NON-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY UNDER SPANISH LAW (a comparative perspective with French and German Law)

Similar documents
PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN TORT LAW

TORTS SPECIFIC TORTS NEGLIGENCE

Law of Tort (Paper 22, Unit 22) Syllabus - for the June and October 2009 Examinations

Chapter II, Book III, Code Civil Of Intentional and Unintentional Wrongs

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. General Principles of Liability

Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92

Regulation of Liability for Damage in the New Czech Civil Code

THE LAW OF NUISANCE IN CANADA

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

Business Law Tort Law Unit Textbook

General Terms and Conditions of Gechter GmbH Werkzeug- und Maschinenbau Issue date: June, 2010

Legal Liability in Adventure Tourism

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Helen accepts instructions for claimants and defendants in commercial, chancery, public law, clinical negligence, and personal injury matters.

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Malta

CED: An Overview of the Law

The section Causation: Actual Cause and Proximate Cause from Business Law and the Legal Environment was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a

Licence shall mean the terms and conditions for use of the Software as set out in this Agreement.

Principles of Common Law 4 January 2017

Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another under the DCFR

Liability for Injuries Caused by Dogs. Jonathan Owen

A. COURSE DESCRIPTION

AVK UK LIMITED CONDITIONS OF SALE OF GOODS FROM WEBSITE

Quantification of damages in international arbitration selection of issues from a civil law perspective. Domitille Baizeau, LALIVE

Customer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory.

Euro tort : an unnecessary step in the march towards unification?

TORT LAW. Third Edition. Lewis N. Klar, Q.C. B.A., B.C.L., LL.M. Professor of Law University of Alberta THOMSON - ^ CARSWELL

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PAESSLER AG

1.1 Definitions. In these Conditions, the following definitions apply:

Business Day: a day (other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) when banks in London are open for business.

THE LAW PROFESSOR TORT LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #3 MODEL ANSWER

LAWS1100 Final Exam Notes

CONTENTS. PART ONE Introduction 1. Preface Abbreviations Table of cases Table of legislation. vii xxi xxix liii

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Contract and Tort Law for Engineers

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Government of the District of Columbia OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION COUNSEL JUDICIARY SQUARE 441FOURTH ST., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C.

Question 1. Under what theory or theories might Paul recover, and what is his likelihood of success, against: a. Charlie? b. KiddieRides-R-Us?

Summary of Contents. PART I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. An Introduction to the Restatement of Torts... 2

Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2013 series 9084 LAW. 9084/43 Paper 4, maximum raw mark 75

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2013 series 9084 LAW. 9084/42 Paper 4, maximum raw mark 75

Torts I review session November 20, 2017 SLIDES. Negligence

Wawanesa Mutual Ins. Co. v. Matlock,

Judicial Protection through the Use of Article 288(2)EC

Contents. Foreword by Professor Andrew Robertson Preface xvii Table of cases xix Table of statutes lvi

THE LAW OF CONTRACT REMEDIES FOR BREACH. Towards Codification of Israeli Civil Law

CONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I

Answer A to Question 4

State responsibility and State liability in international law. Sigmar Stadlmeier

36 month Software User Licence Agreement

Chapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE

Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

Answer A to Question 1

Suppliers Conditions of Sale, Usage and Warranties. Being the Supplier s Terms and Conditions of Supply

ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5

Comparative Law II. The Common / Civil Law Divide. Unit 5: Damages

INDEX. . accountants and actuaries, negligence, . but-for test, factual causation.. but for test, material contribution test, 22-23

COMPOSITE WOOD EXTENDED WARRANTY. This Warranty applies to all and any Goods (as defined below) manufactured by the Supplier.

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2012 series 9084 LAW. 9084/41 Paper 4, maximum raw mark 75

KEY ASPECTS OF THE LAW OF CONTRACT

Professor DeWolf Fall 2008 Torts I December 9, 2008 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MIDTERM EXAM QUESTION 1

Stratus Technologies ftserver Products LIMITED RETURN-TO-FACTORY HARDWARE WARRANTY. Warranty Period (From date of Stratus Shipment)

Civil Liability Act 2002

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES. React Computer Partnership Ltd

This specification is for 2011 examinations

General Terms and Conditions of Lm-therm Elektrotechnik AG, Sulzbachstraße 15, Aldersbach

General Terms and Conditions for the Provision of Services and Work of FAG Aerospace GmbH & Co. KG

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES

SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR

Textbook on. David Howarth Clare College, Cambridge

Damages in Lieu of Performance because of Breach of Contract

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017

How to use this book Acknowledgements

Fall 1994 December 12, 1994 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

TERMS OF USE FOR PUBLIC LAW CORPORATION PERSONAL CERTIFICATES FOR AUTHENTICATION

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2010 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9084 LAW. 9084/43 Paper 43, maximum raw mark 75

California Bar Examination

General Terms and Conditions Day Ahead. of innogy Gas Storage NWE GmbH, Flamingoweg 1, Dortmund (hereinafter, "igsnwe")

General Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery of ECKART GmbH

Responsible Victims and (Partly) Justified Offenders

General Terms and Conditions (GTCs) Valid as of: 1 October 2016

CALADEN LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUPPLY OF GOODS

General Delivery Provisions for KUNZE Food Solutions GmbH

DUTY OF CARE. The plaintiff must firstly establish that the defendant owed hum a duty of care: this arises where:

Comparative Private Law. Dr. Anna Plisecka Tort law Systems in Europe

MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Section 3: The Law of Torts. Nature of Tort

1. The objective interpretation of the concept of contract of carriage

Lecture # 1 Introduction to Law of Tort

Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 (Athens, 13 December 1974) THE STATES PARTIES TO THIS

ACCOUNT OPENING / CREDIT APPLICATION FORM

IDL Solutions Licence Agreement

Profiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working directors

IES Commercial EULA. This licence should be used for any new commercial users of the VE Pro (including Gaia software) i.e. after 11 April 2011.

California Bar Examination

Week 2 - Damages in Contract. The plaintiff simply needs to show that there was a breach of contract

Transcription:

NON-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY UNDER SPANISH LAW (a comparative perspective with French and German Law) UCL, March 15, 2013 Yolanda Bergel Sainz de Baranda Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 1

Non-contractual liability Spanish General Clause: A person who by an act or omission causes damage to another, concurring fault or negligence, is bound to repair the damage caused (art. 1.902 CC) Examples of non-contractual liability Different systems of civil liability Harmonization: European Principles of Tort Law / Draft Common Frame of Reference 2

Different systems of non-contractual liability Spain: - General clause (1902 C.C) - Fault liability is the rule France: - General clause (1382 C.C) - Courts elaboration of a strict liability system for things and persons under control (1384 C.C) Germany: - No generalization of fault liability - Liability for a specific damage ( 823.1 BGB other rights ), breach of Law ( 823.2 BGB) or intentional damage contrary to public policy ( 826 BGB) England: - Tort Law. Intention or fault (strict is exceptional) - Particular torts with specific requirements for particular civil wrongs 3

Requirements for non-contractual liability under Spanish Law 1. Unlawful act or omission 2. Intention, Fault or negligence / Strict liability 3. Damage 4. Causation 4

0. Capacity Spain: Doctrine: Minors and mental incapables if capable to understand the consequences of their acts. In practice 1903 CC. Criminal liability of minors Law: not criminally liable under 14; between14-18 joint and several liability with parents. France: Children and mental incapables are liable even if they cannot understand. In practice 1384 CC Germany: 828 BGB Children under 7 not liable. between 7-18 liable if sufficient understanding (7-10 not liable in road traffic accidents). Mental disturbance not liable ( 827 BGB) England: Children are liable (practical limits; not if the conduct is adequate to the standard of his age). Mental incapables liable if they can understand 5

1. Unlawful act or omission Unlawful act or omission: Breach of a general rule of conduct: alterum non laedere (France and Spain); Germany: need of breach of a protected interest or a safety duty (in case of omission or indirect damage); England: civil wrong that allows civil proceedings + Positive action (all jurisdictions) + Negative conduct (Germany if there is a safety duty; Spain general liability for omissions (in practice if there is a duty to act); France general liability for omissions; England if there is a duty of care [unlikely]) 6

2. Fault or negligence Also intention normally criminal liability Intention in all jurisdictions (French and Spanish Law scarcely contemplate it; Germany 826 BGB; England many intentional Torts) Fault or negligence: any careless or imprudent act or omission that produces a damage which could have been foreseen by a prudent person. Similar in France prudent man) and Germany (necessary care in human affairs). England: Tort of negligence (duty of care, breach of duty of care, causation). Germany: safety duties for omissions and indirect injuries. Standard of conduct: circumstances of the person, time and place (similar in France. In Germany objective standard: group of persons in such activity) 7

2. Fault or negligence General rule in Spain: there is no liability without fault (Germany: need of breach of a protected right, France: reduced applicability) Interpretation of fault by Spanish Supreme Court (currently changing): - Increase of the standard of diligence - Reversal of the burden of proof (Germany: claimant needs to proof negligence unless breach of statutory rule or safety duty) Special cases of liability without fault (proof of fault does not exonerate): strict liability social consideration of damage 8

2. Strict liability Spain: specific cases in Civil Code (animals; excessive smoke; fall of trees; things thrown from a house) and specific Laws (product liability; nuclear installations, road traffic; airplanes; hunting; environmental (limited activities); public administration) France: general system based on 1384 C.C for things and persons. Specific provisions in C.C (animals, buildings, defective products) and Laws (road traffic, airplanes, nuclear installations) Germany: specific cases (non-domestic animals) and Laws (railways, electrical & gas installations, aeroplanes, road traffic, water pollution, nuclear installations (not possession of radioactive materials), environment, medicines, genetically modified organisms) England: reduced strict liability (general: Rylands vs Fletcher; specific: Animals Act and defective products) 9

3. Damage Obligation to compensate when the negligent conduct of the agent produces a damage Damage: harm to a person or loss or diminution of what a person owns caused by the fault of another person 10

3. Damage Spain: Purpose of compensation: complete reparation (no punitive damages) Requirements of damage: a) exist; b) certain; c) valuable Elements of damage: a) value of the loss; b) loss of profit Remedies: in kind if possible; monetary compensation (lump sum) France: Purpose of compensation: complete reparation Remedies: in kind if possible; monetary compensation Germany: Purpose of compensation: complete reparation Elements of damage: a) value of the loss; b) loss of profit Remedies: restitution in kind; periodic payments, in practice lump sum Punitive damages not discarded. 11

Types of damage Spain: personal injuries (influence of road traffic accident tables), damage to property and moral rights or non-pecuniary loss (in general) are compensated Secondary victims can be compensated (affliction after the accident) Pure economic loss: problems of causation and determination of damage France: personal injuries, damage to property and non-pecuniary loss (in general) are compensated Secondary victims can be compensated (affliction after the accident) Pure economic loss: possible (Colmar case 1955) Germany: personal injuries and damage to property are compensated. Non-pecuniary loss ( 253.2 BGB, if psychiatric disease) Secondary victims can be compensated (need of disease and close relation) Pure economic loss: not protected as such in 823.1 BGB (maybe if intentionally or deriving from prejudice of 823.1 rights/right to business) 12

Types of damage (death) Spain: a) Claimant s own rights: the heirs do not inherit the right to ask for compensation (not even if death not simultaneous to accident) b) Rights of others: general recognition, even of moral rights to anybody with links of affection France: a) Claimant s own rights: heirs succeed to the right in all cases (even if death simultaneous to accident), also for moral damage b) Rights of others: general recognition, even of moral rights to anybody with links of affection Germany: a) Claimant s own rights: heirs succeed to the right (unless death simultaneous to accident), also for moral damage b) Rights of others: only funeral and patrimonial rights (when loss of financial support from the dead person). No moral damages 13

4. Causation: relation between the conduct of the agent and the damage Spain: double analysis: factual causation (conditio sine qua non or equivalence) + legal causation (adequate causation, general life risk, purpose of the rule) France: Certain and direct casual connection. Courts ready to see causation Germany: conduct = infringement of a right damage Theories: factual causation (conditio sine qua non) + legal causation (adequate causation, purpose of the rule...) England: factual causation (balance theory) + legal causation (foreseeability or remoteness) 14

Grounds of justification Interferences in the causation/defenses for strict liability: a) Act of God or force majeure (Spain/France/Germany) unforeseeable and unavoidable. Not only events of nature (dif. England) b) Intervention of a third party (Spain/France/Germany) c) Contributory negligence (Spain/France/Germany ( 254BGB)/England Act 1955 d) Fault of the victim (Spain/France/Germany) Lack of unlawfulness or fault/defenses based on justifications: a) Self defense (Spain/France/Germany ( 227 BGB only certain legal interests justify)/england b) Necessity (France/Germany) proportional to avoid a more serious harm. Not in Spain (person benefiting) c) Victim s consent or assumption of risk (volenty non fit injuria) (Spain/France/Germany) d) Use of lawful right (Spain/France/Germany) 15

Liability for others Spain: Liability for own acts (art. 1.902 CC) Liability for others (art. 1.903 CC): the obligation in art. 1.902 CC is enforceable not only for personal acts or omissions, but also for those of persons for whom someone is responsible. The agent of the damage is different from the person liable for it. 1903 C.C Numerus clausus? France: General principle of strict liability for others Germany: No general principle of fault liability for others (it can arise under general non-contractual liability principles) England: No general principle of liability for others 16

Cases of liability for others (parents/tutors) Spain: Parents or tutors for children, minors or incapable persons under their guard: fault in vigilando (in practice vicarious liability) France: Parents: strict joint and several liability (1384.4 C.C) even if no fault of the child (just need of causation). Tutors: general rule of strict liability for others. Germany: Parents and tutors: fault (no liability if sufficient supervision) 832 BGB England: Parents and guardians are not liable (but for their own negligence). 17

Cases of liability for others (teachers/schools) Spain: Owners or managers of schools for damages caused by students during school time: fault in vigilando. Teachers personally liable (1902 C.C). Public schools: strict. France: Teachers: fault. If liability of teacher vicarious liability of school. Public schools teacher not personally liable school liability (if fault of teacher) Germany: Teachers: fault (no liability if sufficient supervision) 823 BGB. At public schools fault ( 839 BGB). England: Teachers are not liable (unless for their own negligence). 18

Cases of liability for others (employers) Spain: Employers for damages caused by employees in the performance of their duties: fault (in practice vicarious) France: Employers: strict (1384.5 C.C). Employee not liable for own acts Germany: Employers: Fault ( 831 BGB); in practice vicarious England: Employers strict liability for torts of employees during the course of the employment. 19