. The Adjudicators will be invited to give their results after the Semi-Finals and the Finals. Immediately following the Finals there will be the Prize-giving followed by refreshments.

MOTIONS NIGHT ONE, PRELIMINARY A ROUND 1 Be it resolved that Trinidad and Tobago should have one national holiday to celebrate the unity of all our people as opposed to continuing in the way that presently exists. Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business (Affirmative) vs University of the Southern Caribbean (Negative) ROUND 2 Be it resolved that many aspects of Trinidad and Tobago s culture compromise integrity. Caribbean Nazarene College (Affirmative) vs The Institute of International Relations (Negative) NIGHT TWO, PRELIMINARY B ROUND 3 Be it resolved that weak law enforcement is the primary cause for rampant white collar crime in Trinidad and Tobago. COSTAATT (Affirmative) vs University of Trinidad and Tobago (Negative) ROUND 4 Be it resolved that Trinidad and Tobago is a divide and conquer democracy. University of the West Indies (Affirmative) vs SITAL College (Negative) NIGHT 3, SEMI-FINALS ROUND 5 Be it resolved that upholding integrity in Trinidad and Tobago is everybody s responsibility, not just Persons in Public Life and persons exercising public functions. Winners, Preliminary A Round 1 (Affirmative) vs Winners, Preliminary A Round 2 (Negative) ROUND 6 Be it resolved that the Licensing Authority (Transport Division) is a help, not a hindrance, to the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago. Winners, Preliminary B Round 3 (Affirmative) vs Winners, Preliminary B Round 4 (Negative) FINAL

ROUND 7 Be it resolved that Trinidad and Tobago s ranking on Transparency International s Corruption Perceptions Index is a valid indicator of the national reality. Winners, Preliminary A (Affirmative) vs Winners, Preliminary B (Negative)

DEBATE FROM THE FLOOR (PEOPLE S CHOICE AWARD) As we are all finding our feet, it is recommended that we consider this for next year. As an alternative, a vote and floor discussion could be held after the debates on the night of the Finals. The process would be something like this Vote before the floor debate The voting ballots are distributed. The Moderator briefs the audience about the intention of the voting: Keep in mind that this vote is not based on what you think about the resolution. Instead, your vote should indicate which side you think has been the most persuasive tonight. In other words, imagine you do not have an opinion, one way or the other, and ask yourself which side has presented the most compelling case. Floor discussion Moderator hosts the Floor discussion, opening it with words along the lines of: We have heard the entire debate. Now it is the turn of the audience to determine which side has been the most persuasive. The discussion may include comments from the audience about the topic, the resolution, the contents of the speeches or the style and strategy of the debating teams. The Moderator must remain impartial during the entire discussion. The Moderator must ensure that criticism of the debaters does not become excessive. At some point in the discussion, the Moderator should ask the informal question: Did your opinion change because of the debate? When the Adjudicators return to the room, conclude the roundtable discussion. Introduce the Adjudicators. After the Chair of the Adjudicators has rendered the verdict, return to the podium and announce the result of the popular vote: The vote was # in favor of the and # in favor of the. I declare the motion [Carried/Defeated]. In the case of a tie, the Moderator casts the deciding vote. Invite the leader of the winning team to the podium to accept the People s Choice Award. Remain standing at the podium during the award presentation.