Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Similar documents
Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 73 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 11

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GRAY PETERSON, Appellant. CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 06/04/2018 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 226 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 7

MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO Telephone: (303) Direct: (303) Fax: (303)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , Oral Argument Requested IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE, MYTON,

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 63 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 210 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 11

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 228 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

Case 4:18-cv DMR Document 5 Filed 09/20/18 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 27 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.^ DlSjJiCT Cuui IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT '

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 51 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 14

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

LEWIS COUNTY; SKAMANIA COUNTY; AND KLICKITAT COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO KEY OBAMA ENVIRONMENTAL RULES BEING CHALLENGED IN COURT. October 6, 2017

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 39 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5. Paul M. Seby (admitted pro hac vice) Robert J. Walker (Wyo. Bar No.

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 83 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 14

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 19 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 16

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. EDWARD TUFFLY, AKA Bud Tuffly, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Transcription:

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 1 Nos. 16-8068, 16-8069 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WYOMING; STATE OF COLORADO; INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION; and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, and Petitioners-Appellees STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA; STATE OF UTAH; and UTE INDIAN TRIBE, v. Intervenors-Appellees RYAN ZINKE; KRISTIN BAIL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; and U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, and Respondents-Appellants SIERRA CLUB; EARTH WORKS; WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES; WILDERNESS SOCIETY; CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND; and SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, Intervenors-Appellants ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING, NOS. 15-CV-41/43 (HON. SCOTT W. SKAVDAHL) FEDERAL APPELLANTS MOTION TO CONTINUE ARGUMENT AND HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION On March 9, 2017, this Court ordered BLM to confirm whether its position in these appeals has changed due to the recent change of Administration. For the reasons stated below, BLM respectfully requests this Court to continue the oral argument and hold these appeals in abeyance pending a new rulemaking by BLM. See

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 2 Fed. R. App. P. 2, 27. Petitioners-Appellees do not oppose this motion. The Citizen Group Intervenors-Appellants oppose this motion. For the following reasons, good cause exists to grant the motion: 1. On March 26, 2015, BLM published a rule governing hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands. Oil and Gas; Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands, 80 Fed. Reg. 16,128 (Mar. 26, 2015) ( 2015 Final Rule ). Petitioners challenged the 2015 Final Rule in the district court, and the district court set the rule aside. As a result, the 2015 Final Rule is not currently in effect. BLM and the Citizen Group Intervenors appealed to this Court, which ordered briefing and scheduled oral argument for March 22, 2017. 2. As the Court is aware, a new Administration took office on January 20, 2017, and a new Secretary of the Interior was sworn in on March 1, 2017. 3. Consistent with the President s January 30, 2017, Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs, the Department of the Interior has been reviewing existing regulations to determine whether revisions or rescissions are appropriate to streamline the regulatory process and eliminate duplicative regulations. As part of this process, the Department has begun reviewing the 2015 Final Rule (and all guidance issued pursuant thereto) for consistency with the policies and priorities of the new Administration. This initial review has revealed that the 2015 Final Rule does not reflect those policies and priorities. Accordingly, the Department through the BLM has begun the process to prepare a notice of proposed rulemaking for 2

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 3 publication in the Federal Register to rescind the 2015 Rule. The Department intends to publish that notice as soon as it and any necessary supporting documents are completed, and to conduct the rulemaking expeditiously and in compliance with applicable law. The BLM expects to issue the notice within 90 days of the date of filing of this motion. See Declar. of Richard Cardinale (attached). 4. To conserve the Court s and the parties resources, and in light of the proposed rulemaking process outlined above, BLM respectfully requests that the Court continue the oral argument and hold these appeals in abeyance pending the outcome of the proposed rulemaking process. Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 683 F.3d 382, 389 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (explaining that the Court may hold the case in abeyance pending resolution of [a] proposed rulemaking, subject to regular reports from [the agency] on its status ). 5. BLM proposes to file a status report 90 days from the date of the Court s order abating these appeals. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General MARCH 15, 2017 90-5-1-4-20425 s/ Nicholas A. DiMascio NICHOLAS A. DIMASCIO Attorney, Appellate Section U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Res. Div. 999 18th St., Suite 370 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 844-1384 3

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32(A) I hereby certify that this motion complies with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and (6) because it has been prepared in 14-point Garamond, a proportionally spaced font. I further certify that this motion complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because it contains 475 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted under Rule 32(f), according to the count of Microsoft Word. s/ Nicholas A. DiMascio NICHOLAS A. DIMASCIO

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 5

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 6

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 7 CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION I hereby certify that with respect to the foregoing documents: (1) all required privacy redactions have been made; (2) if required to file additional hard copies, that the ECF submission is an exact copy of those documents; (3) the digital submissions have been scanned for viruses with the most recent version of a commercial virus scanning program, Microsoft Forefront Client Security, and according to the program are free of viruses. s/ Nicholas A. DiMascio NICHOLAS A. DIMASCIO

Appellate Case: 16-8068 Document: 01019780139 Date Filed: 03/15/2017 Page: 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 15, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing documents with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit using the appellate CM/ECF system. The participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. s/ Nicholas A. DiMascio NICHOLAS A. DIMASCIO