THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

Similar documents
CRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma

NO In The Supreme Court of the United States. KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, FRANK BUONO, Respondent.

Summary of Purpose and Why:

RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols

Is it unconstitutional to display a religious monument, memorial, or other item on public property?

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct (2014).

Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives Home Search Download Classification Codification About

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth

Establishment of Religion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

GOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Fall 2016

Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 2

Case 1:18-cv Document 1-6 Filed 07/06/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe. This case concerning prayer in public

Lynch v. Donnelly: One Giant Step over the Wall?

Magruder s American Government

GOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. George Mason University Law School Fall 2014

Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms

March 15, 2018 THE DISHONESTY OF THE FFRF LETTER

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2012 PROBLEM

Legislative Prayers and Judicial Sins: How Not to Think About Constitutional Foundings

WHEN THE EXCEPTION BECOMES THE RULE: MARSH AND SECTARIAN LEGISLATIVE PRAYER POST-SUMMUM

Freedom & The First Amendment Spring, 2005 PSC 291/Rel 297 Professors Green & Jackson

Case No KEN MAYLE. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Oral arguments in the case are available on the Internet at:

AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,

November 24, 2017 [VIA ]

Removing a Brick from the Jeffersonian Wall of Separationism: A Per Se Rule for Private Religious Speech in Public Fora

THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND RELIGION IN AMERICA PSC 291 Professor Jackson Spring 2016

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Chapter 15 CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS

Topic 8: Protecting Civil Liberties Section 1- The Unalienable Rights

CRS-2 morning and that the federal and state statutes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 4 The Trial Court Decision. On July 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Nos & In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

October 15, By & U.S. Mail

United States District Court for the District of South Carolina Spartanburg Division

No. A-623 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. REV. DR. MICHAEL NEWDOW, Movant. HON. GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., Respondents.

Nos , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN ROE AND ROECHILD-2, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES NOTHING TO STAND ON: OFFENDED OBSERVERS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. 138 E n g a g e Volume 6, Issue 2

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND RELIGION IN AMERICA PSC 291 Professor Jackson Fall 2017

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al.,

The Law of Church and State: U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Since 2002

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Louisiana's Balanced-Treatment Act and the Establishment Clause: Edwards v. Aguillard

The Lemon Test Rears Its Ugly Head Again: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ORDER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Introduction to Religion and the State

CeCe Heil, Senior Counsel, Jordan Sekulow, Executive Director

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

Nonviolent Cities Project

The Religious Act of Welcoming the Stranger

Supreme Court of the United States

HOW SALAZAR V. BUONO SYNTHESIZES THE SUPREME COURT S ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRECEDENT INTO A SINGLE TEST

UNIT 5: JUDICIAL BRANCH, CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL. Miss DeLong Exam Review RIGHTS

Government: Unit 2 Guided Notes- U.S. Constitution, Federal System, Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 7:11-cv MFU Document 12 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 15. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division

"[T]his Court should not legislate for Congress." Justice REHNQUIST. Bob Jones University v. United States

June 20, Re: Unconstitutional Viewpoint Discrimination at June 21, 2017 PWCS Board Meeting

In The Supreme Court of the United States

OCTOBER 2010 LAW REVIEW PUBLIC LAND SWAP PRESERVES WAR MEMORIAL CROSS

Mathew D. Staver, Esq. The Equal Access Act and the First Amendment Equal Access Means Equal Treatment

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. ) ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Lynch v. Donnelly: Breaking Down the Barriers to Religious Displays

Laura Brown Chisolm. Prepared for National Center on Philanthropy and the Law Conference Political Activities: Nonprofit Speech October 29-30, 1998

Marquette Law Review. Linda R. Olson. Volume 66 Issue 1 Fall Article 5

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... INTEREST OF AMICUS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 1 CONCLUSION... 4

Campbell Law Review. Thomas G. Walker. Volume 11 Issue 2 Spring Article 4. January 1989

Case 1:07-cv Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv MDH Document 1 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 10

In the Supreme Court of the United States. CONSTITUTIONAL ATHEISTS, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and FLOYD LAWSON, Petitioners,

The State, the Stork, and the Wall: The Establishment Clause and Statutory Abortion Regulation

Case 8:14-cv DKC Document 1 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

June 19, To Whom it May Concern:

BIBLE DISTRIBUTION REGULATED AT GAY PRIDE FESTIVAL

Native Daughters of the Golden West. Subordinate Parlor Concise Meeting Script

The Status of Constitutional Religious Liberty at the End of the Millenium

According to David Barton, in his book Original Intent

Case 1:13-cv RJA-LGF Document 18 Filed 07/08/14 Page 1 of 32

*Admission pro hac vice pending AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF FOR THE CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Chairman Peter Mendelson 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 504 Washington, DC November 17, Dear Chairman Mendelson:

A Cross to Bear: The Need to Weigh Context in Determining the Constitutionality of Religious Symbols on Public Land

Case 5:10-cv M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

tin t~e ~upreme ~;aurt of t~e ~tnitel~ ~tateg

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Transcription:

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE Post Office Box 7482 Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-7482 JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Founder and President TELEPHONE 434 / 978-3888 FACSIMILE 434/ 978 1789 www.rutherford.org Sheriff Donald Valenza Houston County Sheriff s Office 144 North Oates Street Dothan, Alabama 36303 Re: Blessed Are the Peacemakers Vehicle Decals Dear Sheriff Valenza: On behalf of The Rutherford Institute, 1 an organization dedicated to preserving and defending the Constitution of the United States, I urge you to reconsider your decision to have Blessed Are the Peacemakers decals removed from Houston County Sheriff s Department vehicles. I would also like to offer The Rutherford Institute s assistance in defending against any challenges that might arise due to such a reversal. It is our understanding that Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation have threatened lawsuits over the display of the Peacemakers decals, insisting that they violate the so-called separation of church and state. These groups, apparently operating on a strictly separatist notion that any reference to religion must be purged from public life, are misguided in their understanding of the First Amendment s protections for free speech. It is our view that the Peacemakers decals do not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment as the following analysis will show. Indeed, they serve a clear secular purpose to reinforce the sheriff s department s commitment to peaceful enforcement of the law and are as legally defensible as nonsectarian prayers at legislative meetings, 2 Ten 1 The Rutherford Institute is a national nonprofit civil liberties organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional freedoms. 2 Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2013).

Page 2 Commandments monuments on public property, 3 and the inscription of In God We Trust on U.S. currency. 4 The display of Peacemakers decals on law enforcement vehicles serves a compelling secular purpose By including the phrase Blessed are the peacemakers on their patrol vehicles, the Houston Country Sheriff s Office reminds both police officers and citizens of the community that the primary role of the police should be to foster peace. The relationship between citizens and the police force can be one of mistrust or hostility if members of the community believe law enforcement s goal is dominance and control, as opposed to keeping the peace. A message of peace on the side of police vehicles tells the community that the objective of Sheriff s Department personnel is not just to make arrests, but instead to ensure that Houston law enforcement is there to serve as peace officers. The Constitution should not be read to prohibit local governments from displaying religious messages on the side of police vehicles when there are also compelling secular reasons for displaying them. The sheriff s office is attempting to make the community a safer place by spreading a message of peace and fostering good relations between the police force and the public. Promoting a positive relationship between the police force and the community is clearly a compelling secular purpose for including this message of peace on the side of police vehicles. The Supreme Court has long recognized that religion and references to religion need not be entirely expunged from public life The presence of Blessed are the Peacemakers decals with the source reference to the Bible (Matthew 5:9) is wholly consistent with court decisions allowing governmental acknowledgement of religion in public life. 5 The U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized and made clear that religion and references to religion need not be entirely expunged from public life, and that religion has been closely identified with our history and government. 6 In fact, there is an unbroken history of official acknowledgment by all three branches of government of the role of religion in American life. 7 Moreover, there are a great number of examples in which religious messages within a governmental forum have been found not to violate the Establishment Clause. For example, the 3 See also Lynch, at 680, 687; Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 792 (1983); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 437-40 (1960); Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 U.S. 664, 676-678 (1970). 4 Newdow v. Lefevre, 598 F.3d 638 (9 th Cir. 2010). 5 Lynch, 465 U.S. at 673. 6 School Dist. of Abington Twp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 212 (1963). 7 Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 674 (1984).

Page 3 inscription of the phrase In God We Trust on currency does not violate the Constitution. 8 Additionally, federal, state and local legislative bodies may open their meetings with a prayer that invokes divine guidance and inspiration. 9 Similarly, the City of Las Cruces was found not to violate the Establishment Clause by including the Christian Latin Cross on its official symbol (which appeared on government vehicles) where the cross was an acknowledgement of the role the cross played in the city s history. 10 Finally, within the last decade, the Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of a display on public property of a monument displaying and celebrating the Ten Commandments from the Bible s Book of Exodus. In Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677, 690 (2005), the Court wrote: Simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with a religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause. 11 No reasonable person would interpret the pacifist phrase Blessed are the peacemakers as an unconstitutional endorsement of religion The mere presence of a pacifist phrase on the side of police vehicles, even with a biblical citation included, cannot be construed as an attempt to advance any particular religion over another. No reasonable person reading such a message on the side of a police car would think that Houston County police were attempting to convert the public to Christianity, or evincing some preference for Christians over other members of the religious community. Whether or not the pacifist phrase Blessed are the peacemakers is derived from a religious source and acknowledges that source, the mere presence of religious content or a message consistent with religious beliefs on government property does not violate the Establishment Clause. In Van Orden, 545 U.S. at 691-92, the Supreme Court recognized that a government action may have a dual significance, partaking of both religion and government, and that having a religious significance does not violate the Constitution. Including a citation to the source of the message of peace ( Matthew 5:9 ) is no less acceptable or legal than including the message. The crucial point is that the quote Blessed are the peacemakers on the side of official vehicles serves a number of secular purposes, 12 and simply having a religious origin does not make the quote unconstitutional. Blessed are the peacemakers is a global message of peace that has been echoed repeatedly by other leaders, religious, secular and otherwise 8 Newdow v. Lefevre, 598 F.3d 638 (9 th Cir. 2010). 9 Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2013). 10 Weinbaum v. City of Las Cruces, 541 F.3d 1017 (10 th Cir. 2008) 11 See also Lynch, at 680, 687; Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 792 (1983); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 437-40 (1960); Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 U.S. 664, 676-678 (1970). 12 Courts have recognized that invoking religious tradition can be a valid way of reminding people to act according to their own morals. Town of Greece Galloway, 134 S.Ct.1811 (2014). (It was permissible to open town board meetings with a prayer intended to place town board members in a solemn and deliberative frame of mind, invoke divine guidance in town affairs, and recognize a longstanding legislative tradition.)

Page 4 The message itself, Blessed are the peacemakers, is not exclusive to the Christian religion. Nor is the sentiment exclusively religious. In fact, the message of peace conveyed by the decal is a universally global sentiment that has been echoed repeatedly by other leaders, religious, secular and otherwise. For example, Thich Nhat Hanh, a Buddhist monk and peace activist, asked: How do you want to create peace, if there is no peace inside yourselves? The Dalai Lama advises that Peace is not just mere absence of violence. Peace is, I think, the manifestation of human compassion. Mahatma Gandhi, a Hindu, declared: An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind. and Be the peace you wish for the world. John Lennon, a British-born musician famously said: Give peace a chance. Catholic priest Oscar Romero said: Peace is not the silent result of violent repression. Scientist Albert Einstein said: Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. Ralph Waldo Emerson stated: Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through understanding. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from endorsing religion, but also from showing hostility towards it To single out this particular message of peace merely because it has a biblical source is to exhibit an unlawful hostility towards religion, Christianity in particular, which flies in the face of the Constitution s mandates. Although under the Constitution, governments are not permitted to advance any particular religion, they also may not inhibit religion. 13 In this case, removing the phrase Blessed are the peacemakers from the side of police vehicles would be an act of unnecessary hostility towards religion. There is no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and to throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious 13 Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 612 (1971).

Page 5 influence. 14 While there are limits on the government s power to endorse religious principals, those limits do not prevent the government from promoting valid secular policy, just because that policy may also line up with the doctrine of some religious sects. To require the Houston County Sheriff s Department to remove a message of peace from the side of its police vehicles simply because some religions also promote peace would be asking the government to throw its weight against religion. The Peacemakers decal is a welcome and timely reminder that law enforcement officers are first and foremost peace officers For the reasons discussed herein, we respectfully urge the Houston County Sheriff s Department to reconsider its decision to remove the message Blessed are the peacemakers from its police vehicles. At a time when public trust in law enforcement is eroding due to repeated reports of excessive use of force against unarmed citizens, the Peacemakers decal is a welcome and timely reminder that law enforcement officers are first and foremost peace officers and that the Houston County Sheriff s Department is dedicated to preserving the peace. As I mentioned earlier, The Rutherford Institute is available as a resource should you have any further questions or find yourself in need of legal assistance. Sincerely yours, John W. Whitehead President cc: Houston County Administrator Bill Dempsey County Commissioner Jackie Battles County Commissioner Mark Culver County Commissioner James Curtis Harvey, Jr. County Commissioner Brandon Shoupe County Commissioner Doug Sinquefield 14 Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952).