SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

Similar documents
CASE UPDATE STRATA TITLES BOARD OUTLINES MCSTS DUTY UNDER S47 BMSMA (INSPECTION OF MCST RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS), AND ITS INTERACTION WITH PDPA 2012

the governing law of the Agreement is New York law; and

The Big Shift Singapore s Move To A Positive Grant System Kicks In From 14 February 2014

"Grace Period" in Japan

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Martín BENSADON, Alicia ALVAREZ, Damaso PARDO, Ignacio SÁNCHEZ ECHAÜE.

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

How patents work An introduction for law students

Sample Licensing Agreement

BNA s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

CASE UPDATE. The High Court Considers the Status and Scope of an Arbitration Agreement in the Context of a Termination of the Main Contract

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

Philippines. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and. Trademarks in Philippines COMANAS CORP. IP Management Service Group

Exclusions from patentability 15 Inventions contrary to public order or morality not patentable

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT AND ALLOCATION OF RIGHTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UNDER AN STTR RESEARCH PROJECT between. and

Foundation Certificate

NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (NISO) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY. As approved by NISO Board of Directors on May 7, 2013

pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry

AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

ANNEX 1 - (copy of questionnaire as circulated)

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

INDONESIA IP HANDBOOK

Intellectual Property Reform In Australia

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.)

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

IP MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA: TRADEMARKS & DESIGNS

Client Privilege in Intellectual Property Advice

INFORMATION FOR INVENTORS SEEKING PATENT PROTECTION

Designs. A Global Guide. Malaysia. Henry Goh & Co Sdn Bhd Dave A Wyatt

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

New Zealand. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and. Trademarks in New Zealand COMANAS CORP. IP Management Service Group

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011

CASE UPDATE. Introduction

SEC PROVISIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PATENT LAW TREATY

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

Understanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT (RAISING THE BAR ACT) 2012

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office

A Guide on Patent Laws in the GCC

Application Drafting and Provisional Applications

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WORK FOR OTHERS AGREEMENT WITH A NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR. Strategic Partnership Project Agreement (SPP) No.

WIRELESS INNOVATION FORUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY. As approved on 10 November, 2016

Practice for Patent Application

AGREEMENT WHEREAS Product ). WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS NOW, THEREFORE, Appointment & License End-users Reseller Obligations Sales Exhibit 1

First Inventor to File: Proposed Rules and Proposed Examination Guidelines

LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN in Sphere of Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Your Guide to Patents

NON-DISCLOSURE AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CORE TECHNOLOGIES CONSULTING, LLC UNLIMITED OEM SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

High-Tech Patent Issues

REPUBLIC OF VANUATU BILL FOR THE PATENTS ACT NO. OF 1999

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

UNITED KINGDOM Patent Rules 2007 as amended up to and including October 1, 2014

City State Country Zip. Contact Name Telephone Fax

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

MANUAL FOR THE HANDLING OF APPLICATIONS FOR PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD (THE BROWN BOOK)

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

Novelty. Japan Patent Office

Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property protection

Table of Contents. 9 Intellectual Property Policy

FORUM OF INCIDENT RESPONSE AND SECURITY TEAMS, INC. UNIFORM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ( UNIFORM IPR ) POLICY

Re: Proposed Amendments to the Trade-marks and Industrial Design Practices Involving the Grant of Extension of Time

- MODEL - Public Law , the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, as amended.

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

MBHB snippets Alert October 13, 2011

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

Software License Agreement

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. Patent and Copyright Agreement ( Agreement )

RELIBIT LABS MUTUAL NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

World Intellectual Property Organization

Part 1 Applications for Patents for Inventions

LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS. No. 50-XVI of March 7, Monitorul Oficial nr /455 din * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

GLOSSARY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TERMS

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

Multimedia over Coax Alliance Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

10 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT PATENT REFORM. W. Edward Ramage Chair, IP Group Baker Donelson

Guidelines for completing a Knowledge Development Box (KDB) Certificate Application

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

NFC FORUM, INC. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY

prototyped TEAM Inc. o/a MadeMill

Model Agreement SBIR/STTR Programs

Study Guidelines Study Question. Conflicting patent applications

Considerations for the United States

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

COMMON TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CASH MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS & SERVICES

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

BELIZE PATENTS ACT CHAPTER 253 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

NOTICE: THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT

Transcription:

CLIENT NOTE SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE Advocates & Solicitors Trade Mark & Patent Agents SINGAPORE 50 Raffles Place, #06-00 Singapore Land Tower, Singapore 048623 Tel: +65 62200666 Fax: 65 63241638 E-mail: ipdept@leenlee.com.sg

November 2017 SINGAPORE PATENTS, REGISTERED DESIGNS AND COPYRIGHT LEGISLATION UPDATE Recently, there have been amendments to the Singapore Patents Act and Rules, Registered Designs Act and Rules, and the Copyright Regulations. These came into effect on 30 October 2017. In this note, we highlight the significant amendments. THE PATENTS ACT AND PATENTS RULES The significant amendments to our patents law are: 1. restricting the foreign route option for search and examination to patent applications filed before a prescribed date; 2. broader exceptions in relation to public disclosure of the invention prior to a patent application; and 3. procedural amendments to improve the application process. Restricting the foreign route for search and examination to patent applications filed before a prescribed date Prior to the amendments, applicants may proceed to grant by using the local, foreign or mixed search and examination routes. With the amendments, the option of proceeding through the foreign route, i.e. supplementary examination based on a search and examination report issued by a foreign patent office, will be restricted to an applicant whose application is filed before a prescribed date. This effectively removes the option of reliance on the foreign route for applications filed after the prescribed date. Essentially, there will now be only 3 routes to grant for applications filed after the prescribed date: (a) file a Request for Search by 13 months, followed by filing a Request for Examination by 36 months; (b) file a Request for Search and Examination by 36 months; or (c) file a Request for Examination by 36 months, by relying on the search report of a corresponding application, corresponding international application, related national phase application or the parent PCT application. These routes ensure that all granted patents satisfy the patentability criteria under Singapore patents law. This is unlike the foreign route which places reliance on the search and examination report issued by a foreign patent office and may apply different patentability criteria. The prescribed date is 1 January 2020.

Broader exceptions in relation to public disclosure of the invention An invention which has been disclosed to the public before a patent application will be considered as part of the state of the art (i.e. not novel), unless any of the exceptions under the Patents Act applies. Previously, the exceptions allow the disclosure of an invention due to: (a) the matter therein being obtained unlawfully, or in breach of confidence; (b) the inventor displaying the invention at an international exhibition; or (c) the reading or publishing of the invention in a paper with his consent before any learned society, within 12 months of the filing date. Now, any public disclosure made by the inventor or by a person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor within 12 months from the filing date is also allowed. This exception however does not apply to the disclosure of an invention due to the publication of a patent application, unless (a) the application was filed without the consent of the inventor by the person who obtained the matter directly or indirectly from the inventor; (b) the application was published in error by reason of the application having been withdrawn, refused or abandoned before the publication date; or (c) the application was published prematurely under the law of the country governing the application. Where the publication is premature, the invention shall be treated as disclosed to the public on the date when the publication should have occurred under the law of the country governing the application. Despite the broader exceptions, applicants are advised to avoid disclosing their inventions before the filing date as the laws and practices on disclosure are different in other countries. Procedural amendments targeted to improve the application process These amendments enable: (a) greater flexibility for applicants to switch between a substantive examination route or a supplementary examination route at any time provided that: (i) (ii) the earlier request for substantive or supplementary examination is withdrawn; or the examination report or supplementary examination report is not yet issued; and (b) the treatment of an application as abandoned unless the relevant examination report, search and examination report or supplementary examination report has been requested within the applicable prescribed period.

THE REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT AND REGISTERED DESIGNS RULES The significant amendments to our registered designs law are: 1. broader scope of protection for designs; 2. default ownership of designs by the designer rather than the commissioning party; 3. extended grace period for public disclosure of designs; and 4. procedural amendments to improve the application process. Broader scope of protection for designs Prior to the amendments, it is not clear if designs of handcrafted items, including handmade jewellery, are registrable. This has been clarified, as the definition of article has been amended to include any thing that is manufactured (whether by an industrial process, by hand or otherwise). The amendments to the definition of design also provide a broader scope of protection. Colours can now be considered to be a design feature and the design features can be applied not only to an article but also to a non-physical product. An example of a non-physical product is a lightprojected keyboard which works like a physical keyboard. Default ownership of designs by the designer rather than the commissioning party In the context of a commissioned design, the previous position was that the ownership of the design vests in the party who commissioned the designer to create it. This position has now been changed so that the default owner of a commissioned design is the designer, subject to any agreement in writing to the contrary. Extended grace period for public disclosure of designs Previously, the exceptions provided in the Act were narrow, being limited to, for instance, public disclosure within 6 months of the filing date. With the amendments, the grace period is extended to 12 months. However, applicants are advised to be aware that this extended grace period may not be applicable in other countries. Procedural amendments to improve the application process The amendments enable: (a) the application for the registration of 2 or more designs in one application; and (b) the correction of non-compliance with certain formal requirements of an earlier application for registration by filing one or more new applications, which will be treated as filed on the date of filing of the earlier application.

THE COPYRIGHT REGULATIONS The significant amendments to the regulations relate to the definitions of articles and design, as well as the introduction of non-physical product in the Registered Designs Act. Also, the regulations were amended to deal with circumstances in which a design is deemed to be applied industrially. This is to avoid the overlap between the registered designs and copyright protection. Further Information If you have any query, please do not hesitate to contact the Intellectual Property Department, Lee & Lee. The contact persons are Mr Tan Tee Jim, S.C. at DID: +65 65574615 / email: tanteejim@leenlee.com.sg; and Ms Boo Yee Swan at DID: +65 65574869 / email: booyeeswan@leenlee.com.sg. You can also reach us by fax at 65 63241638. Disclaimer: The copyright in this document is owned by Lee & Lee. No part of this document may be reproduced without our prior written permission. The provision of the information herein does not constitute our giving legal advice and should not form the basis of any decision as to a particular course of action. It is only intended to provide you with an indication of some of the potential legal issues which you should be aware of. You are strongly advised to seek specific, detailed legal advice in respect of the individual requirements and circumstances applicable to you. Lee & Lee will not have any liability to you if you use any information herein without first obtaining appropriate legal advice as to its suitability for your particular requirements. Please note also that the information herein is based on the laws of Singapore. The position in other jurisdictions may differ.