Peace, Conflict, Security, and Development Peace and Conflict Studies 26:735:526 Rutgers University, Newark Fall Semester, 2013 Mondays 1:00-3:50 Hill Hall 215 Instructor: Sean T. Mitchell Office Hours: Wednesdays 2:30-4:00, Hill Hall 631, or by appointment. / (973)353-5078 Course Description International aid organizations and military and police strategists in places as different as rural Afghanistan, urban Brazil, and even here in Newark, NJ often understand security and development to be interdependent goals. But for many critics, this security-development nexus legitimates authoritarian surveillance regimes and violent intervention into the lives of the world s poor. This course examines the relationships between security and development in the contemporary world. Through reading ethnographic and historical case studies, as well as theoretical, journalistic, and polemical works, the course explores the different meanings assigned to these terms, the origins and material consequences of the security-development nexus. Students will develop a critical understanding of the main perspectives and stakes in debates over security and development (and, relatedly, over insecurity and underdevelopment ), rooted in a knowledge of significant case studies and theoretical analyses. At its core, the debate over security and development revolves around key perspectives concerning the meaning and significance of inequality, governance, and well-being on the one hand and the social bases of violence and peace on the other. As a core graduate course for the Rutgers MA in Peace and Conflict Studies, this course also explores the kinds of practical applications that might best promote human rights, well-being, equity, and peace in an interconnected, unequal, and often violent world. Learning Outcomes At the end of the term, students should: have a command of the key perspectives in the security and development debate. understand how this debate reflects longstanding debates about inequality, governance, wellbeing and the social bases of violence and peace. have a knowledge of key case studies that illuminate these perspectives. have a knowledge of key theoretical frameworks that illuminate these perspectives. have a critical understanding of the dilemmas of security and development in the contemporary world. have a critical understanding of the kinds of practical applications that might best promote human rights, well-being, equity, and peace. be able to write clear and well-informed papers considering these issues. be able to engage in oral presentations and debates on assigned essays. be able to utilize the knowledge gained in order to develop an area of personal expertise 1
Evaluation criteria Melbourne Method Work: 40% of grade Take Home Exam: 40% of grade Participation and Attendance: 20% of grade Melbourne Method Discussion To structure discussion, we will use a modified version of the Melbourne Method. During the first day of class, we will divide into three groups that will take turns in their role in class discussions. Each week, I will provide questions for the coming week s readings. Each student in a specified group will be responsible for sharing a 3-4 page response papers (double spaced, 12pt. font, 1 margins) responding to one or two of those questions. These response papers must be posted to the Discussion Board section of Blackboard by 8:00pm on Saturday. Each student preparing a response should be prepared to give an approximately 20 minute presentation on her/his response to the class. We will call this the Written Response Role. During the class, a second specified group will be responsible for discussing the written responses in class. We will call this the Discussion Role. Although the third group will have a rest, they are also required to do the reading and to participate in the class discussion, although they will not have an assigned role. These roles will rotate each week. Each group will perform each role 4 times. The schedule of roles is indicated in the Course Schedule section of the syllabus. This structure is designed to create informed and well-prepared discussions of the material. We will be reading about contentious material and we will sometimes disagree, but we should always do so respectfully and constructively. Each instance of Written Response Role work will be worth 10% of your grade. Together they account for 40% of your grade. Your participation in your oral Discussion Role during Melbourne Method discussion is a crucial part of your participation grade. Take Home Exam At the end of the course you will be given a take-home exam consisting of two essays (5-6 pages each, double spaced, 12pt. font, 1 margins). Each of the essays must respond to a question chosen from a list that I will hand out on the final day of class. I will grade the exams on your ability to understand, analyze, compare and critically assess the arguments and evidence presented by relevant authors. This exam will account for 30% of your grade. Research While Reading Much of the material we will be reading requires background knowledge. I will spend a lot of class discussing relevant theoretical perspectives and historical information. But as you read, you also need to do side research to make sure you understand the material. To this end, you are responsible for reading at least two articles each week, on topics that emerge in your reading. So, for example, don't come to class asking me what "Operation Moshtarak" is; look it up and learn about it. You can use Wikipedia, which is a good resource for developing a FIRST APPROXIMATION of an unfamiliar topic. It is not a source for in-depth research, and, as a rule, you should not use it in citations, but it is a useful resource to get basic knowledge of something you don't otherwise know 2
about. Like all sources, it is sometimes inaccurate. However, when you find an inaccuracy in Wikipedia you can (and should) correct it. Participation and Preparation This is a graduate seminar class; attendance and participation are required. In order to do well in this class, you must show up to class having read and thought about the assigned material. Note: there is no possibility of extra credit work to bring up a course grade at the end. You must keep up with readings, class participation, and quizzes all the way through. Additional Class Material In addition to the reading assigned on this syllabus, I will sometimes assign articles about current events from newspapers, magazines, or blogs relevant to class discussion. These articles are also mandatory reading. Films, available only in class, are course material. Academic Integrity Plagiarism and cheating won t be tolerated. The Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy will apply to all exams and course work. We will discuss this in class, but if you have any doubt about what constitutes plagiarism or cheating, ask me or consult the Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy: http://academicintegrity.rutgers.edu/integrity.shtml. Required Books Arias, Enrique Desmond. 2006. Drugs and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, Social Networks, and Public Security. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Cramer, Christopher. 2006. Violence in Developing Countries: War, Memory, Progress. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Parenti, Christian. 2012. Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence. New York: Nation Books. Additional class readings (as attachments and links) are available on Blackboard: https://blackboard.newark.rutgers.edu. Some of the links posted require that the article be accessed through the Rutgers library. You can either access those links from campus or using the Rutgers library toolbar on your home network. The toolbar is available for Firefox or Chrome browsers at: http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/toolbar. Course Schedule September 9: an Introduction to the Class September 16: Human Nature and the Nature of war Group A, Written Response Role/Group B, Discussion Role Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan (Chapter 13). Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1753. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (Part 1). Pinker, Steven. 2011. Decline of violence: Taming The Devil Within Us. Ferguson, Brian R. 2008. Ten Points on War. Clausewitz, Carl von. 1832. On War (Book 1, Chapter 1; Book 1, Chapter 7). Arendt, Hannah. 1969. A Special Supplement: Reflections on Violence. 3
September 23: Anthropologies of Development and Empire Group B, Written Response Role/Group C, Discussion Role Comaroff, Jean and John 2002. Of Revelation and Revolution. (Book section posted to Blackboard). Foucault, Michel. 1978. Governmentality. Li, Tania. 2007. The Will to Improve. Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke University Press. (Book section posted to Blackboard). Ferguson, James. 1997. Anthropology and Its Evil Twin: Development in the Constitution of a Discipline. Cepek, Michael. 2011. Foucault in the Forest. Questioning Environmentality in Amazonia. September 30: The Security and Development Nexus and its Critics Group C, Written Response Role/Group A, Discussion Role Berger, Mark T and Heloise Weber. 2009. War, Peace and Progress: Conflict, Development, (In)security and Violence in the 21st Century. Chandler, David. 2008. Review Article: Theorizing the Shift from Security to Insecurity. Collier, Paul. 2008. The Bottom Billion. (Chapter 2) Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars : The Merging of Development and Security. (Chapter 2). MacGinty, Roger; and Andrew Williams. 2009. Conflict and Development. (Introduction). Kienscherf, Markus. 2011. A Programme of Global Pacification: US Counterinsurgency Doctrine and the Biopolitics of Human (in)security. October 7: Security, Development, Capitalism, and Violence Group B, Written Response Role/Group A, Discussion Role Cramer, Christopher. 2006. Violence in Developing Countries: War, Memory, Progress. pp., 1-160. October 14: Security, Development, Capitalism, and Violence Group C, Written Response Role/Group B, Discussion Role Cramer, Christopher. 2006. Violence in Developing Countries: War, Memory, Progress. pp., 161-289. October 21: Humanitarianism and Empire Group A, Written Response Role/Group C, Discussion Role Bornstein, Erica and Peter Redfield. 2010. An Introduction to the Anthropology of Humanitarianism. Calhoun, Craig. 2010. The Idea of Emergency: Humanitarian Action and Global (Dis)Order. Philip Gourevitch s review of Polman, Linda. 2010. The Crisis Caravan. What s Wrong with Humanitarian Aid.? Fassin, Didier. 2010. The Heart of Humaneness: The Moral Economy of Humanitarian Intervention. Feldman, Ilana. 2010. Ad Hoc Humanity: UN Peacekeeping and the Limits of International Community in Gaza. October 28: Counterinsurgency Everywhere? Group A, Written Response Role/Group B, Discussion Role 4
Anthropologists, The Network of Concerned. 2009. The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual. (Book section posted to Blackboard). Kelly, John D., Beatrice Jauregui, Sean T. Mitchell, and Jeremy Walton, eds. 2010. Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Book section posted to Blackboard). Nagl, John A., David H. Petraeus, James F. Amos, and Sarah Sewall. 2007. The U.S. Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Book section posted to Blackboard). Petraeus, David H. 2006. Learning Counterinsurgency: Observations From Soldiering in Iraq. Wacquant, Loïc. 2012. Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism November 4: Gender and Violence Group B, Written Response Role/Group C, Discussion Role Gill, Lesley. 1997. Creating Citizens, Making Men: The Military and Masculinity in Bolivia. Cohn, Carol. 1987. Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Higate, Paul; and Marsha Henry. 2004. Engendering (in)security in Peace Support Operations. Das, Veena. 2008. Violence, Gender, and Subjectivity. Nordstrom, Carolyn. 2010. Women, Economy, War. November 11: Identity, Nationalism, Peace and Security Group C, Written Response Role/Group A, Discussion Role Jacoby, Russell. 2011. Bloodlust. Chua, Amy. 2002. A World on the Edge. Kaldor, Mary. 2007. Human Security. (Chapter 3). Thomas, Deborah A. 2009. The Violence of Diaspora: Governmentality, Class Cultures, and Circulations. Fearon, James D., D Laitin. 2000. Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity. Mamdani, Mahmood. 2007. The Politics of Naming: Genocide, Civil War, Insurgency. November 18: Inequality and conflict Group B, Written Response Role/Group A, Discussion Role Andreas, Peter. 2004. The Clandestine Political Economy of War and Peace in Bosnia. Le Billon, Philippe. 2007. Geographies of War: Perspectives on 'Resource Wars'. Murshed, Syed Mansoob and Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin. 2009. Revisiting the Greed and Grievance Explanations for Violent Conflict. Woodward, Susan L. 2007. Do the Root Causes of Civil War Matter? Ferguson, James. 2005. Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa. November 25: Security, Development, and Violence in Rio de Janeiro Group C, Written Response Role/Group B, Discussion Role Arias, Enrique Desmond. 2006. Drugs and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, Social Networks, and Public Security. 5
December 2: Climate Change and Violence Group A, Written Response Role/Group C, Discussion Role Parenti, Christian. 2012. Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence. pp., 1-122 December 9: Climate Change and Violence Parenti, Christian. 2012. Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence. pp., 123-242 6