DO WE KNOW EACH OTHER? Public opinion surveys about the historical memory in V4

Similar documents
THE EASTERN EUROPE AND THE USSR

No 16 INSTYTUT SPRAW PUBLICZNYCH. Analyses & Opinions. Analizy i Opinie. Yes to Visegrad. Mateusz Fałkowski Patrycja Bukalska Grzegorz Gromadzki

Interaction of Hungarian and Other Ethno-Linguistic Groups. Languages & National Identity October 28, 2005 Dr. Robert M. Jenkins

Havel the Intellectual Friend or Enemy of Slovakia?

Youth, Democracy, and Politics: Poland

Edition WORKING PAPERS

SOME ASPECTS OF POLITICAL REGIONALIZATION OF VISEGRAD COUNTRIES

V4 between Germany and Russia

PRESS RELEASE Prague, June 30th, 2004

Youth, Democracy, and Politics: Hungary

ATTITUDES TOWARDS EU MEMBERSHIP IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC, HUNGARY, POLAND AND SLOVAKIA: SUFFICIENT SUPPORT; QUESTIONABLE PARTICIPATION

THE PLAY TRANSITION IN CENTRAL EUROPE

Bi-Lateral Cooperation between Hungary and Poland Case Study

NEWS. Summary. Friday, January 31, Budapest: Controversy for the monument on the Nazi occupation of Hungary in 1944

Strategic Communication Programme GENERATION TRENDS. Central Europe: Mosaic of Perspectives.

THE DILEMMAS OF DISSIDENCE IN EAST-CENTRAL EUROPE

CENS 2017 PAPER SERIES. The Role and Status of the Visegrad Countries after Brexit: the Czech Republic

VII. Unit Seven: Cold War Conflicts and Social Transformations, 1945 to present

THE CZECH EXPERIENCE

A. The image of the European Union B. The image of the European Parliament... 10

Saturday, 15 January Friday, 14 January Thursday, 13 January Wednesday, 12 January Tuesday, 11 January

Wade Danis. Institute of International Business J. Mack Robinson College of Business Georgia State University. May 2009

Lessons from the Cold War,

Challenges to Soviet Control and the End of the Cold War I. Early Cold War A. Eastern European Soviet Control 1. In the early years of the Cold War,

Vienna Technical University January 26, 2010

The Cleavages of Transformation The Key Controversial Questions The Parties Formed within the Cleavage

Policy Paper No.12. What do Hungarian Foreign Policy Stakeholders Think? Zsuzsanna Végh. Author

Lieutenant Colonel József Németh THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVAKIA AND THE SITUATION OF HUNGARIAN MINORITIES THESIS BOOKLET

20-YEARS OF VISEGRAD FOUR COOPERATION:

The Rights of the Child. Analytical report

Sharing the Experiences of Visegrad Cooperation in the Western Balkans and the Eastern Neighbourhood Countries. Project Preparatory Study

How Young Central Europeans View the World

BRENDAN PAUL MAYNARD THESIS

Masterpieces of History

U.S. AID TO CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The European Emergency Number 112. Analytical report

The differences between Czechs and Slovaks!

Soviet Military Intervention. in Hungary 1956

Citizenship empowerment: potential for civic participation in the Visegrad countries, 2017 & 2018

Visegrad Youth. Comparative review of the situation of young people in the V4 countries

Antall József Summer School 3 and 14 July 2017

Security Concepts of the Visegrad Countries

Hungary at the end of the War.

The Visegrád Four: a new European centre of power?

CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTION TO THE EASTERN POLICY OF THE EU

Sunday, 1 May Thursady, 28 April Wednesday, 27 April Tuesday, 26 April Monday, 25 April

What do Hungarian Foreign Policy Stakeholders Think?

October 20, Jatka 78 (Jateční 1530/33, Prague 7 Holešovice) National Security

Vision of Europe through the eyes of young people from the states of the Visegrad Group

Neither beautiful nor ugly, but functional: a pragmatic view on the Visegrad Group

Elżbieta Kużelewska. This article is based on research carried out under project no. 2014/15/B/HS5/01866 of the National Science Centre, Poland.

Relations between Ukraine and Slovakia: Recent History and Future Opportunities

Understanding the Innovative Potential of Central Europe: The Region s Economic, Political, and Cultural Environment

A Tale of Four Elections: Central Europe September 1997-September 1998

World in Transition and Central European Transformation: Lessons Learnt 1-20 July 2013, Masaryk University (the Czech Republic) 8 ECTS

Theses of (PhD) dissertation. Sándor Seremet. The formation of today s Transcarpathia s borders after World War I. ( )

Cold War and a New Western World, (8 th Volume-Newer)

1. How would you describe the new mood in Moscow in 1989? 2. What opposition did Gorbachev face in instituting his reforms?

Vaclav Havel. To the Castle and Back. Translated by Paul Wilson. New York and Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf, pp. 383.

Special Eurobarometer 461. Report. Designing Europe s future:

In Memoriam: Professor Bronislaw Geremek

History 12 (V) Progress and Uncertainty: End of the Cold War Key

REPORT LUSTRATION: THE EXPERIENCE OF HUNGARY. by Prof. Dr. Andras Zs. VARGA (Judge at the Constitutional Court of Hungary, Member, Hungary)

Ethnicity and Nationalism in Contemporary Czechoslovakia

Think Visegrad - V4 Think Tank Platform. Project Report Document January 2015 December 2015

The Open Society Institute and Central European University: Three Campuses, Three Outcomes

MYPLACE THEMATIC REPORT: CITIZENSHIP

Think Visegrad - V4 Think Tank Platform. Project Report Document January 2018 December 2018

be restricted only to an introduction and description of a particular coup and its induced effects, but would endeavor to examine its essence alone.

14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Electoral rights of EU citizens. Analytical Report

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

Migration Survey Results. Response period: September 2015

Section 3. The Collapse of the Soviet Union

About János Esterházy in the context of a Central European dialogue Conference and round table discussion in Esterházy s homeland

2018 Slovakia Anniversary Year Celebrations Continue; Pittsburgh Agreement Celebrated

Think Visegrad - V4 Think Tank Platform

THE HARD ROAD TO FREEDOM

WEEK 8. The last days of the Cold War

The Role of Political Elites in Devolution (or Split Up) of the States in Comparative Perspective

History in the Hands of the Politicians: Lustration, Civil Society, and Unfinished Revolutions in Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic

142 nd EAAE Seminar, May 29-30, Budapest Growing success? Agriculture and rural development in an enlarged EU. Call for papers

GROUP 6: The President s Daily Bulletin Communist Threat in Hungary

«Public perception of the refugee crisis: the rise of Euroskepticism and radicalism»

Undergraduate Program in Central European Studies

Yes: 85.33% States was necessary for this.

THE SLOVAK STATE DURING WWII AND THE HOLOCAUST IN THE SLOVAK COLLECTIVE MEMORY

Flash Eurobarometer 431. Summary. Electoral Rights

NEWS. Budapest: Controversy for the agreement with Russia on nuclear energy

Study Center in Prague, Czech Republic

Atomic Bomb The Atomic bomb was developed by the Americans under the title Manhattan Project.

FEATURES OF INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN INTERWAR CZECHOSLOVAK- HUNGARIAN RELATIONS AND THE CURRENT STATE OF SLOVAK-HUNGARIAN DIALOGUE

POLITICKÉ VEDY / POLITICAL SCIENCES

TURKEY & THE V4: PATHS FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE COOPERATION

EUROBAROMETER 62 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Late modern religiosity in Slovakia: Trends and patterns

INTRODUCING THE EUROBAROMETER

Policy Brief. Visegrad countries in the eurozone: Process of convergence or divergence towards the euro? No. 3. Antonia Molnarova.

CEE National Identity Project: National Identity in Central Eastern Europe

November 01, 1956 Bulgarian Military Intelligence Information on the Situation in Hungary and Poland

Transcription:

DO WE KNOW EACH OTHER? Public opinion surveys about the historical memory in V4 Oľga Gyárfášová Institute for Public Affairs, Bratislava, www.ivo.sk Prepared for the international academic conference My Hero, Your Enemy: Listening to Understand Prague, 1 3 December 2011

Methodological Overview Public opinion surveys conducted in: 1. Czech Republic (N=999) 2. Hungary (N=1200) 3. Poland (N=979) 4. Slovakia (N=1007) Samples are representative for the adult population (18+) in each country. Fieldworks carried out in October 2011 by CVVM (Czech Republic), Medián Opinion & Market Research (Hungary), TNS OBOP (Poland), and FOCUS (Slovakia). Cooperating institutions: Sociological Institute, Prague Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw Central European University, Budapest The research project is financially supported by International Visegrad Fund.

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

In general, looking back on the national history, would you say that you feel to be: Poland 25 51 20 2 Hungary 14 43 37 5 Czech Republic 10 48 37 2 Slovakia 7 36 44 7 very proud rather proud neither/nor rather+very ashamed DK Source: IVF, 2011

How would you describe the course of human history overall? It is mainly: Poland 54 23 11 12 Hungary 23 36 34 7 Czech Republic 53 24 13 10 Slovakia 39 27 25 9 progress neither/nor decline other response+dk Source: IVF, 2011

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

Personalities from the national history the Czechs are proud of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 60 47 44 40 26 20 19 16 0 1 5 Karol IV. T.G. Masaryk V. Havel J.A. Komenský J. Hus does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Hungarians are proud of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 60 40 31 28 20 20 18 13 9 11 0 L. Kossuth I. Széchenyi Matyás király Szent István S. Petofi does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Poles are proud of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 60 48 40 26 20 14 9 7 6 19 0 John Paul II. J. Pilsudski L. Walesa T. Kosciuszko M.C. Sklodowska does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Slovaks are proud of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 60 40 32 32 24 20 17 6 5 9 0 M.R. Štefánik A. Dubček Ľ. Štúr J. Jánošík T.G. Masaryk does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Czechs are ashamed of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 40 30 30 26 20 19 10 7 7 6 8 0 K. Gottwald G. Husák V. Klaus E. Hácha M. Jakeš does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Hungarians are ashamed of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 40 34 30 26 20 18 12 10 8 6 6 0 M. Rákosi F. Szalasi M. Horthy F. Gyurcsány J. Kádar does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Poles are ashamed of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 40 38 30 29 20 10 8 7 5 4 3 0 J. Kaczynski W. Jaruzelski B. Bierut W. Gomulka L. Walesa does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Personalities from the national history the Slovaks are ashamed of (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) 40 38 30 20 10 19 16 14 6 5 11 0 V. Mečiar J. Tiso J. Slota G. Husák M. Dzurinda does not exist DK Source: IVF, 2011.

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

Which important personalities come to your mind when you think of the Czech history? (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) Václav Havel was named by: 40% of Slovaks 21% of Poles 5% of Hungarians Any personality from the Czech history cannot be named by: 35% of Slovaks 72% of Poles 89% of Hungarians

Which important personalities come to your mind when you think of the Polish history? (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) John Paul II. was named by: 33% of Slovaks 32% of Czechs 10% of Hungarians Any personality from the Polish history cannot be named by: 42% of the Czechs 58% of the Slovaks 80% of the Hungarians

Which important personalities come to your mind when you think of the Hungarian history? (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) János Kádar was named by: 14% of Czechs 5% of Slovaks 2% of Poles Any personality from the Hungarian history cannot be named by: 71% of Czechs 74% of Slovaks 90% of Poles

Which important personalities come to your mind when you think of the Slovak history? (open-ended question, max 3 responses, % of cases) Slovak history is the least known for the Hungarians and the Poles. Czech respondents named: M.R. Štefánik 23% V. Mečiar 23 % J. Jánošík 22 % A. Dubček 20 % J. Tiso 18 % G. Husák 13%

Content 1. General perception of the history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

Evaluation of the historical personalities: Czech perspective positive neutral negative DK T.G. Masaryk 89 7 2 2 V. Havel 71 18 10 1 E. Beneš 56 26 11 7 K. Gottwald 11 17 66 6 G. Husák 9 22 62 7 Source: IVF 2011

Evaluation of the historical personalities: Slovak perspective positive neutral negative DK M.R. Štefánik 77 13 2 8 A. Dubček 74 16 2 7 G. Husák 14 36 38 12 J. Tiso 14 28 41 17 V. Mečiar 10 22 64 4 Source: IVF 2011

Evaluation of the historical personalities: Czech and Slovak perspectives Czech respondents perceive the Czechoslovak presidents more positively than Slovaks. At the same time they see more negatively the representatives of totalitarian regimes. 100 80 60 40 20 0 80 60 40 20 0 TGM Beneš Havel ČR SK Tiso Gottwald Husák ČR SK

Evaluation of the historical personalities: Hungarian perspective positive neutral negative DK Árpád Göncz 69 21 7 3 Imré Nagy 56 31 8 5 János Kádar 39 32 26 2 József Antall 34 39 24 3 Miklós Horthy 24 35 36 5 Source: IVF 2011

Evaluation of the historical personalities: Polish perspective positive neutral negative DK Jozef Pilsudski 78 13 5 4 Jacek Kuroń 71 15 5 9 Wladyslaw Sikorski 67 16 4 13 Lech Walesa 64 18 13 4 Wojciech Jaruzelski 25 24 43 8 Wladyslaw Gomulka 16 23 45 16 Source: IVF 2011

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

In the recent years important events occurred in Central European countries. Could you evaluate: Fall of communist regimes in late 1980s good that it happened neither/nor bad that it happened DK Poland 75 15 6 4 Czech Republic 71 17 8 4 Slovakia 56 24 15 5 Hungary 54 24 15 7 Source: IVF 2011

In the recent years important events occurred in Central European countries. Could you evaluate: V4 countries joining EU good that it happened neither/nor bad that it happened DK Poland 60 15 3 22 Slovakia 53 27 12 8 Hungary 47 30 12 11 Czech Republic 43 26 16 15 Source: IVF 2011

In the recent years important events occurred in Central European countries. Could you evaluate: V4 countries joining NATO good that it happened neither/nor bad that it happened DK Poland 62 14 2 22 Czech Rebublic 45 26 14 15 Slovakia 42 31 17 10 Hungary 41 30 15 14 Source: IVF 2011

In the recent years important events occurred in Central European countries. Could you evaluate: Establishing of Visegrad cooperation good that it happened neither/nor bad that it happened DK Poland 61 12 1 26 Slovakia 56 24 5 15 Hungary 54 26 5 15 Czech Republic 52 22 4 22 Source: IVF 2011

In the recent years important events occurred. Could you evaluate: Reunification of Germany in 1990 good that it happened neither/nor bad that it happened DK Poland 78 10 2 10 Hungary 71 17 3 9 Czech Republic 68 17 6 9 Slovakia 62 22 5 10 Source: IVF 2011

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

Fall of communist regimes in late 1980s: it is good that it happened (affirmative responses in 3 generations) 18-34 35-54 55+ 90 80 70 60 50 40 78 77 78 75 73 61 66 58 57 56 40 50 30 20 10 0 Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Source: IVF, 2011.

Joining the EU: it is good that it happened (affirmative responses in 3 generations) 18-34 35-54 55+ 70 65 60 60 58 58 56 50 46 46 50 48 43 44 40 36 30 20 10 0 Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Source: IVF, 2011.

Evaluation of the real socialism personalities by 18-24 years old positive neutral negative DK G. Husák/Czechs 4 18 57 21 G. Husák/Slovaks 12 29 31 27 J. Kádar 27 34 30 9 W. Gomulka 11 30 33 26 Source: IVF 2011

Content 1. General perception of history 2. Heroes and anti-heroes in national histories 3. What do we know about the history of our neighbors? 4. Evaluation of the historical personalities 5. Evaluation of the historical events 6. Generation gap? 7. Conclusions

Conclusions Proud on national history highly prevails everywhere but above all in Poland, on the other hand mostly Hungarians see the general course of history as a decline (perception of history is affected by the presence); In the perception of national history positive personalities are more visible heroization of history? Mostly, we cannot see a lot of controversy about the historical personalities, is it ambivalence over the past? Large white places in the history of the others, does it mean: my heroes are unknown to you ; Overwhelming majority of Visegrad citizens evaluate the events since 1989 positively; Poles more than the others ( return of history for newly emerged regional power?) Large part of youngest generation does not know the personalities connected with the real socialism, Hungary is an exception.

THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION.