MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS

Similar documents
NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF DRAM (DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY) CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARINGS IN THE SRAM CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

Nature of the Lawsuits

BEARINGS OR PRODUCTS EQUIPPED WITH SMALL-SIZE BALL BEARINGS BETWEEN JUNE 1ST, 2003 AND OCTOBER 31ST, 2011.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE CANADIAN LITHIUM BATTERY CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE REPLY

CANADIAN POLYURETHANE FOAM CLASS ACTIONs FXI SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of September 2, Between

Fleet Phospho-Soda Class Action

Proceeding Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992

UNPAID OVERTIME CLASS ACTION. FRESCO v CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Anita Endean, as representative plaintiff Plaintiff and

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 1, Between

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF LEE VALLEY TOOLS LTD. v. CANADA POST CORPORATION CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

Are you a Sixties Scoop survivor? A proposed settlement may affect you. Please read this notice carefully.

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia DAMON GREEN TECUMSEH PRODUCTS OF CANADA LIMITED; TECUMSEH PRODUCTS CO.; TECUMSEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF mstice

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of March / f, Between

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Class Action Certification and Proposed Settlement for Travelers to Riu Resorts* in the Dominican Republic

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 7, Between

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE LAWN MOWERS CLASS ACTION

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of November 3, Between

SINO-FOREST SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Competition Law Roundtable

CPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

GAELEN PATRICK CONDON REBECCA WALKER ANGELA PIGGOTT. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

NOTICE OF A CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED BY THE QUÉBEC SUPERIOR COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF THE CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA ACCORD AND 2009 ACURA TSX CLASS ACTION

CANADIAN AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of November 11, Between

STUDENT LOANS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION and PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS PROCEEDING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview

NOTICE OF OPT OUT PROCEDURE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION, OBJECTION PROCESS AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING LONG FORM NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Uniform Class Proceedings Act

Defending Cross-Border Class Actions. Chantelle Spagnola Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB)

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) )

Between. (the "Plaintiffs") and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO JOIN A LAWSUIT TO RECOVER WAGES

IF YOU RENTED PUBLIC HOUSING OWNED BY THE VANCOUVER HOUSING AUTHORITY, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

Changing our ways: Why and how Canadians use the Internet

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the "Plaintiff. and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

In The Supreme Court of British Columbia. THEODORE WILSON, Plaintiff

(the "Plaintiffs") (the "Settling Defendants")

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If You are a Commercial or Industrial Entity that Bought Natural Gas in Kansas, Missouri, or Wisconsin, Class Action Settlements May Affect You.

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) of 'fiio.«-'", ONTARIO. - and -

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

QUESTIONS? Call toll free, or visit

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Transcription:

MICROSOFT SOFTWARE CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS IF YOU BOUGHT MICROSOFT SOFTWARE OR A COMPUTER WITH MICROSOFT SOFTWARE BETWEEN DECEMBER 23, 1998 AND MARCH 11, 2010 (INCLUSIVE) YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. TO: All persons resident in Canada as of the date of this notice who, between December 23, 1998 and March 11, 2010 (inclusive), indirectly, and not for the purpose of further selling or leasing, purchased a genuine license for any full or upgrade version of: (i) Microsoft s Word or Excel applications software or any full or upgrade version of Microsoft s Office, Works Suite, or Home Essentials applications suites, intended for use on Intel-compatible personal computers ( Microsoft Applications Software ); or (ii) Microsoft s MS-DOS or Windows operating systems software intended for use on Intelcompatible personal computers ( Microsoft Operating Systems ) (collectively the Class Members ). Nature of the Class Actions The plaintiffs in the Class Actions brought in Canada allege that Microsoft and Microsoft Canada have unlawfully created monopolies and used those monopolies to charge Class Members artificially inflated prices for Microsoft Operating Systems and Microsoft Applications Software. Specifically, the plaintiffs seek damages in the amount of the price inflation, or alternatively restitution. The defendants deny the plaintiffs allegations, which remain to be determined at a future trial of the issues, and deny that the plaintiffs and Class Members are entitled to the relief sought. Page 1 of 6

Certification or Authorization of the Class Actions Class action proceedings were initiated in British Columbia (Court File No. L043175, Vancouver Registry) (the BC Action ), in Ontario (Court File No. 05-CV-4308, Windsor Registry) (the Ontario Action ) and in Québec (File No. 200-06-000087-075, Québec City) (the Québec Action ). The representative plaintiffs for the BC Action are Neil Godfrey and Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. The representative plaintiff for the Ontario Action is Marian Staresinic. The representative plaintiff for the Québec Action is Gilles Gagne. The BC Action, the Ontario Action and the Québec Action (the Class Actions ) have been certified or authorized against the defendants by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Québec. The courts have not taken any position as to the likelihood of recovery, or as to the merits of the claims or defences asserted by either side. The allegations against the defendants have not been proven. By order of the BC Court, the class in the BC Action is: All persons resident in British Columbia as of the date of this notice who, between December 23, 1998 and March 11, 2010 (inclusive), indirectly, and not for the purpose of further selling or leasing, purchased a genuine license for any full or upgrade version of the Microsoft Applications Software or the Microsoft Operating Systems, except any person who opts out of the action. (the BC Class ) By order of the Québec Court, the class in the Québec Action is: All persons resident in Québec as of the date of this notice who, between December 23, 1998 and March 11, 2010 (inclusive), indirectly, and not for the purpose of further selling or leasing, purchased a genuine license for any full or upgrade version of the Microsoft Applications Software or the Microsoft Operating Systems, except any person who opts out of the action and any legal person established for a private interest, partnership or association which at any time between September 5, 2006 and September 5, 2007 had under its direction or control more than 50 persons bound to it by contract of employment. Page 2 of 6

(the Québec Class ) By order of the Ontario Court, the class in the Ontario Action is: All persons resident in Canada as of the date of this notice who, between December 23, 1998 and March 11, 2010 (inclusive), indirectly, and not for the purpose of further selling or leasing, purchased a genuine license for any full or upgrade version of the Microsoft Applications Software or the Microsoft Operating Systems, except persons included in the BC Class or the Québec Class and any person who opts out of the action. (the Ontario Class ) Options Available To Class Members As more fully outlined above, you are a Class Member if you are a resident of Canada who purchased for your own use (not for resale) a Microsoft Application Software or a Microsoft Operating System, or a personal computer loaded with such software, from someone other than Microsoft, between December 23, 1998 and March 11, 2010 (inclusive), and you do not opt out of the Class Actions. You do not need to do anything to continue to be included in the Class Actions. As a Class Member, you will be entitled to the benefit of any ruling on the common issues in the Class Action. You will also be bound by judgments rendered in the Class Actions. If you opt out by July 25, 2016, you may be able to bring your own lawsuit against the defendants, but you will not be entitled to collect money that may ultimately be paid to Class Members as a result of the Class Actions. If you want to opt out of the Class Actions, you must complete and sign the Opt Out Form, which you can obtain on Class counsel s websites or by contacting Class counsel at the contact information below, and return it to Class counsel by mail or email. If delivered by mail, the Opt Out form must be postmarked on or before July 25, 2016. If delivered by email, the Opt Out form must be received by Class counsel by midnight on July 25, 2016. Page 3 of 6

Financial Consequences and Class Counsel s Fees In Ontario and British Columbia, no individual Class Member will be liable for costs with respect to the trial of the issues in the Class Actions. In Québec, unless she or he intervenes in the Québec Action, no individual Class Member will be liable for costs with respect to the trial of the issues. Class counsel will only get paid fees if they successfully recover money on behalf of Class Members. The representative plaintiffs have retained them by way of contingency fee agreements whereby Class counsel can recover their disbursements and obtain fees calculated as a percentage of the total amount recovered on behalf of the Class Members, subject to the supervision and approval of the courts. Notice of that hearing and a deadline for any objections to Class counsel s fees will be provided at the appropriate time. Interpretation This notice contains a summary of some of the terms of the certification/authorization orders in the Class Actions. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this notice and the orders, including the schedules to the orders, the terms of the courts certification/authorization orders in each action shall prevail. Class Counsel The law firm of Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman represents Class Members in the BC Action. Class counsel at Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman can be reached at: Telephone: 604-689-7555 or 1-800-689-2322 Email: Mail: Website: microsoft@cfmlawyers.ca 4th Floor, 856 Homer Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2W5 Attention: JJ. Camp, Q.C. www.cfmlawyers.ca/microsoft Page 4 of 6

The law firm of Bouchard, Pagé, Tremblay, s.e.n.c. represents the Class Members in the Québec Action. Class counsel at Bouchard, Pagé, Tremblay, s.e.n.c. can be reached at: Telephone: 1-855-768-6667 Email: recourscollectifs@bptavocats.com Mail: 825, boulevard Lebourgneuf, bureau 510, Québec, QC, G2J 0B9 Attention: Brian A. Garneau Website : www.bptavocats.com The law firm of Sutts, Strosberg LLP represents Class Members in the Ontario Action which includes all Canadian residents except Class Members in the British Columbia Action and the Quebec Action. Class counsel at Sutts, Strosberg LLP can be reached at: Telephone: 1-800-229-5323 extn.8296 Email: Mail: Website: microsoft@strosbergco.com 600 Westcourt Place 251 Goyeau Street Windsor, ON N9A 6V4 Attention: Heather Rumble Peterson www.strosbergco.com/microsoft Additional Information This notice is given to you on the basis that you may be a Class Member whose rights could be affected by the Class Actions. This notice should not be understood as an expression of any opinion of the courts as to the merits of any claim or defences asserted in the Class Actions. Its sole purpose is to inform you of the Class Actions so that you may decide what steps to take in relation to it. This notice contains a summary of the Class Actions. Further details of the certification/authorization orders and claims can be found on Class counsel s websites. Class Members are encouraged to visit the websites. If you have questions that are not answered on-line, please contact the appropriate Class counsel identified above. INQUIRIES SHOULD NOT BE DIRECTED TO THE COURTS. Page 5 of 6

THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE FOR ONTARIO, AND THE SUPERIOR COURT OF QUÉBEC Page 6 of 6