Contracts and innovation: What to be aware of when negotiating ABS contracts

Similar documents
Morten Walløe Tvedt, the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 8 th Pan African Meeting Cotunou, March 2014

A Report from the First Reflection Meeting on the Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism

Report from the workshop Stocktaking ABS in the Nordic Countries with a particular view to business

Achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Functionality of an ABS Protocol

ACCESS and USE of Plant Genetic Resources under the Nagoya Protocol A SEED SAVER S DIGEST

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2012/2135(INI)

Note by the Executive Secretary

THE NEED FOR AND MODALITIES OF A GLOBAL MULTILATERAL BENEFIT-SHARING MECHANISM

AU GUIDELINES FOR A COORDINATED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ABS: AN UPDATE

The Nagoya Protocol and its impact on AnGR and gene banking

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/NP/COP-MOP/2/10 * 3 February 2016 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

How Will a Substantive Patent Law Treaty Affect the Public Domain for Genetic Resources and Biological Material?

The Nagoya Protocol: Fragmentation or Consolidation?

LEGAL ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE NATURAL RESOURCES LEGAL WORKING PAPER SERIES

MATTERS CONCERNING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE (IGC)

CBD. UN Convention on Biological Diversity-

CBD - Nagoya Protocol the global perspectives and its relevance in Nepal

OVERVIEW OF THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE SHARING OF BENEFITS ARISING FROM THEIR UTILIZATION

Implementing the Nagoya Protocol: Overview of Progress and Key Developments

Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS)

FINAL REPORT OF THE REGIONAL CONSULTATIONS FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING

Nagoya, ABS and Dispute Resolution N.L.S I.U. Addressing the space of Private International Law. Sai Ramani Garimella Faculty of Legal Studies

Seminar on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction

ANALYTICAL STUDY ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REMEDIES AVAILABLE IN COUNTRIES WITH USERS UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION AND IN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

NHM ABS Training: 1. Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol. Chris Lyal

ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROTOCOL (ARTICLE

A SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY, ENVIRONMENT, WATER, POPULATION AND COMMUNITIES SHOULD AUSTRALIA SIGN THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL?

ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE SHARING OF BENEFITS ARISING FROM THEIR UTILIZATION

Experiences and Lessons Learned from the Development and Implementation of Community Protocols and Procedures

The ABS Capacity Development Initiative

Law. Environment and Development Journal MODEL CLAUSES FOR MUTUALLY AGREED TERMS ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT SHARING

Protecting Traditional Knowledge: A framework based on Customary Laws and Bio-Cultural Heritage

Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol

FEBRUARY 24-28, 2014 PYEONGCHANG, REPUBLIC OF KOREA THE OUTCOMES: AN AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE MAHLET TESHOME AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge:

Update on the patentability of inventions concerning plants and animals under the EPC SUMMARY

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INTELLECTUAL AND REAL PROPERTY: FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT

ANNEX XVII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Results and state of the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

The relevance of traditional knowledge to intellectual property law

Ericsson Position on Questionnaire on the Future Patent System in Europe

Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources For Users in Japan

An Explanatory Guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing

Submission of the Group of Like-Minded Megadiverse Countries in the context of WG-ABS 8

STUDENT NUMBER:

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions with a Special Focus on the Traditional in Iranian Handmade Carpets

Southern Africa Network for Biosciences. Traditional Knowledge and Plant Genetic Resources Guidelines

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/18 17 December 2016 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND ASSOCIATED TK AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE INTERNATIONAL ABS REGIME- SOME VIEWS AND POSSIBLE OPTIONS

Information Note 1. for IGC 34 DISCUSSIONS UNDER AGENDA ITEM 8 TAKING STOCK OF PROGRESS AND MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. CBD/SBI/2/5 18 May 2018 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case

Making Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Frameworks Work at State Level in India

EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF PLANT BREEDERS RIGHTS.

Options for Incorporating TK and Customary Law into MAT

Gurdial Singh Nijar* MARCH 2011

Enforceability of IP Agreements and Enforcement Strategies

WIPO IGC Seminar 26 May Susan H. Bragdon, Representative, Food & Sustainability, Quaker United Nations Office

BIODIVERSITY LAW AND GOVERNANCE: CONTRIBUTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND GOVERNANCE TO MAINSTREAMING BIODIVERSITY

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA

The Evolution of Benefit Sharing: Linking Biodiversity and Community Livelihoods

I. Introduction In recent years, there has been an increasing need for obtaining patent rights in foreign countries where manufacturing hubs and

SESSION VIII The Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources in Latin America Case Studies

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE (IGC)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMUNITY PATENT CONSULTATION COMPTIA S RESPONSES BRUSSELS, 18 APRIL

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES. 22 November 2001 No IX 618 (As last amended by 26 April 2012 No XI-1994) Vilnius

Please provide to following details on the origin of this report on benefit sharing Contracting Party National Focal Point. and Water Management

AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October Licenses in European Patent Litigation

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP FOR DEVELOPING PRINCIPLES FOR SUI GENERIS, NATIONAL POLICIES AND LEGISLATION FOR INTELECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION THAT

FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE

BOLIVIA REGULATIONS ON PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES CHAPTER I GENERAL

Substantive patent law harmonization: focus on grace period

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

PROTECTING TRADITIONAL MEDICINAL KNOWLEDGE AND ASSOCIATED KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS THROUGH ACCESS & BENEFIT SHARING MODEL: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

Major regional and global environmental agreements often feature

FACILITATING PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT In the Context of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge 1

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer?

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

Chapter 2 Beyond the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol: Other Instruments that Affect ABS and Intellectual Property

Becoming a Party to the Nagoya Protocol: The Rationale and Key Steps

Facilitating International Cooperation for the Protection of Traditional Knowledge: The Relevance of Mutual Recognition Agreements

Intellectual Property and Seed: Concerns & Caveats

Towards a consensus [at][on] the IGC: A view from Brazil

... Briefing Note on the CBD ABS Negotiations. Online at

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

SUMMARY. Geneva, Switzerland

Euro-BioImaging Preparatory Phase II Project

BIODIVERSITY FOCAL AREA STUDY

Introduction. NFA-LD Page 1/5

MISUSE OF MARKET POWER

The use of TK-related databases at the EPO: A brief overview. Enrico Luzzatto Director, Pure and Applied Organic Chemistry, Munich

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 No., 2013

Patent Fees and Pricing: Structures and Policies

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

The relevance of traditional knowledge to intellectual property law

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND INSTITUTIONAL ENGAGEMENT WITH NATIVE NATIONS

Transcription:

Contracts and innovation: What to be aware of when negotiating ABS contracts Morten Walløe Tvedt, Valerie Normand and Christian Prip Tematic sessions 8 th Pan African Workshop, Benin, 10.-14. March 2014

FNI s ABS Publications The Australian ABS Framework - A Model Case for Bioprospecting?, By Christian Prip, G. Kristin Rosendal, Steinar Andresen and Morten Walløe Tvedt, FNI Report 1/2014 Medaglia, Jorge Cabrera, Morten Walløe Tvedt, Frederic Perron- Welch, Ane Jørem and Freedom-Kai Phllips. The Interface between the Nagoya Protocol on ABS and the ITPGRFA at the International Level - Potential Issues for Consideration in Supporting Mutually Supportive Implementation at the National Level. Lysaker, Fridtjof Nansens Institutt, 2013. (FNI Report, no. 1/2013) Book: Global Governance of Genetic Resources Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol. Edited by Sebastian Oberthür and G. Kristin RosendalRoutledge, 2014. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS: A Hypothetical Case Study on Enforcing Benefit Sharing in Norway (with Ole Kristian Fauchald 2011)

FNI s ABS Publications The Australian ABS Framework - A Model Case for Bioprospecting?, By Christian Prip, G. Kristin Rosendal, Steinar Andresen and Morten Walløe Tvedt, FNI Report 1/2014 Medaglia, Jorge Cabrera, Morten Walløe Tvedt, Frederic Perron- Welch, Ane Jørem and Freedom-Kai Phllips. The Interface between the Nagoya Protocol on ABS and the ITPGRFA at the International Level - Potential Issues for Consideration in Supporting Mutually Supportive Implementation at the National Level. Lysaker, Fridtjof Nansens Institutt, 2013. (FNI Report, no. 1/2013) Book: Global Governance of Genetic Resources Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol. Edited by Sebastian Oberthür and G. Kristin RosendalRoutledge, 2014. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS: A Hypothetical Case Study on Enforcing Benefit Sharing in Norway (with Ole Kristian Fauchald 2011)

Initiative tools to be developed Check list Contract study book Sector briefs Templates Negotiating tool Contract training: How and who? A group of persons that will be negotiating

The situation in GR Policy and Law International law The principle of sovereignty Sovereign rights over GR (permanent sovereignty to nat. resources) Regional level Benin Movement of biological material and TK Norway Law of the provider country Law of user country

Benin Requirements to the contract What is required in the contract? The situation in GR Policy and Law International law The principle of sovereignty Sovereign rights over GR (permanent sovereignty to nat. resources) Hinder for cross-border Regional level enforcement of: law, policy, judgments Movement and of biological material and adm. TK decisions How will a contract come around or be negotiated? Norway How will this contract be treated under the jurisdiction or legal situation?

Contract law International law International private law - different systems for making contracts work across borders Benin Private law Agreement MAT (PIC) Norway Enter into a contract how to regulate the object transferred and allowed acts regards that object Enforcement of contracts how to ensure that the user follows the rights of Laos

Challenges for ABS Contracts I: Challenge of creating incentives for the user to share and thus contribute to conservation The time-gap challenge: access, utilisation and benefit sharing The cross-boarder challenge: sovereignty, jurisdiction, Parties and private parties The access-challenge/failure of ABS No background law on GR and TK contracts

Challenges for ABS Contracts II: Procedural contractual issues (how to negotiate) Substantive issues (what is the content in the text) What is the idea of an ABS Contract? Regulate the research and development It is a utmost dynamic object in the contract The raw material is unknown and the product is to be developed High degree of uncertainty how to make good rules? How to construct mutual trust and collaboration?

Contract law International law International private law - different systems for making contracts work across borders Benin Private law Agreement MAT (PIC) Norway Enter into a contract how to regulate the object transferred and allowed acts regards that object Enforcement of contracts how to ensure that the user follows the rules of Benin also those set in a contract

Making a contract: Three Criteria of Successful ABS Negotiations: It should produce a wise/forthsighted agreement if agreement is possible; It should be efficient; And it should create trust, improve collaboration or at least not damage the relationship between the parties. Sources: Kabir Bavikatte

Important elements for negotiation: Separate PEOPLE from the problem; Face-to-face meetings; take your time in responding to an email; Focus on INTERESTS, not positions; What do you want to achieve by this contractual relationship Invent OPTIONS for mutual gain; Clarify what is in it for both Insist on using objective CRITERIA. How to make your contract clear and reflect the mutual interest Sources: Kabir Bavikatte

Key element of the content of contracts: Parties Object Purpose Benefit sharing linked to specific utilisation or products (including IPR) Subsequent third party use Changes of intent Confidentiality Dispute settlement

What is your contract about? What are you transferring to the company? The object of the contract/ subject matter + The actions that the user are allowed to do (positively and negatively defined) Purpose

A case study the teff contract: Teff varieties send from Ethiopia to the Netherlands The purpose/ rational was twofold: Making a new plant variety for being grown in Europe Develop the market in Europe for Ethiopian grown teff Common ground of understanding Make a long term relationship or get some quick benefits?

X The object in the teff case:

X The object in the teff case:

X Relationship to IPRs:

X Relationship to IPRs:

Patent law Autonomous international legal system - No linkes to ABS Benin Private law Agreement MAT (PIC) Europe (Norway ) Enter into a contract how to regulate the object transferred and allowed acts regards that object EPO system and their own court system

Selection of claims in the teff patent Claims 1. A flour of a grain belonging to the genus Eragrostis, preferably Eragrostis tef, characterized in that the falling number of the grain at the moment of grinding is at least 250, preferably at least 300, more preferably at least 340,most preferably at least 380. 2. A flour according to claim 1, characterized in that the grain has after-ripened. 3. A flour according to claim 2, characterized in that the falling number of the grain at the moment of grinding is at least 1.01 times higher than at the moment of harvesting the grain, preferably at least 1.05, more preferably at least 1.20 and still more preferably at least 1.30 times higher.

Selection of claims in the teff patent Claims 4. A flour according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the grain is gluten-free. 5. A flour according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the grains has been ground at least 4, preferably least 6, more preferably at least 8 weeks after harvesting. 6. A flour according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the falling number of the grain at the moment of grinding is substantially stable for at least 2-3 weeks. 16. A dough or batter comprising flour according to any one of claims 1-15. 17. A gluten-free dough or batter comprising flour according to any one of claims 1-14. 18. A food product comprising flour according to any one of claims 1-15.

Exercise: How would you define the object to for the teff contract to target the mutual interest?

Choosing wording for a contract Contract Genetic resources Derivatives Non-traditional Teff based food and beverage Any component of the genetic resources Patent A flour of a grain belonging to the genus After-ripened grain A flour gluten-free A gluten-free dough or batter A method for baking a product (19) A food product or luxury food product prepared A plant variety

A fundamental relationship: What you are giving access to? Process utilisation Product outcome: Which products? How is the contract defining the link between GR/ TK and product?

Personality on the user side: Company negotiating with the authorised persons? Company in which branch does this company operate? A daughter company will the mother become bound? What about the sister companies? Research institutions and middlemen

Personality on the provider side: An ABS framework? Owners of the resources Competent authority, to grant PIC With whom shall the contract be negotiated? Authority Others

Large changes of structure: Transfer for thirdparties? Merger? Acquisition? Bankrupcy? How will the contract work in a bankcrupcy situation?

Changes: New use Not foreseen in the contract Foreseen but depends on a new negotation Contract from one sector to a finding in another Academic a commercial

The situation in GR Policy and Law International law The principle of sovereignty Sovereign rights over GR (permanent sovereignty to nat. resources) Regional level Benin Movement of biological material and TK Norway Law of the provider country Law of user country

Confidenciality: About the contract Terms in the contract Exclusivity For how long time shall the one user have exclusive right At species level At accession level

Enforcement and compliance: Dispute settlement Choice of law a two edge sword Alternative dispute settlement mechanisms Conciliation, arbitration Getting assests of the company under your legislation The Company shall pay such sum of US dollar XXX (US dollar XXX) to the AA as a guarantee deposit returnable on the completion of the scoping phase by the Company in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The interest generated from the deposit will be injected into ABS Fund for strengthening the sustainable conservation initiatives of biological resources.

Thank you for your attention Morten Walløe Tvedt, mwt@fni.no, www.fni.no