Aggravated Felonies: An Overview

Similar documents
Evolution of the Definition of Aggravated Felony

LEGAL ALERT: ONE DAY TO PROTECT NEW YORKERS ACT PASSES IN NY STATE

LEXSTAT 1-4 Bender's Immigration and Nationality Act Service Section 237, 8 U.S.C. 1227

Defending Non-Citizens in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin by Maria Theresa Baldini-Potermin

CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL-ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS (Sec. 1229b.)

Immigrants Rights Organizations Encourage Members of Congress to Vote No on H.R. 6691, a Retrogressive Mass Incarceration Bill September 5, 2018

Immigration Consequences of Criminal Activity

conviction where the record of conviction contains no finding of a prior conviction

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild

ALL THOSE RULES ABOUT CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...ix Table of Decisions Index...367

The Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law

WikiLeaks Document Release

CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL

I. NON-LPR CANCELLATION (UNDOCUMENTED)

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 6, a.m. Legislative Office Building, Room 1C 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106

Representing Foreign Nationals in Criminal Proceedings

Administrative Removal Proceedings Manual (M-430, Rev. June 4, 1999)

Immigration Consequences of Criminal Activity

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES ANALYSIS

United States Court of Appeals

PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 December 16, 2011

IMPACT OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS

Immigration-Related Document Fraud: Overview of Civil, Criminal, and Immigration Consequences

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT FOR IMMIGRANT SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Crimmigration Basics: The Intersection of Criminal and Immigration Law

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Representing Clients in Immigration Court, 5th Ed. Acknowledgments... ix Table of Decisions Index

This March, the Supreme Court issued

Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends

Padilla in Practice Series

1/7/ :53 PM GEARTY_COMMENT_WDF (PAGE PROOF) (DO NOT DELETE)

When Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements


CRIMMIGRATION. The Intersection of Criminal and Immigration Law. John Gihon Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon

Chapter 4 Conviction and Sentence for Immigration Purposes

9 FAM 40.6 EXHIBIT I GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY AVAILABLE WAIVERS

IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY: PRIMER. By Carolina Antonini

Intersection of Immigration Practice with other Areas of Law

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Matter of Khanh Hoang VO, Respondent

Immigration, Crimes, Deportability, Waivers

Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief. By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1

CHAPTER 2 Inadmissibility, Deportability, Waivers, and Relief from Removal

IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. A. Who needs to be aware of immigration consequences?

Checklist of Non-Substantive Offenses

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

Overview of Immigration Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Office of the State Public Defender

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

CRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER KEY. LABE M. RICHMAN, Esq.

California Prop 47 and SB 1310: Representing Immigrants

The Padilla Rule. Complying with Padilla. STATUTES, CASE LAW, and SECONDARY SOURCES 4/21/2010

Update: The LPR Bars to 212(h) To Whom Do They Apply?

Immigration Issues in Child Welfare Proceedings

GUIDE FOR DETAINED IMMIGRANTS

I. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender).

Immigration Issues in New Mexico. Rebecca Kitson, Esq

POST-PADILLA ISSUES. Two-Part Test: Strickland

PC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:

INDEX Alphabetization is word-by-word (e.g., R visas precedes REAL ID Act )

Immigration Relief for Immigrant Survivors of Abuse [July 2017]

Immigrant Defense Project

OTHER GROUNDS OF DEPORTABILITY OR INADMISSIBILITY? 1

Impact of Immigration on Families: Intersection of Immigration and Criminal Law. Judicial Training Network Albuquerque, New Mexico April 20, 2018

DACA LEGAL SERVICES TOOLKIT Practice Advisory 6 of 7

CHAPTER 4 GOOD MORAL CHARACTER

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

CLEAN SLATE FOR IMMIGRANTS:

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, 4TH ED.

CRIMMIGRATION: CRIMES AND IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

California Law and Immigration. Taking matters into our own hands one bill at a time!

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

REPRESENTING NATURALIZATION CLIENTS IN THE WAKE OF USCIS S NEW NTA MEMO

UPDATE: Using the California Chart and Notes After Moncrieffe v. Holder and Olivas-Motta v. Holder

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

Bail: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Below are some of the housekeeping items, including our course text and other details which you should keep in mind this summer. Please read closely.

Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA

Humanitarian Immigration Law, Part II

Thailand Law Forum. Waivers of US Visa Denials and Waivers in Thailand. By Chaninat and Leeds Co., Ltd. 2 June 2009

SUBJECT-MATTER INDEX

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

FALSE CLAIMS TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP: CONSEQUENCES AND POSSIBLE DEFENSES 1 (July 2014) by Jessica Chicco and Zahava Stern 2

Bond/Custody. I. Overview. A. Application Before an Immigration Judge. B. Time. C. Subsequent Hearing. D. While a Bond Appeal is Pending

IMMIGRANT DEFENDANT QUESTIONNAIRE (Re: Padilla Counsel Consultation)

Below are some of the housekeeping items, including our course text and other details which you should keep in mind this summer. Please read closely.

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

6/8/2007 9:42:17 AM SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. XL:4

CRS Report for Congress

Edward Walker v. Attorney General United States

In re Liber Remberto SEJAS, Respondent

GEORGE MASON SCHOOL OF LAW Immigration Law Law 235 Fall Syllabus

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Grounds of Inadmissibility, INA 212(a) Adjustment in Removal; Re-Adjustment of LPR. Aggravated Felonies and Admissibility

Jose Diaz Hernandez v. Attorney General United States

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF STATE COURT CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. October 11, 2013

Transcription:

Aggravated Felonies: An Overview Aggravated felony is a term of art used to describe a category of offenses carrying particularly harsh immigration consequences for noncitizens convicted of such crimes. Regardless of their immigration status, noncitizens who have been convicted of an aggravated felony are prohibited from receiving most forms of relief that would spare them from deportation, including asylum, and from being readmitted to the United States at any time in the future. Despite what the ominous-sounding name may suggest, an aggravated felony does not require the crime to be aggravated or a felony to qualify. Instead, an aggravated felony is simply an offense that Congress sees fit to label as such, and today includes many nonviolent and seemingly minor offenses. This fact sheet provides an overview of aggravated felonies under federal immigration law and the immigration consequences of being convicted of an aggravated felony. What Makes a Crime an Aggravated Felony? An offense need not be aggravated or a felony in the place where the crime was committed to be considered an aggravated felony for purposes of federal immigration law. Instead, an aggravated felony is any crime that Congress decides to label as such. As two prominent immigration judges have noted, numerous non-violent, fairly trivial misdemeanors are considered aggravated felonies under our immigration laws. 1 As initially enacted in 1988, the term aggravated felony referred only to murder, federal drug trafficking, and illicit trafficking of certain firearms and destructive devices. 2 Congress has since expanded the definition of aggravated felony on numerous occasions, 3 but has never removed a crime from the list. Today, the definition of aggravated felony covers more than thirty types of offenses, including simple battery, 4 theft, 5 filing a false tax return, 6 and failing to appear in court. 7 Even offenses that sound serious, such as sexual abuse of a minor, can encompass conduct that most states classify as misdemeanors or do not criminalize at all, such as consensual intercourse between a 21-year-old and a 17-year-old. 8

What if the Conviction Occurred before the Crime Was Labeled an Aggravated Felony? In most federal courts, a conviction for any offense listed as an aggravated felony is grounds for deportation, even if the crime was not considered an aggravated felony at the time of conviction. 9 In other words, whenever Congress adds a new offense to the list of aggravated felonies in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), lawfully present noncitizens who have previously been convicted of such crimes become immediately deportable. As a result, any addition to the list of aggravated felonies will automatically apply retroactively to prior convictions. Are Aggravated Felonies the Only Crimes for Which an Immigrant Can Be Deported? No. An aggravated felony is one but not the only basis to deport immigrants convicted of a criminal offense. Removal proceedings may also be initiated against immigrants convicted of one or more crimes involving moral turpitude, 10 a broad category of offenses that includes, but is not limited to, most crimes that qualify as an aggravated felony. 11 Noncitizens convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude may be subject to deportation, but do not face the additional consequences associated with a conviction for an aggravated felony. The immigration laws also permit deportation for convictions of various standalone offenses. 12 Thus, whether a noncitizen is subject to deportation for a crime is not determined by whether the crime is labeled an aggravated felony. Instead, the primary impact of the aggravated felony classification relates to the increased immigration penalties attached to the label, including the inability to apply for most forms of relief from removal. What are the Potential Consequences of Being Convicted of an Aggravated Felony? Deportation without a Removal Hearing Certain noncitizens convicted of an aggravated felony are provided fewer legal protections than other immigrants. For example, any immigrant convicted of an aggravated felony who is not a lawful permanent resident (LPR) may be administratively deported from the United States without a formal hearing before an Immigration Judge. 13 Immigrants placed in such proceedings are not eligible for asylum or any other form of discretionary relief. 14 Immigrants found deportable in this manner may not appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and can be physically removed two weeks after entry of the order. 15 Mandatory Unreviewable Detention Following Release from Criminal Custody Federal immigration authorities are required to detain any immigrant convicted of an aggravated felony upon his or her release from criminal custody. 16 To obtain bond from an immigration judge, LPRs who are detained following a conviction of a potential aggravated felony must demonstrate with substantial likelihood that the crime in question does not qualify as an aggravated felony. 17 Page 2 of 5

Ineligibility for Asylum Any immigrant convicted of an aggravated felony is ineligible for asylum. 18 Asylum is a form of immigration relief available to immigrants who suffered or have a well-founded fear of persecution in their country of nationality or last habitual residence. 19 Immigrants convicted of an aggravated felony may also be ineligible for withholding of removal, a similar form of relief for noncitizens whose life or freedom would be threatened in the country of deportation. 20 Ineligibility for Cancellation of Removal Any immigrant convicted of an aggravated felony is ineligible for cancellation of removal ( cancellation ). 21 Cancellation is a form of relief allowing immigration judges to permit otherwise deportable immigrants to remain in the United States. The bar to cancellation for immigrants convicted of an aggravated felony applies regardless of whether their removal would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to an immediate family member who is a U.S. citizen or LPR. 22 Ineligibility for Certain Waivers of Inadmissibility Certain LPRs may not obtain a waiver of inadmissibility under Section 212(h) of the INA if they were convicted of an aggravated felony. 23 A waiver of inadmissibility is a means of excusing immigrants for past misconduct that makes them ineligible for admission to the United States. Waivers under Section 212(h) are available to prospective LPRs whose removal from the United States would cause extreme hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or LPR. Ineligibility for Voluntary Departure An immigrant convicted of an aggravated felony is ineligible for voluntary departure. 24 Voluntary departure is a discretionary form of relief allowing otherwise deportable immigrants to leave the country at their own expense in place of formal deportation under an order of removal. Permanent Inadmissibility Following Departure from the United States An immigrant removed from the United States after being convicted of an aggravated felony (or who leaves while an order of removal is outstanding) is permanently inadmissible. 25 To lawfully reenter the United States, such an immigrant must receive a special waiver from the Department of Homeland Security (which is very rare), in addition to meeting all other grounds of admissibility. Enhanced Penalties for Illegally Reentering the United States An immigrant who is removed from the United States following a conviction for an aggravated felony, and who subsequently reenters the country illegally, may be imprisoned for up to 20 years rather than two years. 26 Page 3 of 5

Conclusion In the words of the Supreme Court, immigrants convicted of an aggravated felony face the harshest deportation consequences. 27 As Congress ponders proposals to include even more crimes under the definition of aggravated felony, it must consider the extremely severe consequences that will result. The immigration laws include numerous provisions to ensure that criminals are not allowed to remain in the United States, yet also recognize that exceptions should be made in particularly compelling cases, especially when an immigrant s removal will create hardship for U.S. citizens. Once a crime is labeled an aggravated felony, however, deportation is all but assured and individualized determinations are rarely possible to make. Page 4 of 5

Endnotes 1. Hon. Dana Leigh Marks and Hon. Denise Noonan Slavin, A View Through the Looking Glass: How Crimes Appear from the Immigration Court Perspective, Fordham Urb. L.J. 91, 92 (2012), http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/a-view-through-the-looking-glass-fordham-urban-lawjournal.pdf. 2. Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-690, 7342, 7344, 102 Stat. 4469, 4470. 3. Immigration Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-649, 501, 104 Stat. 4978, 5048; Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-416, 222, 109 Stat. 4305, 4320; Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-132, 440(e), 110 Stat. 1276, 1277; Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-208, 321, 110 Stat. 3009-627. 4. INA 101(a)(43)(F). 5. INA 101(a)(43)(G). 6. INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i); Kawashima v. Holder, 132 S.Ct. 1166 (2012). 7. INA 101(a)(43)(Q), (T), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(Q), (T). 8. Matter of Esquivel-Quintana, 26 I. & N. Dec. 469, 475 (BIA 2015), aff d Esquivel-Quintana v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 1019 (6th Cir. 2016), cert. granted Esquivel-Quintana v. Lynch, --- S.Ct. ----, 2016 WL 3689050 (Oct. 28, 2016). 9. INA 101(a)(43), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). In removal proceedings arising in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, however, an aggravated felony conviction is grounds for removal only if the conviction occurred after November 19, 1988. Zivkovic v. Holder, 724 F.3d 894, 911 (7th Cir. 2013); Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder, 636 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2010). 10. INA 237(a)(2)(A)(i)-(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). 11. Judulang v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 476, 482 (2011). 12. See, e.g., INA 237(a)(2)(A)(iv), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iv) (high speed flight from an immigration checkpoint); INA 237(a)(2)(A)(v), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(v) (failure to register as a sex offender); INA 237(a)(2)(B), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(B) (controlled substances violations); INA 237(a)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(C) (certain firearms offenses); INA 237(a)(2)(D), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(D) (miscellaneous crimes); INA 237(a)(2)(E), 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(E) (crimes of domestic violence and crimes of child abuse). 13. INA 238, 8 U.S.C. 1228. 14. INA 238(b)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1228(b)(5). 15. INA 238(b)(3), 8 U.S.C. 1228(b)(3). 16. INA 236(c)(1)(B), 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1)(B). 17. Matter of Joseph, 22 I&N Dec. 799 (BIA 1999). 18. INA 208(b)(2)(B)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2)(B)(i). 19. INA 101(a)(42), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42). 20. INA 241(b)(3)(B), 8 U.S.C. 1231(3)(B). 21. INA 240A(a)(3), 8 U.S.C. 1229b(a)(3); INA 240A(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1229b(b)(1)(C). 22. INA 240A(b)(1)(D), 8 U.S.C. 1229b(b)(1)(D). 23. INA 212(h), 8 U.S.C. 1182(h); but see Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015) (holding that LPRs who were originally admitted in a nonimmigrant status and who later adjusted to LPR status are eligible for 212(h) waivers even if they have been convicted of an aggravated felony). 24. INA 240B(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. 1229c(a)(1); INA 240B(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1229c(b)(1)(C). 25. INA 212(a)(9)(ii), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(ii). 26. INA 276(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. 1326(b)(2). 27. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S. 563, 2580 (2010). Page 5 of 5