STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT )SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49C MI-

Similar documents
SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 101

Case 1:05-cv SEB-VSS Document 45 Filed 09/08/2005 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division : : : : : : : : : : :

Defendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. v. Civil Action No. Judge: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 3:15-cv AKK Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION CIRCUIT/SUPERIOR COURT )SS: 49DQ jt COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO.

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

1 SB By Senator Brewbaker. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 30-JAN-18. Page 0

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION VERIFIED COMPLAINT (INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF SOUGHT)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Plaintiff A. Donald McEachin, Senator of Virginia, by counsel, and for

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--

Your Committee, to which this proposal was referred, has amended the proposal to read as follows and recommends its adoption as amended.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:15-cv SS Document 10 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:13-cv MEF-CSC Document 9 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

November 18, November 18, November 18, November 18, November 18, 2013

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

GRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET

NO THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. ONE 2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 269th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUDGE:. Defendants.

Case 2:13-cv MEF-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/12/13 Page 1 of 12

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER ON COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, JUDGE: Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

case 4:12-cv RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

PROSPECTIVE PETITION FOR LOCAL MEASURE. C 1 kt z -6 A 5 ~ Po r f bnd ~

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs American Catalog Mailers Association ( ACMA ) and

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Indianapolis*Issues*Brush0ire

Case 2:11-cv MCE -GGH Document 9 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10

JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 1:15-cv WJM-MJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 09/20/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and TRO REQUESTED /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN MARION SUPERIOR COURT 1 COMMERCIAL COURT DOCKET COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49D PL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

Case: 6:16-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/30/16 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 1

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ), ) ) Defendant. )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * CIVIL ACTION * * NO. * IN RE SEARCH AND SEIZURE * JUDGE * * MAGISTRATE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SCOTT L. BEAU AND WYNCROFT, LLC ANSWER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Case No.: COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

WAIVER OF APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM. I,, the Respondent in. give up my right to have this Court appoint a Guardian Ad Litem

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

LAUREL COUNTY, KENTUCKY

Case 1:08-cv RLY-TAB Document 19 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AT KANSAS CITY

No. D-1-GN

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Defendants Final Motion for Enlargement of Time. The Marion County Election Board and Marion County Voter Registration Board

Case 2:12-cv SM-JCW Document 1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE ALLEN SUPERIOR/CIRCUIT COURT )ss: COUNTY OF ALLEN ) CAUSE NO.

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Transcription:

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT )SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49C01-1507-MI- THE FIRST CHURCH OF CANNABIS, INC., ) BILL LEVIN, HERBERT NEAL SMITH, and ) BOBBI JO YOUNG, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF INDIANA; GOVERNOR MIKE) PENCE; ATTORNEY GENERAL GREGORY F. ) ZOELLER; INDIANA STATE POLICE ) SUPERINTENDENT DOUGLAS G. CARTER; ) CHIEF RICK HITE, INDIANAPOLIS ) METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; ) INDIANAPOLIS MAYOR GREG BALLARD; ) and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN ) LAYTON ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION This is a complaint brought by the Plaintiffs identified below, pursuant to I.C. 34-13-9-1, et seq., Indiana Trial Rules 57 and 65 and I.C. 34-26-1-1, et seq., alleging violations of their rights under the Indiana Constitution and the United States Constitution, for which they seek declaratory and injunctive relief challenging as unconstitutional and illegal provisions of Indiana law relating to possession and use of marijuana. II. JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND CAUSE OF ACTION 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this cause pursuant to I.C. 34-26-1-3. 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to Trial Rule 75(A)(5) and (7). 1

3. Declaratory relief is authorized pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 57. 4. Injunctive relief is authorized pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 65 and I.C. 34-26-1-1, et seq. 5. This action is brought, pursuant to I.C. 34-13-9-1, et seq., to redress the substantial burden Indiana governmental entities have placed upon Plaintiffs exercise of their religion as Plaintiffs rights are secured by Article 1, sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 23, and 31 of the Indiana Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as extended to the State of Indiana by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. III. PARTIES 6. Plaintiff First Church of Cannabis, Inc., (hereinafter First Church of Cannabis ) is a notfor-profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Indiana and is a religious society with principal place of business at 3400 South Rural Street, Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana. 7. Plaintiff Bill Levin is a citizen of the State of Indiana, resident of Marion County, and a founder and member of the Church of Cannabis 8. Plaintiff Herbert Neal Smith is a citizen of the State of Indiana, resident of Marion County, and member of the Church of Cannabis. 9. Plaintiff Bobbie Jo Young is a citizen of the State of Indiana, resident of Marion County, and member of the Church of Cannabis. 10. Defendant Michael Pence is the Governor of the State of Indiana, a governmental entity, with principal office located in the City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and as head of the State s executive branch is charged with oversight of the enforcement of the statutes and executive orders of 2

the State of Indiana, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. 11. Defendant Gregory F. Zoeller is the elected Attorney General of the State of Indiana with principal office located in City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and in that capacity is charged with enforcement of the statutes of the State of Indiana, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. 12. Defendant Indiana State Police Superintendent Douglas C. Carter is the head office of the Indiana State Police with principal office located in City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and in that capacity is responsible for enforcement of the statutes of the State of Indiana, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. 13. Defendant Rick Hite is the Chief of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department with principal office located in City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and in that capacity is responsible for enforcement of the statutes of the State of Indiana and ordinances of the City of Indianapolis abnd Marion County, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. 14. Defendant Gregory Ballard is the elected Mayor of the City of Indianapolis with principal office located in City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and, as head of the executive branch of the city, in that capacity is responsible for oversight of enforcement of the statutes of the State of Indiana within the City of Indianapolis and the ordinances of the City of Indianapolis, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. 15. Defendant John Layton is the elected Sheriff of Marion County with principal office located in City of Indianapolis, Marion County, and in that capacity is responsible for enforcement of the statutes of the State of Indiana within the City of Indianapolis and the ordinances of the City of 3

Indianapolis within Marion County, and, at all times relevant herein, has acted under color or title of State law. IV. FACTS 16. Plaintiff First Church of Cannabis is recognized as a not-for-profit religious organization by the United States Internal Revenue Service and is a religious society. 17. Plaintiff First Church of Cannabis advocates a religious belief that involves ultimate ideas, metaphysical beliefs, a moral or ethical system, a comprehensiveness of beliefs, and accoutrements of religion. 18. Among the accoutrements of religion referenced in the previous paragraph are important writings, a gathering place, keepers of knowledge, ceremonies and rituals, a structure and organization, holidays, tenets concerning diet and appearance, and proselytizing. 19. Cannabis sativa also known as marijuana or Cannabis, the Healing Plant, is the sacrament of the First Church of Cannabis; members of the Church believe cannabis brings us closer to ourselves and others. It is our fountain of health, our love, curing us from illness and depression. We embrace it with our whole heart and spirit, individually and as a group. 20. I.C. 35-48-4-19 and -11 define marijuana ; I.C. 35-48-4-11 makes possession of marijuana an offense punishable as a misdemeanor or felony; and I.C. 35-48-4-13 makes the act of visiting a place where marijuana is used a misdemeanor or felony, dependent upon the circumstances. 21. The aforementioned statutes have substantially burdened and may substantially burden Plaintiffs exercise of religion in that Plaintiffs are in a position to be prosecuted for the described offenses for use of the sacrament of their religion, even though such burden of Plaintiffs religion results 4

from rules of general applicability. 22. One or more of said Defendants cannot demonstrate application of the burden on Plaintiffs exercise of religion either is in further of a compelling governmental interest or is the least restrictive means of furthering any compelling government interest. 23. Said Defendants have placed impermissible burdens on Plaintiffs, under I.C. 34-13-9-1, et seq., and Plaintiffs are entitled to relief. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request declaratory relief or injunctive relief that prevents, restrains, corrects, or abates the violations as described in this Complaint, and for all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted, l Mark Small Attorney Number 14656-49 1915 Broad Ripple Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46220 Telephone: (317) 252-4800 Facsimile: (317) 251-1941 E-mail: marksmall2001@yahoo.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark Small, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon Michael Pence, Governor, State of Indiana, Statehouse, 200 East Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, Gregory Ballard, Office of the Mayor of Indianapolis, 2501 City-County Building, 200 East Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204; Gregory Zoeller, Office of the Indiana Attorney General, 219 Statehouse, 200 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Chief Rick Hite, Suite 211 City-County Building, 200 East Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204; Sheriff John Layton, Marion County Jail, 50 South Alabama Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and Indiana State Police Superintendent Douglas G. Carter, Suite 100, Indiana Government Center North, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, by Civil 5

Sheriff with summons and by deposit in the United States mail, first-class postage pre-paid, this 8 th day of July, 2015. Mark Small 6