EU Damages Directive Implementation Half Time

Similar documents
Newsletter Competition law amendment may 2017

Post contractual non-competition clauses

Judicial Cooperation, Brussels Regulation and Cooperation Mechanisms

Damages Directive 2014/104/EU:

Trailblazing Competition Law: Private Enforcement in Europe on the move Christopher Rother, Managing Partner Hausfeld Rechtsanwälte

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 6 June 2013 *

Comments on the European Commission s Proposed New Cartel Settlement Procedure

COMMISSION OPINION. of

Family Dispute Resolution Act 2013

Admission of TCN- Introduction. Constança Urbano de Sousa ULB, Brussels, 2 and 3 February 2013

Challenges of Damages Directive transposition Croatian experience

The Impact of the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment on Present and Future Arbitration Agreements

Strategic choices in antitrust investigations: litigation versus commitments & settlements. Pranvera Këllezi Attorney at Law, Geneva

AND Check one of these three boxes to: CHANGE name and/or address: Complete item 6a or 6b; and item 7a or 7b and item 7c FIRST PERSONAL NAME

EU Damages Directive Implementation

Dispute Resolution Around the World. Austria

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

Implementation of the Damages Directive across the EU

GDPR: Belgium sets up new Data Protection Authority

CASE M.6497 HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA HOLDINGS GMBH / ORANGE AUSTRIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS GMBH

QATAR INTRODUCES NEW ARBITRATION LAW A SUMMARY

The new Statutory Minimum Wage in Germany

THE EU PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE PRACTICAL INSIGHTS

Access to informa.on: Lessons from Fukushima Nuclear Accident

As per January 2015 Preamble 1. Validity KOMUNITAS OG

ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques

Masterclass Cartel Investigations

Competition Express 8 March Issue 40

Antitrust: Commission introduces settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/1056)

Patents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy

Private Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project

United Kingdom. By Penny Gilbert, Kit Carter and Stuart Knight, Powell Gilbert LLP

MWONGOZO; THE CODE OF GOVERNANCE FOR STATE CORPORATIONS. CS Catherine Musakali

The President has signed the Act on the Change of the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection and the Act the Civil Procedure Code

DATA PROCESSING ADDENDUM

Working document 01/2014 on Draft Ad hoc contractual clauses EU data processor to non-eu sub-processor"

BULGARIA: PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTED

Private Sponsorship in Refugee Resettlement. February 2017

Proving Competition Law Private Claims An EU Perspective

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Procedural Decisions in ICC Arbitration

Supreme Court of the United States

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF FRANZ FISCHER v. AUSTRIA. (Application no.

Open Web Foundation. Final Specification Agreement (OWFa 1.0) (Patent and Copyright Grants)

GENERAL SALES AND DELIVERY CONDITIONS

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

Should Jurisdictional Clauses be Interpreted Differently in Competition Law Cases? A Comment on Case C 595/17 Apple ECLI:EU:C:2018:854

Energy Efficiency Good Practice Examples from the Energy Efficiency Directive Concerted Action

Commitments and settlements benefits and risks

Restraints of trade and dominance in Ireland: overview

Telekom Austria Group Standard Data Processing Agreement

Experience of German and Austrian courts and legal practice in applying the European Small Claims Procedure

Money versus networks. How upper middle class groups compete for access to the best middle schools in the Parisian periphery

ACTION FOR DAMAGES AND IMPOSITION OF FINES

LIDC LIGUE INTERNATIONALE DU DROIT DE LA CONCURRENCE INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW INTERNATIONALE LIGA FÜR WETTBEWERBSRECHT

NetTest A European Solution from Austria for measuring Broadband Quality SERENTSCHY.COM ADVISORY SERVICES GMBH

Why is the Commission proposing to introduce a settlement procedure? Does the settlement procedure imply negotiations?

OVERVIEW OF CROATIAN BANKRUPTCY SYSTEM

Par$cipatory Economic Evalua$on

Denmark. Claus Barrett Christiansen Bech-Bruun

Competition Law Newsletter. Settlement with the Competition Authority

The UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive

An#- Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

Norway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS

Quantifying Harm for Breaches of Antitrust Rules A European Union Perspective

Conflicts of Interest and Asset Declarations

Federal Law Gazette I Issued on 6 November 2015 No of 11 FEDERAL LAW GAZETTE FOR THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA Issued on 6 November Part I

Combining physical and financial solidarity in Asylum Policy: TRAQS with matching

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:09-cv Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al.

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Enhancing efficiency in remittance markets in Latin America and the Caribbean

Arbitration, Competition Law and the EU Damages Directive

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques

Retrofit, Governance and Urban Sustainability: Comparing City Regional Responses in Greater Manchester and Cardiff/SE Wales

Designs. Germany Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb. A Global Guide

Act 17 Trademarks Act 2010

The Antitrust Review of the Americas

EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMUNITY PATENT CONSULTATION COMPTIA S RESPONSES BRUSSELS, 18 APRIL

CDC Cartel Damage Claims Consulting SCRL Avenue Louise 475 B-1050 Brussels (Belgium) Telephone +32 (0)

EPO EXAMINERS APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 123(2)

Legal instruments for the estimation of harm

Fundamentals of National Migration Governance:

Departmental Disclosure Statement

RETS DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY INFORMATION SHEET TECHNICAL MEETING

a) has the stipulation of Article 5(2) of the Directive been adopted literally into your national law?

The 10- Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consump=on & Produc=on. * An Intergovernmental mandate * Introduction

PART 1: EVOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION PART 2: INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND LAW MAKING

COURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT ACT, 7 OF 2017

[only applies to companies located abroad] [Stamp]

Choice of Forum: Considerations from a Practitioner s Perspective

PRACTICAL LAW COMPETITION AND CARTEL LENIENCY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL GUIDE The law and leading lawyers worldwide

President's introduction

Croatian Trade Ban: How Economic Operators Can Protect Their Rights Against Anti-Trade State Conducts? Alert Brief

Retroactive application of the Damages Directive

Damages in Private Antitrust Actions in Europe

Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc.

AUSTRIA Anti-Corruption

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

Transcription:

EU Damages Directive Implementation Half Time www.bpv-huegel.com Austria Implementation status and key issues Franz Stenitzer Brussels, 16 June 2016

1. Status of implementation Working group discussing amendment to Cartel Act and Compe55on Act Discussions go further than what is required by the Damages Direc5ve, but implementa5on of the Direc5ve is the core No public consulta5on yet Preliminary draa amendment prepared by ministries responsible (not publicly available) June 2016 l 2

2. Status of implementation 2013 amendment to the Cartel Act already covered some aspects of the Direc5ve (e.g., binding effect of decisions by compe55on authori5es) First legisla5ve reac5on to experience from damage claims following up to cartel proceedings, in par5cular in the elevators and escalators case More than 20 damages proceedings were ini5ated before Austrian courts in 2010 as a follow-up to the Elevators cartel decision In the mean5me, 10 decisions by the Supreme Court on various aspects, such as limita5on periods, umbrella pricing etc. June 2016 l 3

3. Key issues / challenges Defini&ons Infringement of compe55on law Ø Reference to exis5ng fining provisions in the Cartel Act (would also cover breaches of the suspension obliga5on under merger control and noncompliance with of commitments given by an undertaking) Cartel Ø Under Austrian law, the term cartel is not limited to agreements between compe5tors (and covers, in par5cular, ver5cal agreements) Ø By using the term cartel, e.g., in the context of the presump5on of harm, such a presump5on would apply to ver5cal infringements as well June 2016 l 4

4. Key issues / challenges Disclosure of evidence / access to file Legal professional privilege? Non-disclosure of leniency statements Ø Leniency applica5ons also possible for ver5cal infringements under Austrian law (see defini5on of the term cartel above) Liberalisa5on of rules on access to file before the Cartel Court? Ø To address situa5on aaer the ECJ s Donau Chemie decision and in addi5on to implementa5on of Art. 5 and 6 of the Direc5ve? Ø Duplica5on of means to get access to evidence? Ø Effect on effec5veness of civil courts power to order disclosure of evidence (access to file before the Cartel Court not subject to the same balancing of interests and without any cost risk)? June 2016 l 5

5. Key issues / challenges Limita&on periods Suspension for the dura5on of the proceedings before a compe55on authority / an inves5ga5ve measure by a compe55on authority Ø Proceedings / inves5ga5ve measure sufficiently public (e.g., in case of proceedings before another na5onal compe55on authority)? Ø When does an inves5ga5ve measure end? Binding effect of decision of compe&&on authori&es Binding effect also applies to decisions of other na5onal (EU) compe55on authori5es Ø i.e., decisions of other na5onal authori5es are not only prima facie evidence that an infringement of compe55on law has occurred Other issues Passing-on Ø Divergences with case law of Austrian courts? One (specialised) court? June 2016 l 6

Disclaimer bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG is a partnership (Offene Gesellschaft) registered in Austria with the companies register under number FN 80984 w, District Court (Landesgericht) Wiener Neustadt, having its registered seat in Enzersdorfer Strasse 4, 2340 Mödling, Austria. bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG is a law firm regulated by the Bar Association of Lower Austria (Rechtsanwaltskammer Niederösterreich) and subject to the Austrian Bar Rules (see www.oerak.at). The term "Partner" is used to refer to (i) the personally liable partners, Univ. Prof. Dr. Hanns F. Hügel and Dr. Florian Gibitz, LL.M, or to (ii) a consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. The other independent member firms of the bpv LEGAL alliance are regulated by their relevant regulatory body. bpv Hügel is a trademark of bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG. All other trademarks, service marks or registered trademarks used in this presentation are the property of their respective owners. This presentation includes material designed to promote the professional services of bpv Hügel. Nothing in this presentation it is intended to provide legal or other professional advice. You should not rely on any information contained in this presentation as if it were legal or other professional advice. Further details about bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG and the bpv LEGAL alliance members can be found at www.bpv-huegel.com or www.bpv-legal.com. 2015 bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte OG. All rights reserved. Vienna ARES-Tower, Donau-City-Str. 11 A-1220 Vienna Tel. (+43-1) 2 60 50-0 Fax. (+43-1) 2 60 50-133 Mödling Enzersdorferstraße 4, A-2340 Mödling Tel. (+43-2236) 893 377 Fax. (+43-2236) 893 377-40 Baden Hauptplatz 9-13 A-2500 Baden Tel. (+43-2252) 20 98 99 Fax. (+43-2252) 20 98 99-99 Brussels Rond Point Schuman 9, Postbox 14, B-1040 Brussels Tel. (+32-2) 286 81-10 Fax. (+32-2) 286 81-18 www.bpv-huegel.com June 2016 l 7